Just accompany it with a package delivered containing a dead mouse and a tiny die-cast battleaxe, to ensure there are no mixed signals.

It's not very nice to stay with a woman who is only with you because she's under the impression it was leading to marriage, but you do not want to marry her.

You are supposed to throw away 3.5yrs of stringing her along, especially now she's realized you're just stringing her along, because all of it is not very nice of you towards her.

You're the bad one here, not her. A person has a human right to want to share themselves with few others without marriage being involved. For some it is their religious belief and you hurt them when you steal this decision from them by lying to yourself and them about how serious you were about them in the long term.

This sort of thing can really hurt some people, make them suddenly feel like instead of life being wonderful, some malicious guy corrupted and stole from them, just to gets his rocks off.

Now those might not be your beliefs nor mine, but the fact they are some people's beliefs gives you an adult responsibility to consider and accommodate their feelings if you're going to have any relationship with one, or pretend you care about them.

So you're just not a very nice person feller, that's all.

So you're looking for love that's a lie, basically?

Love is retrospect, bud. Not a contract.

bombed out cities are good for that I hear, ibraheem.

It maybe noteworthy to mention in any country with legalized brothels a very broad representation of men literally pay money to bang whoever's working.

Kind of sobering?

Some chicks will say yes if you friendly up to them and others sex you up if you slap the *****. We know this.

I'm so real when I step outside the sun goes, "Now?"
And I go, "Not yet," or like, "Okay now."

Really depends on whether I was wearing shades when I left the house.

you want some girl to run your rpg for you and then ask her to marry you?

Mate, here's the thing. Relationships are inherently subjective in the extreme.

Secretly, the truth is all men are loving because it's pretty much DNA encoded in all people, men and women.

Here's the trick to it:

You have to think of every person as having their very own personality. It's true.

You have to think of a personality as like a rainbow or spectrum containing lots of little parts to make up the whole, each is unique. It's true.

You have to think of two human beings as having two different personalities, so they have two different rainbows or two different spectrums. It's true.

Now the trick: your rainbow has to complement theirs and their rainbow has to complement yours, and automatically you love them and they love you, and you see them as loving, that is what you experience from them personally. So it's true.

But when you get the wrong combination of spectrums, love becomes a negotiation, a lie, or never comes.

And it doesn't make either person any less loving. It just means they weren't the right people for each other.



Everybody, everybody, every human being on this planet has exactly the same amount of love inside them to give: infinite.
It's true.

I celebrate difference as diversity, an evolutionary precept and necessary for species survival in our case.

That said I deal with too much difference summarily, with the awareness the issue is mine, not theirs.

women get confused easily and need to strictly classify everybody, I think we all get that.


I should probably run away now before the backlash hits :D

But still metalwing, this remains a visualization of the math as the math states but not a visualization of a correlative natural mechanic inspired or governed by the math. It's theoretical astrophysics, it's not astronomy. These physicists are cartoonists with accurate math, but it's almost always greatly limited and generally governed by the assumption of a closed system (doesn't occur in nature, it's a minkowski universe).

GR breaks down at the event horizon. No laws of physics do, they work fine. What GR does is it just doesn't describe the physical situation.

String theorest's version is much more likely as a stellar object and doesn't contradict GR, it just doesn't have any correlation, it's just a working hypothesis.

The most likely mathematical solution is the precept on c. is wrong.

This is the feeling you get when the epiphany of visualizing a working natural mechanic that was once just math to you, is what it's like.
It's like you just figured out the universe and discovered a whole new way at looking at everything and the coolest part, it's not a lonely place. New friends become curious about you, they've developed and adored these epiphanies too.

It's kind of like being happy then getting happier.
You get it just from studying/learning the material if you're into it. I suspect it's that way about all deep interests a person can have or practise.

FYI I've only got a Yr10 education. I was a homeless kid. I learned everything hiding out from other, tougher homeless kids in libraries and it just kind of took.

Without question at the very top of my personal list of terribly entertaining, highly intelligent antiwar movies.
It really just gives wonderful perspective on modern warfare and how we as citizens need to control our governments, not the other way around.

