Just ask.
Call the welfare office.
They will tell you, if you are receiving assistance, you have given them the right to demand bank statements, unannounced home inspections. They have the right to review your bills.
It's called an audit.

Taxpayers have a right to know they aren't being cheated.

I'd like to see more attempts at welfare making certain, along with drug testing, that those who are TRULY needy are helped and the scammers weeded out.


So ((((ALLEGEDLY)))) learned and isn't aware of the rules????

I understand what you were doing.

I used 10% of the total because that group makes up almost a quarter of all recipients. Taking into account that not all the programs apply to them.

its not called being 'learned',,,its called having been on assistance and having worked IN assistance

and not just watched from the sidelines because of how great and self sufficient I am while professing so much knowledge about the program,,,,,


in reality, it is only those living in government HOUSING that sign 'away' privacy in the sense that their home is not their own.

all the other people on all the other types of assistance do not sign any right to privacy away when it comes to their homestead

income verification is a process for the reason that the benefits are determined by the income and they cant just take peoples word on what that income is,,,

the ONLY times they need bank statements or bills is in determining the AMOUNT an applicant is eligible for when applying or renewing

these things have nothing to do with returning to slave status anymore than a credit check of gainfully employed when applying for loans or credit cards or purchasing homes is the same as returning to slave status

its a demeaning and silly comparison,,,

BS, MH.
Suspected fraud reports are rarely investigated.

That ((((ALLEGED)))is very doubtful.

They have every right to examine every inch and movement a recipient makes.

So, go backpedal the BS to someone else.

BS is as BS does

BS is the one who has ZERO experience in a system but continues to try to play like they do,,,

So, if I am not a doctor but play one on TV, then ... Oh, never mind.

lol

well ya know what, sometimes those shows will do actual RESEARCH so that their terminology is correct,,,and an actor may pick up some of it

but they still wont be a REAL DOCTOR,,

Some people here might not get my joke.
Of course, I was referring to an old commercial on American television, one that I always considered to be stupid.

I remember the commercial

they still have to put disclaimers to this day that people are actors and not real customers/clients,,etc,,,

but I think that was one of the first where the ACTOR verbally made the disclaimer

Mirror, mirror.
It's the internet.
Scammers can claim to be and have done all they wish.

Fact is, Welfare recipients are slaves of the system.

Word of advice.

Don't piss of yer neighbors.

Inspectors could come a'knockin'.

Yet, the actor wanted people to accept what he said because he played a doctor on TV, as if his pretending to be a doctor qualified him to give out medical advice.

once again, only those in public housing have to have home inspections because they are living in a government provided HOME

others who are renting from private owners, have mortgages, etc,, have no such direct relation to the government to give them that same authority

and we get along fine with our neighbors, the only person doing an inspection would be the property owner, who gives notice before they will enter

I can mention a thousand times that I have been on assistance and WORKED In public housing and IM sure the nonsensical arguments about what is and isn't true,

coming from those who claim to have never had, needed, or to ever in the future NEED or accept such assistance

will continue,,,,

Once again, more BS.

Social Services,AKA, Welfare can audit anyone who signs their contract.

Want I should whip it out and show you?
That contract is really long and thick.

an audit is not the same as a home inspection

taxpayers get audited too,, their FINANCES,, not their homes

Well, you do have the burden of proving that what you say is correct. Otherwise, your argument will be perceived as consisting of a shortcoming.

U r so cute, Mr Doo-Doo.

I am the only one who is supposed to show proof.

Slaves to the system sign their rights away. They feel they've been discriminated against or cut unfairly, there is always the Welfare appeals.

Social services does private home inspection.

They can use the guise of child welfare then, dive into every aspect of your lives.

Best to claim, like Vets have to, any and all extra income earned. Under the table or above board.

I make my hos fill out W-9s. Them biches pay they own taxes.

child welfare can inspect any home with children where suspicion has been raised

what has that to do with the opinion that needing assistance should REQUIRE the applicant to give up any privacy ?

It's not should. They do sign away rights.

Welfare asks for 6 months bank records or pay stubs. You don't send them or they question them, you will get a visit or, they cut your freebies.

Your paid bills are more than you claim to relieve as income, you get investigated.

You have adult wage earners in the home who are unreported, you could go to prison.

Give me an address and we'll see how many rights Welfare observes.

There are many report forms for just suspicion of fraud.

there is no signing away of 'privacy'

its a contract for financial exchange which CALLS for financial openness

just like any loan or application for an item of monetary VALUE to be financed is,,,

If you don't provide the information, you don't get approved or renewed,, that's it

UNLESS you get audited, just like a taxpayer, in which case you can receive a visit for non cooperation

there is no difference in your 'rights',

signing any federal document with false information can land one in jail regardless of their taxpayer status too

these things are irrelevant to signing away privacy DUE to being on assistance,,,

So, all this time you be telling me it ain't so.

Little by little, you're reaffirming posts.
How fkn liberal.

Sometimes, I have to beat da truff outs Mah his.