Previous 1
Topic: Yer nuts if you question Authority say
willing2's photo
Sat 10/16/10 08:40 AM
New age shrinks.laugh laugh laugh laugh

I say. You'd be nuts to just blindly follow them.laugh laugh

The new psychiatric diagnostic manual (DSM-V) identifies a new mental illness called “oppositional defiant disorder” or ODD. Defined as an “ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior,” symptoms include questioning authority, negativity, defiance, argumentativeness, and being easily annoyed.
"Oppositional Defiant Disorder" (ODD), includes anyone who disagrees with authority. All those who are skeptical about the safety of vaccines, for example, are about to be diagnosed with ODD.

90% of people will read the sentence "questioning authority" and won't even realize the implications of it. What does "authority" means in that sentence? It means that it's expected of you to accept that someone has AUTHORSHIP over your life. You should not even question this... it's just a "fact of life" as they say. You are born and automatically you should defer authority over your life to someone else.

This is gonna be used against children the most. Just another excuse to get them into the system and pharmacopoeia.

These diagnostic and statistical manuals just keep getting thicker as they dream up evermore made up psychiatriac disorders. Meanwhile, bigPharma celebrates this madness. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

There was a time when I used to try to "argue" ... but now there is nothing left to argue. You should simply remain silent; you should remain within the boundaries of your personal space and integrity. Don't buy into the "game" of argumentation, because that is when they start labeling you as "crazy", "insane". They want you to show "disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior" because then they can turn the focus and speculation on you…Be a good citizen and conform, or else we'll lobotomize you, got it?!

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/16/10 08:44 AM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 10/16/10 08:45 AM
I have always thought of pyschiatry as the haven by which those with resources can receive medical excuses for their behavior

but I still love dr phil,,lol

willing2's photo
Sat 10/16/10 08:56 AM
The ones who have authority to decide what's acceptable and hold the power over others are the ones who seem to go mad with that power. JMO.

I'd help pay for their Ridlin.drinker

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/16/10 08:57 AM
its a trend

when did drunkards become alcholics,, when enough of the right folks started having the 'problem

when did bad behaving children start having ADD, when enough of the right peoples children started behaving badly


money is the great un equalizer,,lol

willing2's photo
Sat 10/16/10 09:13 AM
I'm even hearing about schools that have a "quiet time", between classes, where kids are forced to listen to conformist tapes.

I'll try to see if I can find those recordings they have to endure.

AndyBgood's photo
Sat 10/16/10 09:23 AM
I think some overly educated sh** head sold himself out to the NWO and now they are going to try to Dr. Spock us into believing we have to be sheep like and follow any leader just becasue.

If I found out My child was in a school forcing kids to listen to "conformist" tapes I would pull my kid from that school, beat up the principle, and SUE SUE SUE and make a total media circus of it. Come to think of it I might even beat up his or her's teachers too!

I am so sick and tired of all this forced social engineering going on in secret!

no photo
Sat 10/16/10 10:08 AM

I have always thought of pyschiatry as the haven by which those with resources can receive medical excuses for their behavior

but I still love dr phil,,lol


That's actually quite brilliant.

Except for the Dr. Phil part.

no photo
Sat 10/16/10 10:11 AM

New age shrinks.laugh laugh laugh laugh

I say. You'd be nuts to just blindly follow them.laugh laugh

The new psychiatric diagnostic manual (DSM-V) identifies a new mental illness called “oppositional defiant disorder” or ODD. Defined as an “ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior,” symptoms include questioning authority, negativity, defiance, argumentativeness, and being easily annoyed.
"Oppositional Defiant Disorder" (ODD), includes anyone who disagrees with authority. All those who are skeptical about the safety of vaccines, for example, are about to be diagnosed with ODD.

90% of people will read the sentence "questioning authority" and won't even realize the implications of it. What does "authority" means in that sentence? It means that it's expected of you to accept that someone has AUTHORSHIP over your life. You should not even question this... it's just a "fact of life" as they say. You are born and automatically you should defer authority over your life to someone else.

This is gonna be used against children the most. Just another excuse to get them into the system and pharmacopoeia.

These diagnostic and statistical manuals just keep getting thicker as they dream up evermore made up psychiatriac disorders. Meanwhile, bigPharma celebrates this madness. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

There was a time when I used to try to "argue" ... but now there is nothing left to argue. You should simply remain silent; you should remain within the boundaries of your personal space and integrity. Don't buy into the "game" of argumentation, because that is when they start labeling you as "crazy", "insane". They want you to show "disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior" because then they can turn the focus and speculation on you…Be a good citizen and conform, or else we'll lobotomize you, got it?!


