Why I don't believe in hollow earth theory any more:

Apology to all you hollow Earthers out there but you've lost a convert. I'm now a member of the school of reasoning that states that some of the liquid rock metallic content within the Earth was at some point released by the puncturing of the Earths crust by what ever means well beyond my compacity to comprehend.

Molten liquid rock metallic content was blasted or ejected into orbit in a very large volume and aquiesced into the ball that we know as the moon today.

Since the inner content of the Earth is liquid, the puncture area on the Earth's surface would have quickly resealed the puncture hole, this made it difficult to find today any evidence of where on the earth this occurred.

My assumption is this area would be very smooth as a result, heavily saturated in mantle type rock metals and baring little to no normal Earth crust.

As a consquence of this past ancient event, there may be hollowed creavaces in the Earth devoid of the content which now makes up the moon, but it can't be uniformly hollow with a star at the centre, at least not in my understanding.


Therefore, in short form, I believe the moon came from the, and was created out of the Earth's inner molten liquid content, therefore to my understanding, it cannot have been hollow.

lets get a field trip going and check it out for ourselves.

welcome aboard...the hollow earth theory was never a thing to waste any time thinking about...