Topic: Hillary's Buddy Involved in Prostitution Ring | |
---|---|
Well, if your were in the company/presence of the person committing the act of shooting, and that person died, you would very possibly be charged with murder - guilt by association.
Lindyy that's when you're there are the crime scene.. that would make you a witness.... not a party to a crime... if you had no previous knowledge.... WITNESS.... |
|
|
|
Sure, and you can do that... if you show me where you have any monitary loss from it.....(slander and libel is only a criminal offense if you can prove monitary loss or emotional trama from it, and I'll bet that if we look in your past...well the emotional trama can be blamed on much more than me saying your name)
and how many slander and/or libel cases have you litigated?...most defamation cases are soft damages and are the amount is decided upon by the jury...very few cases have a tangible amount...the last case I handled a monetary amount was placed on the notice that was sent out and that amount was multiplied by the number of notices that were sent out. and agasin where does she live, what is her name, and what does she do.... what is my name, where do I live, and what do I do??? What loss does an internet profile have? |
|
|
|
that would make you a witness.... not a party to a crime... if you had no previous knowledge.... WITNESS....
they can charge you as an accomplice. in a lot of people's eyes you're just as guilty if you didn't stop the one who was actually breaking the law |
|
|
|
Lily .... He was Hillary's friend .... remember the illegals/driving licenses/New York .... but now Hillary has done her cut and run now that he is in trouble and is useless to her politically
politicians don't have friends amen brotha, amen.... So I had a friend that went to prison... does that make me quilty by association??? No, becuase in this country we are responsible for our own actions, and to use Hilaries name in this is shear propoganda..... Think for yourselves for once would ya? Don't be sheep.... (addressing all of those that want to lump people together because of their associations) Lily ..... Once again, it is not "sheer propoganda" to use Hilliary's name in relation to Spitzer. She aligned herself with him politically and also made out that he was a personal friend since, at the time, he was the powerful governor of New York. Of course, now that he is on his way out, Hillary has disengaged herself from him. As one poster stated, Hillary has removed all mention of him from her website. P.S. I think you meant "birds of a feather." So because I know someone that shot someone, that makes me guilty also.... K, I'll turn myself in..... and no I didn't mean to use birds of a feather... I meant to use sheep, please keep up with the conversations from this point forward.... Lily..... "Birds of a feather flock together" means people of the same (usually, unscrupulous) character associate with one another, as do birds of the same species. You said you "had a friend that went to prison... does that make you guilty by association??? No." Therefore, your statement, "don't be sheep" doesn't make sense. It would have been more appropriate if you had said, just because you have a friend in prison doesn't make you "birds of a feather." Used in that context, it would mean that just because your friend's leanings are criminal doesn't indicate you have that same nature. Incidentally, there is no need to be picking fights with everyone on the thread. The statemenst were seperate.... They did not relate... hence why they were in seperate paragraphs. Paragraphs seperate thoughts and ideas. I meant sheep as sheep follow blindly... yes I know what birds of a feather means... Who am I picking a fight with? I have a different opinion, so I should not state it?? Or is it that I differ from YOUR opinion... |
|
|
|
Sure, and you can do that... if you show me where you have any monitary loss from it.....(slander and libel is only a criminal offense if you can prove monitary loss or emotional trama from it, and I'll bet that if we look in your past...well the emotional trama can be blamed on much more than me saying your name)
and how many slander and/or libel cases have you litigated?...most defamation cases are soft damages and are the amount is decided upon by the jury...very few cases have a tangible amount...the last case I handled a monetary amount was placed on the notice that was sent out and that amount was multiplied by the number of notices that were sent out. and agasin where does she live, what is her name, and what does she do.... what is my name, where do I live, and what do I do??? What loss does an internet profile have? you think it's difficult to track someone down from the internet?....and you really don't understand the dynamics of a defamation case..saying that however does not imply you have or haven't crossed the threshold.. |
|
|
|
