Topic: Religion as a form of Social control
msharmony's photo
Wed 06/01/11 02:47 PM



I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash

but I agree, an issue with silent praying seems ignorant to me

and ignorance is a reality thats out there along with staunch activists who wish NO FORM OF PRAYER to be permitted in schools...

msharmony's photo
Wed 06/01/11 02:49 PM
morals come from inside, just about any behavior the human mind can think of, most human minds can look through an old collection of books and find something that seems to support it, or not support it

but it wont change their individual and INNATE tendency to commit that behavior,, one way or the other

Kleisto's photo
Wed 06/01/11 03:06 PM




I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 06/01/11 03:09 PM





I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.


Not true. If someone kills another in the middle of a group of people. Are all those people going to be charged with murder? Cause obviously they were made part of the whole exercise, whether they killed or not. Same difference as to what you're saying here.

Kleisto's photo
Wed 06/01/11 03:17 PM






I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.


Not true. If someone kills another in the middle of a group of people. Are all those people going to be charged with murder? Cause obviously they were made part of the whole exercise, whether they killed or not. Same difference as to what you're saying here.


Oh give me a break Cowboy! How is that anywhere close to this? If you're in a situation like that, it's just because it happened, you didn't know it was gonna happen ahead of time. This is entirely different, that you'd compare that to this.......is just plain stupid.

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 06/01/11 03:19 PM







I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.


Not true. If someone kills another in the middle of a group of people. Are all those people going to be charged with murder? Cause obviously they were made part of the whole exercise, whether they killed or not. Same difference as to what you're saying here.


Oh give me a break Cowboy! How is that anywhere close to this? If you're in a situation like that, it's just because it happened, you didn't know it was gonna happen ahead of time. This is entirely different, that you'd compare that to this.......is just plain stupid.


No, it's about being somewhere something happened but not being associated with it.

Kleisto's photo
Wed 06/01/11 03:21 PM








I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.


Not true. If someone kills another in the middle of a group of people. Are all those people going to be charged with murder? Cause obviously they were made part of the whole exercise, whether they killed or not. Same difference as to what you're saying here.


Oh give me a break Cowboy! How is that anywhere close to this? If you're in a situation like that, it's just because it happened, you didn't know it was gonna happen ahead of time. This is entirely different, that you'd compare that to this.......is just plain stupid.


No, it's about being somewhere something happened but not being associated with it.


But that is an extreme case, and it can't really be avoided. This however could, it doesn't have to be pushed on all of the students, and in fact shouldn't be.

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 06/01/11 03:22 PM









I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.


Not true. If someone kills another in the middle of a group of people. Are all those people going to be charged with murder? Cause obviously they were made part of the whole exercise, whether they killed or not. Same difference as to what you're saying here.


Oh give me a break Cowboy! How is that anywhere close to this? If you're in a situation like that, it's just because it happened, you didn't know it was gonna happen ahead of time. This is entirely different, that you'd compare that to this.......is just plain stupid.


No, it's about being somewhere something happened but not being associated with it.


But that is an extreme case, and it can't really be avoided. This however could, it doesn't have to be pushed on all of the students, and in fact shouldn't be.


But it wouldn't be, if they didn't wish to partake. They don't have to. Simple as that.

Uselessknowledge's photo
Wed 06/01/11 04:21 PM










I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.


Not true. If someone kills another in the middle of a group of people. Are all those people going to be charged with murder? Cause obviously they were made part of the whole exercise, whether they killed or not. Same difference as to what you're saying here.


Oh give me a break Cowboy! How is that anywhere close to this? If you're in a situation like that, it's just because it happened, you didn't know it was gonna happen ahead of time. This is entirely different, that you'd compare that to this.......is just plain stupid.


No, it's about being somewhere something happened but not being associated with it.


But that is an extreme case, and it can't really be avoided. This however could, it doesn't have to be pushed on all of the students, and in fact shouldn't be.


But it wouldn't be, if they didn't wish to partake. They don't have to. Simple as that.


This quote best describes this discussion.
"One of us is not like the other; one of us, isn't the same"
Those little buggers may not have to partake but the quote above is a pretty good description. I'll let yall add in the context.

CowboyGH's photo
Wed 06/01/11 04:35 PM











I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.


Not true. If someone kills another in the middle of a group of people. Are all those people going to be charged with murder? Cause obviously they were made part of the whole exercise, whether they killed or not. Same difference as to what you're saying here.


Oh give me a break Cowboy! How is that anywhere close to this? If you're in a situation like that, it's just because it happened, you didn't know it was gonna happen ahead of time. This is entirely different, that you'd compare that to this.......is just plain stupid.


No, it's about being somewhere something happened but not being associated with it.


But that is an extreme case, and it can't really be avoided. This however could, it doesn't have to be pushed on all of the students, and in fact shouldn't be.


But it wouldn't be, if they didn't wish to partake. They don't have to. Simple as that.


This quote best describes this discussion.
"One of us is not like the other; one of us, isn't the same"
Those little buggers may not have to partake but the quote above is a pretty good description. I'll let yall add in the context.


