100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Black Male Journalist on Obamas- | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
lol... yea, everyone that hates barry just hates him for no reason... fantasyland=barrysworld...   
wow, HATE? that's deep yeah, I would say people that 'hate' politicians have issues,, but I don't want to get into it ,,,lol I have disliked the policies and behaviors of some politicians, they are human, and for that reason I have not voted in favor of those policies but it never was as personal as 'hatred' for any of them,, I personally find that odd,,and very likely to SLANT ones perception of anything but the negative they hear regarding the one they 'hate' so much , but oh well,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol... yea, everyone that hates barry just hates him for no reason... fantasyland=barrysworld...
wow, HATE? that's deep yeah, I would say people that 'hate' politicians have issues,, but I don't want to get into it ,,,lol I have disliked the policies and behaviors of some politicians, they are human, and for that reason I have not voted in favor of those policies but it never was as personal as 'hatred' for any of them,, I personally find that odd,,and very likely to SLANT ones perception of anything but the negative they hear regarding the one they 'hate' so much , but oh well,,, voted in favor of polices? when do we vote on any policies? they are mandated by king barry... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol... yea, everyone that hates barry just hates him for no reason... fantasyland=barrysworld...
wow, HATE? that's deep yeah, I would say people that 'hate' politicians have issues,, but I don't want to get into it ,,,lol I have disliked the policies and behaviors of some politicians, they are human, and for that reason I have not voted in favor of those policies but it never was as personal as 'hatred' for any of them,, I personally find that odd,,and very likely to SLANT ones perception of anything but the negative they hear regarding the one they 'hate' so much , but oh well,,, voted in favor of polices? when do we vote on any policies? they are mandated by king barry... in our elections, we vote on issues like taxes for school, etc,, we also vote in officials who will decide on other issues, based upon their history and their campaign If I disagree with more of the policies than I agree with, or if the policies I disagree with are priorities, I don't VOTE for that official simply enough I think someone put in another thread about a liked/disliked hero/vigilante the law has spoken, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves',,, the president was elected 'twice',, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves' and do what they can where they can with the energy they waste griping about something that's not gonna be undone and that's only here until the next election that those whose candidate loses wont like the result of,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol... yea, everyone that hates barry just hates him for no reason... fantasyland=barrysworld...
wow, HATE? that's deep yeah, I would say people that 'hate' politicians have issues,, but I don't want to get into it ,,,lol I have disliked the policies and behaviors of some politicians, they are human, and for that reason I have not voted in favor of those policies but it never was as personal as 'hatred' for any of them,, I personally find that odd,,and very likely to SLANT ones perception of anything but the negative they hear regarding the one they 'hate' so much , but oh well,,, voted in favor of polices? when do we vote on any policies? they are mandated by king barry... in our elections, we vote on issues like taxes for school, etc,, we also vote in officials who will decide on other issues, based upon their history and their campaign If I disagree with more of the policies than I agree with, or if the policies I disagree with are priorities, I don't VOTE for that official simply enough I think someone put in another thread about a liked/disliked hero/vigilante the law has spoken, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves',,, the president was elected 'twice',, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves' and do what they can where they can with the energy they waste griping about something that's not gonna be undone and that's only here until the next election that those whose candidate loses wont like the result of,,,, only thing your right about there is there is nothing we can do once they're elected... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol... yea, everyone that hates barry just hates him for no reason... fantasyland=barrysworld...
wow, HATE? that's deep yeah, I would say people that 'hate' politicians have issues,, but I don't want to get into it ,,,lol I have disliked the policies and behaviors of some politicians, they are human, and for that reason I have not voted in favor of those policies but it never was as personal as 'hatred' for any of them,, I personally find that odd,,and very likely to SLANT ones perception of anything but the negative they hear regarding the one they 'hate' so much , but oh well,,, voted in favor of polices? when do we vote on any policies? they are mandated by king barry... in our elections, we vote on issues like taxes for school, etc,, we also vote in officials who will decide on other issues, based upon their history and their campaign If I disagree with more of the policies than I agree with, or if the policies I disagree with are priorities, I don't VOTE for that official simply enough I think someone put in another thread about a liked/disliked hero/vigilante the law has spoken, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves',,, the president was elected 'twice',, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves' and do what they can where they can with the energy they waste griping about something that's not gonna be undone and that's only here until the next election that those whose candidate loses wont like the result of,,,, Gee.... this sentiment coming from the person who still has Zimmerman on trial for murder.... and she wants America to get over someone who's hurting everyone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Mon 03/17/14 08:33 PM
|
|
lol... yea, everyone that hates barry just hates him for no reason... fantasyland=barrysworld...
