If a woman marries a man knowing he's a bank robber, that's intent and would be guilty in a court of law as a accessory to or depending on the state;

i.g. STATE of GEORGIA, has addressed such issues with [had to relook it up] O.C.G.A. 16-2-20 which provides that:

(a) Every person concerned in the commission of a crime is a party thereto and may be charged with and convicted of commission of the crime.
(b) A person is concerned in the commission of a crime only if he:
- (1) Directly commits the crime;
- (2) Intentionally causes some other person to commit the crime under such circumstances that the other person is not guilty of any crime either in fact or because of legal incapacity;
- (3) Intentionally aids or abets in the commission of the crime; or
- (4) Intentionally advises, encourages, hires, counsels, or procures another to commit the crime.

I can tell you based on my reading and some researching that most people get in trouble based on subsections (3) and (4) in the STATE of GEORGIA but there are other STATES with similar Statutes/laws. These elements can be/are very broad and almost can be a basis to convict based solely on "guilt by association".

The Georgia Court of Appeals has also explained the definition of party to a crime in the case of Jordan v. State, 281 Ga. App. 419 (2006). The Court held that "A participant to a crime may be convicted although he is not the person who directly commits the crime. A person who intentionally aids or abets in the commission of a crime or intentionally advises, encourages, hires, counsels, or procures another to commit the crime may be convicted of the crime.


Considering this would be most related to (a)renouncing of Citizenship, you don't just get that back in any country, especially here in the US. And in the US there is a significant difference between being a US Citizen, and an American when it comes to legal definitions and Status. You do NOT want to be anything of a "Citizen" You want to be an American, An Italian, A Greek, A Cambodian, A Equadorian.. etc

Breaking down what a citizen is in much of Europe and North America is far simpler in the westernized world. Despite opposition of popular opinions; the United States Of America is still a British colony, and under Roman Catholic laws and judicial cannons.. And under Roman Catholic Law definitions of a Citizen - is a member of a body of politic that pledges their allegiance in exchange for protection.

I don't know how you or other folks reading this post feel about it but that seems rather reciprocal in nature to me. Right? Here's where it the Citizenry starts to fall apart for me and many others.

Since 1858 in the U.S. Not one but all of the supreme courts have ruled that the police have no "statutory duty", which means it's NO WHERE in their job description whatsoever, to protect the citizens [you and I], from murderers and marauders despite how monstrous that may seem. Their job is to protect the establishment and enforce the rule of law. Full Stop.

That pretty much ends the STATES role to protect you. Which if they have no duty to protect you.. are you really a "Citizen". And without any Citizens, does an actual "Body of Politic" actually exist at that point?

The most recent accounts of these rulings that have been upheld is as recent as 1987 and I believe 1992. and again in 2004.

So in my mind, i'd ask you and anyone else who feels like being a Citizen?


I knew this topic would get more interesting

I would argue this.

All rights are derived from Property. Full stop. That is what separates a (wo)man from a defined slave or slavery in of itself. If you do not even own yourself, or you under the care and responsibility of someone granting you your existence for the lack of a better word. That is a Slave.

A right is not something you can give or take away from someone. You can give or take away someones privileges however. Or as even our own US Government is famous for for the last 140yrs or so now is circumventing the Constitution for profit but that's a whole other Maury Povich show.

A so called society does not nor cannot "grant you rights" and to say they can alone is an infringement on/of your rights. That's clearly "Rights violation(s)" or being violated. In most places in the world, there's some argument to whether there's a 195 or 194 countries in the world depending on how you feel about Ireland or Isreal's recognition but in all of the world, there are still basic human rights and yes, you would be CORRECT that those people and their rights get tresspassed on by the thousands worldwide and daily.

Its like the argument to whether something is legal or illegal which I find to be abhorrently inaccurate words by definition but in the commercial world, they are fitting - by those who operate within the system.

In all honesty, they mean little to some of us. They're merely words that describe the abilities or actions someone else says you can do. Not because of any moral reasoning or for your safety but merely for the fact that another (wo)man states that you can not do or must perform some action. NO other man should be really doing that but hey, I know it's 2020 and as Ice Cube once said, "People don't know how to act".

But here is why and how I justify the use of two better words. "Lawful" and "unlawful". Why you might wonder? Because they add morality to everything under the highest law in the land and from our creator (whomever that may be to you), Gods Law, sometimes referred to as natural Law which is what common law is based on.

Taking the above scenario for example, the slave or the sovereignty of a man. It can be understood by saying, and speaking on behalf of the US here;

"At one time in this country, it used to be "LEGAL" to own a slave or slaves. However, that doesn't mean it was a "LAWFUL" act."

Do you see what happens there? You added morality and accountability to whom it belongs to.. not permissions from another man whom is and should be equal to you.

Here's another one.

"It is "ILLEGAL" to fish in that river but, if you pay me for permission [a license (?)], you can fish in that river." Here you take a a RIGHT to feed ones self, and take it away as if it was a privilege, then SELL him back his right, PROFITING from them, and giving them a permission to do something that would otherwise be "ILLEGAL". right?

No.. Your rights are yours from your creator, again whomever you may believe that is, I know there are several cultures on here. To trespass peoples rights is unlawful, even if they're in a uniform. I'm sorry you can claim 11th amendment all you want, qualified immunity, whatever.. Violate my rights, you can take someones life as they know it away from them.

