1 2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 Next
Topic: what Is The Truth About Dinosaurs
Krimsa's photo
Fri 09/05/08 05:30 AM






Well I am not asking that you support or agree with the evolutionary theory but merely that you demonstrate to us how these scientific discoveries are in fact, inaccurate. That's what I have been asking you to do for about three days now. So you have the dilemma of Neanderthal man's existence in these various museums throughout the world on display. This requires that you legitimately explain what he is. You claim homo sapien in some respect. Okay now this you can attempt to refute also because we do have his DNA on record. Several specimens have been collected that do fall within acceptable range for the recovery of mitochondrial DNA However before that is introduced, can you address any of these issues presented thus far?


Well - in my opinion the inaccuracy comes in the interpretation of time and cause. They are not innacuracies of the events themselves - but of the worldview perception of them. We know for a fact that the fossels exist - that is not in denial, it is a matter of what the fossels are telling us, and this is where the perceptions diverge greatly.

It is the fine line where theory becomes fact. There is no way to establish this through science because the past cannot be repeated to verify if either the theory of Evolution or Creation can be substanciated. So too - the method for assessing the true dates of things, because the method of determining time is through the process of measuring radiation, and this method has not existed long enough to make any definitive conclusion about what happened in the past because science cannot replicate the environmental circumstance to substanciae any rational claims beyond the present state of the atmostpheric information we have now. Certainly these theories may prove viable towards determining what to expect in the future, but thy hold no absolutes about what occured in the past. Man has no means of measuring anything that may or may not occured 1,000 years ago - let alone a billion. To many failed experiments on Carbon-14 dating has born this fact out. It is accurate to a point, but not reliable. Carbon-14 tests have been done on items, and animals that we know are contemporary - and have given evidence that they are thousands of years old.

We are still in the process of discovery on Isochronic aging - so, though scientists are excited about their discoveries, they are a little over-zealous about how factual they are beyond present observation. They have to be, else the money invested in their research would dry up. So - it is still a matter of subjective perception at best.

So - while the work being done with Mito-DNA is certainly facinating, it is being extrapolated into a system that remains theory at best in terms of Aging and cause. In the world of forensics - it is progressing by leaps and bounds.
In the realm of evolution - it remains waiting for the fossels that provide the evidence that there is evolving rom one species to another. What remains is that we still have the same fossels we had before DNA was discovered, and the continual findings have done no more to provide proof of inter-species evolution than it has since Darwin wrote his book.


Eljay, that's a whole lot of diversionary tactic being employed wouldn't you say?happy Okay, well I will bite. You claim that the age of Neanderthal man can not be accurately determined utilizing scientific means because carbon 14 dating can be fallible under certain conditions. The typical practice in determining age approximation in organic remains from archaeological sites is to utilize radiocarbon dating along with other methods. When plants fix atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) into organic material during photosynthesis they incorporate a quantity of 14C that approximately matches the level of this isotope in the atmosphere (a small difference occurs because of isotope fractionation, but this is corrected after laboratory analysis). After plants die or they are consumed by other organisms (for example, by humans or other animals) the 14C fraction of this organic material declines at a fixed exponential rate due to the radioactive decay of 14C. Comparing the remaining 14C fraction of a sample to that expected from atmospheric 14C allows the age of the sample to be estimated.

So by utilizing radiocarbon dating, paleontologists and (other research scientists) have been able to approximate a range for the existence of Neanderthal man. That is theoretically determined to be a time span of about 200,000 years ago up until about 25 ,000 years ago. Now I understand you don't accept the validity of such assertions and claims made by scientists which is absolutely your right.However, if we choose to refute such a time line in order that we appease the bible in some respect than the earliest these men could have existed was about 6000 years ago correct? You feel they ARE in fact Home sapien (modern man) in origin because that is ALL god would have bothered to create. Okay so I need to work within the confines of your own time frame. I am trying to do this the best I can because unlike yourself, I am at least attempting to bridge the gap here and take your beliefs into consideration. I do understand the theory of evolution is NOT nearly as pretty or neatly packaged as Creationism but it is considerably credible and expansive.

Okay so working along the proposed biblical time line, these Neanderthal peoples would only be about 6000 years old. God created them at the same time as Adam and Eve. So why are they physiologically so different in their appearance? How many prototypes of homo sapien did god require or need? Those are legitimate questions are they not? It was suggested by Morning Song that they ARE in fact homo sapien in genus but they look peculiar and not totally human only because their normal lifespan was 900 years and they "adapted" over the course of a lifetime. If this was indeed the case, then why do the discoveries of Neanderthal children and younger specimens already show the characteristics of the adult Neanderthal skeletons? One could look to logic for answers and speculate that this might be because Neanderthal children inherited the genetic profiles of their parents and these genes were passed on to offspring. In other words, you are seeing what they looked like as youngsters and there is no indication that their physiology would have changed over the course of a lifetime. So there is yet another question to pose. As mentioned I will wait to introduce the DNA evidence as I am still simply asking that you attempt to explain some of these problems as it relates to the biblical Creation mythology.


Diversionary tactic? I'm not sure what you mean.
I was merely explaining my rationalization for why I have a problem with the conclusions of time and age, based on the method of testing. To bring it down to a simplistic statement - I do not rationalize the attempts of assuming the amount of carbon present in the atmosphere thousands of years ago to justify the measurements of today as being viably representative of the environment back then. I don't find the theory of attempting to do this unreliable - just the assertion of it as fact. I liken it to the neilsn ratings in television as representative of the whole - or control groups as a viable representation of the whole. To me - testing or questioning a thousand people does no more to represent the 6 billion people on this planet, than drawing conclusions about who the best team in baseball is by talking to 50 Yankee fans. It is unreliable as fact. Especially - when there is conflicting opinions by scientists who have the same accreditation of those claiming their theories are fact.

As to the discussion about Neanderthal - I don't find that the difference in fossel records represent a contradiction to the theory of Intelligent design, despite the account of how long the ancients lived in the bible. The fossels of children don't change that. All I need do is see a photograph of Andre the Giant standing beside Warwick Davis (Willow) in a Hollywood photograph to know that there is a viable explination for the differences. The question becomes - are the records of the fossels contradictory (not able to exist in the same time frame) or complimentary (able to co-exist on the planet - though not necessarily in the same local).

What evidence is there to support that they could not have existed "complimentary" - without the supposition of a time line? What numbers are representative of the experimental controls? Where were the control examples excavated from?
These are all the questions that cross my mind when I read about results of these tests that date things to be billions or hundreds of thousands of years old.

As to biblical "mythology" as you put it. (And you get upset when I call evolution Myth - lets stick with theory in our posts shall we.) I can't see justifying a universe that is 4.5 billion years old with the biblical account. The theories are conflicting.


Eljay, please try to read my posed questions a little more carefully okay? I understand you do not trust the reliability of radiocarbon dating. We do not need to re-hash that over and over again. When you do this, it tends to appear that you are attempting to use some form of diversionary tactic to avoid the issues and questions posed. As I have explained the method is reliable under many circumstances and under certain conditions it is not. There have been problems associated with it. I do not think anyone ever attempted to assert that there has not been? I personally find it's level of accuracy to be quite substantial and has only improved with continued modifications. I don't believe these scientists are EVER stating that these dates are absolutely erefutable fact. Perhaps that is where your misunderstanding lies? Generally they are attempting to approximate the age of these bones and based on that they have successfully established a time line as it relates to these individual hominids and when they existed on the earth. Now Neanderthal we have a range of about 200,000 years ago up until about 30,000 years ago. So that would be are base time line for him.

