Topic: I have a question for you all to ponder... | |
---|---|
Which great opponent of cartesian duellism, insists that there is no
point of further contact, between the extended or the unextended... |
|
|
|
IS THE ANSWER " STFU " ?
|
|
|
|
what exactly is cartesian deullism?
|
|
|
|
<goes to the dictionary>
|
|
|
|
IS MY ANSWER CORRECT ?
|
|
|
|
Car‧te‧sian /kɑrˈtiʒən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled
Pronunciation[kahr-tee-zhuhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective 1. of or pertaining to Descartes, his mathematical methods, or his philosophy, esp. with regard to its emphasis on logical analysis and its mechanistic interpretation of physical nature. –noun 2. a follower of Cartesian thought. |
|
|
|
yo spay why you gonna give the guy a hard time .why not sit and learn
something who knows it might be really interesting. |
|
|
|
i wonder if its sir issack newton...you know like an object in motion
stays in motion unless acted on by an outside source. |
|
|
|
Personally I can't answer this because I don't really know anything
about DesCarte and I really suck at math and all that kind of stuff |
|
|
|
i dont know either i was making a wild guess there hopefully he comes
back witht the answer soon so i can find out. |
|
|
|
me too because it bugs me that I don't stuff
|
|
|
|
Descartes...
or Plato? |
|
|
|
maybe socrates?
|
|
|
|
Hey, put away the dictionary; you're stealing my methods of dealing
with Da Group. I feel that Cartesian Dualism is about two Cartisians Dueling it out under the old oak tree. Really check me out later and ask me something besides a philosophical question. I'm all worn out trying to being reasonable all week |
|
|
|
oops I forgot "know" up^^^ there in my last post
Socrates was more of a social thinker about people and the way things are/were and the whys of it..Don't know much about that Plato guy tho :( gahhhh I feel sooo uneducated right now |
|
|
|
WHEN IS "JUDAS PRIEST" AKA "ROB HALFORD" GOING TO GIVE US THE ANSWER?
|
|
|
|
The body is extended matter: the soul is unextended spirit. When,
however, the extended is acted upon by the unextended, some definite point of interaction is required and it is to be found in the pineal gland. Yet the "soul is united to all parts of the body conjointly." The whole body is the soul's proper housing so long as the body remains intact. When a member of the body--an arm or a leg, for example--is cut off, there is no loss of part of the soul as a consequence because the soul is unitary and indivisible. It then occupies what is left of the body. So without attempting to resolve all the problems, he simply stated that there is a dualism of mind and body, and their interaction is clearly real. The brain is the major locus for the mind or consciousness of the soul, yet mind or consciousness is distributed throughout the whole body. The point of interaction between the two is the pineal gland. Descartes lent his authority to the long-held view that the mind is associated in a particular way with the brain, but he made mind and brain separate entities, dependent upon each other only as a fountain pen and ink are interdependent. The pen will not write without the ink and the ink carries no message without the pen. |
|
|
|
i think they call plato the god father of mathmatics right?
|
|
|
|
whoa thats going to take re reading and serious thinking....
|
|
|
|
Descartes is heavy complicated stuff.
|
|
|