If say there was 10 people in a room. 7 of them decided to pray but 3 of them did not. Afterwards, those three wouldn't be segregated, they wouldn't be looked down upon, they wouldn't be alienated. So don't know what your comment has anything to do with anything my friend.

no photo
Wed 06/01/11 04:38 PM











I was thinking more along the lines of a designated place and time either before or after school to have something like that, and those that wanted to attend could, those that didn't didn't have to.


Right.

When a congregation gathers together and instead of saying a prayer, they opt for a "moment of silence" everyone knows what's going on.

Everyone is thinking, yeh right, we can't pray out loud so we have to have a moment of awkward silence.

But if they announced that they were gathering for a moment of silence would anyone come? I doubt it. Even religious people would think that is a waste of their time.

Personally I would not mind a public prayer in school as long as it was to God and not to a specific God like Lucifer, Allah, Jehovah, Jesus, etc.

But an atheist has every right to object to that.



thats another assumption, which I dont think children make

when I was told in school that we had to be quiet , thats all I took it as

I think in modern schools, if a student chose to bow their head during those times, there might be an issue,, and I dont think THAT is just,,,


OH BULL CRAP. There might be an "issue" if a student chose to bow their head? Are you serious????

You Still don't know what the issue is about if you think that.

It is about SAYING OUT LOUD to a captive audience of mixed religious people "In Jesus name we pray..." or even praying to God in front of a captive audience of atheists.

Its not about what a person does on his own. Please tell me you understand this or I am going to start thinking it has something to do with 'intelligence."

p.s. --and if it is an issue with anyone, then that person is just plain ignorant.





its about tone, and volume, and speech,, for me

its similar to a private conversation between me and a friend, if others choose to EAVESDROP That is one thing, If I am speaking at a tone that OTHERS can hear, that is another

similarly with prayer, speaking it silently does not require anyone to be an 'audience', as people can choose to watch what they and whom they wish to wash


The issue there is, you're still making them a part of the whole exercise, whether they pray or not. They have no option to opt out of the thing entirely.


Not true. If someone kills another in the middle of a group of people. Are all those people going to be charged with murder? Cause obviously they were made part of the whole exercise, whether they killed or not. Same difference as to what you're saying here.


Oh give me a break Cowboy! How is that anywhere close to this? If you're in a situation like that, it's just because it happened, you didn't know it was gonna happen ahead of time. This is entirely different, that you'd compare that to this.......is just plain stupid.


No, it's about being somewhere something happened but not being associated with it.


But that is an extreme case, and it can't really be avoided. This however could, it doesn't have to be pushed on all of the students, and in fact shouldn't be.


But it wouldn't be, if they didn't wish to partake. They don't have to. Simple as that.


This quote best describes this discussion.
"One of us is not like the other; one of us, isn't the same"
Those little buggers may not have to partake but the quote above is a pretty good description. I'll let yall add in the context.



Context...

Musical number on Sesame Street's set...



no photo
Wed 06/01/11 04:38 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 06/01/11 04:44 PM
Okay if they are free "not to partake" and they were told by their teachers and the principle they had to attend the assembly, then what do you think would happen if a student, who did not want to partake, just got up and left the building or the room?

He would stand out, and he might get in trouble for not having a hall pass, or he might be told he could not leave.

Partaking is also having to sit there and listen to the garbage.

When I work over at my mom's house I have to listen to Little house on the Prairie constantly. It is very annoying. I hate it. I want to run screaming from the room. But because I am there working, and she is watching it, I have little choice. She gets mad if I ask her to change the channel.

I would rather the t.v. be off. I don't like hearing that garbage. So I get my work done as fast as I can and get the hell out of there.

Having to sit in a public hall and listen to people praise Lucifer the light bearer, our liberator is not something I would want to do.

Having to sit in a public hall assembly and listen to people worship and praise Jesus Christ, "our" Lord and savior is not something I want to do.

Having to sit in a public hall and kneel down to Allah and pray five times a day is not something I would want to do.

Government sponsored religion should not be allowed in Schools.

KEEP IT IN YOUR CHURCH!!! OR KEEP IT TO YOURSELF.






Uselessknowledge's photo
Wed 06/01/11 06:07 PM

Afterwards, those three wouldn't be segregated, they wouldn't be looked down upon, they wouldn't be alienated. So don't know what your comment has anything to do with anything my friend.


You really sure about that? Kids can be dam mean when they are in their own little posse. Life beyond the intermanet can be extremely complex and unfair most of the time. Also.. If you want.. you can always bring a religious fanatic teacher who is 1 step away from blowing up a Muslim Temple into this picture.. Wonder what will happen.. hmmmm.. No way their professionalism will let them use favoritism and what not.

no photo
Wed 06/01/11 06:16 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 06/01/11 06:17 PM
but I agree, an issue with silent praying seems ignorant to me

and ignorance is a reality thats out there along with staunch activists who wish NO FORM OF PRAYER to be permitted in schools...



They are referring to no form of PUBLIC PRAYER.

