Community > Posts By > ApertureScience

 
no photo
Wed 10/26/11 03:26 PM

I'm all for it.

And yes, as I understand it, there is a jinn or a "tester" who is
an angel or a creation of God who "tests" people (as an agent
of God) with evil inclinations in Islam and Judaism. The
interpretations I have heard take this to mean that as a result
of the way we are created that we struggle internally with good
and bad inclinations - that's all. Of course Jews and Muslims
in general don't take this literally. It is a storybook way of
describing internal struggle for virtue. How the universe tests
us - challenges us.


Cool, thanks. Even without studying it I would wager that this 'tester' & Christianity's 'devil' have the exact same origins, that they're merely different interpretations of the same myth.
+1 for the Jews & Muslims for not taking it literally laugh

no photo
Wed 10/26/11 03:09 PM

Maybe I hang around a more educated crowd but I don't think that
most religious people are so narrowminded in my experience. Except
Jehovah's Witness. Man are they rigid!

laugh


Perhaps you do, all but two of my [real life] educated friends are atheist or just not concerned, and of those two only one is ever up for discussion laugh


Islam and Judaism though for example do not have a Devil opposing
God as you describe it. It is more of an internal human
inclination for good or bad. A more modern view is that the Devil symbolizes our evil inclinations testing us. Anyway it is pretty
common for me and my college educated friends to think along the
lines of a pantheistic view of God.

laugh


Is that right? I confess, of the three big western mono's I've mostly only studied Christianity.
I like that you said 'a more modern view' - it is wise for a people to update their belief system as man advances and more discoveries are made (though I think extreme apologism - that the devil placed dinosaur bones in the ground to confuse us, say - is clearly absurd!). Moving on from primitive views is what I'm all about! laugh

no photo
Wed 10/26/11 02:50 PM
ahh but the Now you found is now Then.

no photo
Wed 10/26/11 02:48 PM

maybe his deity is requiring one for a sacrifice.


. . .


laugh laugh laugh

no photo
Wed 10/26/11 02:39 PM

The religions simply state that there is One God, infinite and
beyond our full comprehension. A God which is the ultimate
origin of the universe and is omniscient and ubiquitous. I see
no problem with visualizing this God in a pantheistic way.


Nor me, s1owhand, and yet it seems that most tradtionally religious people do have a problem with it. Perhaps because it removes the identity of their personal god, it negates the need to attribute human characteristics and emotions to god (something which primitive man needed to do apparently). More importantly, perhaps, because it forces one to view God as a whole, both light and dark, good and evil, not seperate entities or characters like a God and a Devil.

no photo
Wed 10/26/11 11:59 AM

ApertureScience,

I love the way you think!



Thanks very much, Jeanniebean!


The buck stops at the individual. Praying to God is done by visualization and intention and cooperation with the whole.

The only reason Pantheist even use the term "God" is because IT HAS NO NAME. It just is.

God(IT) has no name.



Right back atcha! flowerforyou

no photo
Wed 10/26/11 09:11 AM
I acknowledge (not respect) the fact that faith is an issue to be tiptoed around and causing offence is not my aim, so I will choose my words carefully.




..............Question: "What is pantheism?"...............



Answer: Pantheism is the view that God is everything and everyone

and that everyone and everything is God. Pantheism is similar to

polytheism (the belief in many gods), but goes beyond polytheism to

teach that everything is God. A tree is God, a rock is God, an

animal is God, the sky is God, the sun is God, you are God, etc.

Pantheism is the supposition behind many cults and false religions

(e.g., Hinduism and Buddhism to an extent, the various unity and

unification cults, and “mother nature” worshippers).



Firstly, I find it very hard to take someone seriously when they use terms like 'false religions' trying to make a distinction between their beliefs and those of others. Were I a follower of one of these faiths I'd be justified in playing the 'offended' card here (thankfully, I'm not). This 'I'm right, everyone else is wrong' mentality should be left behind in the dark ages IMO.


Does the Bible teach pantheism? NO, it does NOT.

What many people CONFUSE as pantheism is the doctrine of God's

OMNIPRESENCE.

Psalm 139:7-8 declares, “Where can I go from your Spirit? Where can

I flee from your presence? If I go up to the heavens, you are

there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there.” God's

Omnipresence means HE IS PRESENT EVERYWHERE. There is no place

in the universe where God is not present. This is NOT the same thing

as pantheism. God is everywhere, but He is not everything. Yes, God

is “present” inside a tree and inside a person, but that does NOT

make that tree or person God. Pantheism is not at all a biblical

belief.


