Israel is a dog of US. Therefore, whether US says it was forewarned, or US say it wasn't, make no mistake, Israel will make not a single move, without clearing it with Obama first.

With this said, the posted news means to me, that Obama doesn't want to be attached. He is publicly telling his dog: "Don't you even think of biting anyone without writing me a letter".

When Israel attacks, Obama would have plausible deniability by pointing back that he did have a conversation with his pit bull, but the dog didn't listen.

Yep. A complete propaganda.

Boo, to require me to read the original copy-paste, is to admit that you personally, have no idea about it. If you do, then you are able to answer my questions easily.

As my questions are not being answered at all, other than by adding more ideological stuff on top of already posted, then it can easily be seen that even the supporters of this, have no slightest idea of how this can possibly work, other than if everyone was reeducated or a martian.

I, and I always say that, will not work. I will spend my day in leisure, and even the things I could do, I would delegate to those who desire to do them. Further, if you decode to have no government, then what I would do is to organize my own little army, and enslave the rest.

I figure it is always great to have a slave that wants to do my dishes anyway.

The whores will finally be free, doing what they love to do anyway.

Having no government was a specific flaw I didn't even address. Thanks, Fanta!

I just thought that if I do, the supporters of this will turn and say, that something will serve the organizing, standardizing, and public order functions, so I have skipped it.

Yep, it used to be called communism. Thanks, Thomas!

Your optimism is a great thing to have.

How about simply answering the questions? Surely, not being blinded as myself, the answers must be at the tips of your fingers.

Which countries would that be? Where can we see an example of a perfectly functioning society, that functions on collectivist principles?

Do you know what motivates a small, collectivistically organized tribe, to work? Abject poverty, hunger or a military treat of extermination, that's what. This is why prosperity is incompatible with collectivism.

So, bring in an Abject poverty, famine or war, and your idea will work. Remove those, and it will stop working.

Yes, we were the number one. When we were a lot more capitalist that today.

As we introduced more socialist laws and measures, we slipped to our current 27th place.

Yeah... brilliant. Small problem: China has a positive money flow, by which to subsidize the healthcare, if China wants to do that. We don't.

Oops.

Bummer!

You won't "begin" until you get hired for doing it. This must be a disturbing thought.

The brainwashing that Bezmenov talked about, must be complete, then.

I suppose there will be hobbyists that just love to go clean toilets, haul trash around, separate used tampons from a dog puke bundles, work in a coal mine, or spend their lifetime doing data-entry work.

Sounds great. A worthless fnck, who doesn't know 2+2, doesn't work, and spends his lifetime destroying his health, will have the same access to a highest quality health-care as would some extremely educated chemist making discoveries trough years of hard and sophisticated research, that makes lives of millions much more affordable.

What a concept. Surely, the worthless fnck would love that.

But, aside of fairness and morality, what would serve as a limit of how much resource of this system can anyone in particular consume?

Anyone has a common sense? Can we be that gullible?

I am sorry to intrude on a perfectly good fairytale, but I hae a question.

In this new suggested world, why the fnck would I wake up and go to work? If there is no money, and all resources are shared, then what would I gain by working versus not working that day?

Anybody thought about this tiny obstacle?

It is not like it would work, even if it is not rushed. Pretty much bye-bye American health care, welcome foreign health care trips.

Boy did she look ...ug(scratch that).......no different then she looks now.

That is taxing a particular group, based on the characteristic of that group. The characteristic that differentiates the rich is that they are above the level that you define.

The characteristic that defines fat as a group, is their fat percentage above certain level.

The characteristic that defines soda drinkers as a group, is their choice of drink.

This contradicts your statement above, of not supporting taxing any groups.

Hippies were brainwashed for sure. You can't be naturally that stupid.

No one gives two sh!ts when they tax me on income. Fnck, I am for banning and taxing everything. Welcome to my world.