Topic: can you describe God without sounding delusional | |
---|---|
Mi lago !!!!!! where's Jess? Here I is!!!! |
|
|
|
hi jess!!! where is gypsy??? i feel a hijack coming on.
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what you mean Winnie....*said in wide eyed innocent wonder...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have this HUGE urge to dance on this giant stage of delusion, and swoop those that wish to dance also.... right onto centre stage with me....
|
|
|
|
Edited by
winnie410
on
Sun 12/02/07 05:04 PM
|
|
pick me! pick me! i wanna dance! |
|
|
|
OH NO! MERRIAM WEBSTER IS DELUSIONAL!!!! right you believe everything you read in a book is truth .. that explains a lot |
|
|
|
OH NO! MERRIAM WEBSTER IS DELUSIONAL!!!! right you believe everything you read in a book is truth .. that explains a lot you just proved my point. now dance with us! |
|
|
|
I can't dance, but I can fiddle
|
|
|
|
Oh I wish I was punk rocker with flowers in my hair ...
Already dancing Jess |
|
|
|
Well with the muscle clad one so pointedly pontificating, it should be fun to swish and swirl right past with a shake of the hip, and a evil glint in the eye....
|
|
|
|
again this is not about me or trying to prove or disprove God's existence ..all the question ask is for you to describe God without sounding delusional ..once you bring me or the thread into the equation it becomes an attack In that case, may we ask who will sit in judgment of what's perceived to be 'delusional'. Thus far it appears that you have been the self-appointed judge in these matters. That forces you to become part of the thread does it not? I really don't care. I'm just trying to figure out how you can be the judge of what's delusional and then simultaneously claim not to be part of the thread topic? |
|
|
|
hi jess!!! where is gypsy??? i feel a hijack coming on. and you just proved my point ...ask the wrong question and see how they act |
|
|
|
Well with the muscle clad one so pointedly pontificating, it should be fun to swish and swirl right past with a shake of the hip, and a evil glint in the eye.... Funches, the Queen!!!!! My Queen, LUNCH is served!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Oh ! Dancing...... Sandi Thom, here I come!!!
So in my delusion, I can be whatever I choose, and the muscle clad one does not appear to be a dust bunny, so methinks he is not a god. |
|
|
|
In that case, may we ask who will sit in judgment of what's perceived to be 'delusional'. try giving an answer and if it's delusional I will explain it to you why it's delusional |
|
|
|
Well with the muscle clad one so pointedly pontificating, it should be fun to swish and swirl right past with a shake of the hip, and a evil glint in the eye.... ˙˙˙ s,oloɹ ǝɹınbǝɹ llıʍ sıɥʇ ˙˙˙ ǝɯ oʇ ʎʌɹnʇ ʎsdoʇ llɐ sı ʇı ¿ʇɥƃıʇ ɹǝʇɐʍ ǝsɹɐ s,ƃoɹɟ ɐ sı ¿ʇdǝɔuoɔ ɐ ɹo lɐǝɹ poƃ sı ¿ lɐuoısnlǝp ɹo lıʌǝ noʎ ǝɹɐ |
|
|
|
LOL..oh got to LOVE this post! I happen to believe there is a "God", not not just from a "faith" perspective. But more of a "factual" one. well if you only "believe" there is a God means you have "doubts" of that existence ..to claim the existence as more of a factual one still carries the ring of doubt Truly the oppsite. There is no doubt for me, just means I not only believe in God, but all the factual evidence around gives physical proof He is there. What Factual evidence? Just because we are here? Or because a book told you to believe. The evidence is circumstantial at best for every theory of how we go here. |
|
|
|
Well with the muscle clad one so pointedly pontificating, it should be fun to swish and swirl right past with a shake of the hip, and a evil glint in the eye.... ˙˙˙ s,oloɹ ǝɹınbǝɹ llıʍ sıɥʇ ˙˙˙ ǝɯ oʇ ʎʌɹnʇ ʎsdoʇ llɐ sı ʇı ¿ʇɥƃıʇ ɹǝʇɐʍ ǝsɹɐ s,ƃoɹɟ ɐ sı ¿ʇdǝɔuoɔ ɐ ɹo lɐǝɹ poƃ sı ¿ lɐuoısnlǝp ɹo lıʌǝ noʎ ǝɹɐ Evilly delusional.... and as happy as a clam in the depths of the Great Blue.... ROLOS!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Edited by
nuenjins
on
Sun 12/02/07 05:14 PM
|
|
since noone has never made a claim of seeing God or meeting God that wasn't deem as being certifiable then isn't it logical that God is just a happenstance of fantasy or delusion, this fact can be further proved when a believer attempt to describe God so can anyone describe God without the description sounding like that of delusion or the person making the description sounding irrational if you can not describe God without sounding delusional and yet insist on worshipping something unseen and incomprehensible that you can't even describe ... sounds delusional to me Hey funches, so ya wanna know what is non delusional about God with conclusive evidence is that correct? I know it's hard to concentrate whilst jess is doing her fantastic job as a pixie and spreading mischief. |
|
|