Topic: anonymous hackers | |
---|---|
Yes I understand. The answer is still no. Think about it this way. Millions of people everywhere have camcorders and microphones, have you ever heard any of them talking on your radio or seen them on your tv? No. Why? The FCC. The FAA has a lot to do with this too. If someone could broadcast a signal strong enough they could be mistaken for ground control. We typically don't like it when planes drop out of the sky or run into buildings. There are also emergency weather and information radio broadcasts. They have to be everywhere so they can't afford to broadcast with as much power as the more popular radio stations. They don't allow citizens or businesses to have equipment more powerful than that without licensing. This is where your brainwashing comes in. You are only close enough to local radio stations, their dj, their rotation. This was true of tv until the 70s and early 80s when satellites and cable companies gave us many more choices and clearer pictures. If you dont like local news, change the channel. Still it would take someone capable of wiring a large city's traffic lights to be able to do what you're suggesting and that would only be in a local area. There are different cable companies and satellites that service different areas. Dallas and Houston for example are both in Texas but one may have Cox and the other Time Warner. It all depends on who has the contract to service the area. Supposedly it's so we don't have a monopoly but both companies don't operate in the same area. It all has to do with $ and lots of it going from our pockets to theirs. Cable companies don't actually broadcast either. All they do is provide you a one time connection to all of the networks that make and broadcast their shows. |
|
|
|
Oh yea, btw, I'm a nerd, not a geek. I had to tell you that because I'm wearing geekoflage. I had you going there didn't I? I love your pocket protector. Very practical. Tomato, there is a point where what you are discussing could be construed as terrorism. Taking out salelite comm's would be in that realm. |
|
|
|
In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king!
|
|
|
|
Oh yea, btw, I'm a nerd, not a geek. I had to tell you that because I'm wearing geekoflage. I had you going there didn't I? I love your pocket protector. Very practical. Tomato, there is a point where what you are discussing could be construed as terrorism. Taking out salelite comm's would be in that realm. |
|
|
|
Oh yea, btw, I'm a nerd, not a geek. I had to tell you that because I'm wearing geekoflage. I had you going there didn't I? I love your pocket protector. Very practical. Tomato, there is a point where what you are discussing could be construed as terrorism. Taking out salelite comm's would be in that realm. That's nice, I don't think this thread is any of these things: Politics, Current News & Events. |
|
|
|
Edited by
RebelArcher
on
Sun 03/08/15 10:11 AM
|
|
as I understand it, I am no expert either, is
that it is a group of hackers that are intent with exposing illegal activities of our governments. There is an open case of a girl burned alive, Jessica Chambers, in rural Mississippi. When an arrest wasnt made quick enough, a group of anonymous hackers took to Twitter to "solve" the case......but they basically were just throwing any and all crap against the wall and hoping something wld stick. Sometimes I wonder if they were just some pimply faced kid typng away in their mom's basement..... |
|
|
|
the term ANONYMOUS ought to give you a Clue!
|
|
|
|
Oh yea, btw, I'm a nerd, not a geek. I had to tell you that because I'm wearing geekoflage. I had you going there didn't I? I love your pocket protector. Very practical. Tomato, there is a point where what you are discussing could be construed as terrorism. Taking out salelite comm's would be in that realm. That's nice, I don't think this thread is any of these things: Politics, Current News & Events. |
|
|
|
Maybe it's a conspiracy. Ok, I'll let you have that.
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's a conspiracy. Ok, I'll let you have that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why presume anger? |
|
|
|
Why presume anger? |
|
|
|
Why presume anger? It's the frustrated "smiley". There are much better venues than a dating site, to learn about hacking and other felonious activity. |
|
|
|
Me and my fellow squad hit xbox and psn mate like a week ago
|
|
|
|
Why presume anger? It's the frustrated "smiley". There are much better venues than a dating site, to learn about hacking and other felonious activity. |
|
|
|
Why presume anger? It's the frustrated "smiley". There are much better venues than a dating site, to learn about hacking and other felonious activity. Why do you presume, that they care about anything other than themselves? |
|
|
|
Why presume anger? It's the frustrated "smiley". There are much better venues than a dating site, to learn about hacking and other felonious activity. Why do you presume, that they care about anything other than themselves? |
|
|
|
|
|
|