Topic: Do woman change after marriage
no photo
Tue 01/10/12 07:03 AM

This all makes me wish more men could be honest about what they want. Lex is adamant about not wanting children. Im sure, from the involvement Ive observed in some men, that there are many who agree, but just let it happen anyway or settle.

Dont get me wrong. We all know there are fantastic men out there who make fantastic fathers. There are also fantastic men out there who do not want that.

Just as true: there are women who dont want kids who did it anyway, and made horrible mothers.

People need to take these preferences seriously.


right that's a good point. there is NOTHING wrong with a man who does not want kids

if he does have them - he needs to man up - so what you are suggesting then is that some of the behavior we see from married men who still act like kids is because they never sorted out that they really did not want a family?

I mean most of us go thru a little mid-life silliness in our 30s or 40s -

but there are the guys who are like having another kid in the house...and have always been that way


machug's photo
Tue 01/10/12 07:06 AM

This all makes me wish more men could be honest about what they want. Lex is adamant about not wanting children. Im sure, from the involvement Ive observed in some men, that there are many who agree, but just let it happen anyway or settle.

Dont get me wrong. We all know there are fantastic men out there who make fantastic fathers. There are also fantastic men out there who do not want that.

Just as true: there are women who dont want kids who did it anyway, and made horrible mothers.

People need to take these preferences seriously.


I totally agree with this. It should have been the happiest time for us, instead it was the beginning of the end. If they even think that they cannot accept the added responsibility and work involved with children, then plese don't have them.

msharmony's photo
Tue 01/10/12 07:06 AM

klc, I agree with you. I had that kind of husband and it was marriage crushing.

The thing is though...I work with a deputy who is married with three little children at home. His wife doesn't work outside the home but takes care of the home and children full time. Because she is home all day with the kids, as soon as he comes home (from a long day of work) he takes over for her so she can have a rest. He takes care of the kids so she can go out on a regular basis to do what she wants. He bathes the kids, feeds them, plays with them....he is "driving the car with the kids in the back seat" as you put it. He also works very hard to manage his work schedule in order to be there for his family.

Now here's the interesting part....his fellow deputies and other co-workers say he is "whipped" and needs to stand up to his wife. They think he does too much for her. He is one of the few police officers I know who doesn't cheat on his wife either. But, that's not really the point. I guess my point is that society is not very supportive of the man who does what you (and I) suggest.



amen

typically, the 'weaker' woman is expected to have a 24/7 job without actual pay of her own or time to herself except to sleep

while the 'stronger' man is expected to punch a clock when he is 'done' possibly five days a week,, and then put his feet up or go have fun or whatever else he wants to do with the money he 'earned' by working a set number of hours,,,,,

that part of our expectations is backwards,,,for sure,,,

irisheyes79's photo
Tue 01/10/12 07:31 AM



OT: It's not that women's personalities change but their priorities after kids come. The husband is, eventually, put into the back seat.



If the man winds up in the back seat, he has chosen his location. He could also choose to drive the car with the kids in the back seat. If not, he may as well strap himself in to the safety seat with the kids, and grab a sippy cup.

That woman is taking care of what she is legally obligated to take care of. Ask child protective services. I wonder why that doesnt happen to men much. They sure seem to complain about it, but those who do, dont take over any of the responsibilities.

Interesting that you chose to equate men who mow the lawn or change the oil (done seasonally, or rarely) to breakfast lunch and dinner preparation, as well as dishes after each, wiping, dusting, sanitising, and laundry at least once every two days making regular appointments transporting to appointments, teaching behavior so they will know how to behave without getting in trouble, entertaining in a way that keeps them engaged and learning, and creating opportunities for learning about a healthy lifestyle and social interaction, as well as independence. Thanks for vacuuming.

I wonder why youre in the back seat. It would be nice if you could drive just to provide a break, so she has the energy to thank you, or carry you to the front seat where she will prolly have to strap you in.

Im so lucky to know men who dont 'change the oil in her car, or mow the lawn'. I can do that easy peasy because those are cushy jobs. I know men who make breakfast lunch and dinner, and do the dishes after, and dust, wipe, sanitise, do laundry, teach their kids to behave with fine manners, and take them camping and share who they are and learn about who their kids are to encourage positive development and see that men do all the things to take care of themselves just like women. You surely would not like their company. They respect women who do the same.




