Community > Posts By > adj4u

 
adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 10:23 AM



yes, contrary to popular opinion, that wasn't a democrat republican thing,, people from across the political spectrum supported doing what was possible and legal to prevent a presidency that was not supported by the MAJORITY

many want california and new york to decide the president

truth be told she was behind in the popular vote till california
overwhelmingly voted for her (what state has the most illegal aliens
wonder how many voted illegally)

you need an id for almost everything else an id to vote should be enforced



many dont want living in california or new york to make the individual any less or more significant

only when IDs come without cost


people on welfare must have an id and a birth certificate so cost is
not a good argument

but yes i agree id should be without cost as should anything the govt
wants you to give theman id for (car boat and aircraft registration
to name a few and licensing such as fishing hunting and driving)
these are things for the govt to follow you around so yes they should be free)

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 10:17 AM

yes, contrary to popular opinion, that wasn't a democrat republican thing,, people from across the political spectrum supported doing what was possible and legal to prevent a presidency that was not supported by the MAJORITY

many want california and new york to decide the president

truth be told she was behind in the popular vote till california
overwhelmingly voted for her (what state has the most illegal aliens
wonder how many voted illegally)

you need an id for almost everything else an id to vote should be enforced

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 10:12 AM





and how would they 'find' them,,,,,?


smh



so killery's private email server is part of the dnc email network


i hope not if so the entire party should be investigated for having
official govt emails both classified and not





thank goodness they aren't, because it seems like our President elect would be fine with the hacking ,,,



and that is your opinion ---- you and a lot of others seem to blame
trump for the dnc hacking because of a comment he made about an ILLEGAL
PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER OWNED BY A PRIVATE CITIZEN ---- which has
nothing to do with the
hack of the dnc besides if the dnc had not done the illegal activities
the emails exposed then there wouldn't have been anything to blow the
whistle on about them



I blame Russia for the DNC hacking

I blame Trump for appearing to be supportive of Russia hacking American email



when has he shown support for the hacking of the dnc

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 10:09 AM



I could oblige if I was the type who created threads on any regular basis, let alone did 'hourly' threads on ANY TOPIC



you have 6 political threads list on the first page just a fyi

and that's a good thing



Christmas break is an exception,,,

I have started more threads while school is out

on various topics,,,killer cop, brave girl, dropping execution rates, self image issues, charity, and the internet,,,


i said it was a good thing lol

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 10:07 AM
Edited by adj4u on Fri 12/23/16 10:08 AM



and how would they 'find' them,,,,,?


smh



so killery's private email server is part of the dnc email network


i hope not if so the entire party should be investigated for having
official govt emails both classified and not





thank goodness they aren't, because it seems like our President elect would be fine with the hacking ,,,



and that is your opinion ---- you and a lot of others seem to blame
trump for the dnc hacking because of a comment he made about an ILLEGAL
PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER OWNED BY A PRIVATE CITIZEN ---- which has
nothing to do with the
hack of the dnc besides if the dnc had not done the illegal activities
the emails exposed then there wouldn't have been anything to blow the
whistle on about them

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 10:02 AM

I could oblige if I was the type who created threads on any regular basis, let alone did 'hourly' threads on ANY TOPIC



you have 6 political threads list on the first page just a fyi

and that's a good thing

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 09:58 AM

thats not how that works

lol

thats like saying if someone confesses to a crime, that proves they did it...lol

the most it does is prove their support of the action


unless they can show where they brought the person to an 'organized' facility and gave them training and instructions,,,,






no it don't work that way in terrorist groups

they are in small groups that do not have a major picture of the group

so they can not give away other members of the terrorist group

these are called cells and the very definition of cell is the smallest
building block of an organism

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 09:47 AM
Edited by adj4u on Fri 12/23/16 09:50 AM



didnt they also say something about no standing armies?

more about chicago gun laws here:

But Chicago Police have disputed that, saying it is a common misconception that Chicago has the country's strictest gun control, and the department's officials have contended that gang members face worse sanctions from their gangs for losing a gun than they do by the courts for illegally possessing one. Police have also emphasized that most guns used in Chicago crimes were bought outside of the city or state, where regulations are not as strict.

https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20151027/downtown/does-chicago-have-strictest-gun-laws-country-its-complicated



the fact is when honest people are regulated out of the ability to
protect themselves the criminal knows that the chance of them being retaliated against while committing a crime is very low thus the probability of them committing a crime goes up

not rocket science

does not matter where they get the weapon fact is as stated above
if people could defend themselves legally then criminals would be less likely to attack them


that makes little sense, because people CAN defend themselves legally, and get their guns the same places that criminals can



really so its ok to do what criminals do without becomming a criminal
i doubt that if they defend themselves with a gun then they will be
prosecuted and be thrown in jail because they broke the unconstitutional
law --- the key line is regulated out of protecting themselves
sure they can get a gun if they jump thru all the hoops and can show a need
even tho the need is easily obvious

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 09:29 AM

didnt they also say something about no standing armies?

more about chicago gun laws here:

But Chicago Police have disputed that, saying it is a common misconception that Chicago has the country's strictest gun control, and the department's officials have contended that gang members face worse sanctions from their gangs for losing a gun than they do by the courts for illegally possessing one. Police have also emphasized that most guns used in Chicago crimes were bought outside of the city or state, where regulations are not as strict.

https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20151027/downtown/does-chicago-have-strictest-gun-laws-country-its-complicated



the fact is when honest people are regulated out of the ability to
protect themselves the criminal knows that the chance of them being retaliated against while committing a crime is very low thus the probability of them committing a crime goes up

not rocket science

does not matter where they get the weapon fact is as stated above
if people could defend themselves legally then criminals would be less likely to attack them

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 09:19 AM


if a terrorist group claims responsibility then it is an organized attack

adj4u's photo
Fri 12/23/16 09:10 AM

and how would they 'find' them,,,,,?


smh



so killery's private email server is part of the dnc email network


i hope not if so the entire party should be investigated for having
official govt emails both classified and not


adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 03:12 PM




so what if russia hacked the dnc emails

trump never hacked dnc emails

everyone should quit giving trump a hard time about it



this is another bad example

this is a PERSON directly INVITING a government to break the law


yeah, that person should expect a hard time about it,, especially if that invitation is accepted





he did not invite them to hack

he said if you did i hope you can find the lost emails from clintons email server

that had nothing to do with the hack of the dnc

adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 02:59 PM

WE agree here

judging actions and words




dont tell anyone but we actually agree on more than even we realize

adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 02:57 PM


so what if russia hacked the dnc emails

trump never hacked dnc emails

everyone should quit giving trump a hard time about it

adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 02:54 PM

lots of things people 'should' do

best to make assessments based on what they HAVE done, rather than what they have not,,,,imho

except when they claim to have done something and havent,,,




if people do things in your name and you do not make it perfectly clear that you do not support their actions then it is the same as supporting their actions

it is the same as a policeman that knows another policeman is doing things that are illegal even tho he is not doing those illegal things that policeman is just as guilty as the one that did the illegal actions because they did nothing to stop the actions of the other


if someone says you said to do this or that and never deny their statement then you are showing support for their statement

adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 02:48 PM





Video: ‘Black Lives Matter’ Protest Leader Calls For Shooting, Running Over Cops


http://www.infowars.com/video-black-lives-matter-protest-leader-calls-for-shooting-running-over-cops/

adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 02:46 PM

anyone can buy posterboard and write a Sign

that only tells you about that person

to know about a movement, one should read their official information


that is true but they called for it in the name of the blm

if blm did not like them calling for such actions they should have been out condemning the actions of those calling for such action but they did not


thats like saying i didnt tell my kid to break your windshield and then taking the kid out for pizza and ice cream

adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 02:25 PM


no one really knows what the mind of another says about themselves

that is why we should try to say either positive things or neutral
thing when speaking of ones internal character

this is not saying you should candy coat their bad actions

example hey you should not have screwed around on your wife with the maid (not an attack on the person but is attacking the act)

example 2 you no good man whxre you are a worthless piece of crap for doing it with the maid while married to your wife (that is attacking the person not the action)


but hey what do i know

adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 02:13 PM

its propoganda that ignores the 'human' element completely in favor of blanket character stereotypes

unless talking statistics and trends,which also have a 'human' element, people tend to pretend everyone in a group thinks, acts and believes the same

whether it be political groups like republicans and democrats
whether it be movements, like the Tea party or BLM
whether it be geographic groups, like new yorkers or southerners
or career groups like lawyers, cops, politicians


the mind has an easier time boxing things that are highly correlated together, but intellectual integrity calls for people to take that further once its out the box and discover the human factors,,,


i never heard the teaparty crying out to shoot cops blacks or anyone else ---- blm is a hate group that is as bad as the Aryan Brotherhood an probably worse the a b is not out there telling every one and any one to kill all blacks and jews they may believe in it but they are not promoting it to others that are not a member of their group ----- blm should have charges of inciting riot against them multiple times

blm is an evil organization (that seems bent on the destruction of this country)

they like to aviod the facts like how many whites died to end slavery (John Brown was hung because of his fight to end slavery blm never says anything about him) what about all the whites that operated the underground railroad you never hear blm say anything about them what about all the whites that died in the union army during the civil war you never hear blm mention them what about the whites that tried to help blacks by starting black themed tv shows blm never mentions them


what about all the blacks that went out to capture other blacks to sell at the muslum slave house blm never mentions them


to compare the blm to the tea party is a gross injustice to the tea party

adj4u's photo
Wed 12/21/16 01:59 PM

what point?

should we stop funding centers for disease and ask people to take contagious people into their homes instead?


someone being a 'potential' danger, doesn't justify snuffing out their life,, TO ME

it also makes little sense to have people pay more for what they support if its something that will benefit ALL equally



benefit ALL equally

that is an opinion some would say the death penalty benefits all equally

like i said in the past death penalty must have overwhelming proof and prosecuter can not pull on the emotions of those in the jury
and eyewitness must rove they are reliable by being able to
recognize say the person that was the cashier where they went to buy gas 3 months ago that was not their regular stop

1 2 6 7 8 10 12 13 14 24 25