However you totally glossed over where I assured you that I was willing to work within your own established biblical definition of time. Did you not read that or miss it? Either way, I am making an attempt to take your beliefs into account. I realize I can not expect the same courtesy as it relates to even the basic acceptance of the credibility of radio carbon dating but that is okay.

If Neanderthal man did in fact live only a mere 6000 years ago (feel free to rearrange those numbers if you like) then the assumption could be made that he was created about the same time as Adam and Eve correct? You can change the time frame if you think possibly Neanderthal was created either before A+E or after or whatever. So I still need to ask the question why would the physiology of the Neanderthal be so different? Its not merely a matter of one being taller or one being shorter as in the cited case of the pygmy but their entire skeletal and cranial capacity is divergent. So that is one issue right there. Now it was mentioned that perhaps they simply just "adapted" over the course of a 900 year typical lifespan for this period. Well the only issue with that is it clearly is not fully taking into account the definition of adaptation and secondly these Neanderthal children. We have a range of ages. Neanderthal children look the same and are already beginning to show the characteristics of the adult Neanderthal. So what does that mean? Now god perhaps could have created something other than Homo Sapien could he not? Is that totally outside of the realm of possibility? I will let you answer that.

You were aware that Homo sapien and Neanderthal coexisted correct? Their time lines actually over lapped. However now, what we know of as Neanderthal man has become extinct. That poses yet another question. Why would god create a people only to select them for extinction? Im sorry, the use of the term "Biblical Mythology " was not intended to insult you in any way. It is a designation assigned in Cultural Anthropology. Were you not aware that nearly every discovered people throughout the planet has some form of creation mythology? How is the bible different in that respect? Thats not the point however. Please focus on the issues at hand if you don't mind. The excavation sites have been located in France but also Iran, Iraq and Germany to name some others. The name Neanderthal comes from the site near Duesseldorf, Germany in the Neander Valley.Eljay I am not asking that you accept that any of these fossilized remains are billions of years old. Please focus. Neanderthal is felt to be a recent ancestor of homo sapien or modern man. As stated he was on the scene only about 200,000 years ago. I even took into account that your belief system limits us to a mere 6000 years and I am totally willing to work within the confines of these beliefs. We aren't in the lab here I understand.


Okay - lets put the dating methods aside for now, as they present arguments outside what were focusing on. Correct me if I'm wrong, but are you proposing that God created Neanderthal in addition to A&E, and that A&E are representative of Homosapein - thus, two distinctly different races? I don't see this. I would think that the fossels that date up to 6000 (and beyond) would be decendants of A&E - and that the "adaptation/evolution" into Homosapein is what we have today. I take my logical reasoning from the events of scripture, because I don't find an inconsistancy there, nor do I consider other theories more viable to supplant it.

A major event which effects what we are discussing here is the flood. Examining the supposition that a worldwide flood occured accounts for a lot of the answers to the questions asked. It would account for the eventual extinction of Neanderthal, as only 8 people survived the flood. This was a catoclismic event, which would account for the large amount of fossels located in central area's. Archology has never been an interest of mine - other than extremely casual, so I am not privey to how extensive it has become - only what I catch on the discovery station from time to time, and remember as well, that my academic life was over in the early 70's, so a lot of what is taught in schools, and university today, are by professors I likely would have taught in my math classes. Anyway - not only would the flood have eliminated large numbers of animals we now know to be extinct (dinosaurs, etc) - but by and large the entire population of man with the exception of 8 people. After the time of the flood, man's time on earth was greatly reduced. Man no longer lived to be 900 years old on average - but steadily decreased from the time of Noah - through to Abraham - so that the expected age had reduced to less than 200 years, and eventually to about 80. Of course we know that by the time we reached the middle ages - seeing 50 was considered a blessing. There is no real explination for why the radical decline in the umber of years for man on the planet, but it is evident that there had to be a radical change in the way that amn ages, as well as physicality. But this is just a conclusion I reason out by what I observe in the bibical account.

It would follow logically that the locations of where the fossels were found are in the eastern portion of the hemisphere, as after the flood, man was dispersed from Babel by God. The whole occurance of Babel, and it's history account for a lot of the explinations as to why we find animal fossels all over the world, but man seems to be more centralized in terms of the older fossels. Anyway...

So I don't see that the fossels of adults and children matter that much. This explination of the difference in physicality was not something I introduced - or consider a biblical perspective. I think it was MS who brought it up, and it was just her idea of explaining the difference. I see it more as a transitional occurance as the result of man's days being less in number after the flood. I do think that the occurance of the flood is a majot time-line event fr a radical change in man's physique, the atmospheric make-up, and radical changes to the topography of the earth. I have seen the terain of New Mexico, and the grand canyon from the ground and the sky, and it is obvious that something happened.

I'm sort of writing as a stream of consciousness here, and I think I've explained how I've formulated my opinion here. If I missed adressing something - I'll get it on another post.


Yes, well since you are not willing to accept that Neanderthal man first lived on the Earth about 200,000 years ago then the only position I can assume that you are taking is he must ONLY be 6000 years at the oldest and perhaps even created around the same time as Adam and Eve. Correct me if I'm wrong but when else would god had made him if we are indeed forced to work within the confines of the biblical time line.

Well it is your assertion that Adam and Eve are representative of Homo sapien sapien or modern day man because that is what you have concluded on another post. If you wish to change that position now, it is fine but please explain what genus Adam and Eve are if not Homo Sapien. I always assumed that the bible's position was that god made humans fully formed and as we appear today. In that case, Neanderthal still poses a problem because he is not Homo Sapien. So I ask, why did god make him exactly and when? What about Cro Magnon man?45,000 to 10,000 years ago in the Upper Paleolithic. He is even later on the time line. How would you explain the changes that are occurring between the skulls of Neanderthal and Cro Magnon? Cro Magnon has little to no brow ridge and he has the characteristically high forehead like homo sapien. Cro-Magnon man is also slender in build and stands upright. He does not have the exaggerated, flaring ribcage either, nor the wide pelvis. Neanderthal females would have needed that pelvis in order to give birth to those infants. As noted Homo sapien females would have had a hard time in labor attempting to give birth to these babies with such massive heads This is a plausible explanation for the eventual extinction of Neanderthal. In following in line with adaptation and the ability to pass one's genetic profile onto successive generations.. We are getting closer aren't we? Why are these changes happening gradually if Neanderthal died in a big flood? We can stick with Neanderthal until we can identify his genus and where he came from. The questions naturally arise of not only what are Adam and Eve, but what is Neanderthal and what are these other hominids exacttly? Why are we seeing a slow and gradual change in the physiology?

Okay if we accept that the flood actually did occur which I don't doubt that it may have but in a localized region, how would that ensure the immediate death of ALL Neanderthal? Besides, in order for Neanderthal to "adapt" and become physiologically akin to homo sapien wouldn't he require the time since creation nearly 6000 years ago to become homo sapien? Otherwise, yes okay we could go with your theory that the flood was worldwide and killed Neanderthal in the course of a singular cataclysmic event but then that still leaves you with not having an explanation of what he is? Even if you do not believe he is anything other than homo sapien, we understand from his skeletal structure that he is substantially different and by all accounts had a different mode of existence than these other 6000 year old humans. So why would god have created something totally different and not quite the same as homo sapien (Adam and Eve) It would appear that you are working VERY hard to smash square pegs into round holes in order to accommodate this annoying hominid specimen. Im only requiring you to look at the easiest and most logical explanation first. Actually that's another question for you since you mentioned fossil remains. Shouldn't all of Neanderthals excavated encampments and tools and skulls and bones and pottery and children and burial grounds all be located somewhere in the Middle East or the biblical Cradle of Civilization? Some sites were in Iran and Iraq but others have been found in Europe and Asia because it believed that he migrated and was able to break off into several bands.

