I was just jesting with the person. Wasn't a serious thing.

Why the ugly terminology? In other words, why the vulgar language?

Lindyy





The term was in reference to me and earlier remarks I made. I took no offense to it, so no one else should. We're all friends here and the ":D lol" shows it's said in a "fun" spirit.

Lighten up!!!

It's not paranoia if its true. That is the plan.

You don't know that, what you said is unsubstantiated rhetoric of people who live boring lives and want to have something far greater in scope surrounding their lives than the true reality. Unless you have the top secret dossier on how it is all going down. :D

I don't think they keep top secret dossier's laying around for people to see.

I don't think you know any more about what is "true reality" than anyone else.

All I said is you can't be called "paranoid" if someone is really after you, or it's not paranoia if its true.

And I thank god for my "boring life." (It didn't used to be so boring, but trust me when I say, I like boring. Boring is good.

JB

OH, I read the posts and could not find out where it came from in the first place. Was rather confused.

Lindyy

Why the ugly terminology? In other words, why the vulgar language?

Lindyy







I agree.

The term was in reference to me and earlier remarks I made. I took no offense to it, so no one else should. We're all friends here and the ":D lol" shows it's said in a "fun" spirit.

Lighten up!!!




What does the D mean?

Even if it was said in jest, other pople may not want to see it.

What can we do to stop this crazy plan ?.
Sure we can do something .

Kind of an oxymoron, isn't it?

Pre-emptive defence means any excuse will do to kill anyone anywhere at any time . Invading nations with wealth such as oil , or nations who do not follow their orders , is more than justified in their opinions .

Sam!!

Sounds like that to me too!

If you know someone wants to annihilate you from the face of the Earth and you hit them first before they get the chance or have the opportunity to do so, would that not be pre-emptive defense from those that wish to do you harm rather than during when the bombs come raining down? Yes, pre-emptive defense, not appeasement and not allowing great destruction to come your way before you defend your people who will be caught in the onslaught of the devastation they seek on you.

Just like Syria supports Hezbollah and has allowed it to operate from its land. Syria assassinated the leader of your neighbor, Lebanon, and installed pro-Hezbollah factions. These groups wish your annihilation.

Then Syria gets nuclear shipments from North Korea. Israel learns of these nuclear sites, has all the evidence to prove it, and fearing that nuclear material could be used or handed off to Hezbollah you hit the nuclear site with air power.

Would that not be pre-emptive defense, which is essentially pre-emptive striking, they both being essentially the same thing. You fear that this country that assists and aids in the advancement of a group that wishes your absolutely annihilation, they have nuclear sites, so you hit them and blow the site to pieces. You are in turn defending your people from very possible serious harm and mass destruction. You are pre-emptive defending before they get their hands on the destructive tool to decimate you.

I think I would want to know why first.
Maybe we could work it out!

Nobody wants to start a Nuclear war with us sailor.
Do you realize how many Nukes we have?
They only want them to keep us from invading them.
It seems to be the only thing that guarantees their sovereignty. History and examples have shown this to be true!

WWII. Do nothing until it was way too late to do it much easier and far less bloody. He told everyone he was going to take Austria and everyone just sat back and did nothing.

Hitler and WWII is the great example of how a preemptive defense could have changed the history of WWII. With all the sanctions and treaties Germany was under, having defending them, by putting down this man's rise, would have been preemptive defense to the extreme destruction that was caused to Europe.

The countries of Europe did not do this and thus they were forced to go on their own defense as France got steamrolled, Italy fell in line, and the British got bombarded. It was after they suffered great destruction and so many died that they finally acted on defending their people.

They willfully allowed the destruction to begin, because no good country can act on what they know is coming until it is already on their doorstep, correct?

Thanks for your inclusion of false propaganda. I was wondering when that most common unsubstantiated bigotted attack was going to begin.

Yes, that was before nuclear proliferation became obliterated as Abdul Qadeer Khan spread nuclear technology all over the globe. We are not dealing with sane people like we did with Russia. We are dealing with mass black market trade. North Korea shipped tech to Syria. We knew it happened, we followed it the entire way, but could do nothing about it. I remember when we watched the ship leave and we tracked it all the way to Iran. North Korea is a HUGE blackmarket weapons dealing nation.

Let's say Hezbollah or Hamas or Al Qaeda get their hand on even the smallest nuclear materials. What sovereign nation would they be to fear reprisal? Russia can't even account for all their own nuclear material and they have Generals guarding old nuclear and arms sites. There was just a General in Russia caught weapons dealing.

Are you a Zionist then Starsailor2851?