Topic: Women are Triumphing | |
---|---|
Studies show that, In this 21st century it appears women are evolving, they are learning that they don't have to have a man to provide and protect them and their off-springs. Procreation, raising children no longer means women have to put up with men's self-serving attitudes.
Survival of the fittest/strongest!! I wonder what this means for future generations. |
|
|
|
Triumphing? Is that how you really see it? . Please can we stop all of this gender-bashing? It's getting old. And it's ridiculous. But yeah, I guess the turkey baster has it's uses.
|
|
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_B0CyOAO8y0
Entry Of The Gladiators |
|
|
|
Which studies, can you site your sources please?
|
|
|
|
Edited by
AkitaWhite
on
Sun 02/16/14 04:05 AM
|
|
Which studies, can you site your sources please? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oncFR5XLydE |
|
|
|
Lol, IC, ty...
|
|
|
|
Triumphing? Is that how you really see it? . Please can we stop all of this gender-bashing? It's getting old. And it's ridiculous. But yeah, I guess the turkey baster has it's uses. Place in warming over before use |
|
|
|
Studies show that, In this 21st century it appears women are evolving, they are learning that they don't have to have a man to provide and protect them and their off-springs. Procreation, raising children no longer means women have to put up with men's self-serving attitudes. Survival of the fittest/strongest!! I wonder what this means for future generations. But their pubic hair keeps on retreating. Yes they are evolving & balding this can be woman's new motto. "If you ain't balding..then you ain't evolving, Do not be stuck in the 1970s" I should write commercials. |
|
|
|
Which studies, can you site your sources please? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oncFR5XLydE Yep,YouTube,the "Source Of Sources"! |
|
|
|
Studies show that, In this 21st century it appears women are evolving, they are learning that they don't have to have a man to provide and protect them and their off-springs. Procreation, raising children no longer means women have to put up with men's self-serving attitudes. Survival of the fittest/strongest!! I wonder what this means for future generations. But their pubic hair keeps on retreating. Yes they are evolving & balding this can be woman's new motto. "If you ain't balding..then you ain't evolving, Do not be stuck in the 1970s" I should write commercials. |
|
|
|
But their pubic hair keeps on retreating. Yes they are evolving & balding this can be woman's new motto. "If you ain't balding..then you ain't evolving, Do not be stuck in the 1970s" I should write commercials. |
|
|
|
The "seal" of approval. *cough*
|
|
|
|
I would think that men were also evolving....they are the same species. (well at least I think they are lol)
|
|
|
|
You might be able to harvest sperm and procreate with out the man gifting his love into the equation personally, both short and long term, but any woman who thinks a child does not need a father, or at least a father figure, is a fool.
True children can survive the loss of a father but it is great loss in their life and their identity as a person regardless how capable the Mother. Regardless, I might add, of the gender of the child. Men impart a unique and priceless contribution to children and society. Anyone who wants to suggest that society is somehow superior because woman are supposedly evolving for the better with out GOOD men in their world are deluded by the failed attempt of both SOME mother's and father's to raise better men. To let bitterness and spitefulness to repeat such poison to the world that either parent or sex is not needed in the world because a few have failed to live up to their potential is ignoring the fact that many have. Often stepping up and shouldering the burdens for their lesser brother's and sister's or the one's by the reality of life could not be there by no choice of their own. |
|
|
|
oo. I totally misunderstood the OP. I thought she was talking about the progress of women, in general...not the elimination of men. yikes. lol. like i always say, men need women way more than women need men... |
|
|
|
Edited by
alexfon68
on
Sun 02/16/14 01:43 PM
|
|
oo. I totally misunderstood the OP. I thought she was talking about the progress of women, in general...not the elimination of men. yikes. lol. like i always say, men need women way more than women need men... Do you recall my comment last night about taking my pet over 99% of the human population? Well...... |
|
|
|
oo. I totally misunderstood the OP. I thought she was talking about the progress of women, in general...not the elimination of men. yikes. lol. like i always say, men need women way more than women need men... I think we all need each other equally |
|
|
|
oo. I totally misunderstood the OP. I thought she was talking about the progress of women, in general...not the elimination of men. yikes. lol. like i always say, men need women way more than women need men... Do you recall my comment last night about taking my pet over 99% of the human population? Well...... i'm in total agreement... |
|
|
|
oo. I totally misunderstood the OP. I thought she was talking about the progress of women, in general...not the elimination of men. yikes. lol. like i always say, men need women way more than women need men... I think we all need each other equally I know John Bowlby did, not sure about Maslow. |
|
|
|
oo. I totally misunderstood the OP. I thought she was talking about the progress of women, in general...not the elimination of men. yikes. lol. like i always say, men need women way more than women need men... I think we all need each other equally i agree, i was talking about the human race in general, not personal relationships... |
|
|