There is no reason to believe that these early humans lived to be 900 years of age and for the hard life of Neanderthal, seeing 40 might have been considered rare. However I promised you I would TAKE everything into account. So far that Neanderthal could only be about 6000 years old, that he could have possibly perished in a flood, and whatever biblical parameters and restrictions you would like to enforce on this early descendant of man. The problem is he isn't going away and there is no easy way to explain what he is.

Okay so you are flip flopping here in your explanations. First you are attempting to explain the extinction of Neanderthal in terms of the great flood of Noah. So that would imply that Neanderthal was a descendant of Adam and Eve and existed prior to the flood correct? But then you must have lost track of that assertion because next you try to insert that the only reason we see this significant differential in terms of body structure is due to the atmospheric and climate changes that occurred POST flood. So that would mean you are now trying to say that Neanderthal was actually descended of Noah and his family and the story in the bible from that point on as it relates to repopulating the earth. Also, if we accept your theory that Neanderthal actually came into existence as being descendants of Noah's lineage and not Adam and Eve, and the normal human life span was decreasing by that time, that would give him even less time to adapt correct and become more homo-sapien like in appearance? Morning Song was at least giving him 900 years. You are essentially saying that it just depended on the topography and where those Neanderthal babies were born and that would determine their sloping brow ridge or longer arms or flared rib cages, or elongated cranium. Let me explain that "adaptation" is subject to reproduction and passing one's genetic profile onto that of offspring. It does not occur during the course of one life time, be that life time, 40 years, 80 or 900 years.

I understand you were sleepy so just get to it on another post.

Redykeulous's photo
Fri 09/05/08 07:32 AM
OH NO THERE'S NOT HAND CLAPPING EMOTICON.... ARGHHH..


HERE ARE ALL THE BEST ONES I COULD FIND.

:wink: :wink: :wink:
smokin smokin smokin
drinker drinker drinker
bigsmile bigsmile bigsmile
biggrin biggrin biggrin

and finally:

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

and a big "BRAVO"

Good job hanging in there Krimsa. Excellently thought out, condsiderate of previous posts and very well put together.

I have to say, my creativity is stumped, I will be impressed to hear any creative responces that follow your last post.



Krimsa's photo
Fri 09/05/08 07:49 AM
Edited by Krimsa on Fri 09/05/08 07:50 AM
Oh one other thing. Can you tell me which one of Noah's relatives would have passed on these anatomical traits to his subsequent generations?


* Cranial
o Suprainiac fossa, a groove above the inion
o Occipital bun, a protuberance of the occipital bone which looks like a hair knot
o Projecting mid-face
o Low, flat, elongated skull
o A flat basicranium
o Supraorbital torus, a prominent, trabecular (spongy) brow ridge
o 1200-1750 cm³ skull capacity (10% greater than modern human average)
o Lack of a protruding chin (mental protuberance; although later specimens possess a slight protuberance)
o Crest on the mastoid process behind the ear opening
o No groove on canine teeth
o A retromolar space posterior to the third molar
o Bony projections on the sides of the nasal opening
o Distinctive shape of the bony labyrinth in the ear
o Larger mental foramen in mandible for facial blood supply
o Broad, projecting nose
* Sub-cranial
o Considerably more robust
o Large round finger tips
o Barrel-shaped rib cage
o Large kneecaps
o Long collar bones
o Short, bowed shoulder blades
o Thick, bowed shaft of the thigh bones
o Short shinbones and calf bones
o Long, gracile pelvic pubis (superior pubic ramus)
o Bowed Femur

Eljay's photo
Fri 09/05/08 11:23 AM
Krimsa;

I edited out the beginning of this cause the posts are getting huge. I'll take it from here.


Yes, well since you are not willing to accept that Neanderthal man first lived on the Earth about 200,000 years ago then the only position I can assume that you are taking is he must ONLY be 6000 years at the oldest and perhaps even created around the same time as Adam and Eve. Correct me if I'm wrong but when else would god had made him if we are indeed forced to work within the confines of the biblical time line.


I think that it best to recap here, since it appears that this discussion is expanding with each post.

I think that we can establish as fact - that we have these fossel remains which by consenses - we will call "Neanderthal". Determining the age of "Nea" is presumptuous - as we have no means of travelling back in time to substanciate our claims. The same would be said of "cause". I will let you speak of your pesumptions on cause for yourself - but here are mine.

I contend that man was created once. First Adam, and Eve from his rib. Whether this was 6,000 years ago, or 600,000 years would not change this.
I tend to go with 6,000 (or so), prefering for the time being to shade towards literal interpretation of the numbers in scripture - but I'm not beyond entertaining other theories on this. I'm just not up to spead on the Old World creationist axioms. Anyway - this would demonstrate that the idea of God creating Neanderthol, and A&E as homosapien, as two different events a contradiction for me. I have never stated, or felt otherwise. Therefore - Neanderthol - by logic - would be a descendant of Adam & Eve, and since there is only one event of creation - by extension, allowing for your presumption that Neanderthol came first - this would mean A&E were Neanderthols, and not Homosapien. The only other option that would be acceptable within the confinds of my stated presumption, is that there is no difference between Neanderthol and Homosapien, beyond drawing an analogy of the difference between the physique of a caucasion and an oriental.


Well it is your assertion that Adam and Eve are representative of Homo sapien sapien or modern day man because that is what you have concluded on another post. If you wish to change that position now, it is fine but please explain what genus Adam and Eve are if not Homo Sapien. I always assumed that the bible's position was that god made humans fully formed and as we appear today. In that case, Neanderthal still poses a problem because he is not Homo Sapien. So I ask, why did god make him exactly and when? What about Cro Magnon man?45,000 to 10,000 years ago in the Upper Paleolithic. He is even later on the time line. How would you explain the changes that are occurring between the skulls of Neanderthal and Cro Magnon? Cro Magnon has little to no brow ridge and he has the characteristically high forehead like homo sapien. Cro-Magnon man is also slender in build and stands upright. He does not have the exaggerated, flaring ribcage either, nor the wide pelvis. Neanderthal females would have needed that pelvis in order to give birth to those infants. As noted Homo sapien females would have had a hard time in labor attempting to give birth to these babies with such massive heads This is a plausible explanation for the eventual extinction of Neanderthal. In following in line with adaptation and the ability to pass one's genetic profile onto successive generations.. We are getting closer aren't we? Why are these changes happening gradually if Neanderthal died in a big flood? We can stick with Neanderthal until we can identify his genus and where he came from. The questions naturally arise of not only what are Adam and Eve, but what is Neanderthal and what are these other hominids exacttly? Why are we seeing a slow and gradual change in the physiology?


As previously stated - my presumptions are that Neanderthol are descendant from A&E as priori. So the assertion that A&E is homosapien only serves the purpose of not recognizing Neanderthol as either preceeding H.S. or that there is no definitve distinction between the two, as is presumed in evolution. Again, I tend to find the differences in physicality more in line with the differences we find today within the races - than I do for the need to have adapted from one Eon/Age to the next.

