Topic:
Man !!!
|
|
Johnny Cash and June Carter !!!
Nice to know about M. Jordan and St. Jude's hospital - wonderful (as you may have noted, the opinion piece was by a guy in his 60s so I swallowed it) thanks |
|
|
|
Makes me wonder who XX is and if they know the average term for a congress person(mostly males) is 10 years, if they understand that their bio of her is wrong(she was a wife and did not SERVE in the white house, but she did have a few years as SENATOR before Sec of STATE, which together still dont add up to 8 years in a political career)
I wonder if they ask why male politicians dont just 'let go'? True Ms Harmony, but as i recall, you mentioned 'naked greed' in an earlier post. Without getting distracted by technicalities, any kin of former president, not only wife, but even son, brother; smacks of monarchy. Does it or not? Sure, I understand the importance of having a woman president in society; Margaret Thatcher did a world of good not only for UK; but as an icon. And the reason was she came through on her own power, not on family brand name. That's what I meant; you see once a person needs a crutch; it becomes part of the image & actions are defined by it. Obama is a towering example. He was cautious and did a great job; but there were some omissions in world affairs, or came late. The 8 year term limit is what differentiates US democracy from rest of world. Our PMs in India could continue for life, if elected. Astonishing. One valuable point you mentioned is Senate Term Limits: Under the Constitution, members of the United States Senate may serve an unlimited number of six-year terms and members of the House of Representatives may serve an unlimited number of two-year terms. The 'unlimited' is true in India; we have seen many a son / daughter fill the vacancy (win on sympathy factor). High time, Cinderella was banned in schools. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Man !!!
Edited by
Palghat
on
Thu 03/07/19 06:43 AM
|
|
There are great movie stars and celebrities but was wondering how many of us think this guy made a difference. Or anybody else like him.
I am 62 years of age at this writing and I am a scarred man due to the times I grew up in. I am a child of the 1960's and I BELIEVE that was a time that will not be seen again ......ever! Television grew up and reached its true potential during that time because there were serious changes happening in that decade, with the Viet Nam war,the Black Panthers,F.B.I, C.I.A, the Hippies,etc, and then there was ...........ALI! He set the bar so high for athletes that anyone who didn’t take a political stance for the betterment of the small man was considered a sellout or selfish. This is why I have no respect for Micheal Jordan who during the issue's that took place in L.A ,he said nothing! This all happened because of Ali, man I remember how He , ALI used to walk down the street in New Haven Ct. with no bodyguards or thugs laughing and talking with his "people"! He let you know and said it , that WE were what mattered to him! He would pick up the poorest looking kid in the crowd and hug and kiss them and ask them what they thought about this or that, MAN! ...I WAS THERE,I SAW IT! and that kid became a celeb from then on! He would stop while a dude was fixing his car and help him with his tools all the time joking and buying soda's for the crowd, WE were all high on the love that MAN gave to us all, and He walked down Dixwell Ave with a large crowd following him all the while. This went on for about 2 hours and then he would walk to his car and He and his driver would ride to New York. I remember my aunt Trini saw this cop she didnt like and she called him out and called him a bunch of "m***a f***a's" and ALI laughed and said "Wow! You badder than me"! and all had a good laugh about that! Now everybody’s gone and so are those times. Anyone who considers themselves a celeb has no time for everyday people. People like Michael Jordan who could've made a difference and helped some people and saved some lives have no sincerity in their hearts to do anything that doesn’t bring money. When you reach a certain level of celebrity you control a certain spotlight and people take heed to your opinions and mindset, it seems to come with the territory and he said ....nothing! So I now realize that I came up during a special decade where people did not stand idle which is why things are better for those who enjoy that celebrity that they take for granted which is why it is beginning to erode from a place you cannot see.....the heart, but I guess they shouldn’t be concerned being that is a part that you don’t have. |
|
|
|
Aha, an agreement!
