Topic: Do you think that.... | |
---|---|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. Look around you my dear, have you noticed the changes our society has gone through...boundaries are being broken... I know that many mantras have been chanted and I can see "all the people" trying "to live as one"..."no religion" and soon you will convince yourselves we need "no country" and all that...Seems the world is following a pied piper to places they know not of... People need to wake up and stop lusting and fantasizing and demanding their "rights" to have these foolish dreams fulfilled. |
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. No we are not obsessed with anything. And sure a straight Christian could be friends with a homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that, they are just friends. The Christian wouldn't be embracing the sexual activities this homosexual does. They are just friends. We help homosexuals, we help murderers, we help priests, we help the hobo down the street. What label one wishes to give another doesn't make any difference. We love everyone just the same, there is not segregation or anything of such. Back to the subject, yeah it would be just fine for a Christian to be friends with a homosexual. We love all regardless of the activities they may choose to do. By love do you mean "showing them the error of their ways"? Or putting the fear of god into them? Like you do daily? How can a religious person even attend the gay pagan wedding to support their friend or sign papers showing support for the gay couple to adopt? How can the religious person spend every day with the gay person watching them love their partner and not say anything derogatory? Hypocrisy? I have a question for you Dragoness, Would you continue to be close friends with your gay friend if you discovered she was also enjoying a sexual relationship with her biological father? What would be the comparison with a natural relationship like homosexuality and a sickness like incest? You'd better believe that kind of logic is spreading. Many horses are waiting to come out of the gate. So many waiting for endorsement. At one time homosexuality was as much a sickness as incest...and now because so many have closed their eyes to the taboo of it... it is now labeled "natural". There are a lot of closet incestuous, beastial, and other participants who are waiting for the day when what they enjoy doing is acceptible as well. What kind of society are we allowing? Is this our children's inheritance? Again it sounds like the religious are the ones who should worry about some kind of retribution because the non religious have nothing to worry about. Natural love between homosexuals causes as much problem in the world as heterosexual love does. It is the same. Our children are inheriting a healthier view of human relationships. |
|
|
|
I judge as both God and Jesus commanded.I judge to avoid sinful,evil,and destructive people as both God and Jesus commanded.I do not judge before the facts are know I judge after the facts are known.That is why Jesus said "why don't you judge righteously"?That is also why Jesus not only allowed the court process of being found guilty or innocent he spoke about it as a form of justice. The only people on this planet that do not judge are robots.I am not a robot. Jesus said "Judge not less ye be judged". 1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Is this not judging?Is Jesus a hypocrite?Is not Jesus judging by their actions? What about John the baptist.Did he not yell and scream at King herold and his wife and accuse her of adultery?Is that not judging? Matt. 14:3-4) Yet what did Jesus say about John the baptist? Jesus said of him, “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist” (Matt. 11:11) So not only did Jesus tell us to judge righteously so did his apostles... In Luke 17:3 He commanded us to rebuke a trespassing brother: “If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him.” In 1 Timothy 5:20 he says, “Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning.” In Titus 2:15 he tells Titus, “These things speak and exhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you.” In 2 Tim. 4:2 he tells Timothy to “reprove, rebuke, exhort.” In 1 Thess. 5:14 he says to “admonish the unruly.” In Rom. 15:14 he tells the Roman church that they are “able to admonish one another.” In Eph. 5:11 he tells the church, “Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? (1 Cor. 6:2-6) “tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” (Matt. 18:17-18) It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father’s wife. And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you. For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present, I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did such a thing. When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. (1 Cor. 5:1-5) If we truly did not judge we would not be Christians but Atheists.Because the entire bible talks about who we should and should not associate with. Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Jesus was telling them not to assume and make a personal judgement on the person. He was telling them to take the entire picture into mind and not pick apart things. He in no way was condoning someone to judge another. Making a judgement on someone is totally different then "judging" them. Making a personal judgement of someone is saying you have made an opinion on that someone weather you like them or not. "Judging" someone would be to condemn them to hell. To state they are going there, and this is what Jesus told us not to do. Matthew 7:20-24 20The people answered and said, Thou hast a devil: who goeth about to kill thee? 21Jesus answered and said unto them, I have done one work, and ye all marvel. 22Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye on the sabbath day circumcise a man. 23If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day? 24Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. |
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. Look around you my dear, have you noticed the changes our society has gone through...boundaries are being broken... I know that many mantras have been chanted and I can see "all the people" trying "to live as one"..."no religion" and soon you will convince yourselves we need "no country" and all that...Seems the world is following a pied piper to places they know not of... People need to wake up and stop lusting and fantasizing and demanding their "rights" to have these foolish dreams fulfilled. Trying to uphold what is "good" for our nation is not particularly a "religious" endeavor. |
