Topic: More republican hypocracy | |
---|---|
Affairs and even allegations of rape never hurt your liberal socialist icon Bill Clinton, why would you want to take McCain to task for it if it is true which coming from a secret source at the NY Times makes suspect. Do I see a double standard here?
|
|
|
|
Starsailor2851
reread it i think you missed something insert head scratching emoticon here |
|
|
|
NY Times backs Mccain in the Republican primary knowing that they have been working on this story for over six months. Mccain seals the Republican ticket and suddenly the NY Times releases a story, one which provides NO evidence and is full of innuendos to smear Mccain. This is a very weak smear. We even have Bill Bennet, big Democrat who was a lawyer for Clinton, coming to the aid of Mccain in this horrible smear campaign. Like many, including liberals, and others have said today, this smear piece will bring Republicans and especially conservatives to rally around Mccain. Any sensible person should see the weak attack this was, I was just watching Olbermann and even that fool of a man was holding back big time. Chris Matthews did the same as well today, even though you could surely tell he wished he had something really good to use. The New Republic and Washington Post are doing the same, TNR have a good piece about the inner turmoil this story caused at the NY Times. Some heads are going to roll, unless those anonymous sources decide to step up with real proof. John Weaver, tossed as the head of Mccain's campaign, what you would think would be a disgruntled ex-employee, has comments that go directly against the innuendos or what is implied by the NY Time article. Weaver said he talked to Iseman to back off and stop showing up because she was a lobbist throwing around the fact she knew Mccain and bragging about the pull she had. The piece is extremely weak, and unless they have something else to this it is going to be another Judy Wilson or Jayson Blair affair. NY Times sales are already in the tank and they have been laying off staff after staff and its continuing to go downhill there. Let the fall of the Grey Lady continue. well everyone says it was not a big deal when they bring it up about clinton (proven fact) so i would guess unless they are all hypocrites it is even less a big deal if not proven things that make you go hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm (but thats another thread) |
|
|
|
I for one was happy for Clinton to tag a much younger lady. he certainly deserved a BJ for all the good he did for the economy and the defecit.......now if only Monica had swallowed then Clinton would have no stain on his perfect record......no pun intended. But that reminds me of this little R rated song it will make some smile and others report my post but I am warning now if R language offends you dont click the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSVYkQoFADs
|
|
|
|
I for one was happy for Clinton to tag a much younger lady. he certainly deserved a BJ for all the good he did for the economy and the defecit.......now if only Monica had swallowed then Clinton would have no stain on his perfect record......no pun intended. But that reminds me of this little R rated song it will make some smile and others report my post but I am warning now if R language offends you dont click the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSVYkQoFADs clinton was impeached for lieing under oath not getting a bj wonder what else he lied about (maybe warnings about osama) things that make you go hhhhhmmmmmmmm(that other thread again) |
|
|
|
Starsailor2851 reread it i think you missed something insert head scratching emoticon here I think it was your choice of wording...lol |
|
|
|
Starsailor2851 reread it i think you missed something insert head scratching emoticon here I think it was your choice of wording...lol i think it was your style of reading |
|
|
|
Edited by
Starsailor2851
on
Thu 02/21/08 06:01 PM
|
|
Starsailor2851 reread it i think you missed something insert head scratching emoticon here I think it was your choice of wording...lol i think it was your style of reading Ummm... that's argueable, but I think I know what you saying now :D |
|
|
|
I for one was happy for Clinton to tag a much younger lady. he certainly deserved a BJ for all the good he did for the economy and the defecit.......now if only Monica had swallowed then Clinton would have no stain on his perfect record......no pun intended. But that reminds me of this little R rated song it will make some smile and others report my post but I am warning now if R language offends you dont click the link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSVYkQoFADs |
|
|
|
as long as you realize it should be less of an issue with
an accusation about mccain than it should with clintons proven fact that everyone said it was not a big deal when it a=was brought up over the last 7 years |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 02/21/08 06:05 PM
|
|
so instead of
More republican hypocracy this thread should be titled more democrat hypocrisy |
|
|
|
Just the fact that you all are not foaming at the mouth over it proves thats its bad if Clinton fools around but ok or lie if mcain does.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Starsailor2851
on
Thu 02/21/08 06:16 PM
|
|
Just the fact that you all are not foaming at the mouth over it proves thats its bad if Clinton fools around but ok or lie if mcain does. Where has it been proven that Mccain has lied? |
|
|
|
Just the fact that you all are not foaming at the mouth over it proves thats its bad if Clinton fools around but ok or lie if mcain does. again you miss the point clinton was impeached for lieing under oath to congress it had nothing to do with his infidelity as a husband |
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSVYkQoFADs
|
|
|
|
Ill vote for whoever ends the war, balances the budget and kills of NAFTA sounds like a write in for ron paul If any of you cared about having a candidate who really does understand and have a plan to fix the issues that really should be important to America, you would be voting for Ron Paul! But you keep yeah, yeahin' around about who's a liberal and who's a conservative and always puttin' the cart before the horse, and perpetuating this fallacy of us verses them, and we just keep going farther and farther down the ****ter! The meek should loose their attitude of entitlement and start realizing that it won't matter in 10 years if Clinton had sex with an intern or if Bush lied in order to go to war, or that McCain was bumpin' uglies with a lobbyist, or that Michelle Obama was only proud to be an American twice in her life! Our world as we know it is fixin' to cess to exist. If you really want to make a difference, wake up, get a clue! Any of the "major" candidates are a political machine. There is no changing the machine, you just switch machines. The machine just does the same thing over and over again. Sorry, that's my rant and I'm stickin' to it! |
|
|
|
I'm for whichever candidate supports education the most, so that I never have to read the word hypocracy again. I can't believe an AREICAN would speak like that! |
|
|
|
I'm for whichever candidate supports education the most, so that I never have to read the word hypocracy again. I can't believe an AREICAN would speak like that! |
|
|
|
Ill vote for whoever ends the war, balances the budget and kills of NAFTA sounds like a write in for ron paul If any of you cared about having a candidate who really does understand and have a plan to fix the issues that really should be important to America, you would be voting for Ron Paul! But you keep yeah, yeahin' around about who's a liberal and who's a conservative and always puttin' the cart before the horse, and perpetuating this fallacy of us verses them, and we just keep going farther and farther down the ****ter! The meek should loose their attitude of entitlement and start realizing that it won't matter in 10 years if Clinton had sex with an intern or if Bush lied in order to go to war, or that McCain was bumpin' uglies with a lobbyist, or that Michelle Obama was only proud to be an American twice in her life! Our world as we know it is fixin' to cess to exist. If you really want to make a difference, wake up, get a clue! Any of the "major" candidates are a political machine. There is no changing the machine, you just switch machines. The machine just does the same thing over and over again. Sorry, that's my rant and I'm stickin' to it! some just do not get it do they |
|
|
|
I fear too many don't get it!
|
|
|