was expecting fireworks in defense of the Guardian / BBC W.r.t. your points: 1. Yes Sir, been watching Yes Minister for a long time - same situ here in India. will check out the links you've given. 2. Leading newspapers in India - all leaning left. Economic Times (India) gives close to neutral info. As a socialist democracy we had 70 years of almost uninterrupted Leftist party in government. They left us with an oligarchy where the son of a PM or CM became the next PM / CM. Then there was unchecked increase in corruption. In spite, we survived. Animal Farm - George Orwell As an outsider I always look for intentions - not words. Hillary for instance, after 8 years in White House and 4 years as Secy of State; why can't she let go? --xx-- |
|
|
|
Edited by
Palghat
on
Wed 03/06/19 08:47 PM
|
|
"Yahoo News" News for yahoos. None of it is true. Half of the stories they put up is "Sponsored Content", which is clickbait. A way to advertise the life out of you, and contaminate your device with viruses. WE really don't have good news media. That's why I get MY news from Aljazeera and The Guardian. Also the Western Journal out of Arizona. Used to scan the BBC & Guardian, still do, but with reservations. BBC we know was the bulwark against Nazi propaganda VoA against Russian Pravda The Guardian is a recent phenomenon, it became a world media after Wiki Leaks. That was then. Now, once the shareholders began to clamor for returns which advertisements could deluge them with, (in India, front page headlines are now the second page with fill page ads taking over the front page) integrity of the content became secondary. After Wiki Leaks (including declassified materials going back to Nixon days) Guardian faced possible charges from the US Government and so by UK and started back footing. Now whether it is the Washington Post or NYT, if we want to source the headlines it is the UK Guardian - and that's disturbing - UK meddling into US politics. R2D2, I hope you are reading this! |
|
|
|
"Yahoo News" News for yahoos. None of it is true. Half of the stories they put up is "Sponsored Content", which is clickbait. A way to advertise the life out of you, and contaminate your device with viruses. Wiki terms it as: News Aggregator from, Associated Press, Reuters ... Yahoo USP is: it trawls through Yahoo mails Trawling as we know is nothing new, even Google admits to having done that but this made it a popular rag and revived it's failing finances What escaped notice is when it began to form opinion collector in India, China and this began during the campaign when China Trade (& IP) became Trump's issue it began to tilt reader's perspectives After all tilted reports would find preferences when at the core: Yahoo's founder is Asian born or, Google's CEO is now an Indian origin American (there's this tendency for people including CEO's to look the other way) Yet, Yahoo or Google cannot be singled out for playing in the shadows when US media follows the lead set by The Guardian / BBC Why news headlines are same was explained by a senior newspaper man (retired from Times of India) during a conversation in 2013 it's a tacit understanding for survival and a shield from court cases So if the UK Guardian takes the lead with a certain headline similar headline has to ensue from the US network (affiliated or not) The problem is UK time is 5 hours earlier to US So the Guardian works harder to get it's headline right In other words, US media had it made for them from WWII |
|
|
|
Topic:
A Renter
Edited by
Palghat
on
Mon 03/04/19 05:28 PM
|
|
I see that you are from Texas. Aggravated sexual assault is considered a 1st degree felony in Texas. The minimum imprisonment a person can get for this crime is twenty five years if victim is younger than 14 years, a deadly weapon was exhibited or used, the victim suffered significant injuries, drugs were used to execute the crime, or if the defendant tried to kill the child/person. In Texas, sometimes, judges allow individuals convicted of aggravated sexual assault crimes to serve part of their sentence on probation. It's possible he was told to register as a sex offender. I spent 10 years working in the Nebraska corrections system and it seems VERY unlikely Aggravated would get reduced to simple assault. You obviously rented to him as a repeat offender, so this is going to be difficult. None of this situation is good. He is a dangerous person no matter how you look at it. Access to court records of this nature vary from state to state. So, you need a good attorney or Legal Aid. If anything would happen to a neighbor, especially if he is a sex offender, you could be liable. The general opinion here seems to be that a person committing Violent Crime may turn a new leaf while in the case of Sexual Assault it is unlikely; prison term or no prison term. I'm also inclined to believe so. It's then puzzling why judges allow sex offenders to serve part of their sentence on probation. In India, we had a case where a minor (17) was convicted of aggravated sexual assault (extreme) and the victim (22) eventually died. The minor was let off after detention for 2 years in a Juvenile Center. His ID was protected as he was a minor. Certainly, judges are supposed to know more or refer to some publications? My interest, since I'm working with teens. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Google Translator
Edited by
Palghat
on
Mon 03/04/19 03:38 PM
|
|
Beautiful in Hindi translates to 'Sunder' which is also first name of CEO;, when used as a name denotes 'perfect' as in divine perfection Google gave the poetic version: Khoob Sooorat It's literal breakup is: 'Very Imagery' implying beautiful face now thinking if this machine translator can get into my head, what next? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Google Translator
|
|
it really works.
