Rush Limbaugh was/is a prescription-pill addict. Got off easy..no ones perfect. Dont agree with the political view? dont listen, why always the need to attack the personality?

Rush Limbaugh didn't get off easy. Normally, drug users aren't prosecuted in Florida, but Rush Limbaugh was...or at least they tried to. If you actually look into the case, you will find that Rush Limbaugh was very unfairly treated and is currently going through drug testing to verify that he is off the drugs. He has chronic back pain, if you have never experianced chronic pain, then you really shouldn't judge someone for getting addicted to pain killers to deal with that pain.

he got off easy....everyone rushed to his defense, poor guy. Back problems, etc...yeah,yeah,all the while he's slamming drug users on his show..no sympathy from me.

I don't agree with the man's opinions so I don't listen to him (anymore) and don't bother to follow up on his personal life, just go by what I read in the papers, thats about all he's worth to me.

as i said (and was ignored) anne coulter is the right wing michael moore, she may very well be correct in some of her statements (moore 2) but she says them is such a way as to only appeal to her (narrow) fanbase and only offend those whose flaws shes' pointing out

Her 15 minutes of fame was
up a long time ago.

As far as attacking the personality
goes, she attacks other people,
so why is she somehow immune
to criticism?

I can't believe people even
listen to her speeches or
buy her books.

They are delusional, hate-filled
diatribes.

Of course, the Righties just love
that because they are filled with
hate themselves.

They're gonna hate it even worse
when a Democrat wins the Presidency,

What are you going to do then, Righties,
move to Canada?

Since she serves no useful purpose
she should be ignored, then she
might go away.

Looks like she was right again. If Democrats had any brains they would be Republicans

How many of her books have you read? How many of her articles have you read? Who does she want to be run as the Republican presidential candidate this year? Surely someone who makes such sweeping statements about the woman and her work would have actually read her books / articles and know some of her opinions.

I've done a lot of research on AC, amazingly ignorant and vicious woman...especially since she's a well-educated attorney.
Statements included:

joking about taking away a womans right to vote so that there will be no more democratic presidents,

calling Bill Clinton gay...(comon, and she was SERIOUS)

the whole thing about wiping out Muslims...(talk about hate-mongering)

as I said, ignorant and vicious...no wonder the right-wingers love her.

I bolded the key word for you.



This one went over a lot of people's heads. Feminists claim that womanizing men are actually gay and over-compensating. She was mocking the feminist movement by pointing out this guy they love so much should be outed for being gay, by their own theories.



Here is her quote...


A couple things here...

1) Her close friend Barbara Olsen had been murdered two days before by 9/11 hijackers.
2) This is exactly what was done in the 1970's in Lebanon (a formerly Christian country). They were attacked and taken over by Islamic radicals. This is also what was done to the Middle East following the foundation of Islam until it was stopped by the Crusades. Some disagree with me on that, they are called willfully ignorant. Since history says exactly what I just wrote. The only peacefully converted Islamic nation is Saudi Arabia, all other's were conquerored.



I love her for the fact that she can write the truth in such a way that it drives Liberals (actually socialists, but who's counting?) into fits of mindless rage.

I thought Bush was the Anti-Christ

Spider,
just because its what you want to hear, that doesn't necessarily make it the truth.

All I want to hear is the truth, so it does.

symbelmyne,

Righties only hear what
they want to hear.

They label everyone
liberals and socialists
just because they disagree
with them.

They learned this from
TV and radio pundits
like Bill O'Reilley and
Rush Limbaugh and others.

Simple arguments for simple minds.

They might be surprised
to know that not everyone
is as liberal or socialist
as they portray.

I have no problem with Liberals, I do have a problem with socialist facists who claim to be Liberals.

I'm not ashamed to be called a Conservative...why do "liberals" consider it an insult to be called "liberal"?

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war."




Dresdan was a vicious unnecessary act of vengeance,
If u agree with the wholesale slaughter of innocent civilians, as ms coulter seems 2, then u r probably closer to the terrorist mindset than u would like 2 admit
Its funny, conservatives who push the image of a more "Wholesome christian america" are TOTALLY UNWILLING to take the moral high ground when it comes to their views on torture and war crimes

Why do conservatives use the word "liberal" to insult everyone outside their party-lines?

socialist-facists is an oxymoron...one can not be socialist and facist at the same time.

Facism is a type of socialism. Hitler was a socialist facist. The main difference is that facists allow for private property ownership. They both consider the collective more important than the parts.

Yes Spider,,,I was expecting that from you...the NAZI party was a Nationalist party and Hitler was democratically elected by the german people, even though he was Austrian. He started a war, and stayed in his ELECTED position until it finished and he disappeared.

FDR was a socialist, he created the Social Security system, after the stock market crash.. created the FDIC to protect peoples investments, and put in place the Works Project to give unemployed men a job. From there came the great highways, dams, national parks,...are you getting the picture here?

No....probably not. Will look for your reply, you strike me as the need to have the last word type.

You changed the subject. You said that socialst-facist is an oxymoron and I pointed out that facism is a type of socialism. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make now, you seem to be deflecting by trying to point out the "great" things that socialism has given us. FDR also extended the Great Depression by about 12 years, don't forget that.

HAH! I was right, you DO need to have the last word,...no....wait...hmmm, I guess I do.....