I met my exhusband at work. He didn't grab me or make comments to me about my butt. He just asked me out. He left it up to me to say yes or no.
If you are trying to brush up against a woman in a crowd, you are an abuser. If you are commenting on women's butts to them at work, you are an abuser.

This is where the problem is!!! That very loose term "mistreat" is in the eye of the beholder not in the books of law. If I complement you on your butt, is that mistreatment? If I ask you to spend a week with me someplace, is that mistreatment? If I suggest your career future would be better with a wardrobe makeover is that mistreatment?? If a married man cheats on his wife, who is being mistreated?

Now, obviously, if I reach out and grab your privates, yes now we have mistreatment as well as a violation of law. Then there is the issue of in a crowded environment, my arms brushes over your covered breast, is that an issue?

That's what Mikey's talking about undrboss... He's from the UK

I think you'll find most sites here are controlled or owned by another country underboss

I didn't understand that either.
I did say "if you're wife or husband was a good cook "but was unfaithful would you keep them?

The other day i was watching YouTube and and Facebook i saw many couple meetings on airport meeting after a year or more, meeting for first time because they were in long distance relationship.... It was cool watching them....!!!

its a totally different relationship between spouses than between a person and their employers or job. So yes, they can lie to the spouse about infidelity without lying to others about their business.


It is about trust, but its also about relevance. I would keep a cook regardless of fidelity or a babysitter, but a husband has as part of his expectation in his 'job' with me is to be faithful, so that is a different situation.

Well, yeah, but then the Western (read United States Only) Bill of Rights isn't compatible with ANY religions' rule systems. Including Judaism and Christianity.

Basically, any religious rules that conflict with local laws, are going to be a problem.

As for the whole very real problem of the wearing of face coverings, that appears to be controversial even WITHIN Islamic societies. It apparently is NOT true, that all women are required to have their faces covered at ALL times.

It seems some men are upset that they can't mistreat women anymore. People are still getting married when both people are good to each other. I see men use or try to use women for sex. They get pissed off when they are told no. I see women use men for money. He is usually older and knows he is being used. He gets mad. I don't think either movement has much to do with the war between the genders. I think it's each person's selfish agenda.