Topic: Looking for slam Master
no photo
Thu 04/03/25 03:03 PM
Into long slam sessions during which my Master will train me to fulfill all his desires

Ꮢ Ꭷ Ᏸ ɨ Ꮑ's photo
Thu 04/03/25 11:41 PM
Gone

no photo
Sat 04/05/25 05:28 PM
Gone

hi

Dodo_David's photo
Sat 04/05/25 09:11 PM
Edited by Dodo_David on Sat 04/05/25 09:12 PM
Since this topic is in the "Rate My Profile" forum . . .


Mortman's photo
Sun 04/06/25 10:22 PM
Edited by Mortman on Sun 04/06/25 10:36 PM

Since this topic is in the "Rate My Profile" forum . . .



I think you need to keep in mind that not everyone on this site are looking for a traditional man-woman relationship. There are many people with different kinks, and/or looking for a same-sex relationship that you may not like. Get over yourself and try to be objective.

With that in mind, I think SleazySlamSlave has a profile that could use some more work. The profile photos are somewhat redundant & the text blurb is short.

The photos are basically the same pic (the 1st & 3rd are identical). On the other hand, it's well-lit and framed, so it could just be a favorite shot. I know it's not easy to get a good shot with lighting and focus, so OK, but maybe it'd be better to also post another photo in a nice outfit, or out in an interesting place. At first look, I thought this might be a fake account to embarrass someone, so maybe give that some thought.

The text blurb could say a lot more, but if that slam session is all he wants, then I guess there's no need for more. Hard to judge since I'm not into that, but the text does make it clear to those *not* looking for that, too. Nice filter!

Some of the biographical information is missing, like whether he smokes and religious affiliation, and while smoking/non is important to me, maybe he's trying to say it's not important.

So while SleazySlamSlave's focus is extraordinarily narrow, and the directness is jarring, the profile probably says as much as really needed, and people looking for that will probably recognize it. But for the redundant photos and the missing information, I can only rate it 7/10.

Good luck!