The ancient texts and their numerous translations can and have been interpreted in many, often opposing ways. A Pantheist could quote that exact passage as 'proof' of their God model. Scripture adds no weight to any argument.


The clearest biblical arguments against pantheism are the countless

commands against idolatry. The Bible forbids the worship of idols,

angels, celestial objects, items in nature, etc. If pantheism were

true, it would not be wrong to worship such an object, because that

object would, in fact, be God. If pantheism were true, worshipping a

rock or an animal would have just as much validity as worshipping

God as an invisible and spiritual being. The Bible’s clear and

consistent denunciation of idolatry is a conclusive argument

against pantheism.


flowerforyou:heart:flowerforyou


'It's wrong because Moses said so' is hardly a conclusive argument. Regardless of whether one trusts that Moses was in direct communication with an almighty creator, or believes, as I do, that he spoke to a volcano, here is something I think we can all agree on: he lived thousands of years ago and as such had a limited (we may say 'primitive') understanding of the Earth and its place in the cosmos. We have come a long way since then.

no photo
Wed 10/26/11 08:25 AM


could you explain how the concept is completely consistent with religions? I can't see that. from my p.o.v. the former negates the latter (not entirely, but enough to strip away any amount of dogma and differences between them).


Religions believe in God as a unifying concept. The Universe and
everything in it certainly could be this God. The pantheistic God
is unique - there is only One and includes us as well as all nature
and thought as well (as a subset of thinking beings). So it is all
rather grand and inclusive and such a view of God if universally
accepted by the world's religions as the one true God could serve
to unite those who fall under differing rituals and observances.

So different holidays and methods of prayer etc. are just different
ways of honoring the same universal God.


Great answer, thank you.

no photo
Mon 10/24/11 04:27 PM
could you explain how the concept is completely consistent with religions? I can't see that. from my p.o.v. the former negates the latter (not entirely, but enough to strip away any amount of dogma and differences between them).

no photo
Mon 10/24/11 04:11 PM
Does anyone have any thoughts to share about the concept of pantheism (the idea that everything is god)?
as much as I dislike to use the G-word when discussing my thoughts, or label myself with any 'ism', I find this concept gels with me. If everything that ever was or will be was once one (before the big bang) then why not call that 'one' (and therefore everything in the universe) god?

no photo
Mon 10/24/11 04:05 PM
I respect anyone who stands up for a cause and acts peacefully.

Also, I'm so glad to live in this age where even those who are unable to get physically involved can still contribute to a cause from behind their computer.

no photo
Mon 10/24/11 03:19 PM
major respect to anyone & everyone who suffers through the winter in New York (and there will be some). the countless others occupying cities around the world will be thinking of them.

no photo
Fri 09/30/11 06:08 PM


Jeanniebean, sorry for the delay; may I ask you what is your understanding of the age of Aquarius?


I'm not real sure.

I personally believe it is an age of new awareness and for a leap in new consciousness for sentient life forms in this galaxy. It is a step forward in the evolutionary process of planets in this galaxy, and in the expansion of the universe.







cool. thank you.

no photo
Thu 09/22/11 05:36 PM
Jeanniebean, sorry for the delay; may I ask you what is your understanding of the age of Aquarius?

no photo
Fri 09/16/11 06:34 PM
Has anyone heard about the possible artificial structures on the asteroid Vesta?

Nasa's Dawn spacecraft has recently approached the second most massive asteroid in the belt and there are pictures which show a decidedly unique crater

http://www.ufodigest.com/article/strange-structures-asteroid-vesta

I can't vouch for this particular website but there's a good image with a close up. Googling 'Vesta asteroid structures' yields other results.

I was just wondering how widely-known this is and if anyone has any thoughts or opinions to share.

cheers drinker

no photo
Fri 09/16/11 06:13 PM
@Jeanniebean that's good info, thank you. I've not noticed or read about night sky objects appearing brighter but will look out for it.
You mentioned the galactic alignment on dec 12 2012 - I've heard Dr Neil DeGrasse Tyson say that what the "end timers" fail to realise or neglect to mention is that such an alignment occurs every dec 12 lol


no photo
Fri 09/16/11 06:02 PM
there's nothing pathetic about gaming dude!

1 2 3 5 Next