magyar posta

i am sorry for my dis against you I was born in Hungary during the time
of occupation of germans. We fled to Many areas during this time.Army
was in dismal and barely able to survive wearer literally like rats
hiding and fleeing for our lives. My father and I fled from town to town
to eventually we escaped and hid and then we migrated to the USA

Fräulein hungary22 have they gotten any Kaufhaus ?

Achtung! Hungary22 you speak Deutsche are you from part of Hungary that
was occupied by German.

i hope i didn't type anything important
]

by the way i have no idea in hell what i just typed goddd i'm drunk.....

MOA'S ARE Military Operations Areas

I'm kinda of drunk right now and maybe this is too much or no relevance
at all but, since shadow failing to answer.
FCS, Associate Contractor Agreements (ACAs), as required, are executed,
between the LSI and the prime contractor for the identified program – or
a directed subcontract arrangement is invoked under the LSI agreement.
The ACAs are needed because the LSI is a contractor and not a government
agency. An ACA will not always be required and the need may be filled
with only a government-to-government Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). The
purpose of these MOAs (and Subordinate MOAs) is to establish the
responsibilities and management processes between PEO, Ground Combat
Systems (PEO-GCS), PM-UA, and the other PEOs/PMs in order to procure,
develop, test and field an FCS-equipped UA. The MOAs/SMOAs also provide
a basis for cooperative, technical and, acquisition efforts between
PEO-GCS, PM-UA, and the other PEOs/PMs. The MOAs/SMOAs are what we are
using now to facilitate this significant coordination effort. Current
count within the Army is 19 PEO-to-PEO MOAs and 44 PM-to-PM SMOAs. The
Army recognized that if FCS were to be successful, a permanent process
in addition to the MOAs, SMOAs and ACAs would be required.

I tell you this tactic reminds me of Vietnam where the viet-congs used
to hide in hospitals,schools,churches and the same thing happened to
them. A sad affair indeed and shouldn't have happen but, the Terrorist
are fundalmental radicalist and must be stop at all cause. There is also
two sides maybe information was given wrong. Then, the possibilities
that these people were forced to harbor the terrorist and then again
maybe these people are supporters.

Spin Boldak, Afghanistan - At least 40 civilians were killed in an air
strike in Afghanistan by foreign forces, witnesses said on Thursday, but
the U.S.-led coalition said only rebels were hit and it knew of no other
casualties.

The deaths on Tuesday in the southern province of Helmand, if
confirmed, would raise the civilian toll at the hands of foreign troops
to 110 in the past two weeks.

"Foreign troops are killing Afghans every day, but our government
has closed its eyes and does not see our casualties," local resident
Haji Ibrahim said.

Helmand governor, Assadullah Wafa, said earlier 21 civilians,
including women and children, were killed in Tuesday's air strike in
Sangin district - a major opium-growing area and the scene of a large
anti-Taliban operation by foreign troops.

The U.S.-led coalition said its troops and Afghan soldiers on patrol
in the area had come under fire on Tuesday and there were no reported
injuries to any civilians.

"During the 16-hour battle, Afghan National Army and coalition
forces fought through three separate enemy ambush sites while dozens of
Taliban fighters ... reinforced enemy positions," the coalition said in
a statement.

It estimated 200 Taliban fighters were involved in the clash, in
which one coalition soldier died, and said the air strikes destroyed
three rebel compounds and an underground tunnel network.

Governor Wafa said the Taliban hid in civilian homes during the air
strike and that they must take responsibility for the deaths.

Residents disputed that Taliban fighters were involved. "There were
no Taliban in our area," Mohammad Rahim, a resident of Sangin, told
Reuters by phone, adding he had seen 24 bodies in three houses.

One resident said President Hamid Karzai should travel to Sangin and
see for himself the civilian casualties.

Civilian deaths are a growing issue for Karzai who is also under
pressure over the country's slow economic recovery and rampant
corruption since the Taliban's overthrow in 2001.

Karzai has repeatedly urged the troops to avoid civilian casualties
while hunting militants, to stop searching people's houses and to
coordinate attacks with his government.

Last week, Karzai said the patience of Afghans was running out over
civilian killings by foreign troops.

Irate Afghans in the east and west, the scenes of last month's
operations by coalition forces, have protested against civilian
casualties reported by Afghan officials, and demanded the withdrawal of
foreign forces and Karzai's resignation.