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. No we are not obsessed with anything. And sure a straight Christian could be friends with a homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that, they are just friends. The Christian wouldn't be embracing the sexual activities this homosexual does. They are just friends. We help homosexuals, we help murderers, we help priests, we help the hobo down the street. What label one wishes to give another doesn't make any difference. We love everyone just the same, there is not segregation or anything of such. Back to the subject, yeah it would be just fine for a Christian to be friends with a homosexual. We love all regardless of the activities they may choose to do. By love do you mean "showing them the error of their ways"? Or putting the fear of god into them? Like you do daily? How can a religious person even attend the gay pagan wedding to support their friend or sign papers showing support for the gay couple to adopt? How can the religious person spend every day with the gay person watching them love their partner and not say anything derogatory? Hypocrisy? I have a question for you Dragoness, Would you continue to be close friends with your gay friend if you discovered she was also enjoying a sexual relationship with her biological father? What would be the comparison with a natural relationship like homosexuality and a sickness like incest? Who says incest is a sickness? Double-standards abound in here. So you're allowed to call incest a "sickness" but forbid anyone else the right to call homosexuality wrong??? |
|
|
|
The religious do not know what is good for this country anyway so they are not saving anyone.
|
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. No we are not obsessed with anything. And sure a straight Christian could be friends with a homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that, they are just friends. The Christian wouldn't be embracing the sexual activities this homosexual does. They are just friends. We help homosexuals, we help murderers, we help priests, we help the hobo down the street. What label one wishes to give another doesn't make any difference. We love everyone just the same, there is not segregation or anything of such. Back to the subject, yeah it would be just fine for a Christian to be friends with a homosexual. We love all regardless of the activities they may choose to do. By love do you mean "showing them the error of their ways"? Or putting the fear of god into them? Like you do daily? How can a religious person even attend the gay pagan wedding to support their friend or sign papers showing support for the gay couple to adopt? How can the religious person spend every day with the gay person watching them love their partner and not say anything derogatory? Hypocrisy? I have a question for you Dragoness, Would you continue to be close friends with your gay friend if you discovered she was also enjoying a sexual relationship with her biological father? What would be the comparison with a natural relationship like homosexuality and a sickness like incest? Who says incest is a sickness? Double-standards abound in here. So you're allowed to call incest a "sickness" but forbid anyone else the right to call homosexuality wrong??? Definitely not the bible that is for sure. The bible says man was begotten from incest. But yea incest is a sickness. Homosexuality is a born trait and is evident in nature. |
|
|
|
BTW Cowboy you never did answer me before, if sex is simply for reproduction, are you or are you not saying that a married couple cannot have sex once they can no longer bear kids? Sex outside of reproduction would be lust. Lusting for the physical pleasures of sex. That's what I thought. So not only are you denying certain groups of people the pleasure that comes with sex, but already MARRIED couples now too. Nice, real nice that. Why is it so important to have sex outside of reproduction? Why is the physical pleasure that important? Why can't a couple find other things to do to bring passion to their relationships? Why does it have to be sex? Maybe they use it to express love to each other? Ever think of that? Think outside the box dude, it's very freeing there. Even the Bible speaks to the pleasures and joys of sex in a loving relationship. I seriously can't believe you man, your thinking is even more extreme then some other Christians, yet we're the extremists for seeking freedom? Yes but why do these pleasures and joy HAVE to come from sex? Why can't they be achieved by doing other romantic fun things together? Why particularly sex? Love can be shared with each other in many many many other ways besides sex. Why would sex be so important? Who says it only has to come from that? It can be just a part of it, but for you to deny them it simply because they cannot reproduce anymore is laughable at best. If you can not do it, why lust after doing it? I can't run, but I don't lust after running. I can't fly but I don't lust after flying. I just accept the fact that I can not do either one and don't attempt. What's so major about having sex? What's major about it is you feel you have the right to say whether someone can or can't do something, just cause "God" says it. I find it very scary that anyone in their right mind would think this way. If a married couple wants to have sex, they have every right to do it, regardless of what your "God" says. Yes everyone has the right to do anything they wish to do. That is why we are not to judge one another. They have the right, but there is a reaction to every action. And don't feel people will like the reaction that comes of being homosexual, so I try my best to spread the news and enlighten them. But nevertheless it is up to them to make the choice. And with either decision on that choice, does not change one thing about how I treat anyone. That is their choice, there decision. But again they will have to face the reaction that comes with their action, so I plead to choose wisely. I love how you say not to judge one another, yet you judge others actions all the time. Take the log out of your own eye first cowboy. I am not offended by anyone accusing me of judging...it is my privilege...Thank you very much...when I don't have a log in my eye I can clearly extend a hand to get one out of your eye. Oh!...you're welcome. |
|
|
|