English to Hindi (beautifully) English to Hindi (खूबसूरती से) Google also has a Speech translator Imagine Kim Jong un using it to follow Trump on Fox, gets CNN instead.. So a new product for Kim: Google Lip Reader |
|
|
|
Topic:
Serious Life Change
|
|
I had 5 minutes of happiness. I guess I'm good. You know Tom, for $500 per mo, you could live like a barbarian in a luxury hotel here (India). Includes western cuisine, your choice. Another 5 mins to your happiness. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Kim Jong Un 2, Cheeto O
Edited by
Palghat
on
Sat 03/02/19 11:16 AM
|
|
For those of you who claim Trump failed, you must have some better ideas! What are those great ideas? When should we start firing missiles into North Korea? Maybe we should send troops in to kill Kim? Let's hear all those great insights into this problem!!!!!! Oh honey... One can disagree with something without having a "better way" of doing it.. Most people can see when something is a bad idea/ didn't work.... Knowing Mingle members can be extraordinarily generous when appealed to with such sincerity and love, I too would have moved on and allowed this thread to lapse. But since millions of lives are 'technically' still under threat, I am compelled to set the record straight. This because, the American public is not getting the Eastern (or Indian) side of events. Background I've to return to the famous meeting between General MacArthur and President Truman where the General insisted on pushing beyond the 38th parallel. What you may not be aware is that the Indian Government relayed / cautioned and warned (Mao did not have diplomatic relations with US then) about Chinese involvement if the Americans pushed further. This info was brushed aside and we know all about Korea's split up. Domino Effect What we in India see as the domino effect from McArthur’s misadventure. The Chinese view changed. The Americans were now on the defensive, their forces cordoned off to S Korea in the East. This left Tibet on the West open; and India in the South. India had just gained independence and in the fifties we still had equipment from WWII. Moreover we were have a socialist government with what we call the Gandhi effect - a policy of peace and non-involvement in the cold war. When they took over Tibet, the Chinese also gained the altitude to position missile launches. They also had an easy run across India's eastern border (then Mao seemed to have changed his mind because they returned back). Ping Pong Diplomacy So when Nixon (who unlike Kennedy, was against India; the Cold War era) sent Kissinger to China, we Indian’s heaved in relief. At least the Chinese (we hoped) would now be responsible as a global player. Part II - Was N Korea, a cat's paw? While modern China under President Xi appears to be more responsible (world trade surplus) we suspected that they were using N Korea as their cat’s paw. N.K. was open source for nuclear blueprints. In fact, Pakistan’s military leaders had planned visiting NK; but dropped it after Trump declared the sanctions. So we appreciated Trump's daughter visiting Seoul for winter games and we looked forward to Trump's & Kim's meet in Singapore (last May) We were stunned when a top gun in Trump’s cabinet warned Kim that he would meet the fate of Libya’s Gadafi. Now this recent Cohen enquiry, the timing is not it a sabotage? What we don’t understand is how when the CnC of USA is on a sensitive mission, negotiations with the enemy; the fate of millions - is it not treason? The problem is the World has seen this display - and the consequence is if it happens in US, it's okay all over. From now on wards, any war by responsible governments would be labelled as 'for election reasons'. Iran next We are in a hurry because after N. K we anticipated Iran would be brought to the table and Iran has been important to India for strategic reasons. We know that with this deal now set in motion, it will come through either by Trump or by the next administration. Whether the manner in which Trump is pushing it through (as if it were another Hollywood version of hostage negotiations) or whether he carries the entire US Congress step-by-step - is an internal matter of the US. As I said, it does not concern people like me whether Trump closes this deal or a Democrat; we are interested in defusing tensions so close to India. So do I think negotiations have failed? I think it is under process. I hope it works out because in India we still feel the chill of the Cold War. Thanks for reading. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Kim Jong Un 2, Cheeto O
Edited by
Palghat
on
Fri 03/01/19 11:27 PM
|
|
For those of you who claim Trump failed, you must have some better ideas! What are those great ideas? When should we start firing missiles into North Korea? Maybe we should send troops in to kill Kim? Let's hear all those great insights into this problem!!!!!! I dont think thats what anybody is saying sir . But he should be listening to his own intel on how to negotiate this sensitive situation . And so far he has failed to do so ! Today's headlines in the Wall St. Journal : CIA Korea Expert Who Spurred Talks Sees Hope in Summit |
|
|
|
Topic:
Kim Jong Un 2, Cheeto O
|
|
Interesting and here I was thinking Mingle had many moderates like Pelosi who agree with Trump on the way forward, slowly and cautiously, since an agreement would eventually re-unify the North and South.
