This topic was not about the subject of prostitution, though it'd be interesting to know how many times gustava's given it away for free, as she is pro pre-nup as well. I think that would be called low self-esteem and having no family values to not value a stable home and family.

The educated, and the ones who make it to post-grad school are the ones who THINK for themselves and yes, they DO write their own books.

I merely suggested that you THINK, but perhaps not attempt your own book just yet. It takes a while to get used to having ideas.

Your definition also states NOTHING. Excess is a relative term.

With a little more education you may learn the difference between writing a book and creating your own language.

I'll repeat. This is not a debate about what is and is not excess.

We know, it's evolved into a discussion about using make believe definitions for words.

I'll repeat. I'm using the same language as you are here that everyone understands. Also, like I've said, it takes time to get used to having ideas of your own

Heehee. Goddess, but you are an idiot.

what i find amazing is that everyone is so into discussion
about this. everyone needs to be comfortable and that
is all she was saying.

everybody took issue with her statement about being
forgiving of indiscretions. well that may be a little
different but it is hardly worth this level of commentary.



she never said she did not prefer fidelity. she never
said that she wouldn't contribute. she did say that she
wants a loving relationship. she never said that she
thought money was of primary importance. i think she
just wanted to interact with someone who is in a position
to help support her financially. this is not necessarily
gold-digging. EVERYBODY wants that. so i say. stick with
it savagirl. don't let them define you. i agree that who
the person is - is what's is really important - not how much
money they have or how much money they make. but i also
do not think it is terrible to prefer to be with someone
who can help you financially. in every relationship each
partner contributes in different ways.

Party on, Wayne!

You certainly do have ideas of your own, it's just too bad they're all moronic.

So are you saying that your definition of luxury is incorrect and you are now accepting that the real definition is right?

I will also address the issue of my appearance. I believe it was musclehd? and a few other members that were interested to know what I look like.

I'm a very pretty healthy girl, but I suggest that their assumption is that only the very beautiful are deserving of a marriage and a husband that provides for his family.

I'm happy to forward a full and color photo to any man that is interested in dating a smart, sweet young woman who is interested in marriage and family life.

Why cant we just get along and let this thread fade away??

Why are they moronic? Is it moronic to marry a man that can provide for his family?

Nope, but I'm not really interested to know why you think you have the REAL definition because I'm not sure that you do think.

You also have no idea what my background or education level is. You also do not have to attain a specific level of education before becoming a published author. Much literature has been penned by people based on their life experiences, not their education level.

To think or suggest anything different would be a very uneducated assumption on your part.

I hope that you are educated enough to see how uneducated your responses like this are.

We get along Just a topic of discussion. It's great the people on this site are so responsive. I'd even pay for gustava to attend charm school with my rich husband's money

Well as long as ya'll are having fun i guess!

Your best response to a post yet. Many congratulations