Are 'Gay-ism' and 'Lesbian-ism' traits,an 'advantage' of us humans being the knowledgeable, superior and dominating species on earth.
Why are these traits not found in other species.(no offense 2 ne1)

actually fagginess is rampant in all species!



they...they...are doing it everywhere!





but it is alright. it is not considered to be contagious.
there is no biological advantage however.

Aren't Lesbian-ism and Gay-ism one in the same? Better yet, just use homosexuals.

To answer the question, it does happen in other species.

is it gayism when my male dog humps my leg?

What's with the addition of the '-ism' thingy ... ?

People are 'gay' or 'lesbian'. Or 'tranny'. Can we just drop the pretentious little '-ism' suffix ... ? Jeez. Both forms are homosexuality no matter how y' try to pretense it up.

The only '-ism' involved would be associated with the male version of homosexuality: 'jism' ...

Keep it simple. I'm just sayin' ...

Someone get the duckling liner upperer to take a chill pill?


Hiya S1ow!!!

I agree....here here!



same gender lurvin is rampant in every species...even the human one!!!

No, that's "Confusion-ism"

These traits are found in other species.

Seems to be considered a natural variant in most species.

But of course, some of them are superior and dominating, while others are inferior and submissive -- that's the whole point of the homosexuality! (and some of them are both...)

However, animals, it seems, are just "lusty beasts" -- when the urge comes, they don't particularly descriminate as to whom they "enter". Such descrimination can only be found among humans!!!

well, its a bit tricky, because animals really most likely mate for survival and to assert power,,,so they too can do the same sex thing(although I doubt for the same reasons)

Humans are different because it is more than the INSTINCT for us,, it involves emotions and attachments and values
I dont think it makes us anymore knowledgable to label our sexual tastes, it just means we use labels and language whereas animals just do whatever their gonna do and go on, without a second thought, with no right or wrong...

That's a good point, animals are just innocent for the most part, whereas humans have another side of the brain not instinctual, for instance animals eat only when they are hungry, humans eat for many different reasons, such as if we're depressed, bored, we like the taste of a certain food, now I relate this to the topic is, animals mate only for procreation or to prove dominance like msharmony said, but humans on the other hand mate for many other reasons other than just to procreate, we do it to give us confidence, pleasure (obviously), to prove one's love to another, sometimes for acceptance, and I'm sure for countless other reasons too, but the point is, we make a conscious choice to do the things we do, like to turn to the same sex for companionship and love. Now do I think does this give us an advantage over the animals, I don't think so. I think it is a disadvantage only because I doubt animals ridicule other animals for turning to homosexuality, but humans sometimes kill each other for that very reason. I feel only if this behavior was accepted 100% throughout the world would I then think this would be an advantage for us. And also I hope I didn't offend anyone with this thread, I just really think it's horrible how people who choose to be gay are ridiculed so much for it, I mean I'm not gay, but I don't judge other people if they are. In my opinion as long as no one tries to convert me that way, then I see no problem with it. And sorry if I got off topic a bit on that last sentence.

I think adultery is wrong and polygamy,its abouy lifestyle choice not feelings(what you DO vs what you feel) for me, I feel the same about homosexual lifestyles, but I dont think those are any less human or decent than I am because I have sometimes done what i ought not.

Well to agree to others, it isnt quite an advantage it is simply how the mind workings of the individual are at peace with. It is more of a mental comfort of attraction than it is of a racial dominance or advantage. Animals are also known to do it, such as my neighbor's donkeys are proud homosexuals, haha. But it is simply another part of life and for those individuals to enjoy it.

So in my opinion is the only "advantage" is it makes those individuals have a self peace and joy which allows them to be more productive menbers of society, just like any other group when given their respective settings to be themselves

Also btw "Kings_Knight" the term tranny is offensive, the term for the section is transgender or trans(also many subgroups belong to this), trust me i know this. im sure there was no harm just a fun fact of the day ^^

<----lesbian...."ism"

Actually, Homosexuality has nothing to do with the Choice, but with the Biology:
* scientists have noticed a peculiar phenomenon --
if, during the early stages of pregnancy, a woman experiences some health/psychological problems, then the child might develop homosexual/lesbian tendency later in life!!!

That's why it is so wide spread!!!!
(not just because of choice)

Only to those who aren't trannys. Ever listen to Eddie Izzard?

The only reason to ever be offended by a term commonly used by a group of people to identify THEMSELVES is when its improperly used. Like when you call a tranny gay, even if he's not actually gay.

might is not exactly a word that suggests finality,,,but my belief is that although I dont know if feelings are biological in nature, I do know that ACTIONS and therefore LIFESTYLES are a choice.

msharmony:
As if we are competely free from our heredity?!! {HEREDITY: the biological process whereby genetic factors are transmitted from one generation to the next. (Google) } + the traights acquired during pegnancy!

There are a lot of highly cultural and respected people who cannot change what they are -- just like a zebra cannot shake her stripes off!!!
___________________________ _____________________________

Well, until science can tell us for sure (aside from the conjecture ... which much science is merely theory based on observation), then let's stick with "maybe" as the article says and not change it to something definitive to suit our own arguments.