Damn...now they got a name for what I am....laugh

no photo
Sat 10/16/10 10:12 AM

its a trend

when did drunkards become alcholics,, when enough of the right folks started having the 'problem

when did bad behaving children start having ADD, when enough of the right peoples children started behaving badly


money is the great un equalizer,,lol


The difference between a drunk and an alcoholic is an alcoholic goes to meetings.

no photo
Sat 10/16/10 10:16 AM

I think some overly educated sh** head sold himself out to the NWO and now they are going to try to Dr. Spock us into believing we have to be sheep like and follow any leader just becasue.

If I found out My child was in a school forcing kids to listen to "conformist" tapes I would pull my kid from that school, beat up the principle, and SUE SUE SUE and make a total media circus of it. Come to think of it I might even beat up his or her's teachers too!

I am so sick and tired of all this forced social engineering going on in secret!


I'm thinking that won't work now. Now they can "legally" claim you're insane...all that that entails...

AndyBgood's photo
Sat 10/16/10 11:09 AM
I am crazy, not insane, and worst is how easy it is to say someone is insane.

There are just too many "Experts" out there!

no photo
Sat 10/16/10 11:53 AM

I am crazy, not insane, and worst is how easy it is to say someone is insane.

There are just too many "Experts" out there!


You am crazy but not insane? Why, that's just nuts.
laugh

the_one_for_u's photo
Sat 10/16/10 11:57 AM


I am crazy, not insane, and worst is how easy it is to say someone is insane.

There are just too many "Experts" out there!


You am crazy but not insane? Why, that's just nuts.
laugh
yyyeeeeeaaaaa rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl

willing2's photo
Sat 10/16/10 12:53 PM



I am crazy, not insane, and worst is how easy it is to say someone is insane.

There are just too many "Experts" out there!


You am crazy but not insane? Why, that's just nuts.
laugh
yyyeeeeeaaaaa rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl drinks rofl drinks drinks drinks drinks drinks rofl

Gimme a while and I'll crack that code.smokin

no photo
Sat 10/16/10 02:59 PM
Edited by pmarco41 on Sat 10/16/10 03:00 PM
The first edition (DSM-I) was published in 1952, and had about 60 different disorders. In 1994, DSM-IV was published, listing 297 disorders in 886 pages.

today if you sneeze and wipe your nose with your left hand, someone is going to find it pathological..the pharmaceutical corporations are largely responsible for the additions to the DSM since they tend to benefit from the countless prescriptions being doled out to the population...

"better living through modern chemistry."

Bestinshow's photo
Sat 10/16/10 03:03 PM

The first edition (DSM-I) was published in 1952, and had about 60 different disorders. In 1994, DSM-IV was published, listing 297 disorders in 886 pages.

today if you sneeze and wipe your nose with your left hand, someone is going to find it pathological..the pharmaceutical corporations are largely responsible for the additions to the DSM since they tend to benefit from the countless prescriptions being doled out to the population...

"better living through modern chemistry."
Sometimes its good to be chemicaly enhanced:wink:

no photo
Sat 10/16/10 03:04 PM
blushing

MiddleEarthling's photo
Sun 10/17/10 06:16 AM
"ODD is a mental disorder commonly found in teenagers. It is severe enough that they can not function (or function poorly) in simple day-to-day life" (this is not a diagnosis for adult conspiracy theorists or anti-government politically-minded individuals)"

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/oppositional-defiant-disorder/DS00630/DSECTION=symptoms




davidben1's photo
Sun 10/17/10 08:05 AM
Edited by davidben1 on Sun 10/17/10 08:08 AM
The new psychiatric diagnostic manual (DSM-V) identifies a new mental illness called “oppositional defiant disorder” or ODD. Defined as an “ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior,” symptoms include questioning authority, negativity, defiance, argumentativeness, and being easily annoyed.

