Topic: Question 1 for the day- Which would be worse? | |
---|---|
Not having a way to protect a significant other.
Not having a significant other to protect. |
|
|
|
Not having a significant other to protect.
|
|
|
|
Not having a way to protect a significant other. Not having a significant other to protect. Derrr! Not being able to protect a significant other.... Nothing to protect with option B... ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Danette_Giavanna
on
Thu 02/28/08 05:03 AM
|
|
Not having a way to protect a significant other
|
|
|
|
Love is the reason to live
Nothing is completely protectable True love and companionship is protection from many ills. |
|
|
|
Love is the reason to live Nothing is completely protectable True love and companionship is protection from many ills. Oh ! THAT kind of 'protection'........ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Not having a way to protect a significant other.
|
|
|
|
Love is the reason to live Nothing is completely protectable True love and companionship is protection from many ills. Oh ! THAT kind of 'protection'........ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I believe in protecting my significant but am a bit selfish. I turn it inside out so it is ribbed for "MY" pleasure. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Love is the reason to live Nothing is completely protectable True love and companionship is protection from many ills. Oh ! THAT kind of 'protection'........ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I believe in protecting my significant but am a bit selfish. I turn it inside out so it is ribbed for "MY" pleasure. |
|
|
|
beach beat me to it
![]() |
|
|