Topic: Has Obama Finally Admitted That He Is A Muslim? | |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
It is not just Texas anymore (or part of England, and a few others countries). Sadly, this 80+% Christian (mostly Protestant), country... won't even READ what Sharia law is, to realize not only how Un- Christian it is, but how Un- American it is, how Anti- Woman it is, how Anti-Homosexual it is. How, Anti FREEDOM it is. |
|
|
|
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. Nowhere does this say the individual must be born in the United States. This is why Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada, is eligible. He was a natural born United States citizen because his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. who says he has to be born in the US? Where,in my Post have you read that? I was simply using this to illustrate the point, not to point out any disagreement with you. The point is that you quoted the Constitutional qualifications to be President, whereas everyone else is misunderstanding this to mean that someone must be born on American soil. And I'm not defending Obama. Twice he did not get my vote, and if he could run again, he would be even less likely to get my vote because he's an incompetent, dishonest disaster of a President. And he has been secretive about pretty much everything. But in 2008 Hillary Clinton and John McCain were in powerful positions and able to uncover whatever he is hiding. Politics is a dirty game, so they don't mind destroying each other in very personal ways for the power they seek. And Hillary was the media darling at the time. They wanted who they knew, not some nobody from Illinois. Obama didn't have that kind of power until he was inaugurated. So again, why did those who were more powerful at the time, who felt entitled to the Presidency because it was "their turn," not uncover any of this with the resources they had at their disposal? No one can answer that. |
|
|
|
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. Nowhere does this say the individual must be born in the United States. This is why Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada, is eligible. He was a natural born United States citizen because his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. who says he has to be born in the US? Where,in my Post have you read that? I was simply using this to illustrate the point, not to point out any disagreement with you. The point is that you quoted the Constitutional qualifications to be President, whereas everyone else is misunderstanding this to mean that someone must be born on American soil. And I'm not defending Obama. Twice he did not get my vote, and if he could run again, he would be even less likely to get my vote because he's an incompetent, dishonest disaster of a President. And he has been secretive about pretty much everything. But in 2008 Hillary Clinton and John McCain were in powerful positions and able to uncover whatever he is hiding. Politics is a dirty game, so they don't mind destroying each other in very personal ways for the power they seek. And Hillary was the media darling at the time. They wanted who they knew, not some nobody from Illinois. Obama didn't have that kind of power until he was inaugurated. So again, why did those who were more powerful at the time, who felt entitled to the Presidency because it was "their turn," not uncover any of this with the resources they had at their disposal? No one can answer that. maybe because they are all controlled by whoever is behind the government? not such a far off idea... |
|
|
|
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. Nowhere does this say the individual must be born in the United States. This is why Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada, is eligible. He was a natural born United States citizen because his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. who says he has to be born in the US? Where,in my Post have you read that? I was simply using this to illustrate the point, not to point out any disagreement with you. The point is that you quoted the Constitutional qualifications to be President, whereas everyone else is misunderstanding this to mean that someone must be born on American soil. And I'm not defending Obama. Twice he did not get my vote, and if he could run again, he would be even less likely to get my vote because he's an incompetent, dishonest disaster of a President. And he has been secretive about pretty much everything. But in 2008 Hillary Clinton and John McCain were in powerful positions and able to uncover whatever he is hiding. Politics is a dirty game, so they don't mind destroying each other in very personal ways for the power they seek. And Hillary was the media darling at the time. They wanted who they knew, not some nobody from Illinois. Obama didn't have that kind of power until he was inaugurated. So again, why did those who were more powerful at the time, who felt entitled to the Presidency because it was "their turn," not uncover any of this with the resources they had at their disposal? No one can answer that. maybe because they are all controlled by whoever is behind the government? not such a far off idea... That's a very far off idea. Hillary and McCain, who had the power do uncover whether or not Obama, the son of an American mother, was indeed born an American citizen didn't do so because they were controlled by the government? They controlled the government. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Sun 04/12/15 01:03 PM
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_Hawaii
http://www.hawaii-nation.org/statehood.html Is Hawaii Really a State of the Union? |
|
|
|
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. Nowhere does this say the individual must be born in the United States. This is why Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada, is eligible. He was a natural born United States citizen because his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. who says he has to be born in the US? Where,in my Post have you read that? I was simply using this to illustrate the point, not to point out any disagreement with you. The point is that you quoted the Constitutional qualifications to be President, whereas everyone else is misunderstanding this to mean that someone must be born on American soil. And I'm not defending Obama. Twice he did not get my vote, and if he could run again, he would be even less likely to get my vote because he's an incompetent, dishonest disaster of a President. And he has been secretive about pretty much everything. But in 2008 Hillary Clinton and John McCain were in powerful positions and able to uncover whatever he is hiding. Politics is a dirty game, so they don't mind destroying each other in very personal ways for the power they seek. And Hillary was the media darling at the time. They wanted who they knew, not some nobody from Illinois. Obama didn't have that kind of power until he was inaugurated. So again, why did those who were more powerful at the time, who felt entitled to the Presidency because it was "their turn," not uncover any of this with the resources they had at their disposal? No one can answer that. maybe because they are all controlled by whoever is behind the government? not such a far off idea... That's a very far off idea. Hillary and McCain, who had the power do uncover whether or not Obama, the son of an American mother, was indeed born an American citizen didn't do so because they were controlled by the government? They controlled the government. i disagree.. |
