Leader of organized crime families are prosecuted for things they told others to do

Many military people are prosicuted for theming others what to do

Glad you said that lol .... in Ohio law passed no new comman law after 1991 ..... Texas law is vague on time frame but says present selves as married enter contracts together take others name ...... but didn't see a time listing

But entering into a cohabitation agreement would be suggested to help avoid common law marriage

If that is correct how come the person in charge of an organization tell someone so&so is a problem and you brought them in you need to get rid of them

Then that captain eliminates the so&so how can the head of that organization be held as a responsible party to that crime

Many underworld figures in jail await the response

The quote did not transfer (per email to cause disruptions )

The govt says there is no such arrangement as common law marriage

To be married you must be registered and licensed by the govt

This began after a palamony suit a while back and court ruled you are either married or you are not .... if you are you will have a license

The govt infringement of religion is what a (legally binding) marriage is

The govt moved in on marriage to make money .... they took away a religious right and then began selling you a license to practice that right

Kinda like hunting and fishing and I hear some place say you need a permit to collect rain water ... pretty soon you will need a permit of some kind to breath (oooppps already here it's called mandatory health. care if you have breath you have to have it or suffer the penalty

To be specific marriage is religion obligation been in many religions and separation of church and state (no where stated in declaration of independence or constitution) the govt should not be involved in marriages of any kind ....... if the govt want to be involved you could register your relationship as a civil partnership ........ not a business (commercial ) partnership ...... an atheist that gets married is participating in a religious ceremony even if it is performed by a govt official ...... marriage is a product of the supreme being

the thing about govt marriages is the govt is issuing a worthless piece
of paper

the govt says it s a lifetime contract (that wording needs changed)

it is a contract till it aint

anymore you can void that contract for almost any reason and if both
want to void it you dont need a reason

so why bother all govt marriage does is promote a financial system that
is more corrupt than the mob

its not about the facts its about the money

first thing that happens the lawyers want financials then they know how
much they can milk the couple for before the judge can grant the
breaking of a lifetime contract ---

the judges and the lawyers are doing everything but sleeping together
(well some may even be doing that)

govt marriage is nothing but a scam and if you want it you should be at least 30 lol

he is doing what he said he would

unlike most who get elected

here is the irony

nearly everyone has been complaining elected office holders never do
what they say ---

they are all liars

now comes trump

he is working on doing everything he said he was going to do

and now

most are complaining that he is doing what he said he would do

(per the media)


you cant please anybody so you might as well please yourself


lol

Just uncommon sense & biological mechanics lol

Yep

Best way to stop that and most crap is if you accuse someone of doing something and say they should go thru the legal repercussions of their idea then the accuser should revive the punishment and pay the expense that the accused spent for defending themselves .........in civil area this would unclog the justice system

So if someone told her to do cause may be a republican the person saying to do it shares responsibility but of if not a republican then it doesn't matter if someone said to do it (theme of past posts iwii) but if no one told them to then actions are her own?????

I think we did not take the Obama administration sanctuary country attitude hen mentioning reductions of arrests at the border

the ironically sad thing is the congress of the U S collected trillion
(probably) since the implementation of the fica (federal insurance
contribution act)(even if they say it is not insurance (YOU FEEL LIKE A
NATIVE AMERICAN YET) tax there would be plenty of money their if the
congress did not spend it (they charged hoffa with a crime for spending
teamster health and welfare money refer to cap line) they spent it on everything instead of what it was intended for (kinda like the seat
belt law you will never get a ticket for not wearing a seat belt unless
you are stopped for something else and you are not wearing it and now
it is CLICK IT OR TICKET)again i ask (YOU FEEL LIKE A NATIVE AMERICAN YET)

we the people need to get our employees in the state house and in congress reined in and start paying attention to whats going on and
not voting for people just because they are the incumbent

sorry got off on a tangent lol

but if they would have all that fica tax money in a separate account
there would be enough money there to help buffer a widening of
medicare to cover mainstream Americans by adjusting the fica tax till
it was a solvent way to pay for medical coverage for all citizens

but the congresses over the decades stole that buffer

if you go into a store to create a scene and because your behavior lead
to a death you can be charged for that death

and if you told that someone to go to that store and be disruptive you
are an accessory before the act

well the wall works both ways it can stop illegal stuff going north
and illegal stuff going south and oney from drug sale and guns bought
north of border with drug money also can be made harder to get back
south across the boarder

thus lowering the murder rate and criminals access to guns should make
everyone happy that is not making illegal money from it

i doubt that unless she was up close and personal unless it shows
vagina on video its a she said she saw and if the buttocks are on the video most likely she (teacher) had her back to the class and if she is vertical in the cart wheel i doubt it would crack open and if she was bending at the waist the vagina would be facing away from the class

not condoning her actions but lets get it right

us supreme court says showing butt is not indecent exposure

( Mooning | Open Access articles | Open Access journals | Conference ...
research.omicsgroup.org/index.php/Mooning
Some jurisdictions regard mooning to be indecent exposure, sometimes depending on ... increasingly popular among students at universities in the United States. ... who was arrested after protesting in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building ... court found in 2000 that mooning does not constitute indecent exposure (and, ... )

yes the freedom of speech is very important as is freedom of religion
and the illegality to pass a aw regulating your religion

but if emails are found they people to go disrupt events then the
and that disruption gets out of hand the sender of that email has
responsibility for that happening

i just made a prediction

but even if the rate is down it is still way to high there are illegal drugs coming in across the boarder on backs of people and the money from those drugs leads to violence on both sides of the border
mexico should want to be stopping those crossings as well but hey
maybe their president is making to much money off of those drugs and
kids and women being sold into slavery once they get across the border