AND...work full time. If the man doesn't share in the responsibilities and extra work, there is little to no time left in her day for much else. What little time is left, she gives her man...and too often, there is never time for herself.
laugh

no photo
Tue 01/10/12 07:45 AM


This all makes me wish more men could be honest about what they want. Lex is adamant about not wanting children. Im sure, from the involvement Ive observed in some men, that there are many who agree, but just let it happen anyway or settle.

Dont get me wrong. We all know there are fantastic men out there who make fantastic fathers. There are also fantastic men out there who do not want that.

Just as true: there are women who dont want kids who did it anyway, and made horrible mothers.

People need to take these preferences seriously.


I totally agree with this. It should have been the happiest time for us, instead it was the beginning of the end. If they even think that they cannot accept the added responsibility and work involved with children, then plese don't have them.
:thumbsup:

irisheyes79's photo
Tue 01/10/12 09:24 AM

klc, I agree with you. I had that kind of husband and it was marriage crushing.

The thing is though...I work with a deputy who is married with three little children at home. His wife doesn't work outside the home but takes care of the home and children full time. Because she is home all day with the kids, as soon as he comes home (from a long day of work) he takes over for her so she can have a rest. He takes care of the kids so she can go out on a regular basis to do what she wants. He bathes the kids, feeds them, plays with them....he is "driving the car with the kids in the back seat" as you put it. He also works very hard to manage his work schedule in order to be there for his family.

Now here's the interesting part....his fellow deputies and other co-workers say he is "whipped" and needs to stand up to his wife. They think he does too much for her. He is one of the few police officers I know who doesn't cheat on his wife either. But, that's not really the point. I guess my point is that society is not very supportive of the man who does what you (and I) suggest.
he's whipped

irisheyes79's photo
Tue 01/10/12 09:25 AM


This all makes me wish more men could be honest about what they want. Lex is adamant about not wanting children. Im sure, from the involvement Ive observed in some men, that there are many who agree, but just let it happen anyway or settle.

Dont get me wrong. We all know there are fantastic men out there who make fantastic fathers. There are also fantastic men out there who do not want that.

Just as true: there are women who dont want kids who did it anyway, and made horrible mothers.

People need to take these preferences seriously.


I totally agree with this. It should have been the happiest time for us, instead it was the beginning of the end. If they even think that they cannot accept the added responsibility and work involved with children, then plese don't have them.
hey now it doesnt help the woman pops em out like shes a pez dispenser

no photo
Tue 01/10/12 10:00 AM

This all makes me wish more men could be honest about what they want. Lex is adamant about not wanting children. Im sure, from the involvement Ive observed in some men, that there are many who agree, but just let it happen anyway or settle.

Dont get me wrong. We all know there are fantastic men out there who make fantastic fathers. There are also fantastic men out there who do not want that.

Just as true: there are women who dont want kids who did it anyway, and made horrible mothers.

People need to take these preferences seriously.


But admitting to these kinds of preferences totally horrifies some people, though.

When I was studying psychology, I had a conversation with one of my instructors about this. When I mentioned that I absolutely positively did not someone who had kids or who would want kids down the road, she was totally flabbergasted.

"You're asking them to go against their natural function!" she said.

And it puzzled me for a long time, because the subtext seemed to be that a woman isn't really a woman unless/until she has kids. And I've always seen that in terms of adjunct identification more than natural function.

But I'm clearly in the minority on that one.


irisheyes79's photo
Tue 01/10/12 10:02 AM




This all makes me wish more men could be honest about what they want. Lex is adamant about not wanting children. Im sure, from the involvement Ive observed in some men, that there are many who agree, but just let it happen anyway or settle.

Dont get me wrong. We all know there are fantastic men out there who make fantastic fathers. There are also fantastic men out there who do not want that.

Just as true: there are women who dont want kids who did it anyway, and made horrible mothers.

People need to take these preferences seriously.


I totally agree with this. It should have been the happiest time for us, instead it was the beginning of the end. If they even think that they cannot accept the added responsibility and work involved with children, then plese don't have them.
hey now it doesnt help the woman pops em out like shes a pez dispenser


and a doc can take care of all that for you like a snippity snap. laugh
it dont work anyhow do thier worst

no photo
Tue 01/10/12 10:27 AM

Natural function? I guess technically, abuse is also a natural function. Is that a good goal tho?