The distinction of what happened due to the flood, is that 3 facts are known.
1) the Majority of the decendants of A&E did not survive the flood - with the exception of 8 people.
2) That the expected life span of man decreased steadily, and rapidly. Fom an average of 900 pre-flood - to 200 up until Abraham, and to 80 Up until David and desreased until the middle ages, only increasing in the modern age with the advent of medical procedures and drugs discovered to prolong life and fight disease.
3) That up until the time of Babel - only one language was spoken on earth, and rather than disperse throughout the land and increase, man congregated. Causing language to be confused, and forced dispersement, and abandonment of building the tower of Babel.

My presumption here is that - despite what labels we assign to the fossels - Cro magnon, Homo-sapien, whatever... The radical change in life-span, eventual change of atmospheric environment, and forced dispersion would account for the changing and adapting of the physicality of man, which is often sighted for the differences in physiques between Caucasion, Oriental, Arab, and Negro populations. So it would be expected that we find variants in the fossel records - for the ame reasons we see them in man today. However - I don't presume to have an adequate explination for this - beyond the premises of modern day science.


Okay if we accept that the flood actually did occur which I don't doubt that it may have but in a localized region, how would that ensure the immediate death of ALL Neanderthal? Besides, in order for Neanderthal to "adapt" and become physiologically akin to homo sapien wouldn't he require the time since creation nearly 6000 years ago to become homo sapien? Otherwise, yes okay we could go with your theory that the flood was worldwide and killed Neanderthal in the course of a singular cataclysmic event but then that still leaves you with not having an explanation of what he is? Even if you do not believe he is anything other than homo sapien, we understand from his skeletal structure that he is substantially different and by all accounts had a different mode of existence than these other 6000 year old humans. So why would god have created something totally different and not quite the same as homo sapien (Adam and Eve) It would appear that you are working VERY hard to smash square pegs into round holes in order to accommodate this annoying hominid specimen. Im only requiring you to look at the easiest and most logical explanation first. Actually that's another question for you since you mentioned fossil remains. Shouldn't all of Neanderthals excavated encampments and tools and skulls and bones and pottery and children and burial grounds all be located somewhere in the Middle East or the biblical Cradle of Civilization? Some sites were in Iran and Iraq but others have been found in Europe and Asia because it believed that he migrated and was able to break off into several bands.


Here again - we have a difference in the presumption of time. What would be evidenced from the flood is that whatever variance occured from the creation of A&E till Noah and the other 7 boarded the arc, would have perished in the flood. So, by natural reasoning, Noah and his decendants would now be what would be considered Homo-sapien if the presumption of keeping the labels distinct is to be held to. As to the dispersement of fossels - this would have been a natural occurance due to the dispersement at Babel. It is not clear though, as to how far the ancients (pre-flood) dispersed, as the account of Genesis narrows it's focus to that of Noah, and the generations through to Abraham. All we have of an account in Genesis is that evil had spread throughout the land, and that man had essentially become wicked. So no clear distinction outside of subjective assumptions can be determined concerning where the fossels were located.


There is no reason to believe that these early humans lived to be 900 years of age and for the hard life of Neanderthal, seeing 40 might have been considered rare. However I promised you I would TAKE everything into account. So far that Neanderthal could only be about 6000 years old, that he could have possibly perished in a flood, and whatever biblical parameters and restrictions you would like to enforce on this early descendant of man. The problem is he isn't going away and there is no easy way to explain what he is.


Well - in order to reject the presumptions of their being decendants of A&E, it does not suffice to merely come up with another presumption, that is not sufficent to deny the axioms - what is needed to reject a presumption is to show cause why the presumption is an impossibility due to the claims of the presumption, as opposed to the validity of assumed presumptions that oppose it. Generally though - it can often be demonstrated that only one of the opposing presumptions has the ability to be viable, however assurtion of viability remains subjective at best.


Okay so you are flip flopping here in your explanations. First you are attempting to explain the extinction of Neanderthal in terms of the great flood of Noah. So that would imply that Neanderthal was a descendant of Adam and Eve and existed prior to the flood correct? But then you must have lost track of that assertion because next you try to insert that the only reason we see this significant differential in terms of body structure is due to the atmospheric and climate changes that occurred POST flood. So that would mean you are now trying to say that Neanderthal was actually descended of Noah and his family and the story in the bible from that point on as it relates to repopulating the earth. Also, if we accept your theory that Neanderthal actually came into existence as being descendants of Noah's lineage and not Adam and Eve, and the normal human life span was decreasing by that time, that would give him even less time to adapt correct and become more homo-sapien like in appearance? Morning Song was at least giving him 900 years. You are essentially saying that it just depended on the topography and where those Neanderthal babies were born and that would determine their sloping brow ridge or longer arms or flared rib cages, or elongated cranium. Let me explain that "adaptation" is subject to reproduction and passing one's genetic profile onto that of offspring. It does not occur during the course of one life time, be that life time, 40 years, 80 or 900 years.

I understand you were sleepy so just get to it on another post.


No. Neanderthol would not be a decendant of Noah in our scenario. This would be contradictory to what I have been stating. Either there was previous misunderstanding of perspective on your part, or a typing error on mine. (Not unlikely since I have a tendency to word my mix up all the time, and obviously, I can't spell - nor type.)
The difference in genetic anomolies could happen within one or two generations depending on the genome mapping of the parents and cross breeding.
Of course the difficulty here is the lack of sheer numbers of the control group for DNA testing, due to the limitation of fossel records.
There's no way to determine if the information of any genome tested is one that represents all of the potential information, or if there has been information lost within the genomes of the fossels to determine where that fossel falls into the generational time-line. Here, any explination is only going to be subjective due to a serious lack of onmncience on either of our parts. Therefore, it remains difficult to assess the factual evidence and the DNA it provides with any certainty - due to what is missing to assure an adequeste control group.

As a side note - It is encouraging to note though, that the world view on the necessity of the ongoing excavation of the middle east and beyond has eased tremendously in just the last half century. But - it will take vast numbers of people, and unlimited co-operation of what remains as hostile countries to continue the research. I look forward to additional findings to expand the control groups of these presumptions, so that it does not remain so subjective, for it limits any viable discussion because of it.

lj

Krimsa's photo
Fri 09/05/08 12:25 PM
Edited by Krimsa on Fri 09/05/08 12:33 PM

Krimsa;

I edited out the beginning of this cause the posts are getting huge. I'll take it from here.


Yes, well since you are not willing to accept that Neanderthal man first lived on the Earth about 200,000 years ago then the only position I can assume that you are taking is he must ONLY be 6000 years at the oldest and perhaps even created around the same time as Adam and Eve. Correct me if I'm wrong but when else would god had made him if we are indeed forced to work within the confines of the biblical time line.


I think that it best to recap here, since it appears that this discussion is expanding with each post.

I think that we can establish as fact - that we have these fossel remains which by consenses - we will call "Neanderthal". Determining the age of "Nea" is presumptuous - as we have no means of travelling back in time to substanciate our claims. The same would be said of "cause". I will let you speak of your pesumptions on cause for yourself - but here are mine.