I judge as both God and Jesus commanded.I judge to avoid sinful,evil,and destructive people as both God and Jesus commanded.I do not judge before the facts are know I judge after the facts are known.That is why Jesus said "why don't you judge righteously"?That is also why Jesus not only allowed the court process of being found guilty or innocent he spoke about it as a form of justice. The only people on this planet that do not judge are robots.I am not a robot. Jesus said "Judge not less ye be judged". 1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Is this not judging?Is Jesus a hypocrite?Is not Jesus judging by their actions? What about John the baptist.Did he not yell and scream at King herold and his wife and accuse her of adultery?Is that not judging? Matt. 14:3-4) Yet what did Jesus say about John the baptist? Jesus said of him, “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist” (Matt. 11:11) So not only did Jesus tell us to judge righteously so did his apostles... In Luke 17:3 He commanded us to rebuke a trespassing brother: “If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him.” In 1 Timothy 5:20 he says, “Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning.” In Titus 2:15 he tells Titus, “These things speak and exhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you.” In 2 Tim. 4:2 he tells Timothy to “reprove, rebuke, exhort.” In 1 Thess. 5:14 he says to “admonish the unruly.” In Rom. 15:14 he tells the Roman church that they are “able to admonish one another.” In Eph. 5:11 he tells the church, “Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? (1 Cor. 6:2-6) “tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” (Matt. 18:17-18) It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father’s wife. And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you. For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present, I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did such a thing. When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. (1 Cor. 5:1-5) If we truly did not judge we would not be Christians but Atheists.Because the entire bible talks about who we should and should not associate with. Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Jesus was telling them not to assume and make a personal judgement on the person. He was telling them to take the entire picture into mind and not pick apart things. He in no way was condoning someone to judge another. Making a judgement on someone is totally different then "judging" them. Making a personal judgement of someone is saying you have made an opinion on that someone weather you like them or not. "Judging" someone would be to condemn them to hell. To state they are going there, and this is what Jesus told us not to do. Matthew 7:20-24 20The people answered and said, Thou hast a devil: who goeth about to kill thee? 21Jesus answered and said unto them, I have done one work, and ye all marvel. 22Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye on the sabbath day circumcise a man. 23If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day? 24Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. So not only did Jesus tell us to judge righteously so did his apostles... In Luke 17:3 He commanded us to rebuke a trespassing brother: “If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him.” In 1 Timothy 5:20 he says, “Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning.” In Titus 2:15 he tells Titus, “These things speak and exhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you.” In 2 Tim. 4:2 he tells Timothy to “reprove, rebuke, exhort.” In 1 Thess. 5:14 he says to “admonish the unruly.” In Rom. 15:14 he tells the Roman church that they are “able to admonish one another.” In Eph. 5:11 he tells the church, “Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” 1 Timothy 5:20 1 Timothy 5:20 (King James Version) 20Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear. ----------- Rebuke means to criticize. With this verse We are being told to tell people of their sinful ways and to discuss with them. ================ Luke 17:3 3Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him. ------------ Again it's telling us if someone does something wrong against you to sit down with them and discuss with them what they did. After you've discussed with them and everything is settled away and they won't do it again, forgive them and give them another chance. ================= Titus 2:15 15These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee -------------- Don't know where you were going with this one. This verse in particular has NOTHING to do with any form of judgement in the sense as thinking, feeling, or saying someone is going to burn. This is all I will do right now, if the rest of the verses are needed to be address I will. But I think by just the first few I will open people's eyes to show that this has nothing to do with us being allowed to judge other and or being told to do as such. |
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. No we are not obsessed with anything. And sure a straight Christian could be friends with a homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that, they are just friends. The Christian wouldn't be embracing the sexual activities this homosexual does. They are just friends. We help homosexuals, we help murderers, we help priests, we help the hobo down the street. What label one wishes to give another doesn't make any difference. We love everyone just the same, there is not segregation or anything of such. Back to the subject, yeah it would be just fine for a Christian to be friends with a homosexual. We love all regardless of the activities they may choose to do. By love do you mean "showing them the error of their ways"? Or putting the fear of god into them? Like you do daily? How can a religious person even attend the gay pagan wedding to support their friend or sign papers showing support for the gay couple to adopt? How can the religious person spend every day with the gay person watching them love their partner and not say anything derogatory? Hypocrisy? I have a question for you Dragoness, Would you continue to be close friends with your gay friend if you discovered she was also enjoying a sexual relationship with her biological father? What would be the comparison with a natural relationship like homosexuality and a sickness like incest? Who says incest is a sickness? Double-standards abound in here. So you're allowed to call incest a "sickness" but forbid anyone else the right to call homosexuality wrong??? Definitely not the bible that is for sure. The bible says man was begotten from incest. But yea incest is a sickness. Homosexuality is a born trait and is evident in nature. LOL! You obviously haven't read the Bible. It has even been quoted in this thread. Face it, Bible or not, some people see homosexuality as a sickness. |
|
|
|
Quoting a book of no consequence adds nothing to this thread at all.