wow, HATE? that's deep yeah, I would say people that 'hate' politicians have issues,, but I don't want to get into it ,,,lol I have disliked the policies and behaviors of some politicians, they are human, and for that reason I have not voted in favor of those policies but it never was as personal as 'hatred' for any of them,, I personally find that odd,,and very likely to SLANT ones perception of anything but the negative they hear regarding the one they 'hate' so much , but oh well,,, voted in favor of polices? when do we vote on any policies? they are mandated by king barry... in our elections, we vote on issues like taxes for school, etc,, we also vote in officials who will decide on other issues, based upon their history and their campaign If I disagree with more of the policies than I agree with, or if the policies I disagree with are priorities, I don't VOTE for that official simply enough I think someone put in another thread about a liked/disliked hero/vigilante the law has spoken, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves',,, the president was elected 'twice',, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves' and do what they can where they can with the energy they waste griping about something that's not gonna be undone and that's only here until the next election that those whose candidate loses wont like the result of,,,, Gee.... this sentiment coming from the person who still has Zimmerman on trial for murder.... and she wants America to get over someone who's hurting everyone nope, the statement came from someone in another thread, I just reposted it this person was sexually assaulted TWICE in her life and doesn't harbor 'hate' towards those individuals or harbor on what they may or may not be doing,, so grudging and hating isn't my speed,,,, 'get over ourselves',, if its done its done,, good advice of course, in a public forum where posters may CREATE threads about things that are already done,, the opinions of M2 members about those issues and opinions should be expected I don't give Z two thoughts, UNLESS or UNTIL I read someone here giving him accolades or praise, at which time I contribute my opinion about that opinion and the world keeps spinning,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this is not an attack on the author,, but a warning of potential lack of credibility or honesty and obvious bias based on past behavior,,, http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2012/massieobama.html and if race is relevant, the author here is white and also has pieces written about him and whether he is biased or truthful,, comes with the territory pick your poison,,,,,and whom and what you believe I guess that's life,, Oh this is really golden, sure it is, just as predicted by others on this post. So which part of the OP argument would be a lie, absolutely none. But Mychal does have some words for the entitlement crowd. 
Thanks, I would rather believe in Mychal, not Michelle. yes, the Obama derangement syndrome makes these things easy to accept as truth...lol OMG, now here comes the BS. Obama Derangement Syndrome The acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the statements -- nay -- the very existence of Barack Obama. Definitely don't have that crap, no paranoia at all, just the pure knowledge that Odumbo is a tyrannical dictator with little actual knowledge of most anything except feeding his little ego. But then the entitlement crowd have never been able to think for themselves and must contain everything into their own little capsules as directed by some mystical being or ideology as an excuse for not being able to determine reality on their own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol... yea, everyone that hates barry just hates him for no reason... fantasyland=barrysworld...
wow, HATE? that's deep yeah, I would say people that 'hate' politicians have issues,, but I don't want to get into it ,,,lol I have disliked the policies and behaviors of some politicians, they are human, and for that reason I have not voted in favor of those policies but it never was as personal as 'hatred' for any of them,, I personally find that odd,,and very likely to SLANT ones perception of anything but the negative they hear regarding the one they 'hate' so much , but oh well,,, voted in favor of polices? when do we vote on any policies? they are mandated by king barry... in our elections, we vote on issues like taxes for school, etc,, we also vote in officials who will decide on other issues, based upon their history and their campaign If I disagree with more of the policies than I agree with, or if the policies I disagree with are priorities, I don't VOTE for that official simply enough I think someone put in another thread about a liked/disliked hero/vigilante the law has spoken, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves',,, the president was elected 'twice',, so perhaps people should 'get over themselves' and do what they can where they can with the energy they waste griping about something that's not gonna be undone and that's only here until the next election that those whose candidate loses wont like the result of,,,, Gee.... this sentiment coming from the person who still has Zimmerman on trial for murder.... and she wants America to get over someone who's hurting everyone I would see that type of character as having the hots for Daddy Z and suffering from oButmeister compulsive disorder. Only cure is getting cut off the tit and forced to get a job. Then, they can experience the real world, maybe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'entitlement crowd'' ,, blah blah blah,,
what a broken record,,,,let me know when there is going to be some VALID rebuttals,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have 'hots' for any overgrown wimp who can only defend himself with a gun,,or talk mess behind a computer