I actually really do feel bad for this woman and hope she found some maturity. I assume she had poor role models, or no sense that she could truly be anything she wanted to be. Im stunned she was an instructor. The power of brainwashing I reckon.

My stepmother marched for womens rights in the 60's and 70's and gets really pissed off when women act this way. Its like she wasted her time.


I think it may have been a generational thing. She was quite a bit older than I was, past normal retirement age -- so there may have been a reflection of how things were when she was much younger.

But there is still this standard mindset that women are "supposed" to be mothers, and that it's a terrible shame if they aren't, or that there must be something wrong with them if they actually don't want to be.

And it's pervasive. I've mentioned this before: when I was about 9 or 10, my Mom wanted me to do something or other, and I said "Why?" and she said "You'll understand when you grow up and have kids of your own." Not "if," but "when." For the longest time, I thought it was mandatory. Everyone in our neighborhood had kids, except for one older couple, the Novaks, who, according to rumor, couldn't have any. And all the adults on the block shunned them as if they were lepers.

no photo
Tue 01/10/12 10:52 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 01/10/12 10:58 AM


This all makes me wish more men could be honest about what they want. Lex is adamant about not wanting children. Im sure, from the involvement Ive observed in some men, that there are many who agree, but just let it happen anyway or settle.

Dont get me wrong. We all know there are fantastic men out there who make fantastic fathers. There are also fantastic men out there who do not want that.

Just as true: there are women who dont want kids who did it anyway, and made horrible mothers.

People need to take these preferences seriously.


But admitting to these kinds of preferences totally horrifies some people, though.

When I was studying psychology, I had a conversation with one of my instructors about this. When I mentioned that I absolutely positively did not someone who had kids or who would want kids down the road, she was totally flabbergasted.

"You're asking them to go against their natural function!" she said.

And it puzzled me for a long time, because the subtext seemed to be that a woman isn't really a woman unless/until she has kids. And I've always seen that in terms of adjunct identification more than natural function.

But I'm clearly in the minority on that one.





I never wanted children. People thought I would change my mind. I didn't.

But I see no reason to be married if you don't want to raise children.

Lex, what I see about you is that you want a woman, but I can't for the life of me figure out what you want her for.

You don't want to change anything about your life, you don't want her to change you and you complain that all women try to get you to change.

Marriage is change. People always change after marriage. So a woman coming into your house and your life will bring change to your life. What would you have her do? Tip toe around the house and around you in fear of you thinking that she is trying to change you?

I can see your first argument already. You are yelling "Stop trying to change me!!" She just asked you to do something different or to rearrange the furniture or pick up your underwear or something stupid like that. There is really no room for her to be herself because that, heaven forbid, might change something about you or your life.

No one can change you but YOU. I think it is you who has an attitude that repels any potential relationship you might have. You are not very clear on anything that you want except that you don't want someone to try to change you. The only way to do that is to not get involved with you at all. That way you will stay the same.

Everyone, and the entire universe knows what you don't want. No one really knows what you want. Its no wonder you always get what you don't want. You advertise it, you think about it all the time. Law of attraction will give you that because that is all you think about and talk about.

Just my two cents.


Optomistic69's photo
Tue 01/10/12 10:57 AM




But I see no reason to be married if you don't want to raise children.




Totally agree with this statement..drinker


Carry On...waving

no photo
Tue 01/10/12 11:07 AM





But I see no reason to be married if you don't want to raise children.




Totally agree with this statement..drinker


Carry On...waving


I really like you. Let's not get married together. bigsmile

Optomistic69's photo
Tue 01/10/12 11:09 AM
Edited by Optomistic69 on Tue 01/10/12 11:10 AM






But I see no reason to be married if you don't want to raise children.




Totally agree with this statement..drinker


Carry On...waving


I really like you. Let's not get married together. bigsmile


No Children OK...drinker

no photo
Tue 01/10/12 11:11 AM

Lex, what I see about you is that you want a woman, but I can't for the life of me figure out what you want her for.

You don't want to change anything about your life, you don't want her to change you and you complain that all women try to get you to change.

Marriage is change. People always change after marriage. So a woman coming into your house and your life will bring change to your life. What would you have her do? Tip toe around the house and around you in fear of you thinking that she is trying to change you?

I can see your first argument already. You are yelling "Stop trying to change me!!" She just asked you to do something different or to rearrange the furniture or pick up your underwear or something stupid.