A U.S. military commander on Tuesday apologized for the deaths of 19
civilians in the east. They were killed by U.S. troops early last month

Spin Boldak, Afghanistan - At least 40 civilians were killed in an air
strike in Afghanistan by foreign forces, witnesses said on Thursday, but
the U.S.-led coalition said only rebels were hit and it knew of no other
casualties.

The deaths on Tuesday in the southern province of Helmand, if
confirmed, would raise the civilian toll at the hands of foreign troops
to 110 in the past two weeks.

"Foreign troops are killing Afghans every day, but our government
has closed its eyes and does not see our casualties," local resident
Haji Ibrahim said.

Helmand governor, Assadullah Wafa, said earlier 21 civilians,
including women and children, were killed in Tuesday's air strike in
Sangin district - a major opium-growing area and the scene of a large
anti-Taliban operation by foreign troops.

The U.S.-led coalition said its troops and Afghan soldiers on patrol
in the area had come under fire on Tuesday and there were no reported
injuries to any civilians.

"During the 16-hour battle, Afghan National Army and coalition
forces fought through three separate enemy ambush sites while dozens of
Taliban fighters ... reinforced enemy positions," the coalition said in
a statement.

It estimated 200 Taliban fighters were involved in the clash, in
which one coalition soldier died, and said the air strikes destroyed
three rebel compounds and an underground tunnel network.

Governor Wafa said the Taliban hid in civilian homes during the air
strike and that they must take responsibility for the deaths.

Residents disputed that Taliban fighters were involved. "There were
no Taliban in our area," Mohammad Rahim, a resident of Sangin, told
Reuters by phone, adding he had seen 24 bodies in three houses.

One resident said President Hamid Karzai should travel to Sangin and
see for himself the civilian casualties.

Civilian deaths are a growing issue for Karzai who is also under
pressure over the country's slow economic recovery and rampant
corruption since the Taliban's overthrow in 2001.

Karzai has repeatedly urged the troops to avoid civilian casualties
while hunting militants, to stop searching people's houses and to
coordinate attacks with his government.

Last week, Karzai said the patience of Afghans was running out over
civilian killings by foreign troops.

Irate Afghans in the east and west, the scenes of last month's
operations by coalition forces, have protested against civilian
casualties reported by Afghan officials, and demanded the withdrawal of
foreign forces and Karzai's resignation.

A U.S. military commander on Tuesday apologized for the deaths of 19
civilians in the east. They were killed by U.S. troops early last month

What NSa just did was Chronologically dictate the whole history of the
Terrorist Cell in Fort Dix New jersey

Gee I wonder what they would say About Operation "Fedman" of the Federal
Bureau of Investigestion

Today on the "View" we have a very special and honored guest... Served
his country well and a True Soldier to the end. The one and the Only
ArmyDoc4u...

So, Tell us all what you think about this Political Mumble Jumble and
Propaganda started by The Celebs out there such as Rosie O'Donnell and
others.

Stupid Mercenaries and how many celebs are showing their True Colors.

Information e-mail to me by many Gov.organization

Yet another example of a media celebrity letting their true feeling
about the troops slip out. In this case, it is "The View" guest co-host
Ricki Lake (best known for a trashy talk show), who used the word
"ineducation" to describe why young Americans join the military. This
was in response to a question from co-host Rosie O'Donnell as to why
they enlist. An attempt to challenge that by co-host Elizabeth
Hasselback was slapped down by O'Donnell, who went on to claim that
felons were being allowed to enlist. This is not the first time that
such insults have been fired off, but it does show the contempt that is
held for the troops in at least some quarters of the anti-war movement.


This is not the first time such comments have been made by opponents of
the Iraqi component campaign of the war on terror. In February, NBC
commentator William Arkin, criticized American soldiers who defended
their efforts in the war on terror. Arkin also had expressed his hope
the troops who made the comments had been counseled. Arkin also raised
the specter of a military coup, and then referred to them as
mercenaries.



In November, 2006, Senator John Kerry made comments concerning an
alleged lack of intelligence among the troops and the notion that many
of the recruits are poor. Like Kerry's comments, which killed his 2008
presidential bid, Rosie O'Donnell's comments also have little, if any,
basis in truth. Every year since 1983, over 90 percent of all recruits
have at least a high school diploma. Many officers and enlisted
personnel tend to get college degrees (both graduate and undergraduate),
often paid for by the armed services. The claim that most of the
recruits are poor also did not stand up to facts. Most of the recruits
come from middle-class families. These recruits also score high on the
AVSAB tests (two-thirds of recruits score over 60 percent on the test),
another indication that they are not stupid. Also, felonies are a bar to
enlistment.