I contend that man was created once. First Adam, and Eve from his rib. Whether this was 6,000 years ago, or 600,000 years would not change this.
I tend to go with 6,000 (or so), prefering for the time being to shade towards literal interpretation of the numbers in scripture - but I'm not beyond entertaining other theories on this. I'm just not up to spead on the Old World creationist axioms. Anyway - this would demonstrate that the idea of God creating Neanderthol, and A&E as homosapien, as two different events a contradiction for me. I have never stated, or felt otherwise. Therefore - Neanderthol - by logic - would be a descendant of Adam & Eve, and since there is only one event of creation - by extension, allowing for your presumption that Neanderthol came first - this would mean A&E were Neanderthols, and not Homosapien. The only other option that would be acceptable within the confinds of my stated presumption, is that there is no difference between Neanderthol and Homosapien, beyond drawing an analogy of the difference between the physique of a caucasion and an oriental.


Well it is your assertion that Adam and Eve are representative of Homo sapien sapien or modern day man because that is what you have concluded on another post. If you wish to change that position now, it is fine but please explain what genus Adam and Eve are if not Homo Sapien. I always assumed that the bible's position was that god made humans fully formed and as we appear today. In that case, Neanderthal still poses a problem because he is not Homo Sapien. So I ask, why did god make him exactly and when? What about Cro Magnon man?45,000 to 10,000 years ago in the Upper Paleolithic. He is even later on the time line. How would you explain the changes that are occurring between the skulls of Neanderthal and Cro Magnon? Cro Magnon has little to no brow ridge and he has the characteristically high forehead like homo sapien. Cro-Magnon man is also slender in build and stands upright. He does not have the exaggerated, flaring ribcage either, nor the wide pelvis. Neanderthal females would have needed that pelvis in order to give birth to those infants. As noted Homo sapien females would have had a hard time in labor attempting to give birth to these babies with such massive heads This is a plausible explanation for the eventual extinction of Neanderthal. In following in line with adaptation and the ability to pass one's genetic profile onto successive generations.. We are getting closer aren't we? Why are these changes happening gradually if Neanderthal died in a big flood? We can stick with Neanderthal until we can identify his genus and where he came from. The questions naturally arise of not only what are Adam and Eve, but what is Neanderthal and what are these other hominids exacttly? Why are we seeing a slow and gradual change in the physiology?


As previously stated - my presumptions are that Neanderthol are descendant from A&E as priori. So the assertion that A&E is homosapien only serves the purpose of not recognizing Neanderthol as either preceeding H.S. or that there is no definitve distinction between the two, as is presumed in evolution. Again, I tend to find the differences in physicality more in line with the differences we find today within the races - than I do for the need to have adapted from one Eon/Age to the next.

The distinction of what happened due to the flood, is that 3 facts are known.
1) the Majority of the decendants of A&E did not survive the flood - with the exception of 8 people.
2) That the expected life span of man decreased steadily, and rapidly. Fom an average of 900 pre-flood - to 200 up until Abraham, and to 80 Up until David and desreased until the middle ages, only increasing in the modern age with the advent of medical procedures and drugs discovered to prolong life and fight disease.
3) That up until the time of Babel - only one language was spoken on earth, and rather than disperse throughout the land and increase, man congregated. Causing language to be confused, and forced dispersement, and abandonment of building the tower of Babel.

My presumption here is that - despite what labels we assign to the fossels - Cro magnon, Homo-sapien, whatever... The radical change in life-span, eventual change of atmospheric environment, and forced dispersion would account for the changing and adapting of the physicality of man, which is often sighted for the differences in physiques between Caucasion, Oriental, Arab, and Negro populations. So it would be expected that we find variants in the fossel records - for the ame reasons we see them in man today. However - I don't presume to have an adequate explination for this - beyond the premises of modern day science.


Okay if we accept that the flood actually did occur which I don't doubt that it may have but in a localized region, how would that ensure the immediate death of ALL Neanderthal? Besides, in order for Neanderthal to "adapt" and become physiologically akin to homo sapien wouldn't he require the time since creation nearly 6000 years ago to become homo sapien? Otherwise, yes okay we could go with your theory that the flood was worldwide and killed Neanderthal in the course of a singular cataclysmic event but then that still leaves you with not having an explanation of what he is? Even if you do not believe he is anything other than homo sapien, we understand from his skeletal structure that he is substantially different and by all accounts had a different mode of existence than these other 6000 year old humans. So why would god have created something totally different and not quite the same as homo sapien (Adam and Eve) It would appear that you are working VERY hard to smash square pegs into round holes in order to accommodate this annoying hominid specimen. Im only requiring you to look at the easiest and most logical explanation first. Actually that's another question for you since you mentioned fossil remains. Shouldn't all of Neanderthals excavated encampments and tools and skulls and bones and pottery and children and burial grounds all be located somewhere in the Middle East or the biblical Cradle of Civilization? Some sites were in Iran and Iraq but others have been found in Europe and Asia because it believed that he migrated and was able to break off into several bands.


Here again - we have a difference in the presumption of time. What would be evidenced from the flood is that whatever variance occured from the creation of A&E till Noah and the other 7 boarded the arc, would have perished in the flood. So, by natural reasoning, Noah and his decendants would now be what would be considered Homo-sapien if the presumption of keeping the labels distinct is to be held to. As to the dispersement of fossels - this would have been a natural occurance due to the dispersement at Babel. It is not clear though, as to how far the ancients (pre-flood) dispersed, as the account of Genesis narrows it's focus to that of Noah, and the generations through to Abraham. All we have of an account in Genesis is that evil had spread throughout the land, and that man had essentially become wicked. So no clear distinction outside of subjective assumptions can be determined concerning where the fossels were located.


There is no reason to believe that these early humans lived to be 900 years of age and for the hard life of Neanderthal, seeing 40 might have been considered rare. However I promised you I would TAKE everything into account. So far that Neanderthal could only be about 6000 years old, that he could have possibly perished in a flood, and whatever biblical parameters and restrictions you would like to enforce on this early descendant of man. The problem is he isn't going away and there is no easy way to explain what he is.


Well - in order to reject the presumptions of their being decendants of A&E, it does not suffice to merely come up with another presumption, that is not sufficent to deny the axioms - what is needed to reject a presumption is to show cause why the presumption is an impossibility due to the claims of the presumption, as opposed to the validity of assumed presumptions that oppose it. Generally though - it can often be demonstrated that only one of the opposing presumptions has the ability to be viable, however assurtion of viability remains subjective at best.


Okay so you are flip flopping here in your explanations. First you are attempting to explain the extinction of Neanderthal in terms of the great flood of Noah. So that would imply that Neanderthal was a descendant of Adam and Eve and existed prior to the flood correct? But then you must have lost track of that assertion because next you try to insert that the only reason we see this significant differential in terms of body structure is due to the atmospheric and climate changes that occurred POST flood. So that would mean you are now trying to say that Neanderthal was actually descended of Noah and his family and the story in the bible from that point on as it relates to repopulating the earth. Also, if we accept your theory that Neanderthal actually came into existence as being descendants of Noah's lineage and not Adam and Eve, and the normal human life span was decreasing by that time, that would give him even less time to adapt correct and become more homo-sapien like in appearance? Morning Song was at least giving him 900 years. You are essentially saying that it just depended on the topography and where those Neanderthal babies were born and that would determine their sloping brow ridge or longer arms or flared rib cages, or elongated cranium. Let me explain that "adaptation" is subject to reproduction and passing one's genetic profile onto that of offspring. It does not occur during the course of one life time, be that life time, 40 years, 80 or 900 years.

I understand you were sleepy so just get to it on another post.


