Community > Posts By > Let'sDoThis

 
Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 02:56 PM
Edited by Let'sDoThis on Sun 12/15/19 02:57 PM
About the same time GovernmentMotors was bailed out.
They took the money and moved to Mexico.
Japans Nissan did great with Cash for Clunkers.
Easy for the manipulators to crash the market.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 01:57 PM
Boris Johnson demands 'useless' Sadiq Khan must go ‘immediately’ to thunderous applause
Read more
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1154694/boris-johnson-news-latest-sadiq-khan-london-mayor-tory-leadership-hustings-video

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 01:48 PM
Edited by Let'sDoThis on Sun 12/15/19 01:50 PM
There are also Rinos who push restrictive laws.
However, the democRATS have been extremely busy adding more. Bent on destroying our liberties.
In San Fran, it's jail time for plastic straws. Perfectly acceptable to defecate in the streets and on sidewalks.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 12:41 PM



I challenge the little brainwashed, Nazi, Greta to go to China and threaten to put their leader "Up against the Wall.

She puts only capitalist bad guys up against the wall

Oh well, that's ok then I suppose
One idealog eliminating other idealogs :joy:.
rofl rofl rofl :thumbsup:

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 12:37 PM

Our rights are always being eroded by the politicians who respond to small majorities of the electorate. If it were not for the judicial system, those of us who are in the minority would have few rights left. Today one way to protect our rights is to be willing to challenge the laws that politicians pass. Another is to elect new lawmakers willing to make changes to the existing laws. What this does is really upset those who originally placed the laws or regulations in force. I believe this is part of the cause of the political polarization we see.

I to think in the WE.
I'm an individual is a society of like minded individuals.
I put our interests ahead of my own.
I admire the men who went to the aid of the black man who was shot by the police when he went to vote. Unlike the armed Panthers who intimidated voters.
Unlike the US hating separatists who are looking for FREE STUFF at the expense of taxpayers.
I've seen, in my lifetime, many restrictive laws.
Seems that's what Rats live for.
AmerICAN
RepublICAN
DemocRATS

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 10:57 AM
President Trump haters.
Best pace yourselves.
Still have another 5 years of him Keeping America Great.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 09:55 AM
I got this message from mingle team

It was a full body foto. My face was clearly visible.
May I ask, why was it taken down?

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 09:18 AM
Cool disclaimer

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 09:16 AM


But yet the Law is there it was put in place while Nixon was in office and never taken away~~~ Therefore yes it can happen that the Supreme Court could extend his term and the Re-Election could be in 2023 instead of 2020.. Not saying it will happen just saying it is possible.. Hummm so guess it is not BS after all~~~whoa

https://freedomfictions.com/fact-check-can-the-supreme-court-extend-trumps-term-by-3-years-if-hes-acquitted-in-the-senate/

"“There’s a little-known precedent on the books that Democrats are trying desperately to have removed before the impeachment trial of President Trump begins. In 1974, as Nixon faced impeachment, the Republican Congress passed a law that would allow his term to be extended if he was acquitted.

The law was specific to Nixon, and was set to expire in 5 years, but Nixon resigned. The removal of the law, therefore, never happened.

According to legal analyst and constitutional scholar, Art Tubolls, the fact that the law exists at all sets a precedent:

“The law is very clear. An acquittal, which they were sure they would get until all the facts came to light, would have meant that Nixon’s term was stolen from him, and that three years or less could be added to his time in office without causing a constitutional crisis."

“Because of how Nixon ended his own career and was pardoned, the law was never struck down or removed, meaning it’s still precedent, and only the Supreme Court can take it away.

According to our research, the Supreme Court can absolutely invoke this 1975 law and extend Trump’s term. The catch is, he has to be acquitted by a 2/3rds majority vote. According to our source:

“In order to make this happen, Trump would need 72 Senators to side with him, a number he would likely get if acquitted, as those Democrat Senators from red states would want to save their seats in 2020.”

That would more than likely cause the Democrat party to implode and lose any chance of ever winning another election."



i found this too kristi but nowhere could i find the actual law or the bill/ resolution number to quote the actual text of said 1974 voted in law

No surprise.
Google is biased and only lists impeachment proceedings.
And, as been exposed, leftist snopes has been busted with false reports.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 08:13 AM
Just as these brave souls did.
That time World War II vets violently overthrew corrupt politicians in Tennessee
When veterans of World War II returned home to McMinn County, Tennessee, they probably weren't surprised to find that many of the same politicians from before the war were still running the place. A local political machine run by Paul Cantrell had been suspected of running the county and committing election fraud since 1936.

