Yes it is too easily researchable. Perhaps you should read what the senators say instead of stealthily misrepresenting the facts.

"Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) introduced an amendment that would prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty in order to uphold the Second Amendment. His amendment passed on a 53-46 vote."

"Fairfax, Va. – Today, four members of the U.S. Senate sent a letter to President Barack Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and the United Nations with the clear message that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty will not be ratified. Earlier this year, the U.N. adopted and President Obama directed Secretary Kerry to sign this treaty, which does not exclude civilian arms from its scope and therefore directly threatens the Second Amendment.

“This letter sends a clear message to President Obama and Secretary Kerry that the Arms Trade Treaty will not receive the 67 votes in the U.S. Senate necessary for ratification,” said Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action. “On behalf of our 5 million members, the NRA would like to thank those who signed this letter for their principled stand in defending the Second Amendment freedoms of all law-abiding Americans against this attempt by the U.N. to undermine American sovereignty.”

Sens. Jon Tester (D-MT), Max Baucus (D-MT), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), and Joe Donnelly (D-IN) sent a letter to President Barack Obama saying, “because of unaddressed concerns that this Treaty’s obligations could undermine our nation’s sovereignty and the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans, we would oppose the Treaty if it were to come before the U.S. Senate.”

This joins the bipartisan effort of 50 fellow Senators and 181 members of the U.S. House who sent letters to the President stating their opposition to the ATT earlier this month."

gun totin morons may need to take a mental wellness exam soon?

That should weed out the herd LOL

Another misinformed liberal voter

Not every American wishes to own or drive a car (the largest cause of deaths accidental or otherwise in the US) but there is no actions to outlaw, limit, or ban them!

ANY attack on, or limitation of our Constitutional, or rights by birth, is like surrendering to a criminal the gun he uses to rob you with! To give ANY foreign body power over OUR rights is surrendering your sovereignty and nothing short of treasonous stupidity!

"We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few
lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics."

I haven't misrepresented anything, the OP mentions a pretty specific un resolution and a claim that it disarms citizens,, anyone who CARES TO READ IT

clearly can see that it does no such thing


,,,but on with the 'attack on our rights' fear tactics,,,,if its good enough for the politicians, it must be true,,,,

gun totin morons may need to take a mental wellness exam soon?

That should weed out the herd LOL

once again, regulating INTERNATIONAL Trading is a government issue, its not a personal collection or attack on PERSONAL OWNERSHIP...

Truer words were never spoken.

Can anyone be that misinformed....really?

If the US votes to fall in line with the UN SA treaty, we can kiss sovereign rights goodbye! What part of "compliance" don't you understand? And where is their authority written into our Constitution?

It is said however to form friendships with all and alliances with none!

Like the TPP, it does nothing for the good of the US populace!

It's putting lipstick on a pig for the idiot liberals to kiss easier!

Truer words were never spoken.

its not about misinformation, once again its about perception and interpretation

I don't interpret things as ALL or nothing,,,

I don't believe that regulation on the trade and manufacture of vehicles, for instance, comes anywhere CLOSE to stopping me from being able to PERSONALLY own a car

similarly, I don't believe regulation on trade and/or manufacture of weapons, comes anywhere CLOSE to stopping americans their 'right' to personally own a gun,,,

,,but to each their own interpretation of risk and what LT effect a decision will have,,,

what has your Right to Selfdefense and the Right to Own the Implements to do it with,to do with the Privilege of Driving a Car?
You still are mixing Rights and Privileges!
Rights are inherent in the Individual,not bestowed or given by Government!
And the First and Second are Foremost,regardless of what Government might do!
Any move against those Two is unconstitutional,regardless of what the Liberals think!

The UN is not trying to take 'your guns'

this is the resolution,, stealthily misprepresented as an attack on individual rights as opposed to a measure to control Arms TRADING


http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2117(2013)



don't just READ the emails on this kind of stuff, its too easily researchable,,,

what has your Right to Selfdefense and the Right to Own the Implements to do it with,to do with the Privilege of Driving a Car?
You still are mixing Rights and Privileges!
Rights are inherent in the Individual,not bestowed or given by Government!
And the First and Second are Foremost,regardless of what Government might do!
Any move against those Two is unconstitutional,regardless of what the Liberals think!