No. Neanderthol would not be a decendant of Noah in our scenario. This would be contradictory to what I have been stating. Either there was previous misunderstanding of perspective on your part, or a typing error on mine. (Not unlikely since I have a tendency to word my mix up all the time, and obviously, I can't spell - nor type.)
The difference in genetic anomalies could happen within one or two generations depending on the genome mapping of the parents and cross breeding.
Of course the difficulty here is the lack of sheer numbers of the control group for DNA testing, due to the limitation of fossel records.
There's no way to determine if the information of any genome tested is one that represents all of the potential information, or if there has been information lost within the genomes of the fossels to determine where that fossel falls into the generational time-line. Here, any explination is only going to be subjective due to a serious lack of onmncience on either of our parts. Therefore, it remains difficult to assess the factual evidence and the DNA it provides with any certainty - due to what is missing to assure an adequeste control group.


As a side note - It is encouraging to note though, that the world view on the necessity of the ongoing excavation of the middle east and beyond has eased tremendously in just the last half century. But - it will take vast numbers of people, and unlimited co-operation of what remains as hostile countries to continue the research. I look forward to additional findings to expand the control groups of these presumptions, so that it does not remain so subjective, for it limits any viable discussion because of it.

lj


Well If that is contradictory to what you are stating then by all means try to formulate some kind of an opinion if you would like. The questions that have been posed to you thus far are:

What genus would Neanderthal fall into? I only assumed that you had asserted that he was homo sapien because Adam and Eve are homo sapien and Noah and his lineage are homo sapien.

When would Neanderthal have existed on earth?The paleontologists have a theory based on credible research that would give him a range of 200,000 years and as recently as 30,000 years. I would agree with this premise. I am assuming that you disagree with it in some respect. If you do, please explain when Neanderthal man came into existence and for how long did he live. We are both just hypothesizing here so I dont see the harm. Also, of what direct line is he descended since now you are claiming that it was not Adam and Eve, nor Noah and his family.


Your insistence that the difference in the physical traits between homo sapien and Neanderthal are nothing more than genetic anomalies does not explain why an entire group of people would share these characteristics and pass them from generation to generation. (Please see the list of physiological differences between Neanderthal and homo sapien that was posted). Also, how would you explain these same differences in physiology manifesting themselves in specimens found in various locations through out the world?

There is actually a fair amount of recovered Neanderthal fossil specimens available, including, as you have already been introduced to, children of varying ages who are already showing the characteristic of the adult Neanderthal. A humorous bone sample was taken. It was determined that the amino acid levels were at 20% to 73% of those in modern bone, evidencing DNA survival.

Also how would you explain the difference between Neanderthal and Cro magnon man as we inch closer towards homo sapien. Is he also yet another anomalie?

I am not claiming any "omniscience" on my part here. Were you in some respect? I am uncomfortable with those terms as it smacks of some kind of god like influence. I am simply a human here who is presenting these various issues for your assessment with strong supportive evidence on my side. I am asking that you rebut in some fashion or formulate an argument that would successfully diffuse its credibility as it has been presented thus far.

Lord_Psycho's photo
Fri 09/05/08 12:59 PM
dinosaurs were used in The Flintstones Movies!! and dinosaurs RULE!!!

Krimsa's photo
Fri 09/05/08 01:06 PM

dinosaurs were used in The Flintstones Movies!! and dinosaurs RULE!!!


Incidentally, I feel like its a bad idea to be re-introducing dinosaurs into a modern environment and setting. I agree with the line from "Jurassic Park"

"They had their shot and nature selected them for extinction for a reason."

If someone had paid closer attention to that guy, then far fewer humans would have been consumed over the course of that film. Just my two cents.

Eljay's photo
Fri 09/05/08 01:30 PM


Well If that is contradictory to what you are stating then by all means try to formulate some kind of an opinion if you would like. The questions that have been posed to you thus far are:

What genus would Neanderthal fall into? I only assumed that you had asserted that he was homo sapien because Adam and Eve are homo sapien and Noah and his lineage are homo sapien.

When would Neanderthal have existed on earth?The paleontologists have a theory based on credible research that would give him a range of 200,000 years and as recently as 30,000 years. I would agree with this premise. I am assuming that you disagree with it in some respect. If you do, please explain when Neanderthal man came into existence and for how long did he live. We are both just hypothesizing here so I dont see the harm. Also, of what direct line is he descended since now you are claiming that it was not Adam and Eve, nor Noah and his family.


Your insistence that the difference in the physical traits between homo sapien and Neanderthal are nothing more than genetic anomalies does not explain why an entire group of people would share these characteristics and pass them from generation to generation. (Please see the list of physiological differences between Neanderthal and homo sapien that was posted). Also, how would you explain these same differences in physiology manifesting themselves in specimens found in various locations through out the world?

There is actually a fair amount of recovered Neanderthal fossil specimens available, including, as you have already been introduced to, children of varying ages who are already showing the characteristic of the adult Neanderthal. A humorous bone sample was taken. It was determined that the amino acid levels were at 20% to 73% of those in modern bone, evidencing DNA survival.

Also how would you explain the difference between Neanderthal and Cro magnon man as we inch closer towards homo sapien. Is he also yet another anomalie?

I am not claiming any "omniscience" on my part here. Were you in some respect? I am uncomfortable with those terms as it smacks of some kind of god like influence. I am simply a human here who is presenting these various issues for your assessment with strong supportive evidence on my side. I am asking that you rebut in some fashion or formulate an argument that would successfully diffuse its credibility as it has been presented thus far.


Krimsa;

In light of what I stated in my last post, and the presumptions that I tend to agree with, I have to admit that I'm not really "up to speed" to respond adequately to the specificity of some of the questions you are asking. Remember now - I't been well over 35 years since I spent any time learning this, and my concentration was Math and theaer - not science. DNA wasn't even on the radar screen back in those days, and the thought of going to a store and bringing home a movie to watch on the television set - was an idea out of the Twilight Zone. When I was learning about this - te 8 track hadn't been invented yet. So - you'll have to forgive me if I admit that I can do no more than respond off the top of my head on these matters, because I'm just not "up to speed" as they say.

However - that is not to say that I don't find our discussion enlightening, and certainly interesting. I'm just afraid that I'm severely limited in my recall to even remember what Cro magnon man was. I would be more than willing to catch up on some of this stuff if you sould recommend some web-sights that will give me a quick overview of what we are discussing, and their positioning in the evolutionary time line (as obviously - there are no biblical references for these terms) and I would be better equipped to correspond on the terms with my presumptions from the biblical texts. Right now - I've pretty much stated all that I know based on my rememberances of Neanderthol and Homosapiens.

I would say though, as to something you stated in the first paragraph here - that the term "genus" is not one that would enter into my mode of thinking, as my perspective on Neanderthol and Homosapien is that of generiational, and not genus. I'm not sure how my definition or understanding would fall into a genus classification. To my understanding - The corresondence between Neanderthol and Homosapien, and it would follow for any of the genus - is relational. Depending upon the acceptable premises we establish, I would have one or the other as a descendant of the preceeding. That is what I have established in my presumption. Is this going to take us along parallel lines of missunderstanding? Do you follow my point here?

As to the statement of omniscience - it was just one of clear obviousness. Neither one of us, or anyone for that matter, can go back in time to witness the events that occured to bring about these radical differences in physiological makeup of the differnet fossels that have been discovered. It is for this reason, that whatever we might chose to believe is always going to be from the standpoint of a world view, no matter how logical the presumptions might appear. All we have before us is the fossels themselves - the why or when is always going to remain subjective.
But I agree with you - investigating the possibilities certainly can't hurt, and no shortage of knowledge can be aquired.

hinkypoepoe's photo
Fri 09/05/08 01:54 PM


dinosaurs were used in The Flintstones Movies!! and dinosaurs RULE!!!


