(March 14) - Democrats are increasingly worried about their chances for victory in November after a series of attacks by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on rival Sen. Barack Obama's leadership, credibility, readiness as commander in chief and, now, his ability to win the White House.

http://news.aol.com/elections/story/_a/democrats-fret-over-warring-words/20080314091209990002?ncid=NWS00010000000001

--------------

interesting been going all this time without rodham in her name
now it is back hhhmmmmmmmmm

--------------

wonder if they been reading jsh threads

--------------

imagine that

She's always used Rodham

you check the news for the last 3-4 months

it has been left out in the reports

Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/31/debate.main/

-----------------

YouTube has the hot exchange between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton that everyone is talking about today.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/01/clinton-obama-m.html

--------------------

season was over were wrong. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton agreed

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003725510

---------------------

is this enough or do you need more

I doubt she has been reading the threads. No one knows how to edit the posts and they all take forever to scroll through. Her hand would be cramping.

For shame!

i was referring to party leaders

you know the ones that are really in charge

Well if its left out of the reports, then its the reporters doing it

See what I mean? Quoting proliferators...

that a girl

dave is teaching you well

Hillary dropped the Rodham when she went after the bid for the presidency. The average man doesn't like a woman retaining her maiden name. Therefore, Hillary is leaving Rodham out so as not to alienate the white male whose vote she needs to win the presidency.

thats what i thought


so it was a way to manipulate the ""people""

I think that is sexist and presumptive. The average man? Back that up... with a verifiable and valid source.

am i average enough

I don't have a "verifiable and valid source" other than family, friends, neighbors, and co-workers. I realize this is not a scientific source, but sometimes means such as I referred to are just as good as expensive polling data. At any event, hey guys, how about voting on this and we will have an unscientific poll?

I have one question/observation. Do you mean Hillary or the media? When you see her name in print or hear it on TV or radio is it not media coverage? If the name has in fact been dropped, maybe the correct question to ask is why the MEDIA chose to drop it?

That said, I've seen and heard her name with and without the middle name up to the present day. Don't you conspiracy theorists have something better than this?

if i remember correctly when she ran ads for the primary in ohio

she sai hillry clinton and i approve this message

One more thing. I married a woman who kept her maiden name as a middle name for professional reasons. Ask me if I cared? The answer would be not at all. The only people that would care about such things are those that are insecure.

And when did you hear her call herself Hillary Rodham? Have you ever???? Probably not. You pay attention to things that are nonsensical.

we know there are

no insecure people

in the voting pool

i think the point is being over looked by all of us

and i take the blame

for noticing the name reference change

it was in reference to a discussion in

another thread where it was brought up

that the democrats are imploding

and today this article is on the front page of a news channel