Obama to Congress: OK new cash for roads, bridges


TARRYTOWN, N.Y. (AP) — With New York's aging Tappan Zee Bridge looming behind him, President Barack Obama challenged congressional Republicans to spend more money on the nation's crumbling roads, see-through bridges and outdated ports or face losing businesses to other countries.

"We've got ports that aren't ready for the next generation of cargo ships," Obama said against a backdrop of cranes that are being used to replace the 58-year-old Tappan Zee. "We've got more than 100,000 bridges that are old enough to qualify for Medicare."

Obama used the major Hudson River crossing point north of New York City and its $3.9 billion replacement project to illustrate a fast-track system he initiated that he said cut the permitting time from five years to 1 1/2 years.

He blamed Republicans for not authorizing more money for construction and repairs and warned that without congressional action the Highway Trust Fund, used to pay for transportation projects, will run dry. He accused Republicans of voting against additional spending even as they gladly show up at ribbon cutting ceremonies for projects they refused to finance.

"They are more interested in saying 'no' because they are worried that maybe they'd have to be at a bill signing with me," Obama said. Republicans contended Obama was hypocritical for claiming credit for the expedited process while his administration has yet to decide the fate of a proposed Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline. The GOP is using that up-in-the-air project to bash Democrats ahead of the November elections.

"It's a real challenge to listen to the president talk about reforming the permitting system when he's been sitting on the permit for the country's largest shovel-ready infrastructure program, the Keystone XL pipeline, for five years," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Obama noted that over the last 50 years the United States' spending on transportation as a share of the economy has shrunk by 50 percent while European countries are spending twice as much. "We shouldn't watch the top-rated airports and seaports, or the fastest rail lines or fastest Internet networks get built somewhere else," he said. "They need to be built right here in New York, right here in the United States."

Obama was introduced by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is high on Democrats' list of potential candidates to succeed Obama in 2016. Cuomo credited Obama for the advanced work on the bridge replacement, which is being financed largely by bonds paid for through higher tolls.

"This is a bridge that symbolizes what was and what can be," Cuomo said. Obama, who was traveling with first lady Michelle Obama, also was to headline a pair of high-dollar fundraisers benefiting Democratic candidates in the November elections. On Thursday, the president and first lady planned to attend the dedication ceremony for the National September 11 Memorial & Museum at the World Trade Center.

Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx kicked off the public works push Monday, warning that the Highway Trust Fund, which relies on gasoline taxes, could run dry in August. Those taxes haven't gone up in 20 years.

Vice President Joe Biden was in Cleveland Wednesday with a similar message, noting that the World Economic Forum ranked the United States 18th in the quality of the nation's roads. "Folks, we cannot stand still," Biden said. "If we do, we will lose our economic prominence in the world."

Half of the administration $302 billion transportation plan would be in addition to the programs paid for with fuel taxes. That extra spending would come from revenue raised by closing what the administration says are corporate tax loopholes and by making other changes in business taxes, a long shot in a politically divided Congress.

What happened to all of the money that Congress already allocated for roads and bridges?

The mean wepubwicans took it.

The real question is: Who's feet are the ugliest, Michelle's or the other woman's?

Perhaps Meeshelle used it up in China.

For state roads, yes.
For interstate highways, no, because interstate commerce depends on interstate highways.

Things like that should be up to the states and for the feds to keep their noses out of it.

Silly Obamy, Americans don't work on roads and bridges, Mescans do.

You mean these:

High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Funding by Region



Can't let Agenda 21 down. Got to destroy the highways and go to rail corridors.

It was not the Commerce Clause that was used for the highway system but Necessary and Proper clause under the right to raise and support armies. The excuse back then was to be able to transport the military quickly to ports or other destinations in case the Russians attacked.

It wasn't until the Supreme Court wrote new legislation expanding the Commerce clause that congress has any rights to make laws internal to the United States regarding interstate commerce control over the states.

That was the original intent but Amendment XVII screwed that.