100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Who believes a plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
There were "squibs" evident projecting from the sides of the towers below the collapse. They can be seen on most videos of the collapse. It is reported that there were "workmen" in and out of the building starting 3 months before 9/11 doing "upgrades" to cable and wiring. This is documented. Also, in the weeks prior to 9/11 dog patrols were pulled from the towers and there were numerous "shut downs" causing all business inside the towers to close for days at a time. What you suggest is very possible with that amount of time for preparation. It is a noted fact that many floors of the tower were vacant, there was a problem renting it. It was basiclly condemned because of the asbestos used in construction, and the estimated cost to repair it was billions. The cost to demolish it was also over a billion $$$, yet 3 months before 9/11 Larry Silverstein took out a 99 yr lease and insurance with a "terrorism" clause. But it's all just coincidence. Like the fact that all the Enron and WorldCom trial records and files were in bldg 7.... which also collapse and wasn't hit by a plane.... hmmmm, no jet or jet fuel, fell from the top into a neat little pile..... another miracle! 3 times in the same day! AMAZING! Elvis took care of WTC 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yea, Rose. We don't have to argue ALL the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 06/12/09 08:12 PM
|
|
I will laugh at that. Elvis did it!
I have studied and read as much as anyone on 9/11. My first reactions were "make em pay!" and I promoted action against Bin Laden and Al Quaeda. I even thought Saddam was involved or connected as we were told. I even praised Bill O'Rielly on his commentary.... then I started reading. It wasn't long before I found myself saying "wtf!?". So I read more. I couldn't believe anyone could possibly believe what I was reading, but it posed questions, so I read some more. I haven't stopped reading or asking questions as this post and my others here often show, and I still have questions after all this time, but they are different now. They are opposite of my original beliefs, which was siding with what we were told as truths. The contradictions I have found to evidence, the lies I have learned we were told (backed by documentation), the failure or refusal to investigate, the inavailability or refusal to allow or to obtain access to information, the actions of our leaders and the refusal to answer questions presented by the people they work for (us), the denile to ask or answer over 70% of the questions presented by the Jersey Girls in their demands which won them the investigation after 18 months of refusal, and then calling them conspiracy theorists after they lost their husbands and family members that day and just want answers..... it makes my skin crawl! The audacity! You are welcome to your opinion. I am sorry if at any time I seem out of line or irritated by yours or others replies. It is a human flaw in me and I apologize if I seem out of line or I upset you or anyone with your beliefs. Perhaps we may have to agree to disagree on this and see what the future unfolds. Me, I see subterfuge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yea, Rose. We don't have to argue ALL the time. we don't???? and here I thought I was unique by arguing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will laugh at that. Elvis did it!
I have studied and read as much as anyone on 9/11. My first reactions were "make em pay!" and I promoted action against Bin Laden and Al Quaeda. I even thought Saddam was involved or connected as we were told. I even praised Bill O'Rielly on his commentary.... then I started reading. It wasn't long before I found myself saying "wtf!?". So I read more. I couldn't believe anyone could possibly believe what I was reading, but it posed questions, so I read some more. I haven't stopped reading or asking questions as this post and my others here often show, and I still have questions after all this time, but they are different now. They are opposite of my original beliefs, which was siding with what we were told as truths. The contradictions I have found to evidence, the lies I have learned we were told (backed by documentation), the failure or refusal to investigate, the inavailability or refusal to allow or to obtain access to information, the actions of our leaders and the refusal to answer questions presented by the people they work for (us), the denile to ask or answer over 70% of the questions presented by the Jersey Girls in their demands which won them the investigation after 18 months of refusal, and then calling them conspiracy theorists after they lost their husbands and family members that day and just want answers..... it makes my skin crawl! The audacity! You are welcome to your opinion. I am sorry if at any time I seem out of line or irritated by yours or others replies. It is a human flaw in me and I apologize if I seem out of line or I upset you or anyone with your beliefs. Perhaps we may have to agree to disagree on this and see what the future unfolds. Me, I see subterfuge. I was a freshman in high school when it happened. My own political awakening happened much in the same way as yours. There was just something that didn't seem right about the story we were given so I had to start reading. Haven't stopped, and even started on several other things too.. :~K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will laugh at that. Elvis did it!
I have studied and read as much as anyone on 9/11. My first reactions were "make em pay!" and I promoted action against Bin Laden and Al Quaeda. I even thought Saddam was involved or connected as we were told. I even praised Bill O'Rielly on his commentary.... then I started reading. It wasn't long before I found myself saying "wtf!?". So I read more. I couldn't believe anyone could possibly believe what I was reading, but it posed questions, so I read some more. I haven't stopped reading or asking questions as this post and my others here often show, and I still have questions after all this time, but they are different now. They are opposite of my original beliefs, which was siding with what we were told as truths. The contradictions I have found to evidence, the lies I have learned we were told (backed by documentation), the failure or refusal to investigate, the inavailability or refusal to allow or to obtain access to information, the actions of our leaders and the refusal to answer questions presented by the people they work for (us), the denile to ask or answer over 70% of the questions presented by the Jersey Girls in their demands which won them the investigation after 18 months of refusal, and then calling them conspiracy theorists after they lost their husbands and family members that day and just want answers..... it makes my skin crawl! The audacity! You are welcome to your opinion. I am sorry if at any time I seem out of line or irritated by yours or others replies. It is a human flaw in me and I apologize if I seem out of line or I upset you or anyone with your beliefs. Perhaps we may have to agree to disagree on this and see what the future unfolds. Me, I see subterfuge. I was a freshman in high school when it happened. My own political awakening happened much in the same way as yours. There was just something that didn't seem right about the story we were given so I had to start reading. Haven't stopped, and even started on several other things too.. :~K |
|
|
|
|