It defends noone nor assists none of us in a greater understanding of this life. |
|
|
|
I judge as both God and Jesus commanded.I judge to avoid sinful,evil,and destructive people as both God and Jesus commanded.I do not judge before the facts are know I judge after the facts are known.That is why Jesus said "why don't you judge righteously"?That is also why Jesus not only allowed the court process of being found guilty or innocent he spoke about it as a form of justice. The only people on this planet that do not judge are robots.I am not a robot. Jesus said "Judge not less ye be judged". 1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Is this not judging?Is Jesus a hypocrite?Is not Jesus judging by their actions? What about John the baptist.Did he not yell and scream at King herold and his wife and accuse her of adultery?Is that not judging? Matt. 14:3-4) Yet what did Jesus say about John the baptist? Jesus said of him, “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist” (Matt. 11:11) So not only did Jesus tell us to judge righteously so did his apostles... In Luke 17:3 He commanded us to rebuke a trespassing brother: “If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him.” In 1 Timothy 5:20 he says, “Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning.” In Titus 2:15 he tells Titus, “These things speak and exhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you.” In 2 Tim. 4:2 he tells Timothy to “reprove, rebuke, exhort.” In 1 Thess. 5:14 he says to “admonish the unruly.” In Rom. 15:14 he tells the Roman church that they are “able to admonish one another.” In Eph. 5:11 he tells the church, “Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? (1 Cor. 6:2-6) “tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” (Matt. 18:17-18) It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father’s wife. And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you. For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present, I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did such a thing. When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. (1 Cor. 5:1-5) If we truly did not judge we would not be Christians but Atheists.Because the entire bible talks about who we should and should not associate with. Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Jesus was telling them not to assume and make a personal judgement on the person. He was telling them to take the entire picture into mind and not pick apart things. He in no way was condoning someone to judge another. Making a judgement on someone is totally different then "judging" them. Making a personal judgement of someone is saying you have made an opinion on that someone weather you like them or not. "Judging" someone would be to condemn them to hell. To state they are going there, and this is what Jesus told us not to do. Matthew 7:20-24 20The people answered and said, Thou hast a devil: who goeth about to kill thee? 21Jesus answered and said unto them, I have done one work, and ye all marvel. 22Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye on the sabbath day circumcise a man. 23If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day? 24Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. I do not see what this has to do with what we are talking about except the last verse. If we were not to judge then we would accept everyone regardless of the way they are acting as not only acceptable but equal in Gods eyes.Are you telling me everyone is equal in Gods eyes regardless of the life they are living?If you do you don't know the bible very well because even Christians who are leading unholy lives are ignored by God and Jesus until they repent. If the bible tells us to avoid associating with people by their actions(which it does thousands of times)are you going to associate with them anyways because you are blind to their actions because you will not judge?Nothing could be worse for a Christian. What about these Catholic child molesters?Are you going to be silent on this child molester because you would be judging him regardless of what he is doing? What about our court system in America?Are all those judges evil in Jesus's eyes because they make a living off of judging?Should our court system be abolished? If I do know someone is a prostitute and I know she rejects the word of God am I doing wrong by saying I am avoiding her because she is a prostitute?This is not wrong judgment.Even if I do get judged by the same standards should I worry?Am I am prostitute leading a ungodly unholy life? I don't know what to tell you Cowboy since you are having a hard time telling the differences judging people by their actions and avoiding them and judging people by appearance or photographs and making assumptions.I suggest you do some research on the Internet about judging by Christians and understand what is correct and what is not correct because you are ignoring every bible verse I just posted about righteous judgment. |
|
|
|
Quoting a book of no consequence adds nothing to this thread at all. It defends noone nor assists none of us in a greater understanding of this life. And spouting off your own personal feelings is of no consequence. Are you going to deny that incest is also a part of the natural world? Will you deny that incest is also practiced in breeding? |
|
|
|
Edited by
CeriseRose
on
Mon 01/03/11 09:12 PM