not today, not before, not ever,,lol my world is also plenty REAL enough, REAL enough not to feel like employment status makes people better or worse than other people, or more or less capable of haaaa,,,, the REAL WORLD,, according to the classist supremacists little 'capsules' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this is not an attack on the author,, but a warning of potential lack of credibility or honesty and obvious bias based on past behavior,,, http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2012/massieobama.html and if race is relevant, the author here is white and also has pieces written about him and whether he is biased or truthful,, comes with the territory pick your poison,,,,,and whom and what you believe I guess that's life,, No. It is a blatant attack on the author. The same old story. When you can't attack the message, attack the messager. Find a slur, or a hater, or anyone who can diminish him without addressing his words. not really, I chose not to 'attack' the message because so much in it was just opinion, and because the author has a history of posting lies as facts,, the attack was the CREDIBILITY of the piece based upon past peaces by that author just like I wouldn't get a heart surgery from someone with a history of patients who die in their surgery, even though I have nothing PERSONALLY against the surgeon I wouldn't lend much credibility to this persons posts about the Obamas, based upon their past history its nothing personal , and certainly not a personal attack but, it is kind of funny, I wish to add, that some people keep pointing that attacking the author instead of the post is 'typical' right before they precede to do just that with labels like libtard odumbite welfare ho entitlement crowd,,, ,,funny how the blind really CANT See themselves in their insults,,, Does the BS ever stop, attacking the author from some conceived notion not from the actual person objecting but from some source that could or possibly should be considered questionable unto itself is just pure el toro caca. Of course that is normally the modus operandi of an intellect incapable of refuting the argument presented so uses an attack on the supposed credibility of the argument based on a false assumption of the authors credibility to present the argument because it's just an opinion that does not agree with their own, but they just can't oppose the words without appearing the complete fool. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama Derangement Syndrome is evident whenever someone continues to promote the false claim that President Obama was born outside the USA. Don't care if he was born in the oval office, he still does not meet the requirements of a natural born citizen. Just another false flag to see what the owner's can get away with and it seems a lot. Oh by the way if you want to know what the phrase in the constitution means, it is to be construed by the understanding of the authors, the founding fathers. And what they understood was: Vattel: The Law of Nations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whats that you say about looking the 'complete fool' by using an 'attack' instead of refuting the argument 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama derangement syndrome... did you learn some new words today? i guess bad policies, bad decision making, the lies... none of that matters, only now we have the ODS...
no mighty, actually this I am basing on history and observation too Really and what history book would that be, does it actually exist. ya see,, there are several posters here who have repeatedly posted 'facts' about Obama that I have been able to show were untrue through various factchecking sources, and which I have pointed out And where were those fact checked and what would make one think they actual represent the real facts and not the liberal biased facts. Of course no facts here have been rebutted much less "disproved". So just more BS. Please feel free to prove me wrong. but they seem far too eager to jump on as truth anything negative about the man to ever do that work themselves before they post these 'facts' there also seems to be a tendency for these same people to tie OBama into just about every topic,, But Odumbo does come up in almost every topic, he is the absolute leader of the entitlement crowd and is behind each and every response of the entitlement people. based upon those observations, I conclude these people have a strange 'negative obsession' with the man and that is why I label them with ' Obama derangement syndrome' and the term is not really a new one I learned, anymore than 'entitlement crowd' is some new term amongst the deranged,,,, Entitlement crowd is not a new term, actually started back in 1913 but had a different meaning. That meaning was forced to change in 1929 but not on a big scale until 1933. But since 2008, it has taken on a whole new dimension. But the "derangement syndrome" was coined with Bush and has now passed to Odumbo. It is used by the sheeple entitlement crowd so as not to face reality. I find it totally amusing that entitlement crowd can so readily encapsulate things using this label so as not to face the reality of the truth. Good examples are Travon the thug, the Boston bombing and Sandy Hook. But what is really amusing is just how may ways the entitlement crowd can devise to not have to face the truth that they can't form a concise rebuttal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama derangement syndrome... did you learn some new words today? i guess bad policies, bad decision making, the lies... none of that matters, only now we have the ODS...
