Topic: Spanish Court Issues Arrest Warrant for Israeli Prime Minist | |
---|---|
There were several probes into the incident. A
UNHRC report in September 2010 into the incident deemed the blockade illegal and stated that Israel's actions were "disproportionate" and "betrayed an unacceptable level of brutality", "" Anti-Israel bias has been a pervasive feature of the United Nations Human Rights Council since its inception nine years ago, according to a report issued yesterday by the watchdog group UN Watch. ' In the nine years of its existence, the UN Human Rights Council has condemned Israel more times than the rest of the world combined, revealed UN Watch today, ahead of a new report to be released by the Geneva- based NGO that documents endemic selectivity and politicization at the world body. The outcome resolution for the latest Gaza report, to be introduced at the UNHRC this week by the Palestinians together with the Arab and Islamic states, will condemn Israel exclusively, and will mark the 62nd resolution targeting Israel since the new and improved Council was created in 2006 — while the total of all other UNHRC condemnatory resolutions for the rest of the world amounts to 55, with most of the worst violators given a free pass, if not a seat on the council itself. Sadly, with members like China, Russia, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Venezuela and Qatar, the UNHRC today may possibly rank as a more corrupt international organization than FIFA.' The report includes a number of graphics and charts that illustrate the bias. One detail that exemplifies the council’s bias is the existence of Agenda Item 7, “the Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories,” which is one of ten permanent items on the council’s agenda. No other agenda item targets a specific nation. This may explain why the UNHRC has condemned Israel 61 times—more than all other nations combined—while it has only condemned Syria, where over 200,000 people have died in its civil war, 15 times. The council has also held seven emergency sessions focused on Israel, but only four on Syria. Israel also had a special rapporteur assigned to its case. From 2008 to 2014, the rapporteur was Richard Falk a professor who subscribes to 9/11 conspiracy theories. The UNHRC was supposed to an improvement over its predecessor, the UN Human Rights Commission, but as Claudia Rosett wrote for Forbes in 2009: ' The Human Rights Council [was] born three years ago out of the ashes of the former U.N. Human Rights Commission–an outfit which in 2003 became a world-class symbol of U.N. perversion by choosing Libya to chair its proceedings. The Commission was so hopelessly twisted–obsessed with condemning Israel while prone to excusing the worst human rights violators–that as part of the U.N. reform efforts of recent years, it was finally dissolved and replaced in 2006 by the current Council. However, after a brief pause to update the stationery, the Council began proving, if anything, even worse than the old Commission. Excusing, glossing over or simply ignoring the violations of some of the worst abusers, the Council, as noted by a Geneva- based non-governmental organization, UN Watch, has devoted more than 80% of its country resolutions to condemning Israel, while “eroding free speech protections in the name of Islamic sensitivities and steadily eliminating country investigations in places like Belarus, Congo, Cuba, Liberia and Sudan.”"" http://www.thetower.org/2214-new-watchdog-report-traces-pattern-of-bias-at-un-human-rights-council/ |
|
|
|
How pointless & absurd. That has the practical effect as holding a sign during a campus rally - and accomplishes about as much... I'm not sure I understand, this was a humanitarian mission brutally assaulted, 9 or 10 people died by Israeli gunfire on open waters. Netanyahu apologized to Turkey for it, what's the problem with letting them explain themselves in court? It's about bringing those involved to justice for crimes, Sorry, won't cut it IMO. try reading the truth sometimes... they are bringing weapons to lob more bombs into Israel in your "humanitarian" missions... There were several probes into the incident. A UNHRC report in September 2010 into the incident deemed the blockade illegal and stated that Israel's actions were "disproportionate" and "betrayed an unacceptable level of brutality", with evidence for "willful killing". The UNHRC later also set up a panel of five human rights experts to examine the conclusions of the Palmer report. The panel stated that Israel's blockade of Gaza amounted to collective punishment and was unlawful blah blah blah... i wasn't there, and neither were you, so neither of us are qualified to make a correct statement... i do know that there wouldn't be a blockaid if someone wasn't running weapons into Gaza, and there wouldn't be any problems over there if Israeli citizens weren't being killed in their sleep... so keep coming with more blahs, you're just being another anti-Israeli parrot repeating the babble you pick up on the ihatejew.com websites people like you love to troll... Do you know how ridiculous you sound defending a despicable act in international waters? Turkey got paid 20 million but a final settlement was never reaxched Murder swept under the rug with cash, nice |
|
|
|
