100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: final post - a statement | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Hey beautiful....
Kat 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your both wrong i'm a truist and a very basic diest see the thread - "ok let's try this again" i make my case there wont do it here not interseted - think what you may - as i said - and abra brings more light to the subject now - "i" had never had any discussions wth anyone who held the original concepts you brought forward and believe me - i could care less what anybody chooses to believe, it is not going to affect me one way or the other - but if i see someone using something quoted out of context i will probably let them know that - or not - depending on what mood i might be in - Had the original question been different or stated differently - i would probably have passed it by, as some thing's abra brings up now there are many nore contentous things to discuss than nakedness or whether they were animals or not. though like jellybean i don't agree with the core thoughts abra has on his new post. and see "Tribo" the nakedness is what you failed to comprehend..because everything began when Adam and Eve realized they were naked and tried to hide their family jewells afterwards which means that being naked was a sin in God's eyes ..and that is why Man is born into sin and unless a baby pops out with clothes on it was born of sin and into sin and is automatically a sinner to continue a statement in aother post funches - just like the ever : ready bunny it keeps going and going and going -------------- down and down and down--------------- 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your both wrong i'm a truist and a very basic diest see the thread - "ok let's try this again" i make my case there wont do it here not interseted - think what you may - as i said - and abra brings more light to the subject now - "i" had never had any discussions wth anyone who held the original concepts you brought forward and believe me - i could care less what anybody chooses to believe, it is not going to affect me one way or the other - but if i see someone using something quoted out of context i will probably let them know that - or not - depending on what mood i might be in - Had the original question been different or stated differently - i would probably have passed it by, as some thing's abra brings up now there are many nore contentous things to discuss than nakedness or whether they were animals or not. though like jellybean i don't agree with the core thoughts abra has on his new post. and see "Tribo" the nakedness is what you failed to comprehend..because everything began when Adam and Eve realized they were naked and tried to hide their family jewells afterwards which means that being naked was a sin in God's eyes ..and that is why Man is born into sin and unless a baby pops out with clothes on it was born of sin and into sin and is automatically a sinner to continue a statement in aother post funches - just like the ever : ready bunny it keeps going and going and going -------------- down and down and down---------------
and to continue from another post "Tribo" .. ok..er..what if I called him an ex-christian that's in denial that he is a christian and is forbidden to think beyond that belief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whose Book Of Truths??? Mans? hmmmmmm.... 
my truth's jess - i ask no one to accept or believe just to ponder and throw away if you find them of no value to you. Just as i would if the tables were turned. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your both wrong i'm a truist and a very basic diest see the thread - "ok let's try this again" i make my case there wont do it here not interseted - think what you may - as i said - and abra brings more light to the subject now - "i" had never had any discussions wth anyone who held the original concepts you brought forward and believe me - i could care less what anybody chooses to believe, it is not going to affect me one way or the other - but if i see someone using something quoted out of context i will probably let them know that - or not - depending on what mood i might be in - Had the original question been different or stated differently - i would probably have passed it by, as some thing's abra brings up now there are many nore contentous things to discuss than nakedness or whether they were animals or not. though like jellybean i don't agree with the core thoughts abra has on his new post. and see "Tribo" the nakedness is what you failed to comprehend..because everything began when Adam and Eve realized they were naked and tried to hide their family jewells afterwards which means that being naked was a sin in God's eyes ..and that is why Man is born into sin and unless a baby pops out with clothes on it was born of sin and into sin and is automatically a sinner to continue a statement in aother post funches - just like the ever : ready bunny it keeps going and going and going -------------- down and down and down---------------
and to continue from another post "Tribo" .. ok..er..what if I called him an ex-christian that's in denial that he is a christian and is forbidden to think beyond that belief hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement  won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey beautiful.... Kat
Hello Lovely. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
a theologian? ..been there done that ..see 'Tribo" the point is that I don't like to argue..I just simply apply logic and stay one step beyond what your belief allows you to comprehend... |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Mon 06/09/08 06:02 PM
|
|
hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
a theologian? ..been there done that ..see 'Tribo" the point is that I don't like to argue..I just simply apply logic and stay one step beyond what your belief allows you to comprehend... Funches, that's a load of crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
a theologian? ..been there done that ..see 'Tribo" the point is that I don't like to argue..I just simply apply logic and stay one step beyond what your belief allows you to comprehend... Funches, that's a load of crap.
