Yes. Many of the accusers have been out of the spotlight for years, and now they are back in it again. They have been invited to talk shows, and they ended up on the cover of New York magazine together. And not one of them is required to provide a shred of tangible evidence before they are allowed to join the attention train.

I lean towards believing the earliest and most consistent accusers are telling the truth, and I also lean towards believing that at least a few of the women who later came out of the woodwork are just taking advantage of the opportunity.

Of course, I wasn't there, so the only thing I know for sure is that in 2015 the media is exploiting this spectacle in every way possible.




That's your belief, and maybe its a perfectly reasonable belief, but there is NO law of averages which guarantees your belief is correct.



It might not be the case, but it most certainly could be the case.

This program is great for finding larger files (like videos or some music collections)

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.diskusage&hl=en

I can't answer your question directly, but these two ideas may help you:


1) Install VLC if you haven't already:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.videolan.vlc&hl=en

Its free and safe. It can index the music on your device and might show you where your music is.


If that doesn't work, you can:

2) Install ES File Explorer if you haven't already:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.estrongs.android.pop&hl=en


And use it to explore your device

But back everything up first. You can't trust apple to take care of your data. Several friends of mine lost all of their photos when they upgraded the OS on their iphones.

Choosing to accuse someone is not a coin toss, and there is no law of averages which guarantees that one of them is telling the truth.

And they absolutely CAN all be lying.

I think he is guilty, and I also think that many (not all) of the women are lying because its a safe way to get attention.

But none of us truly know if he is guilty.

I know, right? Any biologist will tell you - breast feeding is one of the most natural things humans do.

Jeffrey, Welcome to Mingle2.

I found your two posts interesting:




I think you are on to something here.

Our brains and senses do not work perfectly. We sense things that aren't there, and fail to sense things that are there. But if you are the kind of person who steps back and asks rational questions about the nature and causes of your experiences, you are going to be less likely to be adversely affected by malfunctioning perceptual machinery.

I used to be intensely interested in all forms of 'alternative medicine'; I've read a great deal about homeopathy and I've had many long conversations with homeopathy's Faithful, including of course 'certified homeopaths'.






This is why I don't drink water. I'm just too much in tune with the imprinted energy of all the previous turds those water molecules have come in contact with.

Exactly.

Who is to say?! If he can do all of that, maybe he also murdered his neighbors!? I'm just asking questions here. If he might have maybe murdered his neighbors - maybe he also poisoned entire cities. I don't need evidence, I'm just saying maybe we should look into it. Who is to say that Cosby hasn't started entire wars? Millions of deaths may be on his hands. Perhaps this option should be looked into as well.

I wager that 2-3 of them were involved in some very shady business, and this is the result of that business. Most areas of 'alternative medicine' involve some slightly shady business anyway.

For the rest of them, I'd wager the events are unrelated. But it would be much more interesting if I'm wrong about that!

That's a great, concise summary of her problems.

Dr. Hahnemann was a doctor of sorts, but he was wrong. Doctors can be wrong.

"English medical science" was a joke in his day, and he was a critic. He was right to criticize some of the superstitious practices of his day, but he was wrong in his theories about the causes and cures of diseases.

Popular snake oil is still snake oil.

Homeopathy has no power. Truly Homeopathic remedies are no better than placebo.

I qualify that with truly homeopathic remedies because some homeopathic practitioners, when they find that their remedies are not achieving long term cures, will tell their patients "In order to get the best results, you need to make the following lifestyle changes...". Some lifestyle changes will help the body cure itself of disease - but that is not homeopathy.

People who think they are benefiting from homeopathy are actually benefiting from their own body's intrinsic healing power.

Why should we waste our money or our time on snake oil? We should learn how to actually help the body heal itself, or get advice from those who do.


Edit: Also, there are herbal remedies out there which are actually effective, and which contain a useful dose of herbs, but which will market themselves as 'homeopathic' when they are not homeopathic. That's another reason to clarify that truly homeopathic remedies are useless.

The money grubbing marketers behind the homeopathy movement have people so confused and misled, that true herbal remedies actually sell better when they have the label 'homeopathy' on them.

Yes, everything I've heard from greek citizens and everything I've read suggests this is true - even from people who defend Greece in this standoff.

False. Homeopathy is useless as a field of study, and its treatments have been shown again and again to be no more effective than placebo.

Of course, the homeopathy con is also big business! And any time something is big business, there are people invested in lying to themselves and to other people.

There is so much BS 'evidence' out there that homeopathy is supposedly effective. Dig deeper and you find paid-off researchers, bad statistical analysis, and extreme cherry picking.

Pretty much.

What?!

As I suspected, you have confused a safe, controlled demolition with a completely uncontrolled collapse.

Once you read this website, it becomes clear that some people have figured out a way to gain notoriety on the web:

Lie to gullible people, and use your lies to drive traffic to your website.

What is your point?

Are you saying that the official explanation must be a lie, because proper demolition is hard and expensive, and yet fire brought a building down?

If so, you seem to be ignoring the most important part of a controlled demolition:

Control.