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. No we are not obsessed with anything. And sure a straight Christian could be friends with a homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that, they are just friends. The Christian wouldn't be embracing the sexual activities this homosexual does. They are just friends. We help homosexuals, we help murderers, we help priests, we help the hobo down the street. What label one wishes to give another doesn't make any difference. We love everyone just the same, there is not segregation or anything of such. Back to the subject, yeah it would be just fine for a Christian to be friends with a homosexual. We love all regardless of the activities they may choose to do. By love do you mean "showing them the error of their ways"? Or putting the fear of god into them? Like you do daily? How can a religious person even attend the gay pagan wedding to support their friend or sign papers showing support for the gay couple to adopt? How can the religious person spend every day with the gay person watching them love their partner and not say anything derogatory? Hypocrisy? I have a question for you Dragoness, Would you continue to be close friends with your gay friend if you discovered she was also enjoying a sexual relationship with her biological father? What would be the comparison with a natural relationship like homosexuality and a sickness like incest? You'd better believe that kind of logic is spreading. Many horses are waiting to come out of the gate. So many waiting for endorsement. At one time homosexuality was as much a sickness as incest...and now because so many have closed their eyes to the taboo of it... it is now labeled "natural". There are a lot of closet incestuous, beastial, and other participants who are waiting for the day when what they enjoy doing is acceptible as well. What kind of society are we allowing? Is this our children's inheritance? Again it sounds like the religious are the ones who should worry about some kind of retribution because the non religious have nothing to worry about. Natural love between homosexuals causes as much problem in the world as heterosexual love does. It is the same. Our children are inheriting a healthier view of human relationships. I think you may actually be convinced of your views. Children are suffering more from this twisted world view than anyone, the adults are just getting their groove on. any way they can. Yes, I said it!!! |
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. No we are not obsessed with anything. And sure a straight Christian could be friends with a homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that, they are just friends. The Christian wouldn't be embracing the sexual activities this homosexual does. They are just friends. We help homosexuals, we help murderers, we help priests, we help the hobo down the street. What label one wishes to give another doesn't make any difference. We love everyone just the same, there is not segregation or anything of such. Back to the subject, yeah it would be just fine for a Christian to be friends with a homosexual. We love all regardless of the activities they may choose to do. By love do you mean "showing them the error of their ways"? Or putting the fear of god into them? Like you do daily? How can a religious person even attend the gay pagan wedding to support their friend or sign papers showing support for the gay couple to adopt? How can the religious person spend every day with the gay person watching them love their partner and not say anything derogatory? Hypocrisy? I have a question for you Dragoness, Would you continue to be close friends with your gay friend if you discovered she was also enjoying a sexual relationship with her biological father? What would be the comparison with a natural relationship like homosexuality and a sickness like incest? Who says incest is a sickness? Double-standards abound in here. So you're allowed to call incest a "sickness" but forbid anyone else the right to call homosexuality wrong??? Definitely not the bible that is for sure. The bible says man was begotten from incest. But yea incest is a sickness. Homosexuality is a born trait and is evident in nature. LOL! You obviously haven't read the Bible. It has even been quoted in this thread. Face it, Bible or not, some people see homosexuality as a sickness. Totally agree.Homosexuality is a choice made by the person.People can claim they were born homosexual but there isn't any evidence backing that up.Homosexuals have the choice to flip flop on who the have sex with anytime they want.If people really were born that way I think it would be safe to say we would see at the minimum 4 out of every 10 or 5 out of every 10 people being born gay since this was natural.Gays make up a tiny fraction of the people in this world and all of them are homosexual by choice and many of them change their minds and marry the opposite sex later in life. |
|
|
|
I judge as both God and Jesus commanded.I judge to avoid sinful,evil,and destructive people as both God and Jesus commanded.I do not judge before the facts are know I judge after the facts are known.That is why Jesus said "why don't you judge righteously"?That is also why Jesus not only allowed the court process of being found guilty or innocent he spoke about it as a form of justice. The only people on this planet that do not judge are robots.I am not a robot. Jesus said "Judge not less ye be judged". 1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Is this not judging?Is Jesus a hypocrite?Is not Jesus judging by their actions? What about John the baptist.Did he not yell and scream at King herold and his wife and accuse her of adultery?Is that not judging? Matt. 14:3-4) Yet what did Jesus say about John the baptist? Jesus said of him, “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist” (Matt. 11:11) So not only did Jesus tell us to judge righteously so did his apostles... In Luke 17:3 He commanded us to rebuke a trespassing brother: “If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him.” In 1 Timothy 5:20 he says, “Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning.” In Titus 2:15 he tells Titus, “These things speak and exhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you.” In 2 Tim. 4:2 he tells Timothy to “reprove, rebuke, exhort.” In 1 Thess. 