So because I know someone that shot someone, that makes me guilty also.... K, I'll turn myself in..... Well, if your were in the company/presence of the person committing the act of shooting, and that person died, you would very possibly be charged with murder - guilt by association. Lindyy you're so funny.... was Hilary in the room when he and the hooker were f*ing? Then how is she guilty??? did she know it was going on....Doubtful... but yet a thread was started and a news story written so that people with little tiny brains would say....OMG Hilary was involved with a prositution ring... when she probably had no knowledge of it whatso ever.... tiny minds think tiny thoughts... lily...... I'll be darned. I didn't know the title of the thread was "Hillary was involved with a prostitution ring." I thought it was entitled "Hillary's Buddy Involved in Prostitution Ring." Did you rename the thread or what? |
|
|
|
So because I know someone that shot someone, that makes me guilty also.... K, I'll turn myself in..... Well, if your were in the company/presence of the person committing the act of shooting, and that person died, you would very possibly be charged with murder - guilt by association. Lindyy you're so funny.... was Hilary in the room when he and the hooker were f*ing? Then how is she guilty??? did she know it was going on....Doubtful... but yet a thread was started and a news story written so that people with little tiny brains would say....OMG Hilary was involved with a prositution ring... when she probably had no knowledge of it whatso ever.... tiny minds think tiny thoughts... Lindyy says: I think you got my post confused with someone else's. But, she was 'buddies' with Spitzer. He is quite a wealthy man. Are there donations to her campaign involved? She has been known to take donations from "people of ill repute." Birds of a Feather Flock Together. People of like minds/habits, lifestyles associate with one another. In this instance, corruption. Her accepting wrongful donations, White Water, etc. Lindyy |
|
|
|
Lindyy says: It falls under 'civil' matters. Sometimes it is better to keep your vocal cords silent. Or, in this instance, your typing fingers quite and invisible. Lindyy Lindyy, so what is your real name, where do you live, what do you do, if those were a matter of public knowledge you might have a case, but they are not... and good luck serving me... what is my name, where do I live, what do I do??? Oh...Lindyy on a stick... I'm so angry now.... lindyy lindyy lindyy.... LIL- Are you that computer illiterate? You have no idea of how things can be traced via a computer? 5) No derogatory or offensive references to sex, gender, ethnicity, religions, or sexual orientation. Lindyy Lindyy I'm not going to fight a battle of intelligence with an unarmed person. In order for someone to prove slander or libel, it must be public knowledge as to who you are... and no one here does, unless you have directly told them. Your profile does not say Lindyy...Jane Doe who lives in Hoboken Kansas, who is a legal secretary at the lawfirm of Dewey Chetum and How... So slander of your name is virtually impossible..... lindyy lindyy lindyy.... I'm so angry lindyy.... |
|
|
|
lily......
I'll be darned. I didn't know the title of the thread was "Hillary was involved with a prostitution ring." I thought it was entitled "Hillary's Buddy Involved in Prostitution Ring." Did you rename the thread or what? could it be that one of Hillary's girls made a mistake...that wasn't the Bill Hillary meant... |
|
|
|
that would make you a witness.... not a party to a crime... if you had no previous knowledge.... WITNESS....
they can charge you as an accomplice. in a lot of people's eyes you're just as guilty if you didn't stop the one who was actually breaking the law I'm sorry I didn't elaborate... I'm at a convience store with someone I barely know, and that person pulls a gun and shoots someone.... If you had no knowledge of the gun or what that person planned.... and that can be proven in court... that makes you a witness... not an accessory... |
|
|
|
Well, if your were in the company/presence of the person committing the act of shooting, and that person died, you would very possibly be charged with murder - guilt by association.
Lindyy that's when you're there are the crime scene.. that would make you a witness.... not a party to a crime... if you had no previous knowledge.... WITNESS.... Lindyy says: Lily, lily, lily. Wrong, wrong, if you went with someone and simply served as an "lookout" and friends went in to an apartment to rob it, and there was a little old lady in there and she died of a heart attack, everyone, including the lookout would be charged with murder. Same if the lookout did not know anyone would be shot/killed, but went along knowing a gun was present - all would be charged to some degree with the murder. At least in Pennsylvania law. Lindyy |
|
|
|
lily.....
we know you are so angry. that is what the complaints are about. in lieu of contributing something worthwhile to this thread, you are starting confrontations with everyone that have nothing to do with the subject of the thread. now quit being so nasty. |
|
|
|
Well, if your were in the company/presence of the person committing the act of shooting, and that person died, you would very possibly be charged with murder - guilt by association.