Incidentally, I feel like its a bad idea to be re-introducing dinosaurs into a modern environment and setting. I agree with the line from "Jurassic Park"

"They had their shot and nature selected them for extinction for a reason."

If someone had paid closer attention to that guy, then far fewer humans would have been consumed over the course of that film. Just my two cents.


Did'nt a big rock fall on them.........I'M BACK SUGAR!

Krimsa's photo
Fri 09/05/08 02:07 PM
Edited by Krimsa on Fri 09/05/08 02:07 PM
Alright fair enough. You just want to do a search for Cro-Magnon. I cant recommend any good web sites but Im sure there are many. Go to the American Museum of Natural History. Im actually referencing some of my old text books here. So much for recent information. :tongue: As far as the actual designations, you can use this:

Neaderthal- Pleistocene species of the Homo genus (Homo neanderthalensis or Homo sapiens neanderthalensis) which inhabited Europe and parts of western and central Asia. The first proto-Neanderthal traits appeared in Europe as early as 500-350 thousand years ago. By 130,000 years ago, complete Neanderthal characteristics had appeared, and disappeared from Asia by 50,000 years ago and Europe by 30,000 years ago.


Cro-Magnon & "Moderns"-About 25,000 BCE until around 10,000 BCE. Cro-Magnon is one of the main types of Homo sapiens of the European Upper Paleolithic. It is named after the cave of Crô-Magnon in southwest France, where the first specimen was found.


no photo
Fri 09/05/08 02:50 PM
"Neaderthal Code" premiers Sunday on cable television. They said that "we previously thought they died out, but that they may still exist in our DNA in humans today.

Should be interesting. On my t.v. it is channel 49 comcast cable.

hinkypoepoe's photo
Fri 09/05/08 02:56 PM


Krimsa;

I edited out the beginning of this cause the posts are getting huge. I'll take it from here.


Yes, well since you are not willing to accept that Neanderthal man first lived on the Earth about 200,000 years ago then the only position I can assume that you are taking is he must ONLY be 6000 years at the oldest and perhaps even created around the same time as Adam and Eve. Correct me if I'm wrong but when else would god had made him if we are indeed forced to work within the confines of the biblical time line.


I think that it best to recap here, since it appears that this discussion is expanding with each post.

I think that we can establish as fact - that we have these fossel remains which by consenses - we will call "Neanderthal". Determining the age of "Nea" is presumptuous - as we have no means of travelling back in time to substanciate our claims. The same would be said of "cause". I will let you speak of your pesumptions on cause for yourself - but here are mine.

I contend that man was created once. First Adam, and Eve from his rib. Whether this was 6,000 years ago, or 600,000 years would not change this.
I tend to go with 6,000 (or so), prefering for the time being to shade towards literal interpretation of the numbers in scripture - but I'm not beyond entertaining other theories on this. I'm just not up to spead on the Old World creationist axioms. Anyway - this would demonstrate that the idea of God creating Neanderthol, and A&E as homosapien, as two different events a contradiction for me. I have never stated, or felt otherwise. Therefore - Neanderthol - by logic - would be a descendant of Adam & Eve, and since there is only one event of creation - by extension, allowing for your presumption that Neanderthol came first - this would mean A&E were Neanderthols, and not Homosapien. The only other option that would be acceptable within the confinds of my stated presumption, is that there is no difference between Neanderthol and Homosapien, beyond drawing an analogy of the difference between the physique of a caucasion and an oriental.


Well it is your assertion that Adam and Eve are representative of Homo sapien sapien or modern day man because that is what you have concluded on another post. If you wish to change that position now, it is fine but please explain what genus Adam and Eve are if not Homo Sapien. I always assumed that the bible's position was that god made humans fully formed and as we appear today. In that case, Neanderthal still poses a problem because he is not Homo Sapien. So I ask, why did god make him exactly and when? What about Cro Magnon man?45,000 to 10,000 years ago in the Upper Paleolithic. He is even later on the time line. How would you explain the changes that are occurring between the skulls of Neanderthal and Cro Magnon? Cro Magnon has little to no brow ridge and he has the characteristically high forehead like homo sapien. Cro-Magnon man is also slender in build and stands upright. He does not have the exaggerated, flaring ribcage either, nor the wide pelvis. Neanderthal females would have needed that pelvis in order to give birth to those infants. As noted Homo sapien females would have had a hard time in labor attempting to give birth to these babies with such massive heads This is a plausible explanation for the eventual extinction of Neanderthal. In following in line with adaptation and the ability to pass one's genetic profile onto successive generations.. We are getting closer aren't we? Why are these changes happening gradually if Neanderthal died in a big flood? We can stick with Neanderthal until we can identify his genus and where he came from. The questions naturally arise of not only what are Adam and Eve, but what is Neanderthal and what are these other hominids exacttly? Why are we seeing a slow and gradual change in the physiology?


As previously stated - my presumptions are that Neanderthol are descendant from A&E as priori. So the assertion that A&E is homosapien only serves the purpose of not recognizing Neanderthol as either preceeding H.S. or that there is no definitve distinction between the two, as is presumed in evolution. Again, I tend to find the differences in physicality more in line with the differences we find today within the races - than I do for the need to have adapted from one Eon/Age to the next.

The distinction of what happened due to the flood, is that 3 facts are known.
1) the Majority of the decendants of A&E did not survive the flood - with the exception of 8 people.
2) That the expected life span of man decreased steadily, and rapidly. Fom an average of 900 pre-flood - to 200 up until Abraham, and to 80 Up until David and desreased until the middle ages, only increasing in the modern age with the advent of medical procedures and drugs discovered to prolong life and fight disease.
3) That up until the time of Babel - only one language was spoken on earth, and rather than disperse throughout the land and increase, man congregated. Causing language to be confused, and forced dispersement, and abandonment of building the tower of Babel.

My presumption here is that - despite what labels we assign to the fossels - Cro magnon, Homo-sapien, whatever... The radical change in life-span, eventual change of atmospheric environment, and forced dispersion would account for the changing and adapting of the physicality of man, which is often sighted for the differences in physiques between Caucasion, Oriental, Arab, and Negro populations. So it would be expected that we find variants in the fossel records - for the ame reasons we see them in man today. However - I don't presume to have an adequate explination for this - beyond the premises of modern day science.


Okay if we accept that the flood actually did occur which I don't doubt that it may have but in a localized region, how would that ensure the immediate death of ALL Neanderthal? Besides, in order for Neanderthal to "adapt" and become physiologically akin to homo sapien wouldn't he require the time since creation nearly 6000 years ago to become homo sapien? Otherwise, yes okay we could go with your theory that the flood was worldwide and killed Neanderthal in the course of a singular cataclysmic event but then that still leaves you with not having an explanation of what he is? Even if you do not believe he is anything other than homo sapien, we understand from his skeletal structure that he is substantially different and by all accounts had a different mode of existence than these other 6000 year old humans. So why would god have created something totally different and not quite the same as homo sapien (Adam and Eve) It would appear that you are working VERY hard to smash square pegs into round holes in order to accommodate this annoying hominid specimen. Im only requiring you to look at the easiest and most logical explanation first. Actually that's another question for you since you mentioned fossil remains. Shouldn't all of Neanderthals excavated encampments and tools and skulls and bones and pottery and children and burial grounds all be located somewhere in the Middle East or the biblical Cradle of Civilization? Some sites were in Iran and Iraq but others have been found in Europe and Asia because it believed that he migrated and was able to break off into several bands.