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Trump's New Campaign Promise
|
|
Trump: We had great talks. You know Kim Jong wanted to bring down the border between him and South Korea.
Post: What was your response Sir? Trump: I said, fine with me; but what do I get for all the trouble all these years? NBC: And, what was the deal? Trump: We get two Koreas and we save billions of dollars each year. From now on, he will protect S. Korea at his costs. Kim is a good guy. He offered to do Japan for us. CNN: What did you say Mr. President? Trump: I said, hold on Bro; I've to talk to the American people. |
|
|
|
Topic:
United States elections
|
|
From the S&P chart it appears that the bulk of the lift occurred during Obama's years. - 300 to +200. Add to this the following employment figures. Clearly Obama years were good for the economy and a period of greater tranquility compared to Bush years. Hillary should've walked in to Presidency. Didn't happen... May be charts don't give us the complete story or, as in this case, the inside story. |
|
|
|
Topic:
United States elections
Edited by
Palghat
on
Tue 02/26/19 12:07 PM
|
|
To others he is a has been businessman riding his glorious invisible clothes through the commoners who stand in awe.
we seem to agree on quite a few things.., like the comparisons with Ali, who wore no clothes. |
|
|
|
Topic:
United States elections
|
|
In a CNBC interview, Anthony Scaramucci explains it as a 3 legged stool with, Leg 1 – Economy, Trump, Scaramucci says, looks at the S&P index every morning; been on the rise Leg 2 – Foreign Policy – with China and N. Korea; N. Korea has been a blinking light since 9 years - Al Gore to AS Leg 3 – Border Security His base of people are very excited about it Given the above, S feels Trump is going to be tough to beat in 2020 I agree in part because like many outside US, I don't see candidates in Blue and Red; and, as mentioned elsewhere, the reality is the Blues don't seem to have a candidate with any sharp focus on issues. This is important because of Trump's style. He thinks he is Mohamed Ali; & he is. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Quitting smoking..
Edited by
Palghat
on
Tue 02/26/19 11:54 AM
|
|
I've quit a few times and there's a pattern.
Last time: Was after 3 months of quitting, feeling on top of the world, I announced it to a good friend. The bright guy says, 'Once an addict always an addict'. Talk of fragile egos, same evening bought a pack. Have you considered hypnotherapy ??
I do know a couple of practicing hypnotherapists. Problem is, cannot seem able to trust them; for obvious reasons. Been thinking of self-hypnotism; if this was possible. The problem is once you get into deep subconscious state - who will wake you up? Is waking up to an alarm, a good idea? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Palghat
on
Mon 02/25/19 08:38 AM
|
|
Indeed. Sowell has interesting perspectives. I obviously agree with some and not others. I feel quite possibly there is a large leap between trying to do better and believing one can achieve perfection. there is never enough anything for EVERY one, but that IMHO is no excuse to not try to do our best for AS MANY as we can. Thank you Ms Harmony. Sowell's first job as he says, was in the labor department and he saw firsthand that good intentions don't trickle down through government agencies to those in need. Listening to him I thought he was talking about the situation we face here in India. For example, our government institutions fundamental purpose is to propagate their existence (authority actually) and listening to him as he uncloaks these; was like rain on dry earth. But I digressed from the topic. Sowell says, introducing pills and contraceptives in schools had a dramatic rise in school pregnancies in US; and here I was thinking of becoming an evangelist for sex education in schools. |
|
|
|
interesting, very. |
|
|