they do what they did befor, learn.
they learn life skills from birth, and continue learning them till death, the only thing stopping them from being qualified in other ventures, is not having tried them,
teachers can stand against this in a united front, and use their unions
( thay are suppose to defend their interests. not the states). to refuse to allow this into their class rooms, in any case they do have a choice in what they teach, if they have the courage to make the stand.

double posted. sorry

blondie, in a mixed class of students while going to JR high school(male/female) we were shown films on genitalia including frank discussions of oral and physical sex. this lasted 3 days before parents reacted shut it down. as being in appropriate content. the state of california was sued over it. and it was removed from the curriculum as being to involved with the sexual practice, and over stepping the established guidelines of responsible health education.
(in layman's terms, it was considered too pornographic to be taught in public schools).
and this was back in 1981.

porn is by literal translation is the public display of nudity or sexuality that may result in the state of sexual arousal or exploitation, of those viewing it.
in the right context, a woman eating an ice cream cone can be considered pornographic. even if she's fully clothed.
just the basic strait exposure to children about their bodies "sexually" starting at kinder garden, is morally corrupt. children do not need to be exposed to that.
and any saine person who is not a deviant should know the right and wrong of exposing them it.
if that sounds judgmental.
imagine the confusion of being a 5-7 year old and being asked if you ever think you might be a member of the opposite sex and that it would be OK to think that way.
when your just beginning to learn what " your just being a boy or girl really means" in terms of being different.

So Bart ......what you refer to as “pornography and indoctrination of children” in fact specifically relates to sexual orientation and gender Identity . Why the need to twist words and inspire hate/disgust ??

”‘Florida's Parental Rights in Education law, which prohibits classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity for students in kindergarten through third grade, was signed into law at the end of March by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Critics have dubbed this it the 'Don't Say Gay' law.“

http://www.npr.org/2022/04/04/1090946670/what-floridas-parental-rights-in-education-law-means-for-teachers

Here is the bill if anyone is interested ...

http://m.flsenate.gov/session/bill/2022/1557/billtext/e1/pdf

What exactly do you feel threatened by ??

Kids that young should not be involved in any discussion concerning sexuality in schools. That should be done only by a parent at that young age. No matter if the discussion is concerning straight, gay or whatever. But a teacher like the one I saw on a video clip telling the kids that it wasn’t a boy or a girl. How confusing is that to a bunch of 6-9 year olds.

If sensitive topics AREN'T being discussed by teachers to children who are probably so young they wouldn't think about gender or sexuality on their own then why is there so much outrage from leftists????

Teachers, pundits and much of the MSM said CRT wasn't being taught in k-12 schools and yet they were outraged about it being banned.....if it wasn't being taught then why was ANYONE upset that it wasn't ALLOWED in k-12?????

What all the teaching "virtually" caused was parents could see what their kids were subjected to from teachers. There were teachers and their unions who opposed parents being in the same room as their kids....what were they afraid of??????