Topic: 72 year old woman getting tazered!? | |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
Oh, sorry, I'm done actually. I don't tend to go any further than making my point, mind if I join you anyway? |
|
|
|
I can hear her voice now
"Don't taze me sonny!" |
|
|
|
I can hear her voice now "Don't taze me sonny!" "Oooooooo"... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep...
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MelodyGirl
on
Fri 10/16/09 07:16 PM
|
|
Yep... Is that toffee and raisins in the mix?? Over here! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kinda like plexico shootin himself in the foot |
|
|
|
Miss "I am going to be a CRIMINOLOGIST",This is for you. You said you do not do circular arguements and none have been presented to you..You are good at evading questions so why don't try answering these two.... My first question is why we hire Officers who can not defend themselves from bodily harm from a 74 year old woman without the use of what could be deadly force.For this officer to claim he was in harms way would be ludicrous to say the least considering his size.If he were in danger ,I might not pose this question but it is clear there was no dangerous situation.. Question 2.......Hypothetically we are a couple...you spit on me and I tazer you. OR You throw a punch at me and miss and I tazer you..Now before you did either action ,I warned you ....do not do it and you proceed..Do you still believe that I should be prosecuted? Or is that a rule only for the police? I see your wasting your time again...try answering and showing how criminologist think...It should be eye opening for all..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That thin Blue wall you speak of is all there is between the criminals and society in general. Unquote...... Miss Star there is something so wrong about what you stated and I must help you out here in understanding what you believe and maybe showing you where you are wrong... We in Florida among many states have a concealed weapons permit which adds a very large force of law abiding folks to the wall between criminals and society.Police are not your only protectors ...The theory here is that we have a right to defend ourselves or another's life as if it were our own without waiting on the police to get there .This stops numerous deaths and for the criminal mind ,it puts a element of doubt about whether their prey may blow their brains out... Hense the police are not the only answer , just the one you call once you survive an attack rather than be just another dead body with no wallet..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss "I am going to be a CRIMINOLOGIST",This is for you. You said you do not do circular arguements and none have been presented to you..You are good at evading questions so why don't try answering these two.... My first question is why we hire Officers who can not defend themselves from bodily harm from a 74 year old woman without the use of what could be deadly force.For this officer to claim he was in harms way would be ludicrous to say the least considering his size.If he were in danger ,I might not pose this question but it is clear there was no dangerous situation.. Question 2.......Hypothetically we are a couple...you spit on me and I tazer you. OR You throw a punch at me and miss and I tazer you..Now before you did either action ,I warned you ....do not do it and you proceed..Do you still believe that I should be prosecuted? Or is that a rule only for the police? I see your wasting your time again...try answering and showing how criminologist think...It should be eye opening for all..... just answer the question claire! yeah claire! c'mon claire, just answer the question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody have her number? I wanna date her. I live in a rough neighbourhood and I need someone to protect me when I haul the groceries home, to my beautiful, zesty, full of zest 72-year-old bouncer girlfriend from the Bronx.
Was she blonde? (Please, someone answer this, because I can't watch Videos on the 'net -- court order. Don't ask.) |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 10/16/09 10:17 PM
|
|
See what blame gets us? Endless back and forth. In my opinion , they BOTH made bad choices. Hers was not to comply, his was to use unnecessary force on a grandmom. Kind of reminds me years back when some citizens decided to protest the LAWFUL demolition of a site. A female stood in front of a bulldozer, the female got bulldozed. People said the driver must have been an animal, others said the girl must have been unreasonable..I said, both made a bad choice. This busts my chops..Sometimes when I read a post ,I go check out the profile to see if there is consistency in thought.In this case I see you say you have and I quote your profile "excessive empathy toward others" Give us a break or define empathy.Bad choices !!!!I find that you are somewhat calloused if you believe what you wrote. A bad choice is not running someone over with a dozer..That is a brain gone dead and an ego out of control..And the driver earned money doing such an act..Please rethink your post and apply it to your children or at least read about school tazering and get back in touch. Would you say it was a good choice then? Mine is only a disagreement in the language we use when judging others. It is because of my empathy I choose not to assign blame and label others as anything but human, but I do aknowledge bad decisions. The woman should not have been beligerent and the cop shouldnt have tased her. Likewise, a person shouldnt stand in front of a moving bulldozer, and a driver shouldnt run said person over. All involved made bad choices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|