|
|
|
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. Nowhere does this say the individual must be born in the United States. This is why Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada, is eligible. He was a natural born United States citizen because his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. who says he has to be born in the US? Where,in my Post have you read that? I was simply using this to illustrate the point, not to point out any disagreement with you. The point is that you quoted the Constitutional qualifications to be President, whereas everyone else is misunderstanding this to mean that someone must be born on American soil. And I'm not defending Obama. Twice he did not get my vote, and if he could run again, he would be even less likely to get my vote because he's an incompetent, dishonest disaster of a President. And he has been secretive about pretty much everything. But in 2008 Hillary Clinton and John McCain were in powerful positions and able to uncover whatever he is hiding. Politics is a dirty game, so they don't mind destroying each other in very personal ways for the power they seek. And Hillary was the media darling at the time. They wanted who they knew, not some nobody from Illinois. Obama didn't have that kind of power until he was inaugurated. So again, why did those who were more powerful at the time, who felt entitled to the Presidency because it was "their turn," not uncover any of this with the resources they had at their disposal? No one can answer that. maybe because they are all controlled by whoever is behind the government? not such a far off idea... That's a very far off idea. Hillary and McCain, who had the power do uncover whether or not Obama, the son of an American mother, was indeed born an American citizen didn't do so because they were controlled by the government? They controlled the government. i disagree.. We've been going in circles. Agreement to disagree is probably our best option. |
|
|
|
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. Nowhere does this say the individual must be born in the United States. This is why Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada, is eligible. He was a natural born United States citizen because his parents were citizens at the time of his birth. who says he has to be born in the US? Where,in my Post have you read that? I was simply using this to illustrate the point, not to point out any disagreement with you. The point is that you quoted the Constitutional qualifications to be President, whereas everyone else is misunderstanding this to mean that someone must be born on American soil. And I'm not defending Obama. Twice he did not get my vote, and if he could run again, he would be even less likely to get my vote because he's an incompetent, dishonest disaster of a President. And he has been secretive about pretty much everything. But in 2008 Hillary Clinton and John McCain were in powerful positions and able to uncover whatever he is hiding. Politics is a dirty game, so they don't mind destroying each other in very personal ways for the power they seek. And Hillary was the media darling at the time. They wanted who they knew, not some nobody from Illinois. Obama didn't have that kind of power until he was inaugurated. So again, why did those who were more powerful at the time, who felt entitled to the Presidency because it was "their turn," not uncover any of this with the resources they had at their disposal? No one can answer that. maybe because they are all controlled by whoever is behind the government? not such a far off idea... That's a very far off idea. Hillary and McCain, who had the power do uncover whether or not Obama, the son of an American mother, was indeed born an American citizen didn't do so because they were controlled by the government? They controlled the government. i disagree.. We've been going in circles. Agreement to disagree is probably our best option. i agree... |
|
|
|
so hes a jew. now hes creating all kinds of problems in middle east. Now it s all clear.
|
|
|
|
so hes a jew. now hes creating all kinds of problems in middle east. Now it s all clear. now what gave you that idea? |
|
|
|
so hes a jew. now hes creating all kinds of problems in middle east. Now it s all clear. now what gave you that idea? probably one drink to many... |
|
|
|
so hes a jew. now hes creating all kinds of problems in middle east. Now it s all clear. now what gave you that idea? probably one drink to many... |
|
|
|
Looks like somebody isnt getting the gist.The enemies of America have infiltrated the congress and the sit of power and are covertly working acidusly to imperil the security of US,Israel and the world.What they couldnt do from without shall soon be achieved from within.Its an effective war tactics.AMERICA,HERE COMES SHARIA,SOON!
|
|
|
|
Looks like somebody isnt getting the gist.The enemies of America have infiltrated the congress and the sit of power and are covertly working acidusly to imperil the security of US,Israel and the world.What they couldnt do from without shall soon be achieved from within.Its an effective war tactics.AMERICA,HERE COMES SHARIA,SOON! Me thinks you might better focus on your Country! Fifty/Fifty? |
|
|
|
Looks like somebody isnt getting the gist.The enemies of America have infiltrated the congress and the sit of power and are covertly working acidusly to imperil the security of US,Israel and the world.What they couldnt do from without shall soon be achieved from within.Its an effective war tactics.AMERICA,HERE COMES SHARIA,SOON! Me thinks you might better focus on your Country! Fifty/Fifty? |
|
|
|
Looks like somebody isnt getting the gist.The enemies of America have infiltrated the congress and the sit of power and are covertly working acidusly to imperil the security of US,Israel and the world.What they couldnt do from without shall soon be achieved from within.Its an effective war tactics.AMERICA,HERE COMES SHARIA,SOON! Me thinks you might better focus on your Country! Fifty/Fifty? So blame America for the problems your country faces? Take the plank out of your eye before you worry about the speck in mine. |
|
|
|
Looks like somebody isnt getting the gist.The enemies of America have infiltrated the congress and the sit of power and are covertly working acidusly to imperil the security of US,Israel and the world.What they couldnt do from without shall soon be achieved from within.Its an effective war tactics.AMERICA,HERE COMES SHARIA,SOON! Me thinks you might better focus on your Country! Fifty/Fifty? So blame America for the problems your country faces? Take the plank out of your eye before you worry about the speck in mine. |
|
|
|
The irony of blaming America for all the problems in the world, yet calling on us to help with every problem around the world.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
uche9aa
on
Mon 04/13/15 03:44 AM
|
|
The irony of blaming America for all the problems in the world, yet calling on us to help with every problem around the world. |
|
|