Topic: Your take on the concept of Original Sin? | |
---|---|
Such as the future we leave for our offspring. If we don't fix it now,
their future is bleak. Kat |
|
|
|
Kat> we are humans.
Made in the image of god. Our future is never bleak. There will allways be light before us and the boundless spirit of god to guide us. |
|
|
|
The Bible says that we were all born sinners. Thats why baptism is
essential. You must confess your sins and be baptised Acts 2:38 in order to recieve God's forgiveness. We are accountable for the Garden of Eden and for Cain and Abel. |
|
|
|
No no, no...I was refering to the damage that we are putting to mother
earth. Sorry, I must have read your post wrong. Kat |
|
|
|
AB
I have the faith, was just playing devils advocate so to speak Trae Why do I have to confess sins when Jesus already died on the cross for them, why should I be held responsible for Cain and Abel? It's not logic and beats me |
|
|
|
I am not responsible for any crime committed by any one that is not me.
Correct me if I am wrong but was not cain a sinner and able a good son? I am not a christian. I can not be held accountable for the sins committed within a christian fairy tale. (not trying to offend just don't beleive in original sin) |
|
|
|
Invisible,
IMO, faith will never be a mathematical equation. It will never need to make sense, or balance with reality past. When present to faith, one person at a time, it delivers reality (present and future) to all!!! When one's faith (based on nothing: no evidence necessary), is absent, the barbaric and primitive nature gives reality. We have lots of evidence for that, and it has nothing to do with faith. |
|
|
|
Oooh, covering a badger in peanut butter and throwing it into an
ice-cream shoppe, that's pretty original ! |
|
|
|
voileazur
Thank you for your answer. Of course I know most of it myself, but can't withstand the urge to ask because I want to know what others think. |
|
|
|
Invisible>
I totally understand. to foster wisdom within the fold one must occasionally stir the flock to action. |
|
|
|
I don't know whether you saw the film LOTR 3, when Merry asks Pippin why
do you always have to look and the answer is, "I can't help it" That's me in a nutshell |
|
|
|
I like that show and the outlook of the hobbits.
the smallest of the group yet they were not there to conqure the world... They are simply there to support a friend. I would like to think I am willing to walk into danger to protect a friend. |
|
|
|
Yes, a few more Samwise Gamgees wouldn't go astray in this world
|
|
|
|
Really the original sin was satans rebellion against Yahweh.
|
|
|
|
Perhaps the original sin was god's mistake in thinking man would stay
cooped up in a garden. Not meaning to offend anyone. |
|
|
|
original sin does not exist...ask a priest to show you where in the
bible does it say that you are condenmed for the sins of your forefathers...if that is so, then technically all of humanity is doomed to hell because we all come from Adam and Eve... |
|
|
|
replying to the first post...
unfortunately in this world, it is MAN who condemns you for the sin of your father, not God...even western gov'ts...if your parent or sibling or any relative for that matter dies before paying a debt, YOU are stuck having to pay for it...that is wrong, its also the legal way to extort money from people...it even exists in societies around the world...for example, in India, if anyone you associate with does something morally wrong, your all considered the same, especially family...how BS is that!!!...even me, as a Muslim, i face ridicule all the time...well, I'm not Osama, nor am i related to Saddam Hussein, and no Ahmedinejad is not my uncle...Hezbollah existed long before I was born, and in another part of the world, am I responsible for them and their actions??...should I carry the burden of guilt, just because they happen to be born into the same religion as i???....i personally believe "original sin" is a concoction invented my misguided individuals who sought to convince others for their own gain... |
|
|
|
Exodus 20:5-6 (also Dt 5:9)
I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments. Deuteronomy 24:16 Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor children put to death for their fathers; each is to die for his own sin. Ezekiel 18:20 The soul who sins is the one who will die. The son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him. Matthew 23:35 (also Lk 11:50-51) And so upon you will come all the righteous blood that has been shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think these passages can be understood by looking at what God does in the Bible. When parents do wrong or experience punishment on earth, their children share the ill effects - if a parent is put in jail, their children are adversely affected; if a parent is abusive or negligent, their children suffer. This sort of thing occurs in many places in the Bible. For instance, Achan and his family died as a result of his disobeying God (Joshua 7). However, while children often shared the earthly