Previous 1
Topic: gun privacy
itsmetina's photo
Fri 04/25/08 12:49 PM
Edited by itsmetina on Fri 04/25/08 12:53 PM
south carolina makes concealed weapons records private.whats your thoughts on this?messed upon this onegrumble

me2g's photo
Fri 04/25/08 12:50 PM
if you can carry it in public people should be able to know who is carrying them..

no photo
Fri 04/25/08 12:53 PM

south carolina makes concealed weapons records public.whats your thoughts on this?

How is the job market in SC I wanna move now drinker :smile:

Drivinmenutz's photo
Fri 04/25/08 12:54 PM
Edited by Drivinmenutz on Fri 04/25/08 12:55 PM
why would it matter? Although, if people didn't know about it then attackers wouldn't be quite as sure as to whether or not their victims are armed... That's really the only argument for either side i can come up with. Maybe it should be treated more like phone numbers. If you really don't want you name listed who cares? Take it off the list. Seriously, what difference does it honestly make? I don't see ANY need for it...

Totage's photo
Fri 04/25/08 12:55 PM

south carolina makes concealed weapons records private.whats your thoughts on this?messed upon this onegrumble


indifferent Makes no difference. Crminals don't register anyway, so how does that matter?

Drivinmenutz's photo
Fri 04/25/08 12:58 PM


south carolina makes concealed weapons records private.whats your thoughts on this?messed upon this onegrumble


indifferent Makes no difference. Crminals don't register anyway, so how does that matter?


yeah, pretty much...

daniel48706's photo
Fri 04/25/08 01:00 PM

why would it matter? Although, if people didn't know about it then attackers wouldn't be quite as sure as to whether or not their victims are armed... That's really the only argument for either side i can come up with. Maybe it should be treated more like phone numbers. If you really don't want you name listed who cares? Take it off the list. Seriously, what difference does it honestly make? I don't see ANY need for it...


I have to agree, what's the big issue? If you dont want it listed, pay the five or ten dollar fee and remain unlisted.ohwell

no photo
Fri 04/25/08 01:24 PM
Well let me ask U this.There are private citizens who are working along side law enforcement for various reasons.Should there idenity become exposed & on public record they would be @ the mercy of these criminals.Not to mention their life expectancy would be quite short.noway

Single_Rob's photo
Fri 04/25/08 01:34 PM

if you can carry it in public people should be able to know who is carrying them..
kinda defeats the whole purpose of "concelaed carry" laugh laugh laugh

itsmetina's photo
Fri 04/25/08 01:40 PM
i'd say so

daniel48706's photo
Fri 04/25/08 01:48 PM


if you can carry it in public people should be able to know who is carrying them..
kinda defeats the whole purpose of "concelaed carry" laugh laugh laugh


no it dont. Just because you CAN carry it in yuor purse (or behind your waistband, lol) doesnt mean you will or are.

Single_Rob's photo
Fri 04/25/08 01:50 PM



if you can carry it in public people should be able to know who is carrying them..
kinda defeats the whole purpose of "concelaed carry" laugh laugh laugh


no it dont. Just because you CAN carry it in yuor purse (or behind your waistband, lol) doesnt mean you will or are.
which means it justifies a potentially more aggressive crime towards an individual? What is your reasoning here? That statement makes no sense to what is being addressed

Single_Rob's photo
Fri 04/25/08 01:52 PM
the only people who should know a citizen is carrying is a law enforcement officer after you identify to him that you are.

daniel48706's photo
Fri 04/25/08 01:53 PM




if you can carry it in public people should be able to know who is carrying them..
kinda defeats the whole purpose of "concelaed carry" laugh laugh laugh


no it dont. Just because you CAN carry it in yuor purse (or behind your waistband, lol) doesnt mean you will or are.
which means it justifies a potentially more aggressive crime towards an individual? What is your reasoning here? That statement makes no sense to what is being addressed


you stated that it defeats the purpose (or someone did) to have a carry concealed permit, and yet have it be public knowledge that you have one.