no mighty, actually this I am basing on history and observation too ya see,, there are several posters here who have repeatedly posted 'facts' about Obama that I have been able to show were untrue through various factchecking sources, and which I have pointed out but they seem far too eager to jump on as truth anything negative about the man to ever do that work themselves before they post these 'facts' there also seems to be a tendency for these same people to tie OBama into just about every topic,, based upon those observations, I conclude these people have a strange 'negative obsession' with the man and that is why I label them with ' Obama derangement syndrome' and the term is not really a new one I learned, anymore than 'entitlement crowd' is some new term amongst the deranged,,,, yea, maybe... but metalwing got it right when you attack the writer, and not addressing what he's saying... a very liberal attack concept...but what is to be expected, we've all seen you close your eyes to the real world, and just live in the same fantasy land the soetoro's are living... what did he say? besides to insult the obamas? I will go back and re read it but I don't recall much of 'verifiable' content just a lot of negative 'opinions',, which he is fortunate enough to get paid to give,, and alive enough to have,,, Really, boy I can't wait for this reply. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama Derangement Syndrome is evident whenever someone continues to promote the false claim that President Obama was born outside the USA. like you know wth barry was born...
The entire world knows where President Obama was born ... in Hawaii. Sadly, hatred for President Obama prevents some people from acknowledging that he was born in Hawaii. 
It really does not matter where, it was his father that disqualifies him to be president. He is not a natural born citizen for the purpose of president, period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama derangement syndrome... did you learn some new words today? i guess bad policies, bad decision making, the lies... none of that matters, only now we have the ODS...
no mighty, actually this I am basing on history and observation too ya see,, there are several posters here who have repeatedly posted 'facts' about Obama that I have been able to show were untrue through various factchecking sources, and which I have pointed out but they seem far too eager to jump on as truth anything negative about the man to ever do that work themselves before they post these 'facts' there also seems to be a tendency for these same people to tie OBama into just about every topic,, based upon those observations, I conclude these people have a strange 'negative obsession' with the man and that is why I label them with ' Obama derangement syndrome' and the term is not really a new one I learned, anymore than 'entitlement crowd' is some new term amongst the deranged,,,, yea, maybe... but metalwing got it right when you attack the writer, and not addressing what he's saying... a very liberal attack concept...but what is to be expected, we've all seen you close your eyes to the real world, and just live in the same fantasy land the soetoro's are living... what did he say? besides to insult the obamas? I will go back and re read it but I don't recall much of 'verifiable' content just a lot of negative 'opinions',, which he is fortunate enough to get paid to give,, and alive enough to have,,, nope, re read it just a long list of his negatively biased opinions... lol the Mythical Reagan syndrome,, and his DOJ< Guess Massie never heard of the Iran Contra hearings,, or else he just conveniently ignores or doesn't give them the merit he gives all the negative allegations against the OBamas,,, Just what I thought, you have no rebuttal. And it isn't just opinions but the why of the opinion. If you can't rebut the why, then you accept the opinion as valid, period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did barry spend over a million dollars getting his records sealed? that's a big fact...
No, that's another false urban legend, and it has nothing to do with the OP of this thread. You bought it up and he is the OP, his topic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
history refers to events of the past it doesn't have to appear in a book to be history,,lol as to the rest of the usual blah blah,, entitlement crowd...blah blah the words entitlement crowd derangement syndrome are not NEW, ,they have in RECENT political history been repeatedly thrown together to distract or disparage,,, maybe I will call those who 'typically' use them, the,,, 'supremacist crowd',,,,
life is good,, people are hilarious even when they think they are being impressive and life goes on,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs? ---fact AGAIN< bypassing congress? what does that even mean? how is that verifiable? vetos are a legal bypass, Reagan used dozens, OBama has used two arrogant DOJ? Still forgetting Iran Contra? THIS: Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama’s have taken lies,dishonesty, deceit, mendacity,subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility is also an opinion,,, signified by words like 'to new depths', 'verbally abusive to the citzenry' (what does that even mean?), and displaying 'animus',,, THIS: Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do that. I have a saying, that “the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide.” No president in history has spent over a million dollars to keep his records and his past sealed. --- fact is also not proven and is speculation, not FACT THIS: He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today. He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel. fact is also opinion I go through this whole thing, and I don't wish to just repost every paragraph, it is ALL opinion,,,throughout the rest,, I don't know how to really discuss if there is not knowledge of the difference between opinions and FACTS,,, So just declaring something not a fact when everyone else knows the exact references without having to be told makes it not a fact, not in this world. The opinion would be strictly your reply, no facts at all. But I will agree with you in one matter: ...I don't know how to really discuss if there is not knowledge of the difference between opinions and FACTS,,, The only actual fact in the post. |
|
|
|
|