It's nothing so innocuous as all that. I've been in enough relationships to know that a certain degree of compromise and flexibility is required. I don't have any problem with that. I'm actually quite good at it.

The issue is the fundamental stuff -- the "I don't want kids either!" for 90 days until she feels like I can no longer live without her, and now's the time to spring "I need a BAY-BEE!" on me.

I'm talking about the core, root essence of my beliefs -- I do not want to be a parent, and the minute she reveals that her agenda involves my being a parent, it's done.

This is the kind of change I'm talking about. Not the put-the-seat-down, put-the-socks-in-the-hamper, could-you-take-out-the-garbage day-to-day stuff.


No one can change you but YOU.


I keep telling people that, and they keep trying anyway.


I think it is you who has an attitude that repels any potential relationship you might have. You are not very clear on anything that you want except that you don't want someone to try to change you.


I think I'm very clear on what I want. Someone smart and creative, with a sense of humor and good conversational skills. Someone who doesn't feel bound and constrained to fit into some archaic, preconceived societal role. Someone who doesn't expect me to be a cardboard cutout of Ward Cleaver.

I think that's reasonably clear.


The only way to do that is to not get involved with you at all. That way you will stay the same.


The thing is, IF their agenda gets back to the whole parenthood thing, then I would PREFER they make no attempt to get involved with me.

As I'm not convinced there are any women out there who aren't ultimately tethered to the parenting agenda -- yes, I've heard the rumors and myths and legends, but they are no more real to me than the Yeti or the Loch Ness Monster -- there isn't anyone I'm currently aware of who I would want to be involved with.


Everyone, and the entire universe knows what you don't want. No one really knows what you want. Its no wonder you always get what you don't want. You advertise it, you think about it all the time. Law of attraction will give you that because that is all you think about and talk about.

Just my two cents.


OK, but I don't believe in that "law of attraction" stuff -- it's like the people who say "It will come when you're not looking," which is demonstrably wrong. Much of what happens or doesn't happen is simply circumstance and blind chance. Cliches are of no use if you're operating in the real world, and if you understand that cliches are primarily meant to comfort and placate without putting any effort into it -- they have no material or predictive value. In my opinion.

no photo
Tue 01/10/12 11:23 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 01/10/12 11:25 AM
No one can change you but YOU.


Bushi said:
I keep telling people that, and they keep trying anyway.


That's funny.laugh laugh



Everyone, and the entire universe knows what you don't want. No one really knows what you want. Its no wonder you always get what you don't want. You advertise it, you think about it all the time. Law of attraction will give you that because that is all you think about and talk about.

Just my two cents.



OK, but I don't believe in that "law of attraction" stuff -- it's like the people who say "It will come when you're not looking," which is demonstrably wrong. Much of what happens or doesn't happen is simply circumstance and blind chance. Cliches are of no use if you're operating in the real world, and if you understand that cliches are primarily meant to comfort and placate without putting any effort into it -- they have no material or predictive value. In my opinion.


Everything in your life is there because of what you think about. (It doesn't matter if you "believe in the law of attraction or not.")

It's not a religion. It is the law of vibration.

It is causation and that begins with THOUGHT.

Anyone who has ever learned how to get what they want understand and practice this law.

It is not a "Cliche."

But then, if you knew that, you would have exactly what you want.

tongue2 laugh waving









no photo
Tue 01/10/12 11:38 AM

Everything in your life is there because of what you think about. (It doesn't matter if you "believe in the law of attraction or not.")

It's not a religion. It is the law of vibration.

It is causation and that begins with THOUGHT.

Anyone who has ever learned how to get what they want understand and practice this law.

It is not a "Cliche."

But then, if you knew that, you would have exactly what you want.

tongue2 laugh waving


I turn on the TV and there are ten million commercials talking about a program to get rich in real estate or through the stock market or by selling polyester pie pans to people in Indonesia or whatever. And they all have at least two things in common -- they appeal to gullible people who want to make a lot of money without actually having to do anything, and they don't work.

Because if they did work, everybody would already be absurdly rich and there would be no further need for this sort of thing in the first place.

I once knew a woman who was convinced she could get rich doing the stuff-envelopes-at-home thing which was a big scam back in the 1980s. She actually did it for about two weeks and gave up.