Most atheists don't give a tinkers damn if someone wants to go off in the corner and pray in school, and if they have a problem with that then they are just plain ignorant.

I have never really met an ignorant atheist. They usually know more about the law and the issue and the Bible than most people.

If you actually know any actual cases where someone objected to a person bowing their head in the appearance of a personal prayer and was given any flack for it I would sure like to know about it.

I would if I could give that person a piece of my mind.tongue2 And call them ignorant to their face.






Dragoness's photo
Wed 06/01/11 06:22 PM

Many religions actually started off as a cult/sect type of organization. It only evolves into the so called Religion when there are enough people who practices it. Many times in the past this was easily done by force, obligation to one's family, clan.. etc.. When you got enough people who believes in it, then you are able to gain power over them and punish those the stray from the beliefs.

Religion has been used as a successful form of psychological control over the uneducated masses. Examples of which can be seen in the ancient Hindu religions; with the concept of "predestination," people just accept their so called fates. They were led to believe that if they lived their lives according to their belief systems (which often meant being loyal to those mistreating you and do not fight against the system, Stay in your social class until you die) then when they do die, they will have a better chance of being reborn into a higher class in society.

Any input; whether it be for or against this post will be greatly welcomed.


Have been saying close to the same thing for years.

Sadly, the use of "for the good of all" is usually a control scheme.

Abracadabra's photo
Wed 06/01/11 06:30 PM

but I agree, an issue with silent praying seems ignorant to me

and ignorance is a reality thats out there along with staunch activists who wish NO FORM OF PRAYER to be permitted in schools...



They are referring to no form of PUBLIC PRAYER.

Most atheists don't give a tinkers damn if someone wants to go off in the corner and pray in school, and if they have a problem with that then they are just plain ignorant.

I have never really met an ignorant atheist. They usually know more about the law and the issue and the Bible than most people.

If you actually know any actual cases where someone objected to a person bowing their head in the appearance of a personal prayer and was given any flack for it I would sure like to know about it.

I would if I could give that person a piece of my mind.tongue2 And call them ignorant to their face.



There is no valid reason for anyone so-called "Christian" to support prayer in public. The New Testament has Jesus himself renouncing public prayer and telling people not to do that. He referred to the Pharisees as being 'hypocrites' for praying in public.

So the whole 'prayer in public schools' issue clearly comes from so-called "Christians" who don't particularly care for the teachings of Jesus. laugh

That whole issue just shows how hypocritical and self-ignorant the religion can become.

Why would anyone want to pray in public for anyway. I personally prefer to keep my spiritual communications with the cosmic mind private. I actually agree with Jesus on this issue. Praying in public is egotistical and hypocritical. There's absolutely no reason for it, and more to the point, if someone truly has awe and reference for a supreme creator they wouldn't even want to belittle that by making it a 'public issue'.

I think it's crystal clear that some people just like to use religion as an excuse to try to push their agendas onto other people. Something I'm sure that Jesus himself would never approve of, based on the stories about him. He never pushed his views onto anyone save for perhaps the money changers in the temple, but that was an understandable exception. Except he really didn't need to become physically violent over that, that was a bit immature on his part. But hey, he was just a human like the rest of us, can't expect him to be perfect. That would be unrealistic.

Uselessknowledge's photo
Wed 06/01/11 06:49 PM


Sadly, the use of "for the good of all" is usually a control scheme.


Yeap.. also a perfect description of The Patriot Act as the US people were lead to believe.. President George W. Bush was the Bestest # 20 presidunt of em Aww. The people that voted for him is also the BESTEST!

Kleisto's photo
Wed 06/01/11 06:55 PM



Sadly, the use of "for the good of all" is usually a control scheme.


Yeap.. also a perfect description of The Patriot Act as the US people were lead to believe.. President George W. Bush was the Bestest # 20 presidunt of em Aww. The people that voted for him is also the BESTEST!


And don't forget, if you dare question what the government says is happening, you're a terrorist and anti-American. Can't exactly stop a controlling system if you can't fight it.

Dragoness's photo
Wed 06/01/11 07:00 PM



Sadly, the use of "for the good of all" is usually a control scheme.


Yeap.. also a perfect description of The Patriot Act as the US people were lead to believe.. President George W. Bush was the Bestest # 20 presidunt of em Aww. The people that voted for him is also the BESTEST!


Agreed here also.

It is not funny how the fight for freedom wages on in other countries who don't threaten our freedom at all, the whole while the government is slowly stripping them at home while the soldiers are distracted.slaphead

Uselessknowledge's photo
Wed 06/01/11 07:13 PM


Agreed here also.

It is not funny how the fight for freedom wages on in other countries who don't threaten our freedom at all, the whole while the government is slowly stripping them at home while the soldiers are distracted.slaphead


More Useless Knowledge...

I only found out after I enlisted that once you are in the military, all your rights to protest are stripped away. If you do so in public, your gluteus maximus will be sent to a quite time out.
Might have been my fault but do you know how freaking big those enlistment packets are?? I use to work in the Operations sector of Military Enlistments and we freaking kill trees faster than Jesus can turn water into wine.