Here again - we have a difference in the presumption of time. What would be evidenced from the flood is that whatever variance occured from the creation of A&E till Noah and the other 7 boarded the arc, would have perished in the flood. So, by natural reasoning, Noah and his decendants would now be what would be considered Homo-sapien if the presumption of keeping the labels distinct is to be held to. As to the dispersement of fossels - this would have been a natural occurance due to the dispersement at Babel. It is not clear though, as to how far the ancients (pre-flood) dispersed, as the account of Genesis narrows it's focus to that of Noah, and the generations through to Abraham. All we have of an account in Genesis is that evil had spread throughout the land, and that man had essentially become wicked. So no clear distinction outside of subjective assumptions can be determined concerning where the fossels were located.


There is no reason to believe that these early humans lived to be 900 years of age and for the hard life of Neanderthal, seeing 40 might have been considered rare. However I promised you I would TAKE everything into account. So far that Neanderthal could only be about 6000 years old, that he could have possibly perished in a flood, and whatever biblical parameters and restrictions you would like to enforce on this early descendant of man. The problem is he isn't going away and there is no easy way to explain what he is.


Well - in order to reject the presumptions of their being decendants of A&E, it does not suffice to merely come up with another presumption, that is not sufficent to deny the axioms - what is needed to reject a presumption is to show cause why the presumption is an impossibility due to the claims of the presumption, as opposed to the validity of assumed presumptions that oppose it. Generally though - it can often be demonstrated that only one of the opposing presumptions has the ability to be viable, however assurtion of viability remains subjective at best.


Okay so you are flip flopping here in your explanations. First you are attempting to explain the extinction of Neanderthal in terms of the great flood of Noah. So that would imply that Neanderthal was a descendant of Adam and Eve and existed prior to the flood correct? But then you must have lost track of that assertion because next you try to insert that the only reason we see this significant differential in terms of body structure is due to the atmospheric and climate changes that occurred POST flood. So that would mean you are now trying to say that Neanderthal was actually descended of Noah and his family and the story in the bible from that point on as it relates to repopulating the earth. Also, if we accept your theory that Neanderthal actually came into existence as being descendants of Noah's lineage and not Adam and Eve, and the normal human life span was decreasing by that time, that would give him even less time to adapt correct and become more homo-sapien like in appearance? Morning Song was at least giving him 900 years. You are essentially saying that it just depended on the topography and where those Neanderthal babies were born and that would determine their sloping brow ridge or longer arms or flared rib cages, or elongated cranium. Let me explain that "adaptation" is subject to reproduction and passing one's genetic profile onto that of offspring. It does not occur during the course of one life time, be that life time, 40 years, 80 or 900 years.

I understand you were sleepy so just get to it on another post.


No. Neanderthol would not be a decendant of Noah in our scenario. This would be contradictory to what I have been stating. Either there was previous misunderstanding of perspective on your part, or a typing error on mine. (Not unlikely since I have a tendency to word my mix up all the time, and obviously, I can't spell - nor type.)
The difference in genetic anomalies could happen within one or two generations depending on the genome mapping of the parents and cross breeding.
Of course the difficulty here is the lack of sheer numbers of the control group for DNA testing, due to the limitation of fossel records.
There's no way to determine if the information of any genome tested is one that represents all of the potential information, or if there has been information lost within the genomes of the fossels to determine where that fossel falls into the generational time-line. Here, any explination is only going to be subjective due to a serious lack of onmncience on either of our parts. Therefore, it remains difficult to assess the factual evidence and the DNA it provides with any certainty - due to what is missing to assure an adequeste control group.


As a side note - It is encouraging to note though, that the world view on the necessity of the ongoing excavation of the middle east and beyond has eased tremendously in just the last half century. But - it will take vast numbers of people, and unlimited co-operation of what remains as hostile countries to continue the research. I look forward to additional findings to expand the control groups of these presumptions, so that it does not remain so subjective, for it limits any viable discussion because of it.

lj


Well If that is contradictory to what you are stating then by all means try to formulate some kind of an opinion if you would like. The questions that have been posed to you thus far are:

What genus would Neanderthal fall into? I only assumed that you had asserted that he was homo sapien because Adam and Eve are homo sapien and Noah and his lineage are homo sapien.

When would Neanderthal have existed on earth?The paleontologists have a theory based on credible research that would give him a range of 200,000 years and as recently as 30,000 years. I would agree with this premise. I am assuming that you disagree with it in some respect. If you do, please explain when Neanderthal man came into existence and for how long did he live. We are both just hypothesizing here so I dont see the harm. Also, of what direct line is he descended since now you are claiming that it was not Adam and Eve, nor Noah and his family.


Your insistence that the difference in the physical traits between homo sapien and Neanderthal are nothing more than genetic anomalies does not explain why an entire group of people would share these characteristics and pass them from generation to generation. (Please see the list of physiological differences between Neanderthal and homo sapien that was posted). Also, how would you explain these same differences in physiology manifesting themselves in specimens found in various locations through out the world?

There is actually a fair amount of recovered Neanderthal fossil specimens available, including, as you have already been introduced to, children of varying ages who are already showing the characteristic of the adult Neanderthal. A humorous bone sample was taken. It was determined that the amino acid levels were at 20% to 73% of those in modern bone, evidencing DNA survival.

Also how would you explain the difference between Neanderthal and Cro magnon man as we inch closer towards homo sapien. Is he also yet another anomalie?

I am not claiming any "omniscience" on my part here. Were you in some respect? I am uncomfortable with those terms as it smacks of some kind of god like influence. I am simply a human here who is presenting these various issues for your assessment with strong supportive evidence on my side. I am asking that you rebut in some fashion or formulate an argument that would successfully diffuse its credibility as it has been presented thus far.


Damn!!! What are you doing – writing a theses?

Eljay's photo
Sat 09/06/08 12:39 AM

"Neaderthal Code" premiers Sunday on cable television. They said that "we previously thought they died out, but that they may still exist in our DNA in humans today.

Should be interesting. On my t.v. it is channel 49 comcast cable.


Do you remember what network it's on - I don't have cable.

damnitscloudy's photo
Sat 09/06/08 12:48 AM
Atleast we can all agree, dinosaurs are freaking awesome =D

Krimsa's photo
Sat 09/06/08 02:29 AM

Atleast we can all agree, dinosaurs are freaking awesome =D


I think dinosaurs are pretty cool. Especially because there was so many different types. I know kids love studying them in school. Back when I was in science class it kind of sparked my interest in everything else related. I like the whole connection between Velosa Raptors and birds of prey. You can actually see it in their bodies and movements. There are some parallels that are apparent even today.

damnitscloudy's photo
Sat 09/06/08 09:26 AM


Atleast we can all agree, dinosaurs are freaking awesome =D


I think dinosaurs are pretty cool. Especially because there was so many different types. I know kids love studying them in school. Back when I was in science class it kind of sparked my interest in everything else related. I like the whole connection between Velosa Raptors and birds of prey. You can actually see it in their bodies and movements. There are some parallels that are apparent even today.


I never grew out of liking them lol embarassed

Krimsa's photo
Sat 09/06/08 09:30 AM
Me neither. I once had an ex that got me a box of assorted soaps that were all different species of dinosaurs. They were for little kids but in a cool box and really intricate molds. Hahah

1 2 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 Next