"Law of attraction" sounds good, admittedly, but there's no rational basis for me to believe in that, any more than I would be inclined to believe in astrology or Ouija boards or palm reading or tea leaves or whatever. It's all wishful thinking, in the end. We all wish we had more say in our lives, at some point, but the fact is there are limitations on what we can do, what we can influence, and all the self-delusion in the world isn't going to make that mountain jump up and plop itself into the ocean, if I may borrow a Biblical reference.

I can think and think and think and do everything I can do to convince myself, but I am still not going to be able to walk to the moon.

In psychology, there is a term called "magical thinking" which is a belief that if I do A, then B will happen. It's like a guy watching a ball game on TV. He's eating an Oreo when his team hits a home run, so he eats another Oreo when the next batter comes up, figuring these events are linked somehow. "Step on a crack, break your Mother's back," that sort of thing.

I don't see "Law of attraction" as being any different.

If it works for you, great. To me, it's just wishful thinking, delusion, and trying to create a cause-and-effect where none demonstrably exists.



no photo
Tue 01/10/12 11:56 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 01/10/12 11:57 AM


Everything in your life is there because of what you think about. (It doesn't matter if you "believe in the law of attraction or not.")

It's not a religion. It is the law of vibration.

It is causation and that begins with THOUGHT.

Anyone who has ever learned how to get what they want understand and practice this law.

It is not a "Cliche."

But then, if you knew that, you would have exactly what you want.

tongue2 laugh waving


I turn on the TV and there are ten million commercials talking about a program to get rich in real estate or through the stock market or by selling polyester pie pans to people in Indonesia or whatever. And they all have at least two things in common -- they appeal to gullible people who want to make a lot of money without actually having to do anything, and they don't work.

Because if they did work, everybody would already be absurdly rich and there would be no further need for this sort of thing in the first place.

I once knew a woman who was convinced she could get rich doing the stuff-envelopes-at-home thing which was a big scam back in the 1980s. She actually did it for about two weeks and gave up.

"Law of attraction" sounds good, admittedly, but there's no rational basis for me to believe in that, any more than I would be inclined to believe in astrology or Ouija boards or palm reading or tea leaves or whatever. It's all wishful thinking, in the end. We all wish we had more say in our lives, at some point, but the fact is there are limitations on what we can do, what we can influence, and all the self-delusion in the world isn't going to make that mountain jump up and plop itself into the ocean, if I may borrow a Biblical reference.

I can think and think and think and do everything I can do to convince myself, but I am still not going to be able to walk to the moon.

In psychology, there is a term called "magical thinking" which is a belief that if I do A, then B will happen. It's like a guy watching a ball game on TV. He's eating an Oreo when his team hits a home run, so he eats another Oreo when the next batter comes up, figuring these events are linked somehow. "Step on a crack, break your Mother's back," that sort of thing.

I don't see "Law of attraction" as being any different.

If it works for you, great. To me, it's just wishful thinking, delusion, and trying to create a cause-and-effect where none demonstrably exists.





>>>>>Because if they did work, everybody would already be absurdly rich and there would be no further need for this sort of thing in the first place<<<<

It does work. But most people don't know enough about it to use it properly. Athletes are being trained with visualization techniques and they do work. The consistently have been proven to improve performance when practiced.

Not everyone thinks about being "absurdly rich" enough to make it happen. laugh Some people do. (Donald Trump.)

I look on the Internet and there are ten million get rich programs there too. The reason 99% of them don't work is because people who buy them don't follow through with them. And that is the legitimate one. Others are scams.

But that has nothing to do with the law of attraction at all.

>>>I can think and think and think and do everything I can do to convince myself, but I am still not going to be able to walk to the moon.<<<<


Maybe not you, but somebody thought about it enough to get it done. tongue2

Unless you believe our trip to the moon was a hoax.







no photo
Tue 01/10/12 11:59 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Tue 01/10/12 12:00 PM
The point is, if you don't think it, and you don't believe it, then it will NEVER EVER HAPPEN.

AND

If you always think about what you don't want, presto! That is what you will get.

Causation begins with thought.




no photo
Tue 01/10/12 01:15 PM

The point is, if you don't think it, and you don't believe it, then it will NEVER EVER HAPPEN.

AND

If you always think about what you don't want, presto! That is what you will get.

Causation begins with thought.


"I might wish right now to instantly become a tomato larger than the whole universe, but now matter how hard I try, I cannot do it." -- J. Richard Gott, Time Travel in Einstein's Universe