100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: what do you think?? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Oh please, who cares who marries whom? Does it affect you directly? No. Then why get your tightywhiteys in a knot over it. You'd think there are more important things this world needs to concern itself over than somebody's personal and private life. No one gets involved in your love life, so why involve yourself in someone else's? Sheesh. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Gumbyvs
on
Mon 06/01/09 06:16 AM
|
|
Oh please, who cares who marries whom? Does it affect you directly? No. Then why get your tightywhiteys in a knot over it. You'd think there are more important things this world needs to concern itself over than somebody's personal and private life. No one gets involved in your love life, so why involve yourself in someone else's? Sheesh. Absurd argument, but if a guy wants to marry a chicken, let him have at it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh please, who cares who marries whom? Does it affect you directly? No. Then why get your tightywhiteys in a knot over it. You'd think there are more important things this world needs to concern itself over than somebody's personal and private life. No one gets involved in your love life, so why involve yourself in someone else's? Sheesh. is the chicken a who or whom? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think in any "Free Country", you should have the same rights and freedoms as anyone else. Here in Canada for example, say two "loving people" have been together for many years, should they not have the same rights as any other loving couple? Should they not have the same benefits as any other married couple, say like dental care or perscriptions? Personally, it kinda creeps me out but hey to each their own, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh please, who cares who marries whom? Does it affect you directly? No. Then why get your tightywhiteys in a knot over it. You'd think there are more important things this world needs to concern itself over than somebody's personal and private life. No one gets involved in your love life, so why involve yourself in someone else's? Sheesh. Umm, the chicken doesn't have free will and cannot make the choice. I (and I assume the rest of us here) are talking about two free and legal adults. So, let's resist the urge to take the conversation into the realm of the idiotic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We're discussing climate changes.We'll address that topic at the next meeting.
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh please, who cares who marries whom? Does it affect you directly? No. Then why get your tightywhiteys in a knot over it. You'd think there are more important things this world needs to concern itself over than somebody's personal and private life. No one gets involved in your love life, so why involve yourself in someone else's? Sheesh. Absurd argument, but if a guy wants to marry a chicken, let him have at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
quiet_2008
on
Mon 06/01/09 06:19 AM
|
|
from a strictly legal point of view (and American)
the Constitution says that anything not forbidden or commanded by the US Constitution is up to the states to decide. And marriage in any form isn't mentioned in the Constitution. So it's up to the states (as it should be) and then I would think up to the individual communities but you just can't force people to believe in something |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We're discussing climate changes.We'll address that topic at the next meeting.
Are those 2 hot female polar bears? Woohoo! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh please, who cares who marries whom? Does it affect you directly? No. Then why get your tightywhiteys in a knot over it. You'd think there are more important things this world needs to concern itself over than somebody's personal and private life. No one gets involved in your love life, so why involve yourself in someone else's? Sheesh. is the chicken a who or whom? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, let's resist the urge to take the conversation into the realm of the idiotic.
well there goes all the fun out of it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pets have human names? SAY IT ISN'T SO!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think in any "Free Country", you should have the same rights and freedoms as anyone else. Here in Canada for example, say two "loving people" have been together for many years, should they not have the same rights as any other loving couple? Should they not have the same benefits as any other married couple, say like dental care or perscriptions? Personally, it kinda creeps me out but hey to each their own, eh? I've always said that no one should be forced to accept or condone a gay lifestyle, providing that they are at least tolerant of individual human beings. I don't think a church should be forced to marry same sexes, since it is against its beliefs. However, I do think it's something that the government should allow and recognize. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Thoughtfulthug
on
Mon 06/01/09 06:22 AM
|
|
Pets have human names? SAY IT ISN'T SO! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pets have human names? SAY IT ISN'T SO! ur just sore coz they're cockblockers 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pets have human names? SAY IT ISN'T SO! Yea, but when the law comes in a takes their 177 cats away and condemns the building, its still amusing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, let's resist the urge to take the conversation into the realm of the idiotic.
well there goes all the fun out of it
You're so right. Don't know what I was thinking 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pets have human names? SAY IT ISN'T SO! ur just sore coz they're cockblockers
You remember that silly argument I had awhile ago. Rofl... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol, i remember alright
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I know 2 hetero couple that have been together for years and are not married. It's called common law marriage. That should be good enough for anybody as signing that piece of paper causes problems.
|
|
|
|
|