5:14 he says to “admonish the unruly.” In Rom. 15:14 he tells the Roman church that they are “able to admonish one another.” In Eph. 5:11 he tells the church, “Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? (1 Cor. 6:2-6) “tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” (Matt. 18:17-18) It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father’s wife. And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you. For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present, I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did such a thing. When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. (1 Cor. 5:1-5) If we truly did not judge we would not be Christians but Atheists.Because the entire bible talks about who we should and should not associate with. Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Jesus was telling them not to assume and make a personal judgement on the person. He was telling them to take the entire picture into mind and not pick apart things. He in no way was condoning someone to judge another. Making a judgement on someone is totally different then "judging" them. Making a personal judgement of someone is saying you have made an opinion on that someone weather you like them or not. "Judging" someone would be to condemn them to hell. To state they are going there, and this is what Jesus told us not to do. Matthew 7:20-24 20The people answered and said, Thou hast a devil: who goeth about to kill thee? 21Jesus answered and said unto them, I have done one work, and ye all marvel. 22Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye on the sabbath day circumcise a man. 23If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day? 24Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. I do not see what this has to do with what we are talking about except the last verse. If we were not to judge then we would accept everyone regardless of the way they are acting as not only acceptable but equal in Gods eyes.Are you telling me everyone is equal in Gods eyes regardless of the life they are living?If you do you don't know the bible very well because even Christians who are leading unholy lives are ignored by God and Jesus until they repent. If the bible tells us to avoid associating with people by their actions(which it does thousands of times)are you going to associate with them anyways because you are blind to their actions because you will not judge?Nothing could be worse for a Christian. What about these Catholic child molesters?Are you going to be silent on this child molester because you would be judging him regardless of what he is doing? What about our court system in America?Are all those judges evil in Jesus's eyes because they make a living off of judging?Should our court system be abolished? If I do know someone is a prostitute and I know she rejects the word of God am I doing wrong by saying I am avoiding her because she is a prostitute?This is not wrong judgment.Even if I do get judged by the same standards should I worry?Am I am prostitute leading a ungodly unholy life? I don't know what to tell you Cowboy since you are having a hard time telling the differences judging people by their actions and avoiding them and judging people by appearance or photographs and making assumptions.I suggest you do some research on the Internet about judging by Christians and understand what is correct and what is not correct because you are ignoring every bible verse I just posted about righteous judgment. The catholic molesters and all other sinful actions will have their judgement. And no it is fine for our government to make judgements on things that are against the land's law. We have been instructed to obey man's law as well. |
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. No we are not obsessed with anything. And sure a straight Christian could be friends with a homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that, they are just friends. The Christian wouldn't be embracing the sexual activities this homosexual does. They are just friends. We help homosexuals, we help murderers, we help priests, we help the hobo down the street. What label one wishes to give another doesn't make any difference. We love everyone just the same, there is not segregation or anything of such. Back to the subject, yeah it would be just fine for a Christian to be friends with a homosexual. We love all regardless of the activities they may choose to do. By love do you mean "showing them the error of their ways"? Or putting the fear of god into them? Like you do daily? How can a religious person even attend the gay pagan wedding to support their friend or sign papers showing support for the gay couple to adopt? How can the religious person spend every day with the gay person watching them love their partner and not say anything derogatory? Hypocrisy? I have a question for you Dragoness, Would you continue to be close friends with your gay friend if you discovered she was also enjoying a sexual relationship with her biological father? What would be the comparison with a natural relationship like homosexuality and a sickness like incest? You'd better believe that kind of logic is spreading. Many horses are waiting to come out of the gate. So many waiting for endorsement. At one time homosexuality was as much a sickness as incest...and now because so many have closed their eyes to the taboo of it... it is now labeled "natural". There are a lot of closet incestuous, beastial, and other participants who are waiting for the day when what they enjoy doing is acceptible as well. What kind of society are we allowing? Is this our children's inheritance? Again it sounds like the religious are the ones who should worry about some kind of retribution because the non religious have nothing to worry about. Natural love between homosexuals causes as much problem in the world as heterosexual love does. It is the same. Our children are inheriting a healthier view of human relationships. I think you may actually be convinced of your views. Children are suffering more from this twisted world view than anyone, the adults are just getting their groove on. any way they can. Yes, I said it!!! I agree and there has been countless studies done showing children are most happy and succeed more when there is a mother and father in a normal relationship. I find it hard to believe that children would think that anal sex between two men is healthy.I also find it hard to believe that children think it's healthy when they have two fathers or two mothers and they ask where babies come from. |