Lindyy that's when you're there are the crime scene.. that would make you a witness.... not a party to a crime... if you had no previous knowledge.... WITNESS.... Lindyy says: Lily, lily, lily. Wrong, wrong, if you went with someone and simply served as an "lookout" and friends went in to an apartment to rob it, and there was a little old lady in there and she died of a heart attack, everyone, including the lookout would be charged with murder. Same if the lookout did not know anyone would be shot/killed, but went along knowing a gun was present - all would be charged to some degree with the murder. At least in Pennsylvania law. Lindyy I agree with you on this point 100% however it was not the sceneiro I was speaking of. |
|
|
|
Edited by
leahmarie
on
Tue 03/11/08 02:09 PM
|
|
that would make you a witness.... not a party to a crime... if you had no previous knowledge.... WITNESS....
they can charge you as an accomplice. in a lot of people's eyes you're just as guilty if you didn't stop the one who was actually breaking the law I'm sorry I didn't elaborate... I'm at a convience store with someone I barely know, and that person pulls a gun and shoots someone.... If you had no knowledge of the gun or what that person planned.... and that can be proven in court... that makes you a witness... not an accessory... lily..... Your accompanying the person makes you an accessory. The law doesn't quibble about whether you barely knew the person or had no knowledge as to what that person was going to do. You are guilty of murder. Of course, under the circumstances, the charges might be mitigated down to a lesser charge of involuntary manslaughter, depending on a multitude of facts. |
|
|
|
lily..... we know you are so angry. that is what the complaints are about. in lieu of contributing something worthwhile to this thread, you are starting confrontations with everyone that have nothing to do with the subject of the thread. now quit being so nasty. I am not angry... I am not starting arguements. I am stating my opinion... I am defending my opinion from my original post that I made to the thread. I was accused of breaking rules, i was defending my stance on them... please re-read the entire thread then when you have a full understanding I will address you again.. Thank you Lily. |
|
|
|
that would make you a witness.... not a party to a crime... if you had no previous knowledge.... WITNESS....
they can charge you as an accomplice. in a lot of people's eyes you're just as guilty if you didn't stop the one who was actually breaking the law I'm sorry I didn't elaborate... I'm at a convience store with someone I barely know, and that person pulls a gun and shoots someone.... If you had no knowledge of the gun or what that person planned.... and that can be proven in court... that makes you a witness... not an accessory... lily..... Your accompanuying the person makes you an accessory. The law doesn't quibble about the facts that you barely knew the person or had no knowledge as to what that person was going to do. You are guilty of murder .... of course, under the circumstances, the charges might be mitigated down to a lesser charge of involuntary manslaughter, depending on a multitude of facts. learn legal terms before you argue with me further thank you. Lily. |
|
|
|
I'm sorry I didn't elaborate...
I'm at a convience store with someone I barely know, and that person pulls a gun and shoots someone.... If you had no knowledge of the gun or what that person planned.... and that can be proven in court... that makes you a witness... not an accessory... then why is OJ being changed with a gun related offense because one of his companions had a gun... |
|
|
|
Edited by
northrn_yanke
on
Tue 03/11/08 02:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lindyy says:
Lily, I can assure you that several people on this thread are WELL aware of legal terminology. And, just like you, WE are stating OUR opinion, without attempting half-heartedly at throwing insults. Lindyy |
|
|
|
I'm sorry I didn't elaborate...
I'm at a convience store with someone I barely know, and that person pulls a gun and shoots someone.... If you had no knowledge of the gun or what that person planned.... and that can be proven in court... that makes you a witness... not an accessory... then why is OJ being changed with a gun related offense because one of his companions had a gun... becasue he went into the situation knowing there was going to be a confrontation, and he knew that his companion was known to carry weapons, and he was an accomplice because he not only did nothing to stop it, he actually helped in the crime.... that's why. |
|
|