13 pics and not one of you?...

Sir? care to explain?

chroniclair75 quote ,

what happen to social movement?

Have you seen the Tarantino & Starbucks thread ?
Geez..if you boycott something the libs loose their mind

No,I havent yet. Let me check.

what mind? (they just like to be "against" things for no rhyme or reason)

I don't think that is it
I think they believe what they hear over & over & over again. " Don't offend anyone, especially the ones that scream the loudest "
That & maybe " Father knows best "

it's not working, they offend me...

Wow!

@ Sassyeuro2

Still have not read yet the tarantino & starbucks thread-
Just wondering about boycott?

Boycott - withdraw from commercial or social relations with (a country, organization, or person) as a punishment or protest.

I am beginning to see the picture..slow as I am at figuring out things,
and here I thought we could all learn from Harry Truman's words.

Here is the verbatim:

"President's from the time of George Washington
had been subjected to attacks & abuse.
It is a way that a free & open society keeps
its government institution on the alert.
It is a small price to pay for an aroused
and active opinion"

...i have a feeling, at the end of this day, someone
would need a pin for an instant "balloon ego"
..withdraw as a punishment or protest? really?
come to think of it-
...someone should really be flattered in a weird way.

let me check the thread..

They frustrate me. I like people who can think out of the box.. Not from inside it

it's not working, they offend me...

They frustrate me. I like people who can think out of the box.. Not from inside it



Then we may differ indeed of how we see things of what is in the box & what is outside the box?

I have check the other threads u have mentioned.
For me both sides have merits &
both have legitimate reasons.
I cant still see the relevance though.
Maybe I am just too dense.
I never claimed, I am of 1 u intellectual people.

Let me borrow words for this:

"I freely admit to being somewhat in the dark
when it comes to sorting out the ever greater
emphasis people in politics have placed in the
..media."

Either it is misleading or Bullseye.
I am very particular in what I read.
Everyone has always the right to skip posts.

What I cant understand until now is why single out?
What makes me baffled always is, there are lots of
other opinions to focus on.
Other quotes,
Other news to focus on,
Other people to focus on.
Other posts to read.

What is it?
Maybe it is high time
someone will explain..
is it the way it is presented?
is it too dramatic? theatrical?
It is not even screaming..
it is just a question,
it is just a musing, wondering why?
what is so offensive, that it is
always singled out?

nothing is really "offensive", people use it for political/monetary gains... or just to have the upper hand for control of something... i'm sure a small bit of has some merit, but mostly it's just hogwash... lots of times someone is just telling the truth about something, like calling someone a Mexican... but some will use that as a way to gain a political foothold by saying that person who said it is racist... sad thing is, anyone from Mexico is a Mexican, just like someone from Germany is German...

With all due respect Sir, ^^^^^I would have buy this,
If this site been one of the Active Citizen's
Network site or socio-political site Sir.

We know it is a dating site forum.
Where can I place political clout on a dating website?
What could be gained?
We are just getting all to know each other.
We ask questions, we give takes, we express ourselves.
Where can I place politics in the middle of it?
Am I to kiss-a@@ to everyone who thinks this is their domain?
All I want is to express. Is that too much to ask.

We know it is a dating site forum.
Where can I place monetary gains?
Are u suggesting that men here in
the forum will just throw in their actual
hard earned money without the benefit
of checking, confirming & investigating?
because of posts?
because of just words?
because of just opinions?
How ridiculous.

I thought all adults here knows that the forum
is a getting to know.
It should match with what is in the instant message.
If I said in the forum, no money should be involve
and that I am not ready to love and be loved,
Would a man instant message me to ask for my
personal info? Why should he? would he want me to call him
stupid & think of him as an idiot, for not reading my posts.
where is the logic?
Are all men here bunch of idiots & ninnies
that can be twirled?

Lets say, I want to negate what I say in the forum,
when a man will instant message me, will he not
ask me, "I thought u said in the forum u are not ready to be loved yet"?
If I behave differently from what I have said in the forum.
Is he that stupid to not match my words with what I said in the forum?
Will he not abide his actions base on how he knew me in the forum?
where is the logic?

I still cant understand and follow u on foothold and control,
I cant grasp it, what is to control.
It escapes me why there is a need of a foothold?
Are u suggesting that there is a need for leverage?
For what? Why?

I agree with you though on how u see truth?
But wouldnt it be safer to be skeptical of what
the other person is saying in the forum?
Wouldnt it be safer to not believe everything & get
totally sold out until, u decided to get to know
that person in instant message?
So u can compare & match & ask for further confirmation.



^^^Indeed.
I will echo the sentiment.


-----

No need to respond to this post Sir,
if u do not feel like doing so.
I am just pointing out.
I am just musing & wondering.
I am expressing what I find
illogical & logical.

are you somehow thinking i'm talking about you? this is a US thing, i can't say how things are in other countries... i don't go outa my way to offend people, but i could care less if they are, that's not my problem... i feel people should just say whats on their mind, without all the PC involved... i'm a bog boy, i can interpret what people are saying without getting my feelings hurt...

Yes as a matter of fact I do.
When u mentioned 13 pics I get baffled.
I checked my photos.

When u said u are offended, I checked
several threads.

Am I wrong in my assumptions?

Tough luck then.

I feel the same way too,
I feel people should say what
is in their mind.
I feel it is important to say
what needs to be verbalize.

Most of the time I am clueless
of others expectation.
Most of the time I did not know
I have stepped on toes.

That doesnt mean I feel the
need to always apologize & kiss-a@@e@@
because of my opinions & takes.
I have just much right as everyone else.

What escapes me & always baffled me
is why the singling out?
Maybe there is a need for me to change
something based on how I presents my opinions.

Just saying.

umm.. whatever

December 4, 2015

Editor's note: This story has been updated throughout.

Twenty-one Syrian refugees — including a dozen children — are set to be resettled next week in Dallas and Houston, the federal government said Friday. The announcement came two days after Texas filed a lawsuit seeking to block the arrival of refugees from that country.

21 Syrian Refugees to Arrive in Texas Next Week | The Texas Tribune http://www.texastribune.org/2015/12/04/21-syrian-refugees-arrive-texas-next-week/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_d6R_AQwNw

Love Dean Martin