How pointless & absurd. That has the practical effect as holding a sign during a campus rally - and accomplishes about as much... I'm not sure I understand, this was a humanitarian mission brutally assaulted, 9 or 10 people died by Israeli gunfire on open waters. Netanyahu apologized to Turkey for it, what's the problem with letting them explain themselves in court? It's about bringing those involved to justice for crimes, Sorry, won't cut it IMO. try reading the truth sometimes... they are bringing weapons to lob more bombs into Israel in your "humanitarian" missions... There were several probes into the incident. A UNHRC report in September 2010 into the incident deemed the blockade illegal and stated that Israel's actions were "disproportionate" and "betrayed an unacceptable level of brutality", with evidence for "willful killing". The UNHRC later also set up a panel of five human rights experts to examine the conclusions of the Palmer report. The panel stated that Israel's blockade of Gaza amounted to collective punishment and was unlawful blah blah blah... i wasn't there, and neither were you, so neither of us are qualified to make a correct statement... i do know that there wouldn't be a blockaid if someone wasn't running weapons into Gaza, and there wouldn't be any problems over there if Israeli citizens weren't being killed in their sleep... so keep coming with more blahs, you're just being another anti-Israeli parrot repeating the babble you pick up on the ihatejew.com websites people like you love to troll... Do you know how ridiculous you sound defending a despicable act in international waters? Turkey got paid 20 million but a final settlement was never reaxched Murder swept under the rug with cash, nice sell it to someone else... muslims killing people all over the world, but you seem to think they are angels to Israel, their most hated enemy? and i only sound ridiculous to the many Israeli haters out there, and you can't imagine how ridiculous you sound to the sane people out there... drink another molsons for me, thanks... |
|
|
|
There were several probes into the incident. A UNHRC report in September 2010 into the incident deemed the blockade illegal and stated that Israel's actions were "disproportionate" and "betrayed an unacceptable level of brutality", with evidence for "willful killing". The UNHRC later also set up a panel of five human rights experts to examine the conclusions of the Palmer report. The panel stated that Israel's blockade of Gaza amounted to collective punishment and was unlawful The UNHRC??!?!? I'm sorry, but I was *almost* taking you seriously before you said that!! It occurs to me that it would be an interesting theoretical exercise to examine the history of votes at the UN, *just* to see if you could find even *ONE* that took Israel's side. But citing a UN report in support of an anti-Israel stance is just a little bit too similar to Obama using a DNC press release in an attempt to support one of his policies - not exactly objective, y'know?? |
|
|
|
Amen x 1000.
They should pick up George and Darth Cheney while they're at it. |
|
|
|
Amen x 1000. They should pick up George and Darth Cheney while they're at it. they're not "picking up" anyone, it's just a kangaroo court that gets the attention of all the jew haters... nothing more |
|
|
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/spain-issues-arrest-warrant-for-israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu-over-2010-gaza-flotilla-a6736436.html About friggin time!!! Tried it before,got set aside! BLITHERING JERK! Jerk doesn't even know the pertaining International Law! wikipedia Immunity from prosecution is a doctrine of international law that allows an accused to avoid prosecution for criminal offences. Immunities are of two types. The first is functional immunity, or immunity ratione materiae. This is an immunity granted to people who perform certain functions of state. The second is personal immunity, or immunity ratione personae. This is an immunity granted to certain officials because of the office they hold, rather than in relation to the act they have committed. This type of immunity arises from customary international law and treaty law and confers immunities on those performing acts of state (usually a foreign official). Any person who in performing an act of state commits a criminal offence is immune from prosecution. This is so even after the person ceases to perform acts of state. Thus it is a type of immunity limited in the acts to which it attaches (acts of state) but will only end if the state itself ceases to exist. This type of immunity is based on respect for sovereign equality and state dignity. The offices usually recognised as attracting this immunity are Head of State or Head of Government, senior cabinet members, Foreign Minister, and Minister for Defence: see the Arrest Warrant Case, Pinochet Case (R v Bow Street Magistrates; ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 3) 1 AC 147, House of Lords). Such officers are immune from prosecution for everything they do during their time in office. For example, an English court held that a warrant could not be issued for the arrest of Robert Mugabe on charges of international crimes on the basis that he was a presently serving Head of State at the time the proceedings were brought: Mugabe, reported at (2004) 53 ICLQ 789. Other examples are the attempts to prosecute Fidel Castro in Spain and Jiang Zemin in the USA. OOps looks like they can't touch him even under international Law. |
|
|
|
Amen x 1000. They should pick up George and Darth Cheney while they're at it. |
|
|
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/spain-issues-arrest-warrant-for-israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu-over-2010-gaza-flotilla-a6736436.html About friggin time!!! Spain? Oh, you mean that socialist country that is being overrun by hoards of muslims and is about to go bellyup? That one? Spain was also a safe haven for Nazi's after WW2. |
|
|
|
Even the antiNetanyahuites in Canuckistan are cheering. Fixed it. There's a price to pay if you kill the innocent, no matter who you are Conrad Like I say,you need to put you Nose into some Books,instead of doing Damage to your Knees all the time! You could look up Maritime Blockade for a starter! That Judge is an Idiot! |
|
|