'Tribo" is not allow to comprehend or discuss when Adam and Eve discovered that they were naked ..because it shows how man was born into sin and was on the same level as all the other animals in the garden of Eden before they ate the apple of knowledge ...all I have to do is keep the conversation at that level and he is forbidden to address it logically... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
a theologian? ..been there done that ..see 'Tribo" the point is that I don't like to argue..I just simply apply logic and stay one step beyond what your belief allows you to comprehend... Funches, that's a load of crap.
'Tribo" is not allow to comprehend or discuss when Adam and Eve discovered that they were naked ..because it shows how man was born into sin and was on the same level as all the other animals in the garden of Eden before they ate the apple of knowledge ...all I have to do is keep the conversation at that level and he is forbidden to address it logically... keep's going and going and going--------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
a theologian? ..been there done that ..see 'Tribo" the point is that I don't like to argue..I just simply apply logic and stay one step beyond what your belief allows you to comprehend... Funches, that's a load of crap.
'Tribo" is not allow to comprehend or discuss when Adam and Eve discovered that they were naked ..because it shows how man was born into sin and was on the same level as all the other animals in the garden of Eden before they ate the apple of knowledge ...all I have to do is keep the conversation at that level and he is forbidden to address it logically... keep's going and going and going--------
well "Tribo" it was you that started this conversation in the other thread and I was just explaining why it's impossible for you to finish it...but don't worry no christian or any of those theologians you keep recommending can argue the point of Adam and Eve discovering their nakedness logically..why? .. simply because your belief simply forbids you to do so ..but what was fascinating was your attempt to blame me and "Abracadabra" and not your belief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
a theologian? ..been there done that ..see 'Tribo" the point is that I don't like to argue..I just simply apply logic and stay one step beyond what your belief allows you to comprehend... Funches, that's a load of crap.
'Tribo" is not allow to comprehend or discuss when Adam and Eve discovered that they were naked ..because it shows how man was born into sin and was on the same level as all the other animals in the garden of Eden before they ate the apple of knowledge ...all I have to do is keep the conversation at that level and he is forbidden to address it logically... keep's going and going and going--------
well "Tribo" it was you that started this conversation in the other thread and I was just explaining why it's impossible for you to finish it...but don't worry no christian or any of those theologians you keep recommending can argue the point of Adam and Eve discovering their nakedness logically..why? .. simply because your belief simply forbids you to do so ..but what was fascinating was your attempt to blame me and "Abracadabra" and not your belief keeps going and going and going----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
a theologian? ..been there done that ..see 'Tribo" the point is that I don't like to argue..I just simply apply logic and stay one step beyond what your belief allows you to comprehend... Funches, that's a load of crap.
'Tribo" is not allow to comprehend or discuss when Adam and Eve discovered that they were naked ..because it shows how man was born into sin and was on the same level as all the other animals in the garden of Eden before they ate the apple of knowledge ...all I have to do is keep the conversation at that level and he is forbidden to address it logically... keep's going and going and going--------
well "Tribo" it was you that started this conversation in the other thread and I was just explaining why it's impossible for you to finish it...but don't worry no christian or any of those theologians you keep recommending can argue the point of Adam and Eve discovering their nakedness logically..why? .. simply because your belief simply forbids you to do so ..but what was fascinating was your attempt to blame me and "Abracadabra" and not your belief keeps going and going and going----------------------
well atleast I can ..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahahahahaha - then funches i would as in the other post just keep repeating the above bunny statement won't work funches been there done that - wait till some theologian comes on here then you can argue or debate with him ok?
a theologian? ..been there done that ..see 'Tribo" the point is that I don't like to argue..I just simply apply logic and stay one step beyond what your belief allows you to comprehend... Funches, that's a load of crap.
'Tribo" is not allow to comprehend or discuss when Adam and Eve discovered that they were naked ..because it shows how man was born into sin and was on the same level as all the other animals in the garden of Eden before they ate the apple of knowledge ...all I have to do is keep the conversation at that level and he is forbidden to address it logically... keep's going and going and going--------
well "Tribo" it was you that started this conversation in the other thread and I was just explaining why it's impossible for you to finish it...but don't worry no christian or any of those theologians you keep recommending can argue the point of Adam and Eve discovering their nakedness logically..why? .. simply because your belief simply forbids you to do so ..but what was fascinating was your attempt to blame me and "Abracadabra" and not your belief keeps going and going and going----------------------
well atleast I can ..... hahahaha - good one funches |
|
|
|
|