In the US you have rights, The Constitution was written to outline to the Government what those rights are and inform GOVERNMENT what their limitations are... Not yours, and you have courts to use them in to get remedy or redress.

The Constitution doesn't grant you your rights and is often stated in deep error in such words. The Constitution is one of 3 most prestigious documents in this country but it is only a very large sheet of hemp paper. If you were to shred it up or burn it you would still have your rights! However, that action would unhinge the Country as a sovereign Democratic Republic to which would no longer exist under the actions of Congress.

Remember at one time President Lincoln was not only not a President for 45 days because of this, but the country technically did not exist during those 45 days either.

Back to the above topics of rights. And this is the part out of all this you may actually want to write this down or copy paste into a Word Document the following:


-- 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights;

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7018(a), (b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(a), title XXXII, §§ 320103(a), 320201(a), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(A), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)


-- 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law;

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)

And don't forget...


-- 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights;

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

(R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, title III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)

My first two questions of the obvious is this.

- If you get a vaccine, by most standards you should become immune to whatever the vaccine was formulated for no? I mean I had a few vaccines as a child, never got two for the same thing so why would you expect a vaccine not to work if it was "supposed too"? LOOK UP Polio virus and its correlation to DDT. The Polio virus and DDT are almost synonymous in timing at every level. DDT in heavy use the next 6 mos Polio was skyrocketing and taking lives

- Pick up a book on virology and turn off the TV... YOU DONT DIE of a virus infection. You CAN die with a virus infection though. Why is that? Because a virus is similar to a parasite, it NEEDS a host to propagate itself. If it kills you, it would kill itself and that's not conducive to an outbreak or pandemic now is it? By the way they've also changed their tune to the fact that far less than 10,000 people died of Cerveza-bug 19 directly, meaning there were NO OTHER factors that were conflicting. I'm not even going to go off on the tangent of paper trails of follow the money but my god, if writing anyone's death certificate and adding to the word Covid to it netted your company (hosppital in this case) a $13k-$37k check FREE from Government Alphabet agencies every time, HOW MANY Covid patients would be dying in your hospital?

2018, over a 1,500,000 people died of TB, (Tuberculosis), Not a single classroom, school, City or town, County even, let alone an entire State, country or the world was shut down. Call me opinionated early on but your Cerveza-bug is being used as a vehicle to reset the worlds economy, governance, and overall legal operation of the world. Why? Because we are the world reserve currency, 2008 isn't over just been band-aided and they cant kick the can down the street and they're also going to use this partial-buffoon in office as a patsy holding the bag too.

- The Cerveza-bug 19 is a Corona/rhino virus variant. As was MERS, SARS, the Flu, Influenza, H1N1 (Bird Flu), 229E, OC43, HKU1 or 11 whatever it is, and NL63 for starters. Most of which are "Flu" like. So It doesnt matter where you live in the country here. Lets stick to N. America for simple logistics. Do you know of ANYONE, A N Y O N E at all who has NEVER had a cold or the Flu? Anyone? Expect to probably at some point whether already, in 3 weeks, 3 months, next year or two to get Cerveza-bug. There are now 1000's of Doctors, reg doctors all over the country and world at that who are being shut down talking about effective treatments and the like.

I wouldnt go as far as to say Cerveza-Bug is fake, it def exists. But it has a 97.4% recovery rate. In fact the CDC has quietly changed their website and opinion stating that Cerveza-bug is barely meeting the definition of an "outbreak" people. I can take you to 10 places right now in LA and San Diego county Alone thats doing everything they can to hush-hush the Bubonic plague in rat infested homeless encampments all along freeway off ramps, local parks, City building area's and industrialized areas that are Outbreaks NOT bigger because the damn MEDIA doesn't talk about anything else than COVID-19, immigration BS, Russian Collusion, and the Orange Man 24/7/365 for 3.5 years now.

A PANDEMIC by definition is a disease or illness that's infection and death rate are at a constant incline and NEVER STOPS. An infection or illness that comes and goes, just like the colds and flu's of our mutual existing time on this planet. Everyone's gotten it at least once.

And as a parent of 3 boys, with an ex wife that had a so-so immune system. Let your damn kids play in the fricken dirt. MY gawd. I swear their immune systems will triple by the time they're in their 20's. Wash there hands to be clean but your body has a natural way to deal with everything that's on this planet except what's trying to make you to be lower on the food chain. You germaphobes are tainting the gene pool of herd immunity and screwing it up for your posterity with your incessant OCD behavior issues. If you pay attention, most farm or rural kids don't get sick, at least not often by anything that's a product of the environments they're in.

Now introduce something to their environments that would otherwise not be there and they will likely get ill, fight it off, and build an immunity to it. Just like the whole purpose behind the CDC. Its intent, by Their words, not my opinion is to take the worlds most deadly pathogens, mutate them to something far worse than imaginable - Then find a cure. I'd bet a left child-DNA-making body part that that if the CDC didn't exist, neither would a bunch of other things either. Remember, money trails? well if something has a patent on it, it's man-made meaning not FOUND in nature.

Hope you all enjoyed your red pilling for the night.. I think it should really crack this conversation open. Seems to be better than trolling the scammers at least in the light of real conversation.