|
|
|
I judge as both God and Jesus commanded.I judge to avoid sinful,evil,and destructive people as both God and Jesus commanded.I do not judge before the facts are know I judge after the facts are known.That is why Jesus said "why don't you judge righteously"?That is also why Jesus not only allowed the court process of being found guilty or innocent he spoke about it as a form of justice. The only people on this planet that do not judge are robots.I am not a robot. Jesus said "Judge not less ye be judged". 1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Is this not judging?Is Jesus a hypocrite?Is not Jesus judging by their actions? What about John the baptist.Did he not yell and scream at King herold and his wife and accuse her of adultery?Is that not judging? Matt. 14:3-4) Yet what did Jesus say about John the baptist? Jesus said of him, “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist” (Matt. 11:11) So not only did Jesus tell us to judge righteously so did his apostles... In Luke 17:3 He commanded us to rebuke a trespassing brother: “If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him.” In 1 Timothy 5:20 he says, “Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning.” In Titus 2:15 he tells Titus, “These things speak and exhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you.” In 2 Tim. 4:2 he tells Timothy to “reprove, rebuke, exhort.” In 1 Thess. 5:14 he says to “admonish the unruly.” In Rom. 15:14 he tells the Roman church that they are “able to admonish one another.” In Eph. 5:11 he tells the church, “Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? (1 Cor. 6:2-6) “tell it to the church. And if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” (Matt. 18:17-18) It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father’s wife. And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you. For though absent in body, I am present in spirit; and as if present, I have already pronounced judgment on the one who did such a thing. When you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is present, with the power of our Lord Jesus, you are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord. (1 Cor. 5:1-5) If we truly did not judge we would not be Christians but Atheists.Because the entire bible talks about who we should and should not associate with. Cowboy I have gone through this issue with you at least ten times in here and every time I give you bible verses it goes through one ear and out the other.I guess I will have to explain this to you for the 11th time. Jesus was talking about judging people based on appearance,rumors,slander,assumptions,false witness'sand other traits.He was talking about labeling people into a category before even talking to them.He was not talking about judgment of people after the facts were known.He was talking about judging before the facts were known. In Jesus's own words... “Has not Moses given you the law? Yet none of you keeps the law. . . . Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.” (John 7:19, 24) Cowboy are you saying Jesus is a liar?Anyone can see this bible verse for what it is.Don't judge by appearance but by peoples actions. Jesus told the Pharisees, “You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell?” (Matt. 23:23) Jesus was telling them not to assume and make a personal judgement on the person. He was telling them to take the entire picture into mind and not pick apart things. He in no way was condoning someone to judge another. Making a judgement on someone is totally different then "judging" them. Making a personal judgement of someone is saying you have made an opinion on that someone weather you like them or not. "Judging" someone would be to condemn them to hell. To state they are going there, and this is what Jesus told us not to do. Matthew 7:20-24 20The people answered and said, Thou hast a devil: who goeth about to kill thee? 21Jesus answered and said unto them, I have done one work, and ye all marvel. 22Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye on the sabbath day circumcise a man. 23If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day? 24Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment. I do not see what this has to do with what we are talking about except the last verse. If we were not to judge then we would accept everyone regardless of the way they are acting as not only acceptable but equal in Gods eyes.Are you telling me everyone is equal in Gods eyes regardless of the life they are living?If you do you don't know the bible very well because even Christians who are leading unholy lives are ignored by God and Jesus until they repent. If the bible tells us to avoid associating with people by their actions(which it does thousands of times)are you going to associate with them anyways because you are blind to their actions because you will not judge?Nothing could be worse for a Christian. What about these Catholic child molesters?Are you going to be silent on this child molester because you would be judging him regardless of what he is doing? What about our court system in America?Are all those judges evil in Jesus's eyes because they make a living off of judging?Should our court system be abolished? If I do know someone is a prostitute and I know she rejects the word of God am I doing wrong by saying I am avoiding her because she is a prostitute?This is not wrong judgment.Even if I do get judged by the same standards should I worry?Am I am prostitute leading a ungodly unholy life? I don't know what to tell you Cowboy since you are having a hard time telling the differences judging people by their actions and avoiding them and judging people by appearance or photographs and making assumptions.I suggest you do some research on the Internet about judging by Christians and understand what is correct and what is not correct because you are ignoring every bible verse I just posted about righteous judgment. The catholic molesters and all other sinful actions will have their judgement. And no it is fine for our government to make judgements on things that are against the land's law. We have been instructed to obey man's law as well. This is another issue I have. This lends credence to us just being slaves even if the laws are unjust. Sorry a slave is not I. |