punishment of their parents, they would not be punished for their parents' sins in the afterlife. Ezekiel 18 makes it clear that the real guilt belongs to the person who sinned, not their family. Deuteronomy 24:16 is an application of this principle to human-administered justice: while God decreed that some sins merited the death penalty, humans were not to apply the penalty to anyone other than the guilty party. If, as in the case of Achan, a family or nation was to be corporately punished, only God had the authority to decide that corporate punishment was merited. On the other hand, God often extends mercy to the families of people who are righteous. Rahab's family was allowed to survive because she respected God (Joshua 2). God spared Noah's family because Noah was righteous (Genesis 7:1). And of course the nation of Israel was blessed because of Abraham's obedience to God (Genesis 22:17-18). Again, the blessings received by a righteous person's family only affected their life on earth. A person's relatives will not be saved or condemned in the afterlife because of that person's actions; rather each will be judged as individuals. In other words, the true distinction is between life on earth and the afterlife. People do not receive precisely what they deserve while they are on earth; they are affected by the actions of those around them, and thus can be said to be punished (i.e. experience suffering) for their relatives' wrongs. But this is a temporary state of affairs; when people enter the eternal afterlife, they will be judged as individuals, and what punishment they receive will be only for things they are truly guilty of. Why then would God corporately punish a family when not all of them had sinned? In some cases, the relatives of the wrongdoers shared in their guilt by failing to stop the person from doing wrong or rebuke them for their wrong. In other cases, it's possible that the loss of the wrongdoer's family line was part of their punishment. Finally, what about the passages in Matthew and Luke, which seem to say the Jews of Jesus' day would be held accountable for murders committed by previous generations? Jesus' statement is true in a figurative sense, i.e. that his contemporaries who rejected him would experience a far greater condemnation than others who rejected him without the benefit of hearing his teaching or seeing his miracles. The Jewish leaders were expected to know the Scriptures and be in close relationship with God, both of which would have enabled them to recognize Jesus as the Messiah. They were given advance notice of the Messiah's arrival by John the Baptist. They also had many opportunities to hear Jesus' teaching, interact with him and witness the miracles he performed, especially since Jesus focused his ministry on the Jews. Since they had far more opportunity to accept Jesus than anyone else, their punishment for rejecting him would be far greater than that of others (see also Degrees of punishment in hell). Jesus' statement can also be taken more literally, in that his contemporaries were guilty of their ancestors' sins to the extent that they condoned their actions and committed similar ones. In fact, they weren't just repeating past sins but were committing ones that were far worse, since the prophet they persecuted was God himself. Considering these two factors, one could make a comparison between the punishment they would receive and the aggregated punishment for all martyrdoms in previous history. Kat |
|
|
|
Kat
Very well thought out. I do see the sins of the fathers on the childrens for 3 to 4 generations today. As we well know by now most child molestors were molested themselves and thier father or mother had probally had the same sin happen to them. I believe this is what the commandment was refering to ( any act repeated). Shalom.. Miles |
|
|
|
Answer: The Bible mentions “generational curses” in several places
(Exodus 20:5; 34:7; Numbers 14:18; Deuteronomy 5:9). It sounds unfair for God to punish children for the sins of their fathers. However, this is looking at it from an earthly perspective. God knows that sin is passed down from one generation to the next. When a father has a sinful lifestyle, his children are likely to have the same sinful lifestyle as well. That is why it is not unjust for God to punish sin to the third or fourth generation – because they are committing the same sins their ancestors did. They are being punished for their own sins, not the sins of their ancestors. The Bible specifically tells us that God does not hold children accountable for the sins of their parents (Deuteronomy 24:16). There is a trend in the church today to try and blame every sin and problem on some sort of generational curse. This is not Biblical. The cure for generational curses is salvation through Jesus Christ. When we become Christians, we are new creations (2 Corinthians 5:17). How can a child of God still be under God’s curse (Romans 8:1)? The cure, then, for a generational curse is faith in Christ and a life consecrated to Him (Romans 12:1-2). |
|
|