Well I don't mean that in a nasty way.....I love the animals more then most.....cmon your talking to a lady with a opossum on her shoulder....But I do know that I am a lil more intelligent then my fury friends. I believe in being at one with nature.....but I also know that I am the more intelligent of the two species.

Animals make decisions based solely on survival.......we make choices on a whole other level......yes some may be to survive but not on the same level as in the animal kingdom.

I take care of them and am a voice for them yes......but where would you get the idea that I place them above my fellow human being....a lil presumtious of you funches. I believe that everything on this planet needs to be taken care of whether its a feral cat, a opossum that I found at a couple days old...or a human being that would ask it of me.

Humans are both noble and cruel. We do things that are amazing and totally awe inspiring and we do things that no animal on the planet would do. We are distinctly different from animals in that they are not able to think or communicate on the level which we can. A bad dog will always be a bad dog, I watch the rescue vet shows and see that they have no choice but to put fighting dogs to sleep. A bad human can become a great human. Clyde Thompson, who was nick-named the "meanest man in Texas" by his fellow death row inmates became a minister and spent the rest of his life ministering to prisoners. Humans have the ability to change their nature, animals do not. I believe that there are a great many things that set humans apart from animals.

I got that idea when you yourself just stated it in the statement below



doesn't that means you place yourself above animals ..

The animal comment with choices. You took it down to the point where humans and animals will react the same -- ruled by survival instinct. I think many humans would like to claim they are not ruled by it. Maybe I should have said "bare bones" of a topic rather than backwards. My meaning was by going backwards through a chain of events you eventually get to the bare bones beginning of that chain and much quicker than if you had muddled through trying to just find the beginning.

yes fuches what I said is that you placed yourself on the same level with animals......becuase of what you stated....I don't place myself on the same level.....God put the animals on earth for us......and it's our duty to take care of the animals not to be one.

eleven angels can dance on the head of a pin. It's a prime number, as is 13, and as 3. The flood of hogwash, regrettably, takes away the possibility that there could indeed be a creator, who may have said, "Let there be a big bang!" and let us then see what happens.

All agruments about this topic just drip with the ludricous. How intelligent (!) adults waste valuable electrons on such drivel never fails to amaze me. Idiocy must surely be a prerequisite to such discussions. Me and Jesus both agree on this.

Happy New Year and a high colonic to the lot of you

Back at'cha marlin

if you and your furry friends were placed in the middle of the jungle naked it's more than likely they will survive longer than your did ..in the jungle without the use and protection of technology you would just become another food source ..

in such a situation the animals would be more intelligent than you ..to survive in that situation you would have to rely on primordial instincts and given enough time in the jungle if you did survive you would become just like one of those animals

I believe technology didn t always exist and hmmm.......seem to be the top of the food chain.

Yeah, but most of the top of the food chain buys the lower echelon already dead and skun out. Imagine it without that.

only because of technology ...put you up against a tiger or a mosquite that carrying malaria and you will not be on the top

all this jabbering when the answer is a simple two letter word?

an octopus can grow another arm...can a human do that ...even Jesus and God can't heal an amputeee

omg now you sound like funches.....no no no no no

Which you, feral?

possibly me