Topic: The Secret War On Black Republicans | |
---|---|
So, as long as they have positions that are not favorable to black people, they are "Tom Types". But Condoleeza Rice has been targeted many times because she is female? I dont think I could explain it to you, truly, in a way you can relate to. but the short answer to the above questions are NO and yes Yes, please splain to me. I would like to know. 'not favorable to', is alot different and broader than 'against' If I dont show someone 'favor', it means I am either treating them inferior or EQUAL,,not favored if I am AGAINST someone, I am not seeing them 'EQUALLY here is an easier to understand definition, although I am doubting it will get through either The term "Uncle Tom" is used as a derogatory epithet for an excessively subservient person, particularly when that person perceives their own lower-class status based on race. It is similarly used to negatively describe a person who betrays their own group by participating in its oppression, whether or not they do so willingly EXCESSIVELY SUBSERVIENT,, Or PARTICIPATING IN OPPRESSION,,,, |
|
|
|
So, as long as they have positions that are not favorable to black people, they are "Tom Types". But Condoleeza Rice has been targeted many times because she is female? I dont think I could explain it to you, truly, in a way you can relate to. but the short answer to the above questions are NO and yes Yes, please splain to me. I would like to know. 'not favorable to', is alot different and broader than 'against' If I dont show someone 'favor', it means I am either treating them inferior or EQUAL,,not favored if I am AGAINST someone, I am not seeing them 'EQUALLY here is an easier to understand definition, although I am doubting it will get through either The term "Uncle Tom" is used as a derogatory epithet for an excessively subservient person, particularly when that person perceives their own lower-class status based on race. It is similarly used to negatively describe a person who betrays their own group by participating in its oppression, whether or not they do so willingly EXCESSIVELY SUBSERVIENT,, Or PARTICIPATING IN OPPRESSION,,,, Ok, that is, as long as they are good liberal blacks,and follow that line, they are not being subservient. But if they follow the republican philosophy, they are betraying their own group and oppressing blacks? Got it. |
|
|
|
So, as long as they have positions that are not favorable to black people, they are "Tom Types". But Condoleeza Rice has been targeted many times because she is female? I dont think I could explain it to you, truly, in a way you can relate to. but the short answer to the above questions are NO and yes Yes, please splain to me. I would like to know. 'not favorable to', is alot different and broader than 'against' If I dont show someone 'favor', it means I am either treating them inferior or EQUAL,,not favored if I am AGAINST someone, I am not seeing them 'EQUALLY here is an easier to understand definition, although I am doubting it will get through either The term "Uncle Tom" is used as a derogatory epithet for an excessively subservient person, particularly when that person perceives their own lower-class status based on race. It is similarly used to negatively describe a person who betrays their own group by participating in its oppression, whether or not they do so willingly EXCESSIVELY SUBSERVIENT,, Or PARTICIPATING IN OPPRESSION,,,, Ok, that is, as long as they are good liberal blacks,and follow that line, they are not being subservient. But if they follow the republican philosophy, they are betraying their own group and oppressing blacks? Got it. nope, didnt think you would either,,, |
|
|
|
So, as long as they have positions that are not favorable to black people, they are "Tom Types". But Condoleeza Rice has been targeted many times because she is female? I dont think I could explain it to you, truly, in a way you can relate to. but the short answer to the above questions are NO and yes Yes, please splain to me. I would like to know. 'not favorable to', is alot different and broader than 'against' If I dont show someone 'favor', it means I am either treating them inferior or EQUAL,,not favored if I am AGAINST someone, I am not seeing them 'EQUALLY here is an easier to understand definition, although I am doubting it will get through either The term "Uncle Tom" is used as a derogatory epithet for an excessively subservient person, particularly when that person perceives their own lower-class status based on race. It is similarly used to negatively describe a person who betrays their own group by participating in its oppression, whether or not they do so willingly EXCESSIVELY SUBSERVIENT,, Or PARTICIPATING IN OPPRESSION,,,, Ok, that is, as long as they are good liberal blacks,and follow that line, they are not being subservient. But if they follow the republican philosophy, they are betraying their own group and oppressing blacks? Got it. nope, didnt think you would either,,, I got it. You didn't. |
|
|
|
So, as long as they have positions that are not favorable to black people, they are "Tom Types". But Condoleeza Rice has been targeted many times because she is female? I dont think I could explain it to you, truly, in a way you can relate to. but the short answer to the above questions are NO and yes Yes, please splain to me. I would like to know. 'not favorable to', is alot different and broader than 'against' If I dont show someone 'favor', it means I am either treating them inferior or EQUAL,,not favored if I am AGAINST someone, I am not seeing them 'EQUALLY here is an easier to understand definition, although I am doubting it will get through either The term "Uncle Tom" is used as a derogatory epithet for an excessively subservient person, particularly when that person perceives their own lower-class status based on race. It is similarly used to negatively describe a person who betrays their own group by participating in its oppression, whether or not they do so willingly EXCESSIVELY SUBSERVIENT,, Or PARTICIPATING IN OPPRESSION,,,, Ok, that is, as long as they are good liberal blacks,and follow that line, they are not being subservient. But if they follow the republican philosophy, they are betraying their own group and oppressing blacks? Got it. nope, didnt think you would either,,, I got it. You didn't. really? seems like you typed alot of things that WERE not what I typed at all,, the paraphrasing was WAY OFF,,, simply put tommery consists SIMPLY of EXCESSIVE (above whats considered normal or balanced) SUBSERVIENCE or PARTICIPATION IN OPPRESSION,,,,,,, whatever other elaborations one chooses to make of those simple concepts are their own hangups,, shrugs,,, |
|
|
|
Msh, simply put, no one should be called names for their political affiliations or beliefs.
|
|
|
|
Msh, simply put, no one should be called names for their political affiliations or beliefs. arent labels like 'conservative' and 'liberal' name calling? they are words of description that have an understood meaning based upon ones set of beliefs,, yes? |
|
|
|
Msh, simply put, no one should be called names for their political affiliations or beliefs. arent labels like 'conservative' and 'liberal' name calling? they are words of description that have an understood meaning based upon ones set of beliefs,, yes? You missed the point of the op. I just wanted to see how far you would go with it. You did. |
|
|
|
of course you did,,,,,,lol
|
|
|
|
Thank you Dodo.
|
|
|
|
Harmony, you are fighting a losing battle on this issue. Conservative blacks and Republican blacks have been complaining for decades about this subject. Look at how much was ever reported on Condalisa (sp?) Rice's point of views, or Colin Powell. they are just labeled as "uncle Tom" blacks and swept to the side by the media. colin powell. I wish he had run for Prezzie |
|
|
|
Harmony, you are fighting a losing battle on this issue. Conservative blacks and Republican blacks have been complaining for decades about this subject. Look at how much was ever reported on Condalisa (sp?) Rice's point of views, or Colin Powell. they are just labeled as "uncle Tom" blacks and swept to the side by the media. colin powell. I wish he had run for Prezzie Would have been better than what we have now. |
|
|
|
He would have been a good candidate,,,
|
|
|
|
He would have been a good candidate,,, the best candidate by far |
|
|
|
Harmony, you are fighting a losing battle on this issue. Conservative blacks and Republican blacks have been complaining for decades about this subject. Look at how much was ever reported on Condalisa (sp?) Rice's point of views, or Colin Powell. they are just labeled as "uncle Tom" blacks and swept to the side by the media. colin powell. I wish he had run for Prezzie Would have been better than what we have now. trust me - no border crisis no botched healthcare no silly stuff with syria.....etc etc |
|
|
|
Harmony, you are fighting a losing battle on this issue. Conservative blacks and Republican blacks have been complaining for decades about this subject. Look at how much was ever reported on Condalisa (sp?) Rice's point of views, or Colin Powell. they are just labeled as "uncle Tom" blacks and swept to the side by the media. colin powell. I wish he had run for Prezzie Me too! |
|
|