now they tried to get the charges to stick with the Impeachment ...

but President Bill Clinton was acquitted, becoming the second sitting United States President to be formally charged with a crime (impeached) and

subsequently declared not guilty (acquitted) of all the charges ...


and do you really believe if he was not cleared and clean of all charges ...Hilary would even run for President ... Please...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

I think its absolutely ridiculous women are held accountable for their husbands choices anyway,,,,

never see this scrutiny with men about their wives choices,,,,its pretty preposterous

he is a slick snake....and had oral sex with young women while in office...and

married.....morals, what morals.....

why? he was a liar and a cheat, how is that different from hillary?

quite average morals for men in his position,,,,fidelity is not high on the list of most powerful men in history,,,

its preposterous because MEN dont get scrutinized or held accountable based on their wives past choices

the way that WOMEN are regarding their husbands choices

Declared Not Guilty?


Situation was similar to one if you have a Mobster tried by a Jury of other Mobsters!

There is a saying,that one Crow won't pick out the Eye of another Crow!

Only reason he was declared Not Guilty,was because there were enough of his Cronies sitting in the Senate!
Him and his Dear Wife are a Two-Person-Crime-Syndicate!
And slick Willy is a Philanderer!(I am being charitable)

From History.com:

"After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approves two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice."

From the New York Daily News, January 20, 2001:

"President Clinton escaped indictment yesterday by surrendering his Arkansas law license for five years and admitting that he made false statements under oath about his affair with Monica Lewinsky."

From the Baltimore Sun, April 13, 1999:

"A federal judge in Arkansas found President Clinton in contempt of court yesterday for giving "intentionally false" testimony last year when he told Paula Corbin Jones' lawyers that he did not have "sexual relations" with Monica Lewinsky -- and could not even recall being alone with her."

The newspaper quotes presiding judge Susan Webber Wright as saying, "Simply put, the president's deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. Lewinsky was intentionally false, and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false."

The judge in the case cited Bill Clinton's presidential duties in declining to hold him in criminal contempt.

From the Baltimore Sun:



So, no, Bill Clinton is not clean of the charge of perjury even if he wasn't convicted by the U.S. Senate.

Bill Clinton admitted to his crime at the end of his presidency.

From the New York Daily News:

he escaped indictment

so he was 'clever' just like Trump who escaped being guilty of discrmination by being able to 'settle without admission of guilt'


two clever men using the resources available to their best outcome,,lol

,,,,,,,,,BAU

Hillary Clinton isn't being held accountable for her husband's misdeeds.

Hillary Clinton is being held accountable for her own misdeeds.

This thread is simply a red herring.

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/1986-trump-received-ellis-island-award-along-rosa-parks-muhammad-ali/

I sure have heard Trump and Guilliani bring him up on more than one occasion to disparage her intelligence, character, and/or ability to lead

He was the subject of several responses and questions by Trump in the debates in fact,,,

I will amend my last statement by saying that Hillary isn't being held accountable for Bill's crime of perjury.

However, Hillary is being held accountable for aiding Bill politically even when she knew that he had been committing adultery.

AMEN...SHE COST PEOPLE THERE LIVES , AND SHE SAID TRUMPS NOT FIT AND STUPID

LIBERAL'S BELIEVE IT.......

why is it ALWAYS about someone else with liberals? are the libs just not happy with anything?

http://nypost.com/2016/09/28/the-fbis-hillary-email-probe-is-looking-even-more-like-a-coverup/

The FBI’s Hillary email probe is looking even more like a coverup

she belongs into Federal penitentiary,not into the WH!

Female equivalent of Scarface Capone!

This is called being smart and use the system to ones advantage which anyone with enough intelligence and effort can achieve. the reaction against those who do so if a function of their inability to see that others are brighter and know how to use the system whereas others are just complacent and acquiescent in style and effort

ask Trump,, who answers so many questionsabout what he would do with 'why havent you?'

or who continues to ask questions about Bill Clinton

because one can doesn't mean one should

I will take smart and ethical, over merely smart every day of the week

I also believe in putting things in perspective though

I have never applied for a job where my dating life was relevant,,nor my marriage


if someone sucks at being a spouse, dont marry them, but if they are brilliant with numbers,,,let them do what the do and give them credit when its done,,


I feel the same way about the presidency really, its never really been a position that depended upon 'morals'(look historically at slave holding presidents, and adulterous presidents),,,because ones approach to romance has little to do with their job skills

if it did we would see a much higher unemployment rate that should reflect our divorce rate,, but they are totally IRRELEVANT of each other

but what does his adultery or whether she forgives him,,,have to do with the PRESIDENCY?