The comments from Ricki Lake, Rosie O'Donnell, and John Kerry are not
the worst things that have been said about the troops. Some scurrilous
and very incendiary charges came from Seymour Hersh, a journalist who
broke various stories in the Vietnam War. Hersh openly called for
American troops to be treated as they were when they returned from
Vietnam. Hersh claimed that the American forces in Iraq were carrying
out atrocities. In one instance, he claimed a video of a massacre at a
soccer game in the wake of an IED attack existed. Yet Hersh made this
claim at a lecture at McGill University in Canada. He apparently had not
heard of the Army's Criminal Investigative Division and the Naval
Criminal Investigative Service (the latter of which is the subject of a
popular prime-time TV series).



In a very real sense, there is only so much hypocrisy that the anti-war
movement will be able to get away with. It certainly is fair to ask the
anti-war movement how they reconcile their belief that they support the
troops, when they express almost implacable opposition to what the
troops are doing. These claims of support become harder to buy when they
come right after the person making them has called the troops stupid on
national TV.

Islamic militants have added Internet Cafes to their list of banned
places. Having already attacked movie theaters and shops selling videos
and music, the religious militants want to shut down Internet Cafes that
rent private viewing booths, where one or two people can surf the net
and whatever. The militants want to stop both activities. This is a
tricky issue, as the Islamic militants depend on the Internet Cafes for
communication services, and many jihadis like to catch a little porn
from time to time

I was wondering why i had headaches...

May 1, 2007: The widespread use of roadside bombs and rocket propelled
grenades in Iraq is causing more injuries than it appears. As early as
2004, when army doctors checked out soldiers wounded in Iraq, they found
62 percent also had undiagnosed concussion injuries. Later studies found
that 18 percent of all troops serving in Iraq suffered some damage from
roadside bombs and other explosions. In order to identify those troops
who might have injuries that show no symptoms now, but might turn into
serious problems years from now, the U.S. Army is using a new brain
scanner combines gamma rays and radioisotopes to identify subtle damage
to the brain.



Normally, brain injuries (concussion) from the of nearby explosions,
appear to wear off after a few hours, or days, of rest. What has been
missed until now were the long term effects. Too many concussions has
long been known to cause permanent and severe brain damage. Boxers who
took too many blows to the head would, in their later years, become
permanently disoriented and mentally disabled. This came to be called
punch drunk. But as more professional football and hockey players
suffered concussions, experts in sports medicine began to notice
patterns in how a few concussions could cause serious, and delayed, long
term damage. Better diagnostic tools (like MRI) made it possible to see
the damage early on.



Progress in treating sports injuries, especially head concussions, have
provided the U.S. Army with a large body of experience on how to spot,
and treat concussions (from explosions) and the resulting brain
injuries. The army developed guidelines for combat commanders to apply
for troops who suffer concussions, giving them several days of rest, or
sending them for MRI and other tests to make sure there is no serious
damage. Like professional athletes, soldiers who have suffered a certain
amount of concussion injury will be removed from combat duty. This in
itself is nothing new. For decades, combat soldiers have been shifted to
less strenuous jobs when they suffered permanent muscular or skeletal
injuries from combat, or even peacetime, operations. Paratroopers, or
even airmobile infantry who jump a few feet out of helicopters with
carrying a hundred pounds of gear, often suffer permanent back or other
injuries. Tank crews suffer similar risks jumping off their tanks, or
overexerting themselves pulling maintenance on their armored behemoths.
Just training for combat is a very physically demanding task.



Concussions, first encountered on a large scale during World War I,
which gave rise to the term "shell shock," was the result of the
increasing use of high explosive shells and hand grenades. This created
large numbers of soldiers with no visible wounds, but who were
definitely in a state of shock. Shell shock eventually came to be
renamed combat fatigue, because it wasn't the numerous blast injuries
that caused so many soldiers to go into a long term state of mental
distress, but prolonged exposure to the stresses of combat.



These long term injuries are nothing new, and with thousands of World
War II combat veterans studied for over half a century, there is more
and more data to pinpoint what kind of injuries we are dealing with, and
what their long term effects are. The big breakthrough has been the
ability to spot these subtle injuries early on.

I guess that goes along that saying: " Give them something and the
fighting may stop cause now they got something to lose".

They are fighting cause they got nothing to lose and by the teaching of
Allah if they die in a glorious battle or take out some enemy with a
bomb that they served him well and will be rewarded in Heaven with
riches and a harem of women.