I say no it does not defeat the purpose, because of this: lets say I have a permit and am publicly known as having one. I walk up to you on the street. You do not know if I have a weapon on me or not.

Single_Rob's photo
Fri 04/25/08 02:03 PM





if you can carry it in public people should be able to know who is carrying them..
kinda defeats the whole purpose of "concelaed carry" laugh laugh laugh


no it dont. Just because you CAN carry it in yuor purse (or behind your waistband, lol) doesnt mean you will or are.
which means it justifies a potentially more aggressive crime towards an individual? What is your reasoning here? That statement makes no sense to what is being addressed


you stated that it defeats the purpose (or someone did) to have a carry concealed permit, and yet have it be public knowledge that you have one.

I say no it does not defeat the purpose, because of this: lets say I have a permit and am publicly known as having one. I walk up to you on the street. You do not know if I have a weapon on me or not.
but if it is publicly available information a person who decided to "stalk" or "target" you will possibly approach you with a greater degree of force in a given situation, and negate the advantage you have with a concealed firearm

daniel48706's photo
Fri 04/25/08 02:08 PM






if you can carry it in public people should be able to know who is carrying them..
kinda defeats the whole purpose of "concelaed carry" laugh laugh laugh


no it dont. Just because you CAN carry it in yuor purse (or behind your waistband, lol) doesnt mean you will or are.
which means it justifies a potentially more aggressive crime towards an individual? What is your reasoning here? That statement makes no sense to what is being addressed


you stated that it defeats the purpose (or someone did) to have a carry concealed permit, and yet have it be public knowledge that you have one.

I say no it does not defeat the purpose, because of this: lets say I have a permit and am publicly known as having one. I walk up to you on the street. You do not know if I have a weapon on me or not.
but if it is publicly available information a person who decided to "stalk" or "target" you will possibly approach you with a greater degree of force in a given situation, and negate the advantage you have with a concealed firearm


but when you meet me on the street I am in the very same exact position I would be if you didnt know I had a permit. Either way you do not know if I have a gun on me, due to he fact that as several people said, people DO carry wether they have a permit or not.

So it makes no differance whatsoever.

itsmetina's photo
Fri 04/25/08 02:08 PM
this is crazy the criminals just get one off the street if they commit a crime they ditch the gun after cleaning their prints yet when u buy one legal in some states now its public.

Single_Rob's photo
Fri 04/25/08 02:11 PM







if you can carry it in public people should be able to know who is carrying them..
kinda defeats the whole purpose of "concelaed carry" laugh laugh laugh


no it dont. Just because you CAN carry it in yuor purse (or behind your waistband, lol) doesnt mean you will or are.
which means it justifies a potentially more aggressive crime towards an individual? What is your reasoning here? That statement makes no sense to what is being addressed


you stated that it defeats the purpose (or someone did) to have a carry concealed permit, and yet have it be public knowledge that you have one.

I say no it does not defeat the purpose, because of this: lets say I have a permit and am publicly known as having one. I walk up to you on the street. You do not know if I have a weapon on me or not.
but if it is publicly available information a person who decided to "stalk" or "target" you will possibly approach you with a greater degree of force in a given situation, and negate the advantage you have with a concealed firearm


but when you meet me on the street I am in the very same exact position I would be if you didnt know I had a permit. Either way you do not know if I have a gun on me, due to he fact that as several people said, people DO carry wether they have a permit or not.

So it makes no differance whatsoever.
Dave that is not the topic of this thread. It is making the records private. Your posts have absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic at hand. The simple truth is nobody walking next to a person who is a stranger on the street will know they are carrying, but if it is a person who is directly targeting it DOES make a difference. So what good would possibly come from making these records public? What advantage does it serve

hellkitten54's photo
Fri 04/25/08 02:16 PM
I could care less if someone is carrying a gun. As long as it's not used on me, more power to em. I don't care to know.

itsmetina's photo
Fri 04/25/08 02:18 PM
Edited by itsmetina on Fri 04/25/08 02:19 PM
has anyone considered that when making records public any kid can say hey lets go to ---------- house and steal their gun.lives can be at stake here

Previous 1