|
|
|
Quoting a book of no consequence adds nothing to this thread at all. It defends noone nor assists none of us in a greater understanding of this life. And spouting off your own personal feelings is of no consequence. Are you going to deny that incest is also a part of the natural world? Will you deny that incest is also practiced in breeding? Only if you want mutation in breeding The incestuous beginning of the bible is sicker than any healthy homosexual relationship can be that is for sure. And yes homosexuals are born homosexuals. All you have to do is talk with them and you can see how they are born that way. Nothing wrong with homosexuality unless you are religious, so I recommend the religious not be homosexual or let the religion go so they have no fear of hell for what they naturally are. |
|
|
|
Do you think that being Christian or Islamic (since they are so similar) makes a person overly obsessed with death/reward so that they cannot live life? Or even truly be themselves and genuine? (living life does not mean debauchery either) I feel that the doctrines are stifling to the person even if they don't realize it. Allowing/coercing them to conceal their real true selves behind a false shield of the religion. Not meaning that their true selves are evil as the religions teach. Example: A person who is a part of one of these religions is associated with a gay person. The two of them are very compatible and a great friendship could happen but the religious person cannot fully love and support the gay person in a healthy way due to misgivings taught by the church. (And "saving" or converting this person is not healthy no matter what you have been told" In this case the real person behind the shield would be a true friend and have a life long close relationship with another loving human. The religious shield cannot allow this person to be genuine because of the fear of hell taught by the church. Causing the religious person to be ungenuine in their relationships due to the doctrines of the church in this case causing fear. No we are not obsessed with anything. And sure a straight Christian could be friends with a homosexual. There's nothing wrong with that, they are just friends. The Christian wouldn't be embracing the sexual activities this homosexual does. They are just friends. We help homosexuals, we help murderers, we help priests, we help the hobo down the street. What label one wishes to give another doesn't make any difference. We love everyone just the same, there is not segregation or anything of such. Back to the subject, yeah it would be just fine for a Christian to be friends with a homosexual. We love all regardless of the activities they may choose to do. By love do you mean "showing them the error of their ways"? Or putting the fear of god into them? Like you do daily? How can a religious person even attend the gay pagan wedding to support their friend or sign papers showing support for the gay couple to adopt? How can the religious person spend every day with the gay person watching them love their partner and not say anything derogatory? Hypocrisy? I have a question for you Dragoness, Would you continue to be close friends with your gay friend if you discovered she was also enjoying a sexual relationship with her biological father? What would be the comparison with a natural relationship like homosexuality and a sickness like incest? You'd better believe that kind of logic is spreading. Many horses are waiting to come out of the gate. So many waiting for endorsement. At one time homosexuality was as much a sickness as incest...and now because so many have closed their eyes to the taboo of it... it is now labeled "natural". There are a lot of closet incestuous, beastial, and other participants who are waiting for the day when what they enjoy doing is acceptible as well. What kind of society are we allowing? Is this our children's inheritance? Again it sounds like the religious are the ones who should worry about some kind of retribution because the non religious have nothing to worry about. Natural love between homosexuals causes as much problem in the world as heterosexual love does. It is the same. Our children are inheriting a healthier view of human relationships. I think you may actually be convinced of your views. Children are suffering more from this twisted world view than anyone, the adults are just getting their groove on. any way they can. Yes, I said it!!! I agree and there has been countless studies done showing children are most happy and succeed more when there is a mother and father in a normal relationship. I find it hard to believe that children would think that anal sex between two men is healthy.I also find it hard to believe that children think it's healthy when they have two fathers or two mothers and they ask where babies come from. All types of sex that happen in homosexual relationships happen in heterosexual relationships too and it is healthy then also. As long as the couple show love and respect to each other and the child the child will be healthy and they are often not even gay since they are not born that way. |
|
|