Topic: Blood Moon Rising | |
---|---|
It's coming!
Prophecy loves signs from the heavens, and they will deliver Tuesday with a moonlight spectacle. Get ready for an unusually beautiful moon to grace the night skies next week. There will be a total lunar eclipse Tuesday that will turn the moon a burnt reddish orange, NASA says. It's called a blood moon, and this one is just the first in a series of four consecutive total eclipses. Within a year and a half, North America will be able to see a blood moon a total of four times. The moon takes on this color during the eclipse as it passes through the Earth's shadow, which is the color of a desert sunset. The four blood moons will occur in roughly six-month intervals on the following dates: April 15, 2014; October 8, 2014; April 4, 2015, and September 28, 2015. With that frequency, one might be misled into thinking that they are commonplace. There are about two lunar eclipses per year, NASA says. Some of them -- penumbral eclipses -- are so subtle, they are vaguely visible and go greatly unnoticed. Other eclipses just cast a partial shadow on the moon but lend it none of that brilliant sunset hue. Lunar eclipses -- penumbral, partial or umbral -- occur in random order, NASA says. Getting four umbral eclipses in a row is like drawing a rare lunar poker hand of four of a kind. Just like the poker players, astronomers have a name for that lucky draw. It's called a tetrad, NASA says. "The most unique thing about the 2014-2015 tetrad is that all of them are visible for all or parts of the USA," longtime NASA eclipse expert Fred Espenak said in a prepared statement. In the 21st century, there will be many tetrads, but look back a few centuries, and you'll find the opposite phenomenon, Espenak said. Before the dawn of the 20th century, there was a 300-year period when there were none, he said. Zero. That would mean that neither Sir Isaac Newton, Mozart, Queen Anne, George Washington, Napoleon, Abraham Lincoln nor their contemporaries ever had a chance to see one. So, we're in luck. To take advantage of it, you'll have to stay up late from Monday night into Tuesday. People in North and South America will be able to see the entire eclipse, while sky watchers in the western Pacific can catch only the last half. The moon will be setting in most of Europe and Africa during the eclipse, so residents there probably won't see much. |
|
|
|
OMG, I can feel another one of those weird Planet dreams coming on.
Yes and before anyone say's anything, I do know the moon is not a planet |
|
|
|
....and it is scaring heck out of some People too!
|
|
|
|
....and it is scaring heck out of some People too! Can you imagine how scared they must have been thousands of years ago. I bet a few got sacrficed. |
|
|
|
OMG, I can feel another one of those weird Planet dreams coming on. Yes and before anyone say's anything, I do know the moon is not a planet Is the Moon a planet? By some definitions it may become one in the distant future. The controversy over what makes a celestial body a planet has been going on for decades. In fact the planet Pluto became a casualty of that debate when it was demoted to a planetoid. So if Pluto can get the axe as a planet, then surely the Moon can be eventually promoted to being a planet. However we have to go by the currently accepted understanding of what a planet is. According to the IAU a planet is any rocky body that has different layers, is geologically active, and most importantly orbits the Sun. We know that the Moon can easily fit these categories. First the moon is a rocky body composed of many of the same elements that the Earth is composed of. It also had volcanic activity in its past. Even now the Moon still experiences detectable quakes so it is still geologically active. The last is obvious in that it does orbit the Sun it just also orbits Earth while doing it. A new wrinkle in the definition of a planet could be just the thing to put the Moon over the top in the future. According to the current definition of a moon, it can’t become a planet if it orbits another planet however it can be considered one if the center of gravity known as the barycenter lies outside of the larger planet. Right now the Moon is still solidly in the natural satellite category but each year it is drifting further and further away in its orbit from the Earth. This means that someday in the distant future scientists may consider reclassifying it as a planet. However, that is if the definition for what is a planet does not change in that time. So in the end we know for certain that the Moon is not a planet. It is a natural satellite by even the most current definition issued by the IAU. However the question brings up the issue of how flexible the definition of what makes a planet a planet becomes. In either case it would be likely that tradition would remain too strong. The moon has been the moon for millennia so it would be very unlikely for astronomers to change its designation without very convincing evidence to back it up. http://www.universetoday.com/85749/is-the-moon-a-planet/ |
|
|
|