___________________________________________________________________

would not every politician fall into this category?

would not practically all world leader's fall into this category?

these the most important, as they ENFORCE THE LAW, or in essence, HAVE THE POWER TO LOCK UP, AND SUBJECT TO TREATMENT, those deemed to be of "mental disorder"?

what if there be good reason to be upset?

many white folk were extremely "negative" over seeing authority being biased, "easily annoyed" WITH INJUSTICE, "hostile" toward racist, and argumentative over black folk being tortured?

these all had mental disorder's?

of course, we know they DID NOT, but rather THOSE THAT TRIED TO IMPLY, CONDEM, ABUSE, RESTRICT, IMPRISON, ARREST THESE WANTED THE "PEOPLE" TO THINK SO?

many were annoyed, defiant, "agitated on an ongoing basis", over "witches" being deemed worthy of death?

many are and were agitated, hostile toward, negative, and argumentative about gay's being tortured, beaten, abused, and deemed as an inferior species?

yes, ALL HUMAN'S INTRINSIC "RIGHT", TO DECIDE ALL THINGS BASED UPON "MUTUAL CONSENT", must be upheld, no matter what any one believe's to be their "own good or moral behaviour" for themself.

if "ULTIMATE POWER", embrace SUCH UNSANE NOTION'S AS "MENTAL DISORDER'S", these that have the power of life and death OVER ALL, and embrace such physcological definition's, such should send shiver's thru the body of any sane human being, seeing the true implication unto ALL, ALL, ALL, OUTSIDE OF "THE POWER AGENDA"...

for the ONLY LAW, of restriction of bodily movement of ANOTHER HUMAN BEING, should only be based upon NO PHYSICAL HARM UNTO ANOTHER?

WHO SHALL DIAGNOSE THE PHYSCOLOGIST?

WHO SHALL QUESTION THE ONE MAKING DEFINING SUCH DEFINTION'S OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AS "UNJUST" IN THE FIRST PLACE?

AND, THEN THE "DELUSIONS OF GRANDEAUR", OF ANY, to DEEM any that display such behaviour, or action, or words, as being MENTALLY INCOMPETENT?

obviously with NO INSIGHT OR TRUE REALITY, OF ALL PAST "EXTREME GOOD", THAT CAME FROM THESE EXACT ****ING BEHAVIOURS?

hardly so, BUT THESE PAST "EXTEREME GOODS" SUCH AS "ALL HUMAN ARE EQUAL", and the ongoing fight to attain such, ARE NOT WISHED, BY ANYONE DEEMING SUCH THINGS AS "MENTAL DISORDER'S", so the EXTREMELY VILE AND CONTEMPUOUS MOTIVE AND INTENT OF THESE CANNOT BE MISSED.

during the era of the beginning's of the physcology study in the early 1900's, thousands were restrained, given fatal beta meds, tortured, given labotomies, by the "established", main stream psychcological communtiies...

would not any OPPOSING HITLER, then fit ALL THESE DEFINITION'S?

any that cannot see, that such hath FAR REACHING DEVASTING CONSEQUENCE'S HAS BUT LEARNED TO LAUGH AT WHAT CREATE'S IT'S OWN DEMISE, AND IMPRISONEMENT, AND TORTURE, AND ELIMINATION.

if the very validity of such, is not legally opposed, AND OVERTURNED, and the creator's of such not examined for 'the same mental disorder', and even gresater disorder, of misusing it's position and power to sabotage ALL BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS, the implication to anything outside of 'THE CIRCLE OF POWER' is threatened to the most extreme degree...

oh, but then is that even still possible, since WHO WOULD BE CALLED TO THE STAND TO DEFEND SUCH DEFINITION'S?

ANOTHER PSYHCOLOGIST?

SO, A MEMBER OF THE SAME "PIER GROUP"?

doth the court assign a jury of pier's equal to ONE defining?

how would such be fair and impartial?

but it is done each day.

and each day the more...

if people do not get behind, the civil liberties of LIFE AS EQUAL IN VALUE, then the life of all will not be seen as equal, and if the life of all be not considered as equal in value, then WHOM shall be the decider of WHAT LIFE, BE CONSTRUED, IMLIED, CONSIDERED, LAWED, AS "NOT" EQUAL IN VALUE?

for these definition's indeed, create MANY A PAST DAYS OF HUMAN HORROR INTO EXISTENCE, AND INDEED, PAVE THE WAY FOR THE REMOVAL OF ANY "LAW" OR SAFEGAURD TO RESTRICT IT.

peace


















MiddleEarthling's photo
Sun 10/17/10 08:18 AM

The new psychiatric diagnostic manual (DSM-V) identifies a new mental illness called “oppositional defiant disorder” or ODD. Defined as an “ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior,” symptoms include questioning authority, negativity, defiance, argumentativeness, and being easily annoyed.