The Nicholas Cage movie "Lord of War" was based on a French black market arms dealer based in Italy, who sold Ukrainian cold war surplus to the Iranians, not west coast Africans.

The script was adapted for an American audience, so the nationalities changed, and being set in the Middle East was thought already too heavily represented in news media, Africa selected to keep American politics out of the story.

But what actually happened was the character played by Nic Cage supplied Georgia with an entire military (combat helicopters and tanks, etc.), and gave the Iranians nuclear capable cruise missiles through the 90s. At market bazaars in the desert.

That's scary stuff.

Well yes, what we can do is invent new ways to make observations in nature, continue correlating and falsifying hypotheses, continue developing theorum based upon these observations and correlate them with reproducible experimentation...

it's a time consuming process.

History shows Russia's beligerence is directly related to whether they've conservative or progressive leadership. Unfortunately Putin power base at the Kremlin are all ultra-conservatives. Old school soviets still sore about failing economics class.
Not a good combination.

They do have a lot of powerful business czars that are progressive however, but most are involved in some sort of criminal enterprise.
Not very different from the US, but they get government/military backing there and in Russia they've turned into regional fiefdoms.

The danger identified in the 90s (when the USSR collapsed) was the potential for rogue generals to create citystates with cold war military materiel to play crazy warlord with.
It's still the current danger.

Well firstly theoretical astrophysics is a bit removed from scientific journalism because it makes predictions based on mathematical solutions but those don't necessarily literally descibe a stellar object. They describe some properties, but there could be much much more to it than that.

And that's kind of the situation with GR and black holes.
GR is a very centralized thorum that correlates all observation of any particular element or association, however it is still limited.
One of the areas is in black holes. The whole term came about because it was a hypothetical mathematical solution (based on chandrasekhar's work) that produced a singularity.

A singularity isn't an object by any means. It's a space dragon.
A singularity is when an equation won't solve because the two halves are imbalanced.

It means the math is incomplete. That's what the black hole model tells us when we look at GR. It's incomplete because singularities don't exist in nature. Mythology, but not nature.

Note, that doesn't mean black holes don't exist, but there's more to them than a GR thought-experiment and some rudimentary math on likely properties.

Note also, there is the same problem with Relativity in SR, you get a singularity on any Lorentz solution at lightspeed, but not over. So there's a space dragon preventing travel at the speed of light, but the math works fine to go faster than or slower than light.
That's definitely not how it actually works, it just means the math is incomplete and there's more to learn and know on the topic before we start building technology that can use the math.

One more edit, the confusion I think is because scientific-journalism presents theoretical math as literal stellar objects when they only describe properties.
It's like a model of the central nervous system and brain in a humanoid shape, all neurological strands and clumps with no bone, muscle or skin, taking this picture of the nervous system and saying, "This is what a human looks like."
No, it doesn't.

The Russians have been working on simulating these kind of effects by using AI logarithms in hypersonic antishipping missile guidence, this is the dangerous feature of the Shipwreck missile currently in use with their heavy, modern warships. Basically each has some profile defaults and the datalinking/avionics capacity of a launch craft (shipwreck missiles are the size of a small fighter jet). Fired in volleys, the one shipwreck becomes the control craft and flies top cover taking sensor readings and transmitting course changes to the rest of the volley, which flies fast supersonic at wave height. If the control craft is shot down, another missile in the volley climbs and starts scanning to take its place.
They're virtually impossible to take down with medium/long range air defence emplacements, and overwhelm conventional CIWS. One hit with any warhead will sink any warship up to a Nimitz-class, a typically volley from a Russian task force will be 40 conventional shipwrecks plus 12 nuclear if use is warranted. The Russian Navy has become purpose built to take out NATO naval craft, especially US carrier-battlegroups on the skirts of CIS borders, they started building for this objective following the naval standoff during the Cuban Missile Crisis.


But if you could use a system of quantum entanglement you're already a massive step ahead on any kind of datalinking protocol, which is the current universal standard. Datalinking midcourse updates is the US standard and datalinking operational equipment is the Russian standard, they're the two in the lead on military spending.
Quantum entanglement, no need for a datalink or AI, real time thought-action protocols over any distance, that's going to put somebody ahead in the arms race.