You gonna love this one. Saudi Arabia, despite being the al Qaeda
"homeland", has been very effective in rounding up al Qaeda operatives.
Why is that? Because part of that is because many Saudis are willing to
divulge information on the terrorists, even if the informant is an al
Qaeda fan, or the guy being flipped is a relative. It's a Saudi thing
that's can be hard to explain. But, who turn informant or surrender
receive gentle treatment, Although, there is a catch to this the lads
who have not killed anyone are the only ones who can qualify and given
several months of "re-education" (largely by more moderate clerics).
Then jobs or other goodies (like an apartment or new car) are awarded to
the graduates. This program has led to some young Saudi men trying to
scam the system for the rewards. There are now freelancers who will
teach a young man how to scam the terrorist re-education system. It's
feared that some of the scammers have succeeded.



Note: that any terrorist who has actually killed someone, gets executed.
The preferred method in Saudi Arabia is beheading.

The Other Problems with this war on Terrorism has drawn our attention
away from other countries manufacturing weapons. Now, Chinese or more
politically correct Taiwan has been modifying weapons.

This info has been heard of but, never thought that it had any
relevance. Regardless, if it does or not my opinion is that it can pose
a possible threat if they decide to sell the weapons to another country
including any muslim or even the Taliban.

Our Government has known for a long time has known that Taiwan has been
relatively quiet about its long range missile programs. But recently,
senior officials mentioned that Taiwan does have missiles that can reach
targets deep inside China. Also mentioned was a recent wargame, where
Taiwanese used these missiles to defeat a Chinese attempt to invade
Taiwan. Apparently, someone is sending a message.


About, two years ago Taiwan tested a cruise missile version of its
Hsiung Feng anti-ship missile. This baby has a range of over 500
kilometers, and a highly accurate guidance system, the missile could do
a lot of damage to the many Chinese military targets near the coast.
Taiwan had held off on mass production of the missile, so as not to
alarm China, and to avoid the enormous expense of building up a Hsiung
Feng stockpile. The missiles cost over $300,000 each. There are already
over 700 Chinese ballistic missiles across 160 kilometers wide the
Taiwan Straits. The Hsiung Feng is capable of hitting land targets along
the Chinese coast, and deep inland, including a GPS guidance system.



Last year, Taiwan revealed that it had developed yet another version of
its Hsiung Feng II anti-ship missile. This one is launched from trucks
or fixed launchers, has a range of at least 600 kilometers and is
intended to go after targets on the Chinese mainland. Only if China
attempts to invade Taiwan, of course. Three prototypes have been built,
and production has apparently already begun. Current plans are for 500
of these one ton Hsiung Feng IIE cruise missiles to be put in service.
They apparently use GPS guidance and some stealth features, to make them
less liable to getting shot down. Using a more efficient engine, range
could be extended to 1,000 kilometers or more. The Hsiung Feng IIE is
pretty cheap, about $300,000 each, and carries a 500 pound warhead. The
Hsiung Feng IIE project has been kept quiet, with few details released
officially. Apparently this was done so as to not alarm the Chinese, at
least in public.



Taiwan also built their own version of the American AGM-154A JSOW (Joint
Stand Off Weapon). The Taiwanese version is called the Wan Chien. JSOW
is basically a smart bomb with wings. That enables it to glide up to 70
kilometers from the aircraft dropping it, to a target on the ground.
Range is about 25 kilometers if dropped from low altitude. JSOW also
contains more elaborate fins and software that enables it to follow a
specific route. Like the wingless JDAM smart bomb, JSOW uses GPS and
inertial guidance (as a backup) to find its target. Like JDAM, JSOW hits
within 30 feet of its aiming point. The U.S. pays about $250,000 for
each JSOW. The Taiwanese could use their Wan Chien. JSOW as a form of
HARM to take out the latest Chinese air defense radars. Taiwan is also
building its own version of HARM, called Tien Chien 2A. JDAM technology
is a lot simpler than these two other projects, and Taiwan could easily
design and build its own. Refusing to sell them just costs the U.S.
export sales. On the other hand, it allows the United States to tell
China that it didn't sell JDAM to Taiwan, thus "defusing" tensions over
Taiwan. In reality, of course, Taiwan can just go build their own JDAM,
which they will probably do.


The main question i think is Beside defending their country from
invasion from the Chinese will Taiwan use this to an advantage and
support the U.S.A or will they sell it to the highest bidders