That’s right people, you might die!!!

take this to heart the next time you go to the zoo.





On the subject of the S.F tiger story

Recently the two unfortunate survivors of the San Francisco Tiger mauling have hired Ambulance chaser Mark Geragos and Plan to Sue San Francisco Zoo.

In a resent interview Geragos, stated that the two brothers, are and I quote “They are grieving like you would not believe."



In this reporters opinion this would read as, “doing the salsa, and saying over and over again, were going to get some money!, Were going to get some money!”


Ok people I want to know one thing here. WHO IS TO BLAME ???? (1) or (2)


1, BAD TIGER, ZOO to BLAME

2, THE TWO brothers that were caught lying to there father about first (dead) brothers location in the first place, recently arrested for assault charges, disturbing the peace, and kicking the separation glass in the back of a patrol car after there arrest, standing on the rail (footprint) teasing a cat, that they thought could not get out, after the park was closed, and there was no one around, messing around, with a OTHER wise very dossal if not utterly, bored to tears cat.

This reporter has only ever seen (the cat) in the act of sleeping playing or walking back and forth, back and forth followed by the occasional smelling/sniffing of the air when dumb, stupid ass inbred, whether there white trash, or I have something to prove, Whatever there race” people waving to get her attention, “look over here, look over here, yeah that works, all the time you stupid douche!!! followed by going to the corner were the gate to the inside is in order to hide from, and sleep. Especially after the fact this was 3hr and 15 min after she ate, and that is her nappy time.




The very f**king pi**sed off monkey


*act ….. no, no act.

well i guess from what you just said id go with the kids are to blame, but i dont know the whole story.

PLEASE do not go by what I say!!!!

do your own research, now armed with some of these facts. Check these points with older articles that have been published, don’t let this lawyer screw the people of San Francisco... tell your friends... get involved.

TAG

you got me...now tell me what you think?

I THINK THE ZOO SHOULD SUE THEM

and they should have to pay for a new cat and any cost incurred in obtaining it and having it delivered

plus have to pay for loss of patronage that the fear of cat attack causes thus keeping away paying consumers

*act - monkey gives great big hug.

Its going to be hard to sue the zoo since its come to light that some kids taunted the tiger and ticked it off enough to escape.

Off the subject tho...are you saying that everyone who goes to the zoo are white trash imbreds? You maybe a ticked off monkey, but now I'm a ticked off human

that is NOT what I said, but maybe the next time you go to the zoo, stand in one spot for more then 20 seconds and you will see the people I speak of.

or not.

wow that is interesting to know!

please tell us more...

Wow, and the funny thing is if I do read it I will certainly die!

I heard on the news that the guys had slingshots.

I haven't heard about the slingshots. But if they went to the zoo with the intent to enrage an animal, grrrrr, grrr, grumble, rumble, boo, hiss, ACK!

They say the zoo enclosures were not up to par. But there would not have likely to ever been a problem if the kids were not breaking the rules already. Having gone to a few zoos in my life, I know there are warning signs around. Things like, don't climb on or over the fences.....

does anyone even consider it odd that based on the fact the zoo was closed all of a sudden the tiger chooses that time to leap out and kill someone after all these years!!!!



I mean come on people!!!!!

the poor kid, the poor kid my ass.

if I was the cop there that day , I would have waited and given the kitty some milk after his meal!

Both sides hired lawyers and its going to get ugly from a legal stand point. Theres no doubt in my mind that those people taunted the tiger. I really doubt the tiger just jumped out for no reason and said "OMGWTF HOOMANS! I R HUNGRY!" and started attacking them.

Also I read a book somewhere that says zoo animals can always escape if they want it badly enough, but most of them are content with being feed every day and just laying around. So for the tiger to jump out of its territory and just start mauling for no reason is stupid. Just my thoughts.

And sorry for the earlier post I was under medication of nyquil

What seems funny to me is this is supposed to be a published article by a professional reporter... Or so it reads :quote: In a resent interview Geragos, stated that the two brothers, are and I quote “They are grieving like you would not believe."



In this reporters opinion :quote:

and further in this article it contnues to say "in this reporters...."

Now, what agency would hire a reporter that talked or wrote the way this article is written?

Docile?



The kids were in the zoo during business hours, the zoo was locked down after the tiger escaped. The attacks were 30 minutes apart, Carlos was killed at 4:30, but the other brother wasn't attacked until after 5:00. During that time, the brothers had saught help from a guard, who reported them as crazy and at a restraunt, where they were denied help. The police weren't allowed into the zoo when they arrived and they had to wait five minutes before they were allowed in. The police have called the sling-shot story "a rumor". You have the story VERY wrong.

I want to know what the tiger was doing between attacks. I think it would be hard to miss a tiger wandering around.

The zoo wasnt closed anyway, it was an hour before closing time.