___________________________________________________________________

would not every politician fall into this category?

would not practically all world leader's fall into this category?

these the most important, as they ENFORCE THE LAW, or in essence, HAVE THE POWER TO LOCK UP, AND SUBJECT TO TREATMENT, those deemed to be of "mental disorder"?

what if there be good reason to be upset?

many white folk were extremely "negative" over seeing authority being biased, "easily annoyed" WITH INJUSTICE, "hostile" toward racist, and argumentative over black folk being tortured?

these all had mental disorder's?

of course, we know they DID NOT, but rather THOSE THAT TRIED TO IMPLY, CONDEM, ABUSE, RESTRICT, IMPRISON, ARREST THESE WANTED THE "PEOPLE" TO THINK SO?

many were annoyed, defiant, "agitated on an ongoing basis", over "witches" being deemed worthy of death?

many are and were agitated, hostile toward, negative, and argumentative about gay's being tortured, beaten, abused, and deemed as an inferior species?

yes, ALL HUMAN'S INTRINSIC "RIGHT", TO DECIDE ALL THINGS BASED UPON "MUTUAL CONSENT", must be upheld, no matter what any one believe's to be their "own good or moral behaviour" for themself.

if "ULTIMATE POWER", embrace SUCH UNSANE NOTION'S AS "MENTAL DISORDER'S", these that have the power of life and death OVER ALL, and embrace such physcological definition's, such should send shiver's thru the body of any sane human being, seeing the true implication unto ALL, ALL, ALL, OUTSIDE OF "THE POWER AGENDA"...

for the ONLY LAW, of restriction of bodily movement of ANOTHER HUMAN BEING, should only be based upon NO PHYSICAL HARM UNTO ANOTHER?

WHO SHALL DIAGNOSE THE PHYSCOLOGIST?

WHO SHALL QUESTION THE ONE MAKING DEFINING SUCH DEFINTION'S OF HUMAN BEHAVIOUR AS "UNJUST" IN THE FIRST PLACE?

AND, THEN THE "DELUSIONS OF GRANDEAUR", OF ANY, to DEEM any that display such behaviour, or action, or words, as being MENTALLY INCOMPETENT?

obviously with NO INSIGHT OR TRUE REALITY, OF ALL PAST "EXTREME GOOD", THAT CAME FROM THESE EXACT ****ING BEHAVIOURS?

hardly so, BUT THESE PAST "EXTEREME GOODS" SUCH AS "ALL HUMAN ARE EQUAL", and the ongoing fight to attain such, ARE NOT WISHED, BY ANYONE DEEMING SUCH THINGS AS "MENTAL DISORDER'S", so the EXTREMELY VILE AND CONTEMPUOUS MOTIVE AND INTENT OF THESE CANNOT BE MISSED.

during the era of the beginning's of the physcology study in the early 1900's, thousands were restrained, given fatal beta meds, tortured, given labotomies, by the "established", main stream psychcological communtiies...

would not any OPPOSING HITLER, then fit ALL THESE DEFINITION'S?

any that cannot see, that such hath FAR REACHING DEVASTING CONSEQUENCE'S HAS BUT LEARNED TO LAUGH AT WHAT CREATE'S IT'S OWN DEMISE, AND IMPRISONEMENT, AND TORTURE, AND ELIMINATION.

if the very validity of such, is not legally opposed, AND OVERTURNED, and the creator's of such not examined for 'the same mental disorder', and even gresater disorder, of misusing it's position and power to sabotage ALL BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS, the implication to anything outside of 'THE CIRCLE OF POWER' is threatened to the most extreme degree...

oh, but then is that even still possible, since WHO WOULD BE CALLED TO THE STAND TO DEFEND SUCH DEFINITION'S?

ANOTHER PSYHCOLOGIST?

SO, A MEMBER OF THE SAME "PIER GROUP"?

doth the court assign a jury of pier's equal to ONE defining?

how would such be fair and impartial?

but it is done each day.

and each day the more...

if people do not get behind, the civil liberties of LIFE AS EQUAL IN VALUE, then the life of all will not be seen as equal, and if the life of all be not considered as equal in value, then WHOM shall be the decider of WHAT LIFE, BE CONSTRUED, IMLIED, CONSIDERED, LAWED, AS "NOT" EQUAL IN VALUE?

for these definition's indeed, create MANY A PAST DAYS OF HUMAN HORROR INTO EXISTENCE, AND INDEED, PAVE THE WAY FOR THE REMOVAL OF ANY "LAW" OR SAFEGAURD TO RESTRICT IT.

peace




"ODD is a mental disorder commonly found in teenagers. It is severe enough that they can not function (or function poorly) in simple day-to-day life" (this is not a diagnosis for adult conspiracy theorists or anti-government politically-minded individuals)"

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/oppositional-defiant-disorder/DS00630/DSECTION=symptoms



Previous 1