State Using Taxpayer Funds to Implant 10-Year-Olds With Birth Control


http://www.infowars.com/state-using-taxpayer-funds-to-implant-10-year-olds-with-birth-control/

Taxpayers in the State of Washington are funding the disturbing practice of fitting extremely young public school girls with implantable long-lasting birth control devices, according to documents received by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Girls as young as 10 attending public schools in Seattle have been implanted with intrauterine devices (IUDs), the documents show, and as exposed by Life News in July, the children do not need to obtain parents permission before the procedure is performed.

While data is still incomplete for 2015, the documents, provided by the Washington Health Care Authority, reveal children as young as 10 and teens from all age groups received implants throughout 2013 and 2014.
bc-harmon

Data for 2015 incomplete.

[T]he records show that in 2014 and at least part of 2015, girls as young as 10 received the implants. The largest group of minors that got the birth control implants was 17 years old, according to the data, but girls much younger also received them, reports Judicial Watch.

Four 11-year-olds got birth control from the state during the 2 ½- year period and so did more than 100 girls between the ages of 12 and 13. The numbers go up as the girls get older with 364 girls age 14 getting the implants and 744 15-year-olds. The records show that 2,336 girls ages 16 to 17 were given implants during this period.

The IUD implant, administered at school-based clinics, requires an extremely invasive procedure in which a device is inserted directly into the uterus. The device either emits hormones which typically prevent sperm from fertilizing an egg, or includes copper which is toxic to sperm.

The cost of the procedure is evidently covered for low income families by Medicaid, but children can also access the device by using their own money, or parents insurance plans even without their knowledge.

Life News also highlighted the ironic nature of the program, pointing out how children in Seattle can freely opt into contraception, while at the same time being unable to purchase a soft drink:

So, a young teen in Seattle cant get a coke at her high school, but she can have a device implanted into her uterus, which can unknowingly kill her unborn child immediately after conception. Or, if she uses another method, she can increase her chances of health risks for herself, especially if using a new method.

Judicial Watch notes the State of Washington did not provide requested data regarding adverse events. Evidently, the state isnt tracking the negative health consequences from administering the implants in young girls, JW writes.

Judicial Watch also asked for data concerning the amount of children who received the implant with or without parental consent, but the state evidently doesnt keep track and no records were produced.

As the political watchdog group reports, the effort can be viewed as part of a growing trend by states to override parental consent.

Last month a separate JW investigation found that Oregon offers minors taxpayer-funded sex change without parental consent. In a matter of months dozens of kids some younger than 9 received sex-change therapy in Oregon, which earlier this year made it legal for minors to undergo radical treatment for gender dysphoria without permission from a parent or guardian.

In a way this is just so wrong... But then we have a lot of pedophiles out there that go after girls at this age..

Would I do it with my child no not at 10 no way..

Should the state pay for it hell no...

That in mind is just way too young to mess with their bodies with something that has not been tested.. And if they did test it in girls that age then what parent in their right mind would use their kids as a guinea pig???

I know someone who wouldnt mind having this implemented as mandatory as long as it is government-required...
He'd probably want this device inserted along with a vaccine...

something that has all ways bothered me
and most people have no clue about is

the usa can do what ever they want to people living in the usa
do what ever tests, good or bad
and its all legal

sad really : (

and a lot of the tests they have done would make the dead roll over in there graves

This is some of the most twisted, state sponsored crap, that I've heard of in recent times.

This smacks of state mandated, taxpayer funded aid to chomos.

Most states imprison pedophiles.
Apparently, Washington state and Oregon, chose to reward the chesters, by providing evidence resistant children.

Wtf?

My view on this : a really perveted messed up mind came up with this & it might seem like they looking out for the girl's best interest ect but it's a lot more then that

sounds unbelievable

What the.........?????
This is sick, very sick

What kind of world do we live in
Robbing kids from their childhood?
Why can't kids be kids? They have enough to deal with without this bull.

What message are we giving to pedos?
Gess it's alright the kids got birth control we are safe?

If this is happening there where else is it happening?

It's bad enough we have to do the parents job and teach them about sex now we take away the parents right for permission.

This is one xxxx up world
Yeah I'm mad

i firmly oppose to Birth Control

worse still done on children

The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.

Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Wouldn't this cause problems if the child hasn't even start menstration? That whole thing is crazy

Sorry but...

http://www.infowars.com/state-using-
taxpayer-funds-to-implant-10-year-olds-with-
birth-control/

...didn't read and don't care. Infowars sucks....unless you like tinfoil hats.

I like the idea of birth control without parental consent in the case of condoms, birth control pills, and even the morning after pill. Teen pregnancies are not good for anyone involved and no one is going to be able to prevent them from having sex if they want to. Plus, very few of the teens having sex want to tell their parents about it. However, it's my understanding implants basically require surgery. In this case I would like to see parental consent required.

I don't understand why people would freak out about someone even as young as 7 or 8 getting any type of hormonal birth control. The same hormones that prevent pregnancy is also used to treat many issues with menstrual cycles. Some girls start their cycles as early as 7 years old. Therefore, they could be getting treatments for some issue with their cycle at the same age.

The only thing that bothers me in any of this is "taxpayer funds."

I don't think the "state" is forcing implants into 10 year olds, just making them available to 10 year olds if they want them.

The only thing they're forcing people to do is pay taxes that go to pay for them.

...I hate taxes.

I don't give a crap what other peoples kids do to themselves with or without permission as long as they can generate income to pay for it.



I believe governments respond to problems though rather than come up with solutions to nothing out of thin blue air.

So I wonder if there was some sort of increase in 10 year old pregnancies, rampant sex among 4th graders, if 10 is the age kids learn sex ed and about birth control, or if this is just a "happy" coincidence of loopholes or flaws in the current laws.

I believe governments respond to problems though rather than come up with solutions to nothing out of thin blue air.
----------------------
Hmm.. like trust in " Father Knows best " & only wants the best for us & TV, movies & commercials are a reflection of society & not creating it or dictating for control & profit ?

Ugh.. history has taught us otherwise.. or at least it should have.

Im going to see where this thing goes before I put my two cents in...

I believe the issue is the policy of initiating implantable contraceptive devices in healthy girls 10 years old in public schools...

Glancing thru the thread...there a few aspects...political will...medical soundness...and apparently, parental convenience...and such wonderfully thought out commentaries as to why...

Scotland, August -2014

Five Scottish health boards given long-term birth control to young girls
Schoolgirls among 3,500 minors to have the slow-release devices fitted
Drug has never been tested on children and is known to have side effects�
In adults, they include nausea, depression, acne and headaches
Expert warns the implant will make young girls 'more vulnerable to abuse and exploitation by older sexual predators'.

Children as young as 12 are being given contraceptive implants | Daily Mail Online

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2736517/Children-young-12-given-contraceptive-implants-making-vulnerable-abuse-sexual-exploitation.html/

Personal attacks edited out.

soufie
Site Moderator

Libtardism at it's finest!

I dont know

do we have abortion without consent?
do we have sex change without consent?


how far will we go in this 'its their body' culture?