However, when the sheriff's deputies began targeting the veterans with fines for minor arrests, the vets suspected they were being taken advantage of. One veteran, Bill White, later told American Heritage magazine:

"There were several beer joints and *****-tonks around Athens; we were pretty wild; we started having trouble with the law enforcement at that time because they started making a habit of picking up GIs and fining them heavily for most anything—they were kind of making a racket out of it.
"After long hard years of service—most of us were hard-core veterans of World War II—we were used to drinking our liquor and our beer without being molested. When these things happened, the GIs got madder—the more GIs they arrested, the more they beat up, the madder we got …"

By early 1946, the vets and the townspeople were tired of what they saw as corrupt practices by Paul Cantrell and his lackeys. The vets started their own political party with candidates for five offices. The focus of the contest was the race for sheriff between Paul Cantrell and Henry Knox, a veteran of North Africa.

Everyone knew that the election could turn violent. Veterans in nearby Blount County promised 450 men who could assist in any need that McMinn County had on election day. In response, Cantrell hired two hundred "deputies" from outside the county to guard polling places.

What happened next would go down as the "Battle of Athens," or the "McMinn County War."
Tensions built on election day as the veterans faced off with the special deputies. By 3 p.m., an hour before the polls closed, violence broke out. Deputies beat and shot a black farmer who tried to vote and arrested two veterans who were then held hostage in the Athens Water Works. Other veterans responded by taking hostage deputies who were sent to arrest them. Still, Cantrell was able to fill most of the ballot boxes with purchased votes and get them to the jail, ensuring he would win the election.

While the sheriff and his lackeys counted the votes in the jail, White and the other veterans were getting angry. Finally, sometime after 6 p.m., White led a raid on the National Guard armory to get guns.

White said in a 1969 interview that they "broke down the armory doors and took all the rifles, two Thompson sub-machine guns, and all the ammunition we could carry, loaded it up in the two-ton truck and went back to GI headquarters and passed out seventy high-powered rifles and two bandoleers of ammunition with each one."

The veterans set siege to the jail, firing on deputies that were outside the jail when they arrived. One deputy fell wounded into the building while another crawled under a car after he was hit in his leg. But, Cantrell and others were safely locked behind the brick walls of the jail. The veterans needed to get through before other police or the National Guard arrived.
Molotov cocktails proved ineffective but at 2:30 in the morning, someone arrived with dynamite. At about the same time, an ambulance arrived and the veterans let it through, assuming it was there for the wounded. Instead, Paul Cantrell and one of his men escaped in it.

A few minutes later, the vets started throwing dynamite. The first bundle was used to blow up a deputy's cruiser, flipping it over. Then, three more bundles were thrown. One landed on the porch roof, one under another car, and one against the jail wall. The nearly simultaneous explosions destroyed the wall and car and threw the jail porch off of its foundation.

The deputies in the jail, as well as some hiding out in the courthouse, surrendered immediately. The veterans were then forced to protect the deputies as local townspeople attempted to kill them. At least one deputy had his throat slit and another of Cantrell's men was shot in the jaw.

The veterans established a patrol to keep the peace. To prevent a counterattack by Cantrell, the vets placed machine guns at all the approaches to Athens, where the jail and courthouse were located.

The rest of the incident played out without violence. Henry Knox took over as sheriff Aug. 4, 1946 and future elections dismantled what was left of Cantrell's machine.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 07:43 AM
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/boris-johnson-refuses-apologise-racist-burka-comments-191129101017762.html
London, United Kingdom - British Prime Minister Boris Johnson refused to offer an outright apology for Islamophobic comments he made in 2018, which led to a spike in anti-Muslim hate crimes.

He was responding to presenter Nick Ferrari, who asked whether Johnson was "sorry for the words of the offence" caused by a Daily Telegraph column in 2018 in which he wrote that the "burka is oppressive" and that Muslim women who wear the full veil look "like letter boxes" and bank robbers.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 07:04 AM
I challenge the little brainwashed, Nazi, Greta to go to China and threaten to put their leader "Up against the Wall.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 04:15 AM
https://katv.com/news/local/judge-orders-childs-mother-hunter-biden-to-release-financial-records-from-past-5-years

LITTLE ROCK (KATV) — Sixteenth Judicial Circuit Judge Don McSpadden ordered Hunter Biden and Lunden Alexis Roberts to release their financial records from the past 5 years as a part of a child custody case, reports KATV content partner KAIT8.

The judge also ordered that all financial records shall be treated as “confidential financial information" and would be sealed.
The sister-in-law could always leak those records.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 04:04 AM
45°. Partly cloudy. 57° expected high.
Going to work in shorts.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sun 12/15/19 03:38 AM
I could see President Trumps crew challenging and suing for time wasted on the charade.
I'm actually pretty excited to see what happens when this circus is taken to trial.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sat 12/14/19 07:10 PM
That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sat 12/14/19 06:58 PM
Times are a changing.

'The ill-considered impeachment efforts against President Donald Trump have seriously interfered with his first term as president. Thus, argues constitutional scholar William Mattox in The Wall Street Journal, if acquitted, Trump should be eligible for a third term, notwithstanding the two-term limit in the 22nd Amendment.


Mattox deploys a sports analogy: “In the National Football League, teams can challenge a call on the field — but there’s a risk. If instant replay doesn’t merit overturning the call, the challenging team loses one of its three timeouts. That discourages frivolous challenges and keeps the game flowing, while also providing a way to reverse egregious errors.”

Hence, a third term for the president: “That would allow him to make up for the time lost advancing the agenda that voters elected him to enact. It would preserve impeachment for genuine offenses but discourage its use for disputed ones and for mere politics. Absent such an amendment, and in an era when government is divided more often than not, impeachment seems likely to become an increasingly common means of opposition.”
Third terms, no amendment needed?

Mattox’s proposal sounds radical, but actually, he’s a piker: He wants to accomplish this shift via a constitutional amendment. How old-fashioned. Doesn’t he know that the Constitution is a living thing, made to grow and change with the times? Over the past century, we have made dramatic changes in the extent of federal power, the redistricting of state legislatures, the constitutionalization of abortion and contraception and gay marriage, and much, much more, all without the tedious necessity of an actual amendment to the Constitution.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sat 12/14/19 05:13 PM
Supreme Court Can Extend Trump’s Term By Up To 3 Years If He’s Acquitted In The Senate

There’s a little-known precedent on the books that Democrats are trying desperately to have removed before the impeachment trial of President Trump begins. In 1974, as Nixon faced impeachment, the Republican Congress passed a law that would allow his term to be extended if he was acquitted.
According to legal analyst and constitutional scholar, Art Tubolls, the fact that the law exists at all sets a precedent:
The law is very clear. An acquittal, which they were sure they would get until all the facts came to light, would have meant that Nixon’s term was stolen from him, and that three years or less could be added to his time in office without causing a constitutional crisis.

“Because of how Nixon ended his own career and was pardoned, the law was never struck down or removed, meaning it’s still precedent, and only the Supreme Court can take it away.

“Our sources say it would be a 5-4 vote to allow President Trump to go on for another three years, making the next Presidential election due in 2023. Trump would still be eligible to run.

“That may sound extreme and unconstitutional, but only the SCOTUS can determine that, and they are solidly behind Trump, no matter what crimes he’s committed. The office is better with him in it, and that’s all they’re supposed to care about.“

The White House says the president absolutely would request an extension if acquitted because it’s his constitutional right to do so. If the Democrats want to play dirty, they can spend the next three years campaigning and then get a beat down like they would have in 2020 anyway.

What all of this means is that if the Democrats don’t convince 8 Republican Senators to vote to convict, we’ll be making America Great again for three extra years with no elections to worry about.

God Bless America.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sat 12/14/19 07:41 AM
Was God homophobic?
He did create Adam and Eve.
Not Adam and Steve.

Let'sDoThis's photo
Sat 12/14/19 07:22 AM


My belief, the Anti-Christ is a group.
Hundreds of millions strong.
Advancing, very rapidly

That's a hell of an army, do we stand a chance ? Any plans ?

Yes. That's one Hell of an army. Reality is, it exists. They are out for world domination.
One would know that by keeping current on world events.
Are you aware? Christians are denied protection by the UN?