OMG, I can feel another one of those weird Planet dreams coming on. Yes and before anyone say's anything, I do know the moon is not a planet Is the Moon a planet? By some definitions it may become one in the distant future. The controversy over what makes a celestial body a planet has been going on for decades. In fact the planet Pluto became a casualty of that debate when it was demoted to a planetoid. So if Pluto can get the axe as a planet, then surely the Moon can be eventually promoted to being a planet. However we have to go by the currently accepted understanding of what a planet is. According to the IAU a planet is any rocky body that has different layers, is geologically active, and most importantly orbits the Sun. We know that the Moon can easily fit these categories. First the moon is a rocky body composed of many of the same elements that the Earth is composed of. It also had volcanic activity in its past. Even now the Moon still experiences detectable quakes so it is still geologically active. The last is obvious in that it does orbit the Sun it just also orbits Earth while doing it. A new wrinkle in the definition of a planet could be just the thing to put the Moon over the top in the future. According to the current definition of a moon, it can’t become a planet if it orbits another planet however it can be considered one if the center of gravity known as the barycenter lies outside of the larger planet. Right now the Moon is still solidly in the natural satellite category but each year it is drifting further and further away in its orbit from the Earth. This means that someday in the distant future scientists may consider reclassifying it as a planet. However, that is if the definition for what is a planet does not change in that time. So in the end we know for certain that the Moon is not a planet. It is a natural satellite by even the most current definition issued by the IAU. However the question brings up the issue of how flexible the definition of what makes a planet a planet becomes. In either case it would be likely that tradition would remain too strong. The moon has been the moon for millennia so it would be very unlikely for astronomers to change its designation without very convincing evidence to back it up. http://www.universetoday.com/85749/is-the-moon-a-planet/ I'm impressed Soufie. I would love to know who the man in the moon is. He must be bored up there all on his lonesome. |
|
|
|
I'm impressed Soufie. I would love to know who the man in the moon is. He must be bored up there all on his lonesome. He was on Mingle2 for a while. Banned for stalking. |
|
|
|
....and it is scaring heck out of some People too! Can you imagine how scared they must have been thousands of years ago. I bet a few got sacrficed. I would have been VERY scared. But then, mattress tags scare me. |
|
|
|
I'm impressed Soufie. I would love to know who the man in the moon is. He must be bored up there all on his lonesome. He was on Mingle2 for a while. Banned for stalking. There was a programme on a while back in the UK, all about stars and planets and things. It said betelgeuse (beatlejuice) in the constelation of orion will die soon, soon being within the next 1 million years. I couldn't help but think, well next week is within the next 1 million years. There's a lot of debate about how it will affect us. Watch this below, its amazing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q |
|
|
|
There was a programme on a while back in the UK, all about stars and planets and things. It said betelgeuse (beatlejuice) in the constelation of orion will die soon, soon being within the next 1 million years. I couldn't help but think, well next week is within the next 1 million years. There's a lot of debate about how it will affect us. Watch this below, its amazing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q Ah, but how far away is it? (Sorry, I cannot seem to get YouTube working.) |
|
|
|
There was a programme on a while back in the UK, all about stars and planets and things. It said betelgeuse (beatlejuice) in the constelation of orion will die soon, soon being within the next 1 million years. I couldn't help but think, well next week is within the next 1 million years. There's a lot of debate about how it will affect us. Watch this below, its amazing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEheh1BH34Q Ah, but how far away is it? (Sorry, I cannot seem to get YouTube working.) I've just Googled it. It's 640 light years away, so not too far, and it's a super red giant up to 30 times bigger than our sun. I'll let you do the maths. |
|
|
|
I went and read up on it...seems like when it goes supernova
it will take 100,000 years to affect earth's ecosystem, and that is after the 643 light years. I think we are okay :-) |
|
|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Sun 04/13/14 04:19 PM
|
|
I went and read up on it...seems like when it goes supernova it will take 100,000 years to affect earth's ecosystem, and that is after the 643 light years. I think we are okay :-) it depends what position Betelgeuse is when it goes supernova... if it's north or south pole is pointing towards earth when it happens, we could be wiped out much sooner with the release of the gamma rays, called a gamma ray burst... http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/bursts.html |
|
|
|
.. oh I can't wait for it to happen..
|
|
|
|
.. oh I can't wait for it to happen.. lol, don't hold your breath... |
|
|
|
I went and read up on it...seems like when it goes supernova it will take 100,000 years to affect earth's ecosystem, and that is after the 643 light years. I think we are okay :-) it depends what position Betelgeuse is when it goes supernova... if it's north or south pole is pointing towards earth when it happens, we could be wiped out much sooner with the release of the gamma rays, called a gamma ray burst... http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/bursts.html Great..just great. I may have to get religion. |
|
|
|
I went and read up on it...seems like when it goes supernova it will take 100,000 years to affect earth's ecosystem, and that is after the 643 light years. I think we are okay :-) it depends what position Betelgeuse is when it goes supernova... if it's north or south pole is pointing towards earth when it happens, we could be wiped out much sooner with the release of the gamma rays, called a gamma ray burst... http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/bursts.html Great..just great. I may have to get religion. don't drink the cool aid... |
|
|
|
ooooo I hear dat.
|
|
|
|
I love them when they are out over the ocean just beautiful!
|
|
|
|
here is something to peruse!
http://www.bible.ca/pre-date-setters.htm Library of Date Setters of The End of